The test_cmpxchg() and test_xchg() functions say "test_run add".
Therefore, make them say "test_run cmpxchg" and "test_run xchg",
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201005030.GA3071525@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1
Add $(OUTPUT) prefix to testing_helpers.o, so it can be built out of
tree when necessary. At the moment, in addition to being built in-tree
even when out-of-tree is required, testing_helpers.o is not built with
the right recipe when cross-building.
For consistency the other helpers, cgroup_helpers and trace_helpers, can
also be passed as objects instead of source. Use *_HELPERS variable to
keep the Makefile readable.
Fixes: f87c1930ac ("selftests/bpf: Merge test_stub.c into testing_helpers.c")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201145101.823159-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org
The commit 087cba799c ("selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeleton")
added test_ksyms_weak to light skeleton testing, but remove CO-RE access.
Revert that part of commit, since light skeleton can use CO-RE in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-17-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Add a test where randmap() function is appended to three different bpf
programs. That action checks struct bpf_core_relo replication logic
and offset adjustment in gen loader part of libbpf.
Fourth bpf program has 360 CO-RE relocations from vmlinux, bpf_testmod,
and non-existing type. It tests candidate cache logic.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201181040.23337-16-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Add benchmark to measure the throughput and latency of the bpf_loop
call.
Testing this on my dev machine on 1 thread, the data is as follows:
nr_loops: 10
bpf_loop - throughput: 198.519 ± 0.155 M ops/s, latency: 5.037 ns/op
nr_loops: 100
bpf_loop - throughput: 247.448 ± 0.305 M ops/s, latency: 4.041 ns/op
nr_loops: 500
bpf_loop - throughput: 260.839 ± 0.380 M ops/s, latency: 3.834 ns/op
nr_loops: 1000
bpf_loop - throughput: 262.806 ± 0.629 M ops/s, latency: 3.805 ns/op
nr_loops: 5000
bpf_loop - throughput: 264.211 ± 1.508 M ops/s, latency: 3.785 ns/op
nr_loops: 10000
bpf_loop - throughput: 265.366 ± 3.054 M ops/s, latency: 3.768 ns/op
nr_loops: 50000
bpf_loop - throughput: 235.986 ± 20.205 M ops/s, latency: 4.238 ns/op
nr_loops: 100000
bpf_loop - throughput: 264.482 ± 0.279 M ops/s, latency: 3.781 ns/op
nr_loops: 500000
bpf_loop - throughput: 309.773 ± 87.713 M ops/s, latency: 3.228 ns/op
nr_loops: 1000000
bpf_loop - throughput: 262.818 ± 4.143 M ops/s, latency: 3.805 ns/op
>From this data, we can see that the latency per loop decreases as the
number of loops increases. On this particular machine, each loop had an
overhead of about ~4 ns, and we were able to run ~250 million loops
per second.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130030622.4131246-5-joannekoong@fb.com
This patch tests bpf_loop in pyperf and strobemeta, and measures the
verifier performance of replacing the traditional for loop
with bpf_loop.
The results are as follows:
~strobemeta~
Baseline
verification time 6808200 usec
stack depth 496
processed 554252 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 16
total_states 15878 peak_states 13489 mark_read 3110
#192 verif_scale_strobemeta:OK (unrolled loop)
Using bpf_loop
verification time 31589 usec
stack depth 96+400
processed 1513 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 2
total_states 106 peak_states 106 mark_read 60
#193 verif_scale_strobemeta_bpf_loop:OK
~pyperf600~
Baseline
verification time 29702486 usec
stack depth 368
processed 626838 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 7
total_states 30368 peak_states 30279 mark_read 748
#182 verif_scale_pyperf600:OK (unrolled loop)
Using bpf_loop
verification time 148488 usec
stack depth 320+40
processed 10518 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 10
total_states 705 peak_states 517 mark_read 38
#183 verif_scale_pyperf600_bpf_loop:OK
Using the bpf_loop helper led to approximately a 99% decrease
in the verification time and in the number of instructions.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130030622.4131246-4-joannekoong@fb.com
Similar to previous patch, just copy over necessary struct into local
stack variable before checking its fields.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124002325.1737739-14-andrii@kernel.org
Buf can be not zero-terminated leading to strstr() to access data beyond
the intended buf[] array. Fix by forcing zero termination.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124002325.1737739-12-andrii@kernel.org
Perfbuf doesn't guarantee 8-byte alignment of the data like BPF ringbuf
does, so struct get_stack_trace_t can arrive not properly aligned for
subsequent u64 accesses. Easiest fix is to just copy data locally.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124002325.1737739-10-andrii@kernel.org
Prevent sanitizer from complaining about passing NULL into memcpy(),
even if it happens with zero size.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124002325.1737739-9-andrii@kernel.org
Test is using __int128 variable as unsigned and highest order bit can be
set to 1 after bit shift. Use unsigned __int128 explicitly and prevent
UBSan from complaining.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124002325.1737739-8-andrii@kernel.org
Conversion is straightforward for most cases. In few cases tests are
using mutable map_flags and attribute structs, but bpf_map_create_opts
can be used in the similar fashion, so there were no problems. Just lots
of repetitive conversions.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211124193233.3115996-5-andrii@kernel.org
Add selftest that combines two BPF programs within single BPF object
file such that one of the programs is using global variables, but can be
skipped at runtime on old kernels that don't support global data.
