Commit Graph

129 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Namhyung Kim ee042be16c locking: Apply contention tracepoints in the slow path
Adding the lock contention tracepoints in various lock function slow
paths.  Note that each arch can define spinlock differently, I only
added it only to the generic qspinlock for now.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322185709.141236-3-namhyung@kernel.org
2022-04-05 10:24:35 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner f16cc980d6 Merge branch 'locking/urgent' into locking/core
Pick up the spin loop condition fix.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2021-12-18 10:57:03 +01:00
Zqiang 8f556a326c locking/rtmutex: Fix incorrect condition in rtmutex_spin_on_owner()
Optimistic spinning needs to be terminated when the spinning waiter is not
longer the top waiter on the lock, but the condition is negated. It
terminates if the waiter is the top waiter, which is defeating the whole
purpose.

Fixes: c3123c4314 ("locking/rtmutex: Dont dereference waiter lockless")
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217074207.77425-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com
2021-12-18 10:55:51 +01:00
Kefeng Wang c0bed69daf locking: Make owner_on_cpu() into <linux/sched.h>
Move the owner_on_cpu() from kernel/locking/rwsem.c into
include/linux/sched.h with under CONFIG_SMP, then use it
in the mutex/rwsem/rtmutex to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211203075935.136808-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
2021-12-04 10:56:25 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 02ea9fc96f locking/rtmutex: Squash self-deadlock check for ww_rt_mutex.
Similar to the issues in commits:

  6467822b8c ("locking/rtmutex: Prevent spurious EDEADLK return caused by ww_mutexes")
  a055fcc132 ("locking/rtmutex: Return success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters")

ww_rt_mutex_lock() should not return EDEADLK without first going through
the __ww_mutex logic to set the required state. In fact, the chain-walk
can deal with the spurious cycles (per the above commits) this check
warns about and is trying to avoid.

Therefore ignore this test for ww_rt_mutex and simply let things fall
in place.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-12-04 10:56:23 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner 9321f8152d rtmutex: Wake up the waiters lockless while dropping the read lock.
The rw_semaphore and rwlock_t implementation both wake the waiter while
holding the rt_mutex_base::wait_lock acquired.
This can be optimized by waking the waiter lockless outside of the
locked section to avoid a needless contention on the
rt_mutex_base::wait_lock lock.

Extend rt_mutex_wake_q_add() to also accept task and state and use it in
__rwbase_read_unlock().

Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928150006.597310-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-01 13:57:52 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 8fe46535e1 rtmutex: Check explicit for TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT.
rt_mutex_wake_q_add() needs to  need to distiguish between sleeping
locks (TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) and normal locks which use TASK_NORMAL to use
the proper wake mechanism.

Instead of checking for != TASK_NORMAL make it more robust and check
explicit for TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT which is the reason why a different wake
mechanism is used.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928150006.597310-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2021-10-01 13:57:52 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra e548057270 locking/rtmutex: Fix ww_mutex deadlock check
Dan reported that rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() can be called with
.orig_waiter == NULL however commit a055fcc132 ("locking/rtmutex: Return
success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters") unconditionally dereferences it.

Since both call-sites that have .orig_waiter == NULL don't care for the
return value, simply disable the deadlock squash by adding the NULL check.

Notably, both callers use the deadlock condition as a termination condition
for the iteration; once detected, it is sure that (de)boosting is done.
Arguably step [3] would be a more natural termination point, but it's
dubious whether adding a third deadlock detection state would improve the
code.

Fixes: a055fcc132 ("locking/rtmutex: Return success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YS9La56fHMiCCo75@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2021-09-09 10:31:22 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra a055fcc132 locking/rtmutex: Return success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters
ww_mutexes can legitimately cause a deadlock situation in the lock graph
which is resolved afterwards by the wait/wound mechanics. The rtmutex chain
walk can detect such a deadlock and returns EDEADLK which in turn skips the
wait/wound mechanism and returns EDEADLK to the caller. That's wrong
because both lock chains might get EDEADLK or the wrong waiter would back
out.

Detect that situation and return 'success' in case that the waiter which
initiated the chain walk is a ww_mutex with context. This allows the
wait/wound mechanics to resolve the situation according to the rules.

