LLVM D59377 (included in Clang 9) refactored Clang VFS construction a
bit, which broke perf clang build. Let's fix it.
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Reviewed-by: Dennis Schridde <devurandom@gmx.net>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: Denis Pronin <dannftk@yandex.ru>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Naohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191228171314.946469-2-mail@maciej.szmigiero.name
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
It was put in place just to make sure the 'new' C++ operator wouldn't
clash with some argument name in util.h, but there is not anymore any
such argument and also the reason stated for util.h to be included there
was to get the __maybe_unused definition, that is in linux/compiler.h,
so use that instead and nuke util-cxx.h.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-1r5tvfnwiydjxhukgqs6bi11@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Delete a superfluous semicolon in getBPFObjectFromModule().
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <yang.wei9@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yang Wei <albin_yang@163.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1551710174-3349-1-git-send-email-albin_yang@163.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Rename build libperf to perf, because it's used to build perf.
The libperf build object name will be used for libperf library.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190213123246.4015-4-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
It prevents copy elision, generating this warning when building with
fedora:rawhide's clang:
clang version 7.0.1 (Fedora 7.0.1-2.fc30)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/9
Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/9
Selected GCC installation: /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/9
Candidate multilib: .;@m64
Candidate multilib: 32;@m32
Selected multilib: .;@m64
$ make -C tools/perf CC=clang LIBCLANGLLVM=1
<SNIP>
util/c++/clang.cpp: In function 'std::unique_ptr<llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char> > perf::getBPFObjectFromModule(llvm::Module*)':
util/c++/clang.cpp:163:18: error: moving a local object in a return statement prevents copy elision [-Werror=pessimizing-move]
163 | return std::move(Buffer);
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
util/c++/clang.cpp:163:18: note: remove 'std::move' call
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
<SNIP>
References:
http://www.cplusplus.com/forum/general/186411/#msg908572https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/return#Noteshttps://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/copy_elision
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Luis Cláudio Gonçalves <lclaudio@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-lehqf5x5q96l0o8myhb6blz6@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Arnaldo reported the perf build failure with latest llvm/clang compiler
(7.0).
$ make LIBCLANGLLVM=1 -C tools/perf/
<SNIP>
CC /tmp/tmp.t53Qo38zci/tests/kmod-path.o
util/c++/clang.cpp: In function ‘std::unique_ptr<llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char> >
perf::getBPFObjectFromModule(llvm::Module*)’:
util/c++/clang.cpp:150:43: error: no matching function for call to
‘llvm::TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile(llvm::legacy::PassManager&,
llvm::raw_svector_ostream&, llvm::TargetMachine::CodeGenFileType)’
TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile)) {
^
In file included from util/c++/clang.cpp:25:0:
/usr/local/include/llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h:254:16: note: candidate:
virtual bool llvm::TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile(
llvm::legacy::PassManagerBase&, llvm::raw_pwrite_stream&,
llvm::raw_pwrite_stream*, llvm::TargetMachine::CodeGenFileType, bool,
llvm::MachineModuleInfo*)
virtual bool addPassesToEmitFile(PassManagerBase &, raw_pwrite_stream &,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/local/include/llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h:254:16: note:
candidate expects 6 arguments, 3 provided
mv: cannot stat '/tmp/tmp.t53Qo38zci/util/c++/.clang.o.tmp': No such file or directory
make[7]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:101:
/tmp/tmp.t53Qo38zci/util/c++/clang.o] Error 1
make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: c++] Error 2
make[5]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2
make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/tmp.t53Qo38zci/tests/thread-map.o
The function addPassesToEmitFile signature changed in llvm 7.0 and such
a change caused the failure. This patch fixed the issue with using
proper function signatures under different compiler versions.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180616174739.1076733-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
As stated in tests/llvm-src-base.c, the name of the bpf function should
be "bpf_func__SyS_epoll_pwait" but this clang test fails as it tries to
lookup "bpf_func__SyS_epoll_wait".
Before applying patch:
55: builtin clang support :
55.1: builtin clang compile C source to IR : FAILED!
55.2: builtin clang compile C source to ELF object : Skip
After applying patch:
55: builtin clang support :
55.1: builtin clang compile C source to IR : Ok
55.2: builtin clang compile C source to ELF object : Ok
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: e67d52d411 ("perf clang: Update test case to use real BPF script")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180404180419.19056-3-sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The clang API calls used by perf have changed in recent releases and
builds succeed with libclang-3.9 only. This introduces compatibility
with libclang-4.0 and above.
