Deadlock on shutdown:
btree_update_nodes_written() unblocks btree nodes from being written;
after doing so, it has to check if they were marked as needing to be
written and if so kick off those writes - if that doesn't happen, we'll
never release journal pins and shutdown will get stuck when flushing the
journal.
There was an error path where this didn't happen, because in the error
path we don't actually want those btree nodes write to happen; however,
we still have to kick off the write path so the journal pins get
released. The btree write path checks if we're in a journal error state
and doesn't do the actual write if we are.
Also - there was another deadlock because btree_update_nodes_written()
was taking the btree update off of the unwritten_list too soon - before
getting a journal reservation, which could fail and have to be retried.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, BTREE_ID_INODES was special - inodes were indexed by the
inode field, which meant the offset field of struct bpos wasn't used,
which led to special cases in e.g. the btree iterator code.
Now, inodes in the inodes btree are indexed by the offset field.
Also: prevously min_key was special for extents btrees, min_key for
extents would equal max_key for the previous node. Now, min_key =
bkey_successor() of the previous node, same as non extent btrees.
This means we can completely get rid of
btree_type_sucessor/predecessor.
Also make some improvements to the metadata IO validate/compat code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
vmalloc allocations don't always obey GFP_NOFS - memalloc_nofs_save() is
the prefered approach for the future.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, the btree has always been self contained and internally
consistent on disk without anything from the journal - the journal just
contained pointers to the btree roots.
However, this meant that btree node split or compact operations - i.e.
anything that changes btree node topology and involves updates to
interior nodes - would require that interior btree node to be written
immediately, which means emitting a btree node write that's mostly empty
(using 4k of space on disk if the filesystemm blocksize is 4k to only
write perhaps ~100 bytes of new keys).
More importantly, this meant most btree node writes had to be FUA, and
consumer drives have a history of slow and/or buggy FUA support - other
filesystes have been bit by this.
This patch changes the interior btree update path to journal updates to
interior nodes, after the writes for the new btree nodes have completed.
Best of all, it turns out to simplify the interior node update path
somewhat.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Ever since the btree code was first written, handling of overwriting
existing extents - including partially overwriting and splittin existing
extents - was handled as part of the core btree insert path. The modern
transaction and iterator infrastructure didn't exist then, so that was
the only way for it to be done.
This patch moves that outside of the core btree code to a pass that runs
at transaction commit time.
This is a significant simplification to the btree code and overall
reduction in code size, but more importantly it gets us much closer to
the core btree code being completely independent of extents and is
important prep work for snapshots.
This introduces a new feature bit; the old and new extent update models
are incompatible when the filesystem needs journal replay.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Add a new btree ptr type which contains the sequence number (random 64
bit cookie, actually) for that btree node - this lets us verify that
when we read in a btree node it really is the btree node we wanted.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is partly prep work for introducing bch_btree_ptr_v2, but it'll
also be a bit of a performance boost by moving the full key out of the
hot part of struct btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_ptr_swab was never updated when the code for generic keys with
pointers was added - it assumed the entire val was only used for
pointers.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, partial overwrites of existing extents were handled
implicitly by the btree code; when reading in a btree node, we'd do a
mergesort of the different bsets and detect and fix partially
overlapping extents during that mergesort.
That approach won't work with snapshots: this changes extents to work
like regular keys as far as the btree code is concerned, where a 0 size
KEY_TYPE_deleted whiteout will completely overwrite an existing extent.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Long overdue cleanup - this converts btree_node_iter_large uses to
sort_iter.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We're not really supposed to allocate from the same mempool more than
once.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The whiteout compaction path - as opposed to just dropping whiteouts -
is now only needed for extents, and soon will only be needed for extent
btree nodes in the old format.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
More prep work for snapshots: extents will soon be using
KEY_TYPE_deleted for whiteouts, with 0 size. But we wen't be able to
keep these whiteouts with the rest of the extents in the btree node, due
to sorting invariants breaking.
We can deal with this by immediately moving the new whiteouts to the
unwritten whiteouts area - this just means those whiteouts won't be
sorted, so we need new code to sort them prior to merging them with the
rest of the keys to be written.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
For upcoming inline data extents, we're going to need to be able to
shorten the value of existing bkeys in the btree - and to make that work
we're going to be able to need to pad out the space the value previously
took up with something.
This patch changes the various code that iterates over bkeys to handle
k->u64s == 0 as meaning "skip the next 8 bytes".
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Switch to always using bio_add_page(), which merges contiguous pages now
that we have multipage bvecs.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is prep work for the btree key cache: btree iterators will point to
either struct btree, or a new struct bkey_cached.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Now, we store blacklisted journal sequence numbers in the superblock,
not the journal: this helps to greatly simplify the code, and more
importantly it's now implemented in a way that doesn't require all btree
nodes to be visited before starting the journal - instead, we
unconditionally blacklist the next 4 journal sequence numbers after an
unclean shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
this lets us get rid of a lot of extra switch statements - in a lot of
places we dispatch on the btree node type, and then the key type, so
this is a nice cleanup across a lot of code.
Also improve the on disk format versioning stuff.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
userspace allocators don't align allocations as nicely as kernel
allocators, which meant that in some cases we weren't allocating big
enough bvec arrays - just make the calculations more rigorous and
explicit to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This lifts the restriction that 0 size extents must not overlap with
other extents, which means we can now sort extents and non extents the
same way, and will let us simplify a bunch of other stuff as well.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Initially forked from drivers/md/bcache, bcachefs is a new copy-on-write
filesystem with every feature you could possibly want.
Website: https://bcachefs.org
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