[ tglx: Split it apart and added changelog ]

Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Fixes: add461325e ("locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YSeWjCHoK4v5OcOt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2021-08-27 14:28:49 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 6467822b8c locking/rtmutex: Prevent spurious EDEADLK return caused by ww_mutexes
rtmutex based ww_mutexes can legitimately create a cycle in the lock graph
which can be observed by a blocker which didn't cause the problem:

   P1: A, ww_A, ww_B
   P2: ww_B, ww_A
   P3: A

P3 might therefore be trapped in the ww_mutex induced cycle and run into
the lock depth limitation of rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() which returns
-EDEADLK to the caller.

Disable the deadlock detection walk when the chain walk observes a
ww_mutex to prevent this looping.

[ tglx: Split it apart and added changelog ]

Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Fixes: add461325e ("locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YSeWjCHoK4v5OcOt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2021-08-27 14:28:49 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 37e8abff2b locking/rtmutex: Dequeue waiter on ww_mutex deadlock
The rt_mutex based ww_mutex variant queues the new waiter first in the
lock's rbtree before evaluating the ww_mutex specific conditions which
might decide that the waiter should back out. This check and conditional
exit happens before the waiter is enqueued into the PI chain.

The failure handling at the call site assumes that the waiter, if it is the
top most waiter on the lock, is queued in the PI chain and then proceeds to
adjust the unmodified PI chain, which results in RB tree corruption.

Dequeue the waiter from the lock waiter list in the ww_mutex error exit
path to prevent this.

Fixes: add461325e ("locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex")
Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210825102454.042280541@linutronix.de
2021-08-25 15:42:33 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner c3123c4314 locking/rtmutex: Dont dereference waiter lockless
The new rt_mutex_spin_on_onwer() loop checks whether the spinning waiter is
still the top waiter on the lock by utilizing rt_mutex_top_waiter(), which
is broken because that function contains a sanity check which dereferences
the top waiter pointer to check whether the waiter belongs to the
lock. That's wrong in the lockless spinwait case:

 CPU 0							CPU 1
 rt_mutex_lock(lock)					rt_mutex_lock(lock);
   queue(waiter0)
   waiter0 == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)
   rt_mutex_spin_on_onwer(lock, waiter0) {		queue(waiter1)
   					 		waiter1 == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)
   							...
     top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)
       leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters);
							-> signal
							dequeue(waiter1)
							destroy(waiter1)
       w = rb_entry(leftmost, ....)
       BUG_ON(w->lock != lock)	 <- UAF

The BUG_ON() is correct for the case where the caller holds lock->wait_lock
which guarantees that the leftmost waiter entry cannot vanish. For the
lockless spinwait case it's broken.

Create a new helper function which avoids the pointer dereference and just
compares the leftmost entry pointer with current's waiter pointer to
validate that currrent is still elegible for spinning.

Fixes: 992caf7f17 ("locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism")
Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210825102453.981720644@linutronix.de
2021-08-25 15:42:32 +02:00
Steven Rostedt 992caf7f17 locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism
Going to sleep when locks are contended can be quite inefficient when the
contention time is short and the lock owner is running on a different CPU.

The MCS mechanism cannot be used because MCS is strictly FIFO ordered while
for rtmutex based locks the waiter ordering is priority based.

Provide a simple adaptive spinwait mechanism which currently restricts the
spinning to the top priority waiter.

[ tglx: Provide a contemporary changelog, extended it to all rtmutex based
  	locks and updated it to match the other spin on owner implementations ]

Originally-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211305.912050691@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 19:06:11 +02:00
Gregory Haskins 48eb3f4fcf locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing
The current logic only allows lock stealing to occur if the current task is
of higher priority than the pending owner.

Significant throughput improvements can be gained by allowing the lock
stealing to include tasks of equal priority when the contended lock is a
spin_lock or a rw_lock and the tasks are not in a RT scheduling task.

The assumption was that the system will make faster progress by allowing
the task already on the CPU to take the lock rather than waiting for the
system to wake up a different task.

This does add a degree of unfairness, but in reality no negative side
effects have been observed in the many years that this has been used in the
RT kernel.

[ tglx: Refactored and rewritten several times by Steve Rostedt, Sebastian
  	Siewior and myself ]

Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211305.857240222@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 19:06:07 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra add461325e locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex
Add a ww acquire context pointer to the waiter and various functions and
add the ww_mutex