Without this patch, we will see the following compilation errors with
libclang-4.0+:
util/c++/clang.cpp: In function ‘clang::CompilerInvocation* perf::createCompilerInvocation(llvm::opt::ArgStringList, llvm::StringRef&, clang::DiagnosticsEngine&)’:
util/c++/clang.cpp:62:33: error: ‘IK_C’ was not declared in this scope
Opts.Inputs.emplace_back(Path, IK_C);
^~~~
util/c++/clang.cpp: In function ‘std::unique_ptr<llvm::Module> perf::getModuleFromSource(llvm::opt::ArgStringList, llvm::StringRef, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::vfs::FileSystem>)’:
util/c++/clang.cpp:75:26: error: no matching function for call to ‘clang::CompilerInstance::setInvocation(clang::CompilerInvocation*)’
Clang.setInvocation(&*CI);
^
In file included from util/c++/clang.cpp:14:0:
/usr/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:231:8: note: candidate: void clang::CompilerInstance::setInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>)
void setInvocation(std::shared_ptr<CompilerInvocation> Value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
Committer testing:
Tested on Fedora 27 after installing the clang-devel and llvm-devel
packages, versions:
# rpm -qa | egrep llvm\|clang
llvm-5.0.1-6.fc27.x86_64
clang-libs-5.0.1-5.fc27.x86_64
clang-5.0.1-5.fc27.x86_64
clang-tools-extra-5.0.1-5.fc27.x86_64
llvm-libs-5.0.1-6.fc27.x86_64
llvm-devel-5.0.1-6.fc27.x86_64
clang-devel-5.0.1-5.fc27.x86_64
#
Make sure you don't have some older version lying around in /usr/local,
etc, then:
$ make LIBCLANGLLVM=1 -C tools/perf install-bin
And in the end perf will be linked agains these libraries:
# ldd ~/bin/perf | egrep -i llvm\|clang
libclangAST.so.5 => /lib64/libclangAST.so.5 (0x00007f8bb2eb4000)
libclangBasic.so.5 => /lib64/libclangBasic.so.5 (0x00007f8bb29e3000)
libclangCodeGen.so.5 => /lib64/libclangCodeGen.so.5 (0x00007f8bb23f7000)
libclangDriver.so.5 => /lib64/libclangDriver.so.5 (0x00007f8bb2060000)
libclangFrontend.so.5 => /lib64/libclangFrontend.so.5 (0x00007f8bb1d06000)
libclangLex.so.5 => /lib64/libclangLex.so.5 (0x00007f8bb1a3e000)
libclangTooling.so.5 => /lib64/libclangTooling.so.5 (0x00007f8bb17d4000)
libclangEdit.so.5 => /lib64/libclangEdit.so.5 (0x00007f8bb15c5000)
libclangSema.so.5 => /lib64/libclangSema.so.5 (0x00007f8bb0cc9000)
libclangAnalysis.so.5 => /lib64/libclangAnalysis.so.5 (0x00007f8bb0a23000)
libclangParse.so.5 => /lib64/libclangParse.so.5 (0x00007f8bb0725000)
libclangSerialization.so.5 => /lib64/libclangSerialization.so.5 (0x00007f8bb039a000)
libLLVM-5.0.so => /lib64/libLLVM-5.0.so (0x00007f8bace98000)
libclangASTMatchers.so.5 => /lib64/../lib64/libclangASTMatchers.so.5 (0x00007f8bab735000)
libclangFormat.so.5 => /lib64/../lib64/libclangFormat.so.5 (0x00007f8bab4b2000)
libclangRewrite.so.5 => /lib64/../lib64/libclangRewrite.so.5 (0x00007f8bab2a1000)
libclangToolingCore.so.5 => /lib64/../lib64/libclangToolingCore.so.5 (0x00007f8bab08e000)
#
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: 00b86691c7 ("perf clang: Add builtin clang support ant test case")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180404180419.19056-2-sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Removing it from util.h, part of an effort to disentangle the includes
hell, that makes changes to util.h or something included by it to cause
a complete rebuild of the tools.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-ztrjy52q1rqcchuy3rubfgt2@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
After this patch, perf utilizes builtin clang support to build BPF
script, no longer depend on external clang, but fallbacking to it
if for some reason the builtin compiling framework fails.
Test:
$ type clang
-bash: type: clang: not found
$ cat ~/.perfconfig
$ echo '#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 0x040700' > ./test.c
$ cat ./tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c >> ./test.c
$ ./perf record -v --dry-run -e ./test.c 2>&1 | grep builtin
bpf: successfull builtin compilation
$
Can't pass cflags so unable to include kernel headers now. Will be fixed
by following commits.
Committer notes:
Make sure '-v' comes before the '-e ./test.c' in the command line otherwise the
'verbose' variable will not be set when the bpf event is parsed and thus the
pr_debug indicating a 'successfull builtin compilation' will not be output, as
the debug level (1) will be less than what 'verbose' has at that point (0).
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@163.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161126070354.141764-16-wangnan0@huawei.com
[ Spell check/reflow successfull pr_debug string ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
getBPFObjectFromModule() is introduced to compile LLVM IR(Module)
to BPF object. Add new testcase for it.
Test result:
$ ./buildperf/perf test -v clang
51: builtin clang support :
51.1: builtin clang compile C source to IR :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 21822
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
builtin clang support subtest 0: Ok
51.2: builtin clang compile C source to ELF object :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 21823
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
builtin clang support subtest 1: Ok
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@163.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161126070354.141764-15-wangnan0@huawei.com
[ Remove redundant "Test" from entry descriptions ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Allow C++ code to use util.h and tests/llvm.h. Let 'perf test' compile a
real BPF script.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@163.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161126070354.141764-14-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Improve getModuleFromSource() API to accept a cflags list. This feature
will be used to pass LINUX_VERSION_CODE and -I flags.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@163.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161126070354.141764-13-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Utilize clang's OverlayFileSystem facility, allow CompilerInstance to
access real file system.
With this patch the '#include' directive can be used.
Add a new getModuleFromSource for real file.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@163.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161126070354.141764-12-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Add basic clang support in clang.cpp and test__clang() testcase. The
first testcase checks if builtin clang is able to generate LLVM IR.
tests/clang.c is a proxy. Real testcase resides in
utils/c++/clang-test.cpp in c++ and exports C interface to perf test
subsystem.
Test result:
$ perf test -v clang
51: builtin clang support :
51.1: Test builtin clang compile C source to IR :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 13215
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
Test builtin clang support subtest 0: Ok
Committer note:
Make sure you've enabled CLANG and LLVM builtin support by setting
the LIBCLANGLLVM variable on the make command line, e.g.:
make LIBCLANGLLVM=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin
Otherwise you'll get this when trying to do the 'perf test' call above:
# perf test clang
51: builtin clang support : Skip (not compiled in)
#
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@163.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161126070354.141764-11-wangnan0@huawei.com
[ Removed "Test" from descriptions, redundant and already removed from all the other entries ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
