The "comment" part can never be displayed, so we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
no I2C driver has "i2c" in its name. It makes more sense to call this
i2c driver "hid".
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
In case we are returning from i2c_hid_probe() through the 'err' or
'err_mem_free' labels, there is noone freeing the buffers allocated by
i2c_hid_alloc_buffers().
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Microsoft published the protocol specification of HID over i2c:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/hh852380.aspx
This patch introduces an implementation of this protocol.
This implementation does not includes the ACPI part of the specification.
This will come when ACPI 5.0 devices enumeration will be available.
Once the ACPI part is done, OEM will not have to declare HID over I2C
devices in their platform specific driver.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