Another BPF program is written with the goal to be runnable on very old
kernels and only relies on explicitly accessed BPF maps.
Such test, run against old kernels (e.g., libbpf CI will run it against 4.9
kernel that doesn't support global data), allows to test the approach
and ensure that libbpf doesn't make unnecessary assumption about
necessary kernel features.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211123200105.387855-2-andrii@kernel.org
Fix trivial typo in comment from 'oveflow' to 'overflow'.
Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211122070528.837806-1-dfustini@baylibre.com
bpf_program__set_extra_flags has just been introduced so we can still
change it without breaking users.
This new interface is a bit more flexible (for example if someone wants
to clear a flag).
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211119180035.1396139-1-revest@chromium.org
Add an artificial minimal example simulating compilers producing two
different types within a single CU that correspond to identical struct
definitions.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211117194114.347675-2-andrii@kernel.org
[1] added s390 support to libbpf CI and added an ${ARCH} prefix to a
number of paths and identifiers in libbpf GitHub repo, which vmtest.sh
relies upon. Update these and make use of the new s390 support.
[1] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/pull/204
Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211118115225.1349726-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
xsk_configure_umem() needs hugepages to work in unaligned mode. So when
hugepages are not configured, 'unaligned' tests should be skipped which
is determined by the helper function hugepages_present(). This function
erroneously returns true with MAP_NORESERVE flag even when no hugepages
are configured. The removal of this flag fixes the issue.
The test TEST_TYPE_UNALIGNED_INV_DESC also needs to be skipped when
there are no hugepages. However, this was not skipped as there was no
check for presence of hugepages and hence was failing. The check to skip
the test has now been added.
Fixes: a4ba98dd0c (selftests: xsk: Add test for unaligned mode)
Signed-off-by: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211117123613.22288-1-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com
Add benchmark to measure overhead of uprobes and uretprobes. Also have
a baseline (no uprobe attached) benchmark.
On my dev machine, baseline benchmark can trigger 130M user_target()
invocations. When uprobe is attached, this falls to just 700K. With
uretprobe, we get down to 520K:
$ sudo ./bench trig-uprobe-base -a
Summary: hits 131.289 ± 2.872M/s
# UPROBE
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uprobe-without-nop
Summary: hits 0.729 ± 0.007M/s
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uprobe-with-nop
Summary: hits 1.798 ± 0.017M/s
# URETPROBE
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uretprobe-without-nop
Summary: hits 0.508 ± 0.012M/s
$ sudo ./bench -a trig-uretprobe-with-nop
Summary: hits 0.883 ± 0.008M/s
So there is almost 2.5x performance difference between probing nop vs
non-nop instruction for entry uprobe. And 1.7x difference for uretprobe.
This means that non-nop uprobe overhead is around 1.4 microseconds for uprobe
and 2 microseconds for non-nop uretprobe.
For nop variants, uprobe and uretprobe overhead is down to 0.556 and
1.13 microseconds, respectively.
For comparison, just doing a very low-overhead syscall (with no BPF
programs attached anywhere) gives:
$ sudo ./bench trig-base -a
Summary: hits 4.830 ± 0.036M/s
So uprobes are about 2.67x slower than pure context switch.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211116013041.4072571-1-andrii@kernel.org
Script test_bpftool_synctypes.py parses a number of files in the bpftool
directory (or even elsewhere in the repo) to make sure that the list of
types or options in those different files are consistent. Instead of
having fixed paths, let's make the directories configurable through
environment variable. This should make easier in the future to run the
script in a different setup, for example on an out-of-tree bpftool
mirror with a different layout.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211115225844.33943-4-quentin@isovalent.com
test_bpftool_synctypes.py helps detecting inconsistencies in bpftool
between the different list of types and options scattered in the
sources, the documentation, and the bash completion. For options that
apply to all bpftool commands, the script had a hardcoded list of
values, and would use them to check whether the man pages are
up-to-date. When writing the script, it felt acceptable to have this
list in order to avoid to open and parse bpftool's main.h every time,
and because the list of global options in bpftool doesn't change so
often.
