The skb_segment() function returns error pointers on error. It never
returns NULL.
Fixes: 76db8087c4 ("net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Without the previous commit,
"modprobe test_bpf" will have the following errors:
...
[ 98.149165] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 98.159362] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:3667!
[ 98.169756] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ 98.179370] Modules linked in:
[ 98.179371] test_bpf(+)
...
which triggers the bug the previous commit intends to fix.
The skbs are constructed to mimic what mlx5 may generate.
The packet size/header may not mimic real cases in production. But
the processing flow is similar.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on
x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and
commit 09584b4067 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when
CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") makes sure that failure is detected on that
case.
However, it does not fail on other architectures, which have a different
JIT compiler design. So, test_bpf has started to fail to load on those.
After this fix, test_bpf loads fine on both x86_64 and ppc64el.
Fixes: 09584b4067 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y")
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
For tests that are using the maximal number of BPF instruction, each
run takes 20 usec. Looping 10,000 times on them totals 200 ms, which
is bad when the loop is not preemptible.
test_bpf: #264 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:1 19248
18548 PASS
test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:1 20896 PASS
Lets divide by ten the number of iterations, so that max latency is
20ms. We could use need_resched() to break the loop earlier if we
believe 20 ms is too much.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
test_bpf() is taking 1.6 seconds nowadays, it is time
to add a schedule point in it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new
test cases.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a couple of test cases for interpreter and JIT that are
related to an issue we faced some time ago in Cilium [1],
which is fixed in LLVM with commit e53750e1e086 ("bpf: fix
bug on silently truncating 64-bit immediate").
Test cases were run-time checking kernel to behave as intended
which should also provide some guidance for current or new
JITs in case they should trip over this. Added for cBPF and
eBPF.
[1] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/2162
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The BPF interpreter has been used as part of the spectre 2 attack CVE-2017-5715.
A quote from goolge project zero blog:
"At this point, it would normally be necessary to locate gadgets in
the host kernel code that can be used to actually leak data by reading
from an attacker-controlled location, shifting and masking the result
appropriately and then using the result of that as offset to an
attacker-controlled address for a load. But piecing gadgets together
and figuring out which ones work in a speculation context seems annoying.
So instead, we decided to use the eBPF interpreter, which is built into
the host kernel - while there is no legitimate way to invoke it from inside
a VM, the presence of the code in the host kernel's text section is sufficient
to make it usable for the attack, just like with ordinary ROP gadgets."
To make attacker job harder introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config
option that removes interpreter from the kernel in favor of JIT-only mode.
So far eBPF JIT is supported by:
x64, arm64, arm32, sparc64, s390, powerpc64, mips64
The start of JITed program is randomized and code page is marked as read-only.
In addition "constant blinding" can be turned on with net.core.bpf_jit_harden
v2->v3:
- move __bpf_prog_ret0 under ifdef (Daniel)
v1->v2:
- fix init order, test_bpf and cBPF (Daniel's feedback)
- fix offloaded bpf (Jakub's feedback)
- add 'return 0' dummy in case something can invoke prog->bpf_func
- retarget bpf tree. For bpf-next the patch would need one extra hunk.
It will be sent when the trees are merged back to net-next
Considered doing:
int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly = BPF_EBPF_JIT_DEFAULT;
but it seems better to land the patch as-is and in bpf-next remove
bpf_jit_enable global variable from all JITs, consolidate in one place
and remove this jit_init() function.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add a test that i) uses LD_ABS, ii) zeroing R6 before call, iii) calls
a helper that triggers reload of cached skb data, iv) uses LD_ABS again.
It's added for test_bpf in order to do runtime testing after JITing as
well as test_verifier to test that the sequence is allowed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, eBPF only understands BPF_JGT (>), BPF_JGE (>=),
BPF_JSGT (s>), BPF_JSGE (s>=) instructions, this means that
particularly *JLT/*JLE counterparts involving immediates need
to be rewritten from e.g. X < [IMM] by swapping arguments into
[IMM] > X, meaning the immediate first is required to be loaded
into a register Y := [IMM], such that then we can compare with
Y > X. Note that the destination operand is always required to
be a register.
