Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Al Viro
d13ffb5630 m68k: move exports to definitions
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2016-08-07 23:47:19 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
d6410efad2 m68k: Remove FSF address
We have a central copy of the GPL for that, and the FSF may change
address again in the future.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
2015-03-15 10:23:30 +01:00
Geert Uytterhoeven
5df58f3aac m68k: delay, muldi3 - Use CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_MULDIV64
instead of open coding CONFIG_M68000 || CONFIG_COLDFIRE

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer<gerg@uclinux.org>
2012-06-10 10:18:30 +02:00
Greg Ungerer
734c3ce3bd m68k: use kernel processor defines for conditional optimizations
Older m68k-linux compilers will include pre-defined symbols that
confuse what processor it is being targeted for. For example gcc-4.1.2
will pre-define __mc68020__ even if you specify the target processor
as -m68000 on the gcc command line. Newer versions of gcc have this
corrected.

In a few places the m68k code uses defined(__mc68020__) for optimizations
that include instructions that are specific to the CPU 68020 and above.
When compiling with older compilers this will be true even when we have
selected to compile for the older 68000 processors.

Switch to using the kernel processor defines, CONFIG_M68020 and friends.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
2011-06-14 11:42:29 +10:00
Greg Ungerer
98d655a68f m68k: merge mmu and non-mmu versions of muldi3
The implementation of gcc's muldi3 support function differs only in
the use of the machine's 64 bit sized mul or not. (It isn't based
on using an MMU or not). Merge the current mmu and non-mmu versions
of arc/m68k/lib/muldi3 and use the appropriate pre-processor
conditionals to get the right version for all m68k processor types.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
2011-05-24 10:03:49 +10:00
Greg Ungerer
66d857b08b m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
There is a lot of common code that could be shared between the m68k
and m68knommu arch branches. It makes sense to merge the two branches
into a single directory structure so that we can more easily share
that common code.

This is a brute force merge, based on a script from Stephen King
<sfking@fdwdc.com>, which was originally written by Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@arndb.de>.

> The script was inspired by the script Sam Ravnborg used to merge the
> includes from m68knommu. For those files common to both arches but
> differing in content, the m68k version of the file is renamed to
> <file>_mm.<ext> and the m68knommu version of the file is moved into the
> corresponding m68k directory and renamed <file>_no.<ext> and a small
> wrapper file <file>.<ext> is used to select between the two version. Files
> that are common to both but don't differ are removed from the m68knommu
> tree and files and directories that are unique to the m68knommu tree are
> moved to the m68k tree. Finally, the arch/m68knommu tree is removed.
>
> To select between the the versions of the files, the wrapper uses
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> #include <file>_mm.<ext>
> #else
> #include <file>_no.<ext>
> #endif

On top of this file merge I have done a simplistic merge of m68k and
m68knommu Kconfig, which primarily attempts to keep existing options and
menus in place. Other than a handful of options being moved it produces
identical .config outputs on m68k and m68knommu targets I tested it on.

With this in place there is now quite a bit of scope for merge cleanups
in future patches.

Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
2011-03-25 14:05:13 +10:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00