However, this is prone to omissions, and we recently added a new
-l|--legacy option which was described in common_options.rst, but not
listed in the options summary of each manual page. The script did not
complain, because it keeps comparing the hardcoded list to the (now)
outdated list in the header file.
To address the issue, this commit brings the following changes:
- Options that are common to all bpftool commands (--json, --pretty, and
--debug) are moved to a dedicated file, and used in the definition of
a RST substitution. This substitution is used in the sources of all
the man pages.
- This list of common options is updated, with the addition of the new
-l|--legacy option.
- The script test_bpftool_synctypes.py is updated to compare:
- Options specific to a command, found in C files, for the
interactive help messages, with the same specific options from the
relevant man page for that command.
- Common options, checked just once: the list in main.h is
compared with the new list in substitutions.rst.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211115225844.33943-3-quentin@isovalent.com
Without previous libbpf patch, the following error will occur:
$ ./test_progs -t btf
...
do_test_dedup:FAIL:check btf_dedup failed errno:-22#13/205 btf/dedup: btf_type_tag #5, struct:FAIL
And the previous libbpf patch fixed the issue.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211115163943.3922547-1-yhs@fb.com
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-11-15
We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 13 day(s) which contain
a total of 171 files changed, 2728 insertions(+), 1143 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add btf_type_tag attributes to bring kernel annotations like __user/__rcu to
BTF such that BPF verifier will be able to detect misuse, from Yonghong Song.
2) Big batch of libbpf improvements including various fixes, future proofing APIs,
and adding a unified, OPTS-based bpf_prog_load() low-level API, from Andrii Nakryiko.
3) Add ingress_ifindex to BPF_SK_LOOKUP program type for selectively applying the
programmable socket lookup logic to packets from a given netdev, from Mark Pashmfouroush.
4) Remove the 128M upper JIT limit for BPF programs on arm64 and add selftest to
ensure exception handling still works, from Russell King and Alan Maguire.
5) Add a new bpf_find_vma() helper for tracing to map an address to the backing
file such as shared library, from Song Liu.
6) Batch of various misc fixes to bpftool, fixing a memory leak in BPF program dump,
updating documentation and bash-completion among others, from Quentin Monnet.
7) Deprecate libbpf bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear() API and migrate its users as
the API is heavily tailored around perf and is non-generic, from Dave Marchevsky.
8) Enable libbpf's strict mode by default in bpftool and add a --legacy option as an
opt-out for more relaxed BPF program requirements, from Stanislav Fomichev.
9) Fix bpftool to use libbpf_get_error() to check for errors, from Hengqi Chen.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (72 commits)
bpftool: Use libbpf_get_error() to check error
bpftool: Fix mixed indentation in documentation
bpftool: Update the lists of names for maps and prog-attach types
bpftool: Fix indent in option lists in the documentation
bpftool: Remove inclusion of utilities.mak from Makefiles
bpftool: Fix memory leak in prog_dump()
selftests/bpf: Fix a tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare compiler warning
selftests/bpf: Fix an unused-but-set-variable compiler warning
bpf: Introduce btf_tracing_ids
bpf: Extend BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL with parameter for number of IDs
bpftool: Enable libbpf's strict mode by default
docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG support
selftests/bpf: Clarify llvm dependency with btf_tag selftest
selftests/bpf: Add a C test for btf_type_tag
selftests/bpf: Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.c
selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG for deduplication
selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG unit tests
selftests/bpf: Test libbpf API function btf__add_type_tag()
bpftool: Support BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG
libbpf: Support BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115162008.25916-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
When using clang to build selftests with LLVM=1 in make commandline,
I hit the following compiler warning:
benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c:84:46: warning: result of comparison of constant 256
with expression of type '__u8' (aka 'unsigned char') is always false
[-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
if (args.value_size < 2 || args.value_size > 256) {
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
The reason is arg.vaue_size has type __u8, so comparison "args.value_size > 256"
is always false.
This patch fixed the issue by doing proper comparison before assigning the
value to args.value_size. The patch also fixed the same issue in two
other places.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112204838.3579953-1-yhs@fb.com
When using clang to build selftests with LLVM=1 in make commandline,
I hit the following compiler warning:
xdpxceiver.c:747:6: warning: variable 'total' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
u32 total = 0;
^
This patch fixed the issue by removing that declaration and its
assocatied unused operation.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112204833.3579457-1-yhs@fb.com
btf_tag selftest needs certain llvm versions (>= llvm14).