This has the downside of having unnecessarily increased register
pressure, meaning complex program would need to spill other
registers temporarily to stack in order to obtain an unused
register for the [IMM]. Loading to registers will thus also
affect state pruning since we need to account for that register
use and potentially those registers that had to be spilled/filled
again. As a consequence slightly more stack space might have
been used due to spilling, and BPF programs are a bit longer
due to extra code involving the register load and potentially
required spill/fills.
Thus, add BPF_JLT (<), BPF_JLE (<=), BPF_JSLT (s<), BPF_JSLE (s<=)
counterparts to the eBPF instruction set. Modifying LLVM to
remove the NegateCC() workaround in a PoC patch at [1] and
allowing it to also emit the new instructions resulted in
cilium's BPF programs that are injected into the fast-path to
have a reduced program length in the range of 2-3% (e.g.
accumulated main and tail call sections from one of the object
file reduced from 4864 to 4729 insns), reduced complexity in
the range of 10-30% (e.g. accumulated sections reduced in one
of the cases from 116432 to 88428 insns), and reduced stack
usage in the range of 1-5% (e.g. accumulated sections from one
of the object files reduced from 824 to 784b).
The modification for LLVM will be incorporated in a backwards
compatible way. Plan is for LLVM to have i) a target specific
option to offer a possibility to explicitly enable the extension
by the user (as we have with -m target specific extensions today
for various CPU insns), and ii) have the kernel checked for
presence of the extensions and enable them transparently when
the user is selecting more aggressive options such as -march=native
in a bpf target context. (Other frontends generating BPF byte
code, e.g. ply can probe the kernel directly for its code
generation.)
[1] https://github.com/borkmann/llvm/tree/bpf-insns
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
On MIPS, conditional branches can only span 32k instructions. To
exceed this limit in the JIT with the BPF maximum of 4k insns, we need
to choose eBPF insns that expand to more than 8 machine instructions.
Use BPF_LD_ABS as it is quite complex. This forces the JIT to invert
the sense of the branch to branch around a long jump to the end.
This (somewhat) verifies that the branch inversion logic and target
address calculation of the long jumps are done correctly.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
test_bpf.ko doesn't call verifier before selecting interpreter or JITing,
hence the tests need to manually specify the amount of stack they consume.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Some JITs can optimize comparisons with zero. Add a couple of
BPF_JSGE tests against immediate zero.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
On 32-bit:
lib/test_bpf.c:4772: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4772: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4773: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4773: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4787: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4787: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4801: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4801: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4802: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
lib/test_bpf.c:4802: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
On 32-bit systems, "long" is only 32-bit.
Replace the "UL" suffix by "ULL" to fix this.
Fixes: 85f68fe898 ("bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADD")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
After commit 636c262808 ("net: skbuff: Remove errornous length
validation in skb_vlan_pop()") mentioned test case stopped working,
throwing a -12 (ENOMEM) return code. The issue however is not due to
636c262808, but rather due to a buggy test case that got uncovered
from the change in behaviour in 636c262808.
The data_size of that test case for the skb was set to 1. In the
bpf_fill_ld_abs_vlan_push_pop() handler bpf insns are generated that
loop with: reading skb data, pushing 68 tags, reading skb data,
popping 68 tags, reading skb data, etc, in order to force a skb
expansion and thus trigger that JITs recache skb->data. Problem is
that initial data_size is too small.
While before 636c262808, the test silently bailed out due to the
skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN check with returning 0, and now throwing an
error from failing skb_ensure_writable(). Set at least minimum of
ETH_HLEN as an initial length so that on first push of data, equivalent
pop will succeed.
