Doing copy_file_range() on exfat with a file opened for direct IO leads
to an -EFAULT:
# xfs_io -f -d -c "truncate 32768" \
-c "copy_range -d 16384 -l 16384 -f 0" /mnt/test/junk
copy_range: Bad address
and the reason seems to be that we go through:
default_file_splice_write
splice_from_pipe
__splice_from_pipe
write_pipe_buf
__kernel_write
new_sync_write
generic_file_write_iter
generic_file_direct_write
exfat_direct_IO
do_blockdev_direct_IO
iov_iter_get_pages
and land in iterate_all_kinds(), which does "return -EFAULT" for our kvec
iter.
Setting exfat's splice_write to iter_file_splice_write fixes this and lets
fsx (which originally detected the problem) run to success from
the xfstests harness.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
The timestamp for access_time has double seconds granularity(There is no
10msIncrement field for access_time unlike create/modify_time).
exfat's atimes are restricted to only 2s granularity so after
we set an atime, round it down to the nearest 2s and set the
sub-second component of the timestamp to 0.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
This adds the implementation of file operations for exfat.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