Make it clear in the selftests README.rst file.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012651.1508549-1-yhs@fb.com
The following is the main btf_type_tag usage in the
C test:
#define __tag1 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1")))
#define __tag2 __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2")))
struct btf_type_tag_test {
int __tag1 * __tag1 __tag2 *p;
} g;
The bpftool raw dump with related types:
[4] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[11] STRUCT 'btf_type_tag_test' size=8 vlen=1
'p' type_id=14 bits_offset=0
[12] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=16
[13] TYPE_TAG 'tag2' type_id=12
[14] PTR '(anon)' type_id=13
[15] TYPE_TAG 'tag1' type_id=4
[16] PTR '(anon)' type_id=15
[17] VAR 'g' type_id=11, linkage=global
With format C dump, we have
struct btf_type_tag_test {
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) * __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) *p;
};
The result C code is identical to the original definition except macro's are gone.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012646.1508231-1-yhs@fb.com
Rename progs/tag.c to progs/btf_decl_tag.c so we can introduce
progs/btf_type_tag.c in the next patch.
Also create a subtest for btf_decl_tag in prog_tests/btf_tag.c
so we can introduce btf_type_tag subtest in the next patch.
I also took opportunity to remove the check whether __has_attribute
is defined or not in progs/btf_decl_tag.c since all recent
clangs should already support this macro.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112012641.1507144-1-yhs@fb.com
btf__dedup() and struct btf_dedup_opts were added before we figured out
OPTS mechanism. As such, btf_dedup_opts is non-extensible without
breaking an ABI and potentially crashing user application.
Unfortunately, btf__dedup() and btf_dedup_opts are short and succinct
names that would be great to preserve and use going forward. So we use
___libbpf_override() macro approach, used previously for bpf_prog_load()
API, to define a new btf__dedup() variant that accepts only struct btf *
and struct btf_dedup_opts * arguments, and rename the old btf__dedup()
implementation into btf__dedup_deprecated(). This keeps both source and
binary compatibility with old and new applications.
The biggest problem was struct btf_dedup_opts, which wasn't OPTS-based,
and as such doesn't have `size_t sz;` as a first field. But btf__dedup()
is a pretty rarely used API and I believe that the only currently known
users (besides selftests) are libbpf's own bpf_linker and pahole.
Neither use case actually uses options and just passes NULL. So instead
of doing extra hacks, just rewrite struct btf_dedup_opts into OPTS-based
one, move btf_ext argument into those opts (only bpf_linker needs to
dedup btf_ext, so it's not a typical thing to specify), and drop never
used `dont_resolve_fwds` option (it was never used anywhere, AFAIK, it
makes BTF dedup much less useful and efficient).
Just in case, for old implementation, btf__dedup_deprecated(), detect
non-NULL options and error out with helpful message, to help users
migrate, if there are any user playing with btf__dedup().
The last remaining piece is dedup_table_size, which is another
anachronism from very early days of BTF dedup. Since then it has been
reduced to the only valid value, 1, to request forced hash collisions.
This is only used during testing. So instead introduce a bool flag to
force collisions explicitly.
This patch also adapts selftests to new btf__dedup() and btf_dedup_opts
use to avoid selftests breakage.
[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/281
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-4-andrii@kernel.org
Few clean ups and single-line simplifications. Also split CLEAN command
into multiple $(RM) invocations as it gets dangerously close to too long
argument list. Make sure that -o <output.o> is used always as the last
argument for saner verbose make output.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-3-andrii@kernel.org
After recent refactoring bpf_prog_test_load(), used across multiple
selftests, lost ability to specify extra log_level 1 or 2 (for -vv and
-vvv, respectively). Fix that problem by using bpf_object__load_xattr()
API that supports extra log_level flags. Also restore
BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 prog_flags by utilizing new bpf_program__set_extra_flags()
API.
Fixes: f87c1930ac ("selftests/bpf: Merge test_stub.c into testing_helpers.c")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111051758.92283-3-andrii@kernel.org
A new field was added to the bpf_sk_lookup data that users can access.
Add tests that validate that the new ingress_ifindex field contains the
right data.
Signed-off-by: Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211110111016.5670-3-markpash@cloudflare.com
Exception handling is triggered in BPF tracing programs when a NULL pointer
is dereferenced; the exception handler zeroes the target register and
execution of the BPF program progresses.
To test exception handling then, we need to trigger a NULL pointer dereference
for a field which should never be zero; if it is, the only explanation is the
exception handler ran. task->task_works is the NULL pointer chosen (for a new
task from fork() no work is associated), and the task_works->func field should
not be zero if task_works is non-NULL. The test verifies that task_works and
task_works->func are 0.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Add tests for bpf_find_vma in perf_event program and kprobe program. The
perf_event program is triggered from NMI context, so the second call of
bpf_find_vma() will return -EBUSY (irq_work busy). The kprobe program,
on the other hand, does not have this constraint.
Also add tests for illegal writes to task or vma from the callback
function. The verifier should reject both cases.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-3-songliubraving@fb.com