Fixes: 4d9c5c53ac ("test_bpf: add bpf_skb_vlan_push/pop() tests")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Commit d5709f7ab7 ("flow_dissector: For stripped vlan, get vlan
info from skb->vlan_tci") made flow dissector look at vlan_proto
when vlan is present. Since test_bpf sets skb->vlan_tci to ~0
(including VLAN_TAG_PRESENT) we have to populate skb->vlan_proto.
Fixes false negative on test #24:
test_bpf: #24 LD_PAYLOAD_OFF jited:0 175 ret 0 != 42 FAIL (1 times)
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dinan Gunawardena <dinan.gunawardena@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Since the blinding is strictly only called from inside eBPF JITs,
we need to change signatures for bpf_int_jit_compile() and
bpf_prog_select_runtime() first in order to prepare that the
eBPF program we're dealing with can change underneath. Hence,
for call sites, we need to return the latest prog. No functional
change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
quickly tag the precise problem.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
BPF_ALU32 and BPF_ALU64 tests for adding two 32-bit values that results in
32-bit overflow.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Unsigned Jump-if-Greater-Than.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
JMP_JSET tests incorrectly used BPF_JNE. Fix the same.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add couple of test cases for interpreter but also JITs, f.e. to test that
when imm32 moves are being done, upper 32bits of the regs are being zero
extended.
Without JIT:
[...]
[ 1114.129301] test_bpf: #43 MOV REG64 jited:0 128 PASS
[ 1114.130626] test_bpf: #44 MOV REG32 jited:0 139 PASS
[ 1114.132055] test_bpf: #45 LD IMM64 jited:0 124 PASS
[...]
With JIT (generated code can as usual be nicely verified with the help of
bpf_jit_disasm tool):
[...]
[ 1062.726782] test_bpf: #43 MOV REG64 jited:1 6 PASS
[ 1062.726890] test_bpf: #44 MOV REG32 jited:1 6 PASS
[ 1062.726993] test_bpf: #45 LD IMM64 jited:1 6 PASS
[...]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When running "mod X" operation, if X is 0 the filter has to be halt.
Add new test cases to cover A = A mod X if X is 0, and A = A mod 1.
CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
CC: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It is mandatory for the JIT or interpreter to reset the A and X
registers to 0 before running the filter. Check that it is the case on
various ALU and JMP instructions.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This exerces the LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions for various sizes and
alignments. This also checks that X when used as an offset to a
BPF_IND instruction first in a filter is correctly set to 0.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When developping on the interpreter or a particular JIT, it can be
interesting to restrict the tests list to a specific test or a
particular range of tests.
This patch adds the following module parameters to the test_bpf module:
* test_name=<string>: only the specified named test will be run.
* test_id=<number>: only the test with the specified id will be run
(see the output of test_bpf without parameters to get the test id).
* test_range=<number>,<number>: only the tests within IDs in the
specified id range are run (see the output of test_bpf without
parameters to get the test ids).
Any invalid range, test id or test name will result in -EINVAL being
returned and no tests being run.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
These new tests exercise various load sizes and offsets crossing the
head/fragment boundary.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This introduce a new test->aux flag (FLAG_SKB_FRAG) to tell the
populate_skb() function to add a fragment to the test skb containing
the data specified in test->frag_data).
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As JITs start to perform optimizations whether to clear A and X on eBPF
programs in the prologue, we should actually assign a program type to the
native eBPF test cases. It doesn't really matter which program type, as
these instructions don't go through the verifier, but it needs to be a
type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC. This reflects eBPF programs loaded via bpf(2)
system call (!= type unspec) vs. classic BPF to eBPF migrations (== type
unspec).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
improve accuracy of timing in test_bpf and add two stress tests:
- {skb->data[0], get_smp_processor_id} repeated 2k times
- {skb->data[0], vlan_push} x 68 followed by {skb->data[0], vlan_pop} x 68
1st test is useful to test performance of JIT implementation of BPF_LD_ABS
together with BPF_CALL instructions.
2nd test is stressing skb_vlan_push/pop logic together with skb->data access
via BPF_LD_ABS insn which checks that re-caching of skb->data is done correctly.
In order to call bpf_skb_vlan_push() from test_bpf.ko have to add
three export_symbol_gpl.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently "ALU_END_FROM_BE 32" and "ALU_END_FROM_LE 32" do not test if
the upper bits of the result are zeros (the arm64 JIT had such bugs).
Extend the two tests to catch this.
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
While 3b52960266 ("test_bpf: add more eBPF jump torture cases")
added the int3 bug test case only for eBPF, which needs exactly 11
passes to converge, here's a version for classic BPF with 11 passes,
and one that would need 70 passes on x86_64 to actually converge for
being successfully JITed. Effectively, all jumps are being optimized
out resulting in a JIT image of just 89 bytes (from originally max
BPF insns), only returning K.
Might be useful as a receipe for folks wanting to craft a test case
when backporting the fix in commit 3f7352bf21 ("x86: bpf_jit: fix
compilation of large bpf programs") while not having eBPF. The 2nd
one is delegated to the interpreter as the last pass still results
in shrinking, in other words, this one won't be JITed on x86_64.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add two more eBPF test cases for JITs, i.e. the second one revealed a
bug in the x86_64 JIT compiler, where only an int3 filled image from
the allocator was emitted and later wrongly set by the compiler as the
bpf_func program code since optimization pass boundary was surpassed
w/o actually emitting opcodes.
Interpreter:
[ 45.782892] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 11 PASS
[ 45.783062] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 14705 PASS
After x86_64 JIT (fixed):
[ 80.495638] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:1 6 PASS
[ 80.495957] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:1 17157 PASS
Reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/364729
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently the testsuite does not have a test case with a backward jump.
The s390x JIT (kernel 4.0) had a bug in that area.
So add one new test case for this now.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fix several sparse warnings like:
lib/test_bpf.c:1824:25: sparse: constant 4294967295 is so big it is long
lib/test_bpf.c:1878:25: sparse: constant 0x0000ffffffff0000 is so big it is long
Fixes: cffc642d93 ("test_bpf: add 173 new testcases for eBPF")
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Couple of torture test cases related to the bug fixed in 0b59d8806a
("ARM: net: delegate filter to kernel interpreter when imm_offset()
return value can't fit into 12bits.").
I've added a helper to allocate and fill the insn space. Output on
x86_64 from my laptop:
test_bpf: #233 BPF_MAXINSNS: Maximum possible literals jited:0 7 PASS
test_bpf: #234 BPF_MAXINSNS: Single literal jited:0 8 PASS
test_bpf: #235 BPF_MAXINSNS: Run/add until end jited:0 11553 PASS
test_bpf: #236 BPF_MAXINSNS: Too many instructions PASS
test_bpf: #237 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump jited:0 9 PASS
test_bpf: #238 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 20329 20398 PASS
test_bpf: #239 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 32178 32475 PASS
test_bpf: #240 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 10518 PASS
test_bpf: #233 BPF_MAXINSNS: Maximum possible literals jited:1 4 PASS
test_bpf: #234 BPF_MAXINSNS: Single literal jited:1 4 PASS
test_bpf: #235 BPF_MAXINSNS: Run/add until end jited:1 1625 PASS
test_bpf: #236 BPF_MAXINSNS: Too many instructions PASS
test_bpf: #237 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump jited:1 8 PASS
test_bpf: #238 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:1 3301 3174 PASS
test_bpf: #239 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:1 24107 23491 PASS
test_bpf: #240 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:1 8651 PASS
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
add an exhaustive set of eBPF tests bringing total to:
test_bpf: Summary: 233 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/226 JIT'ed]
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Extend the testcase to catch a signedness bug in the arm64 JIT:
test_bpf: #58 load 64-bit immediate jited:1 ret -1 != 1 FAIL (1 times)
This is useful to ensure other JITs won't have a similar bug.
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/8/458
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
I think this is useful to verify whether a filter could be JITed or
not in case of bpf_prog_enable >= 1, which otherwise the test suite
doesn't tell besides taking a good peek at the performance numbers.
Nicolas Schichan reported a bug in the ARM JIT compiler that rejected
and waved the filter to the interpreter although it shouldn't have.
Nevertheless, the test passes as expected, but such information is
not visible.
It's i.e. useful for the remaining classic JITs, but also for
implementing remaining opcodes that are not yet present in eBPF JITs
(e.g. ARM64 waves some of them to the interpreter). This minor patch
allows to grep through dmesg to find those accordingly, but also
provides a total summary, i.e.: [<X>/53 JIT'ed]
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# insmod lib/test_bpf.ko
# dmesg | grep "jited:0"
dmesg example on the ARM issue with JIT rejection:
[...]
[ 67.925387] test_bpf: #2 ADD_SUB_MUL_K jited:1 24 PASS
[ 67.930889] test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:0 794 PASS
[ 67.943940] test_bpf: #4 AND_OR_LSH_K jited:1 20 20 PASS
[...]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Expand DIV_KX to use BPF_MOD operation in the
DIV_KX bpf 'classic' test.
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
nmap generates classic BPF programs to filter ARP packets with given target MAC
which triggered a bug in eBPF x64 JIT. The bug was fixed in
commit e0ee9c1215 ("x86: bpf_jit: fix two bugs in eBPF JIT compiler")
This patch is adding a testcase in eBPF instructions (those that
were generated by classic->eBPF converter) to be processed by JIT.
The test is primarily targeting JIT compiler.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
old gcc 4.2 used by avr32 architecture produces warnings:
lib/test_bpf.c:1741: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
lib/test_bpf.c:1741: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
lib/test_bpf.c: In function '__run_one':
lib/test_bpf.c:1897: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function
silence these warnings.
Fixes: 02ab695bb3 ("net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction")
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register.
All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction.
Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction:
insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM
insn[0].dst_reg = destination register
insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit
insn[1].code = 0
insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit
All unused fields must be zero.
Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM
which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register.
x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64'
arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn
Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter.
It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one
instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions:
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32)
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2)
User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only.
To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of
this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding
to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide.
For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose.
src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and
load in-kernel map pointer.
src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer
src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data
All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer
as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel
to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then
will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside
the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never
see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that
loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct
pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other
instructions.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
With eBPF getting more extended and exposure to user space is on it's way,
hardening the memory range the interpreter uses to steer its command flow
seems appropriate. This patch moves the to be interpreted bytecode to
read-only pages.
In case we execute a corrupted BPF interpreter image for some reason e.g.
caused by an attacker which got past a verifier stage, it would not only
provide arbitrary read/write memory access but arbitrary function calls
as well. After setting up the BPF interpreter image, its contents do not
change until destruction time, thus we can setup the image on immutable
made pages in order to mitigate modifications to that code. The idea
is derived from commit 314beb9bca ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit
against spraying attacks").
This is possible because bpf_prog is not part of sk_filter anymore.
After setup bpf_prog cannot be altered during its life-time. This prevents
any modifications to the entire bpf_prog structure (incl. function/JIT
image pointer).
Every eBPF program (including classic BPF that are migrated) have to call
bpf_prog_select_runtime() to select either interpreter or a JIT image
as a last setup step, and they all are being freed via bpf_prog_free(),
including non-JIT. Therefore, we can easily integrate this into the
eBPF life-time, plus since we directly allocate a bpf_prog, we have no
performance penalty.
Tested with seccomp and test_bpf testsuite in JIT/non-JIT mode and manual
inspection of kernel_page_tables. Brad Spengler proposed the same idea
via Twitter during development of this patch.
Joint work with Hannes Frederic Sowa.
Suggested-by: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
'shift by register' operations are supported by eBPF interpreter, but were
accidently left out of x64 JIT compiler. Fix it and add a testcase.
Reported-by: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Fixes: 622582786c ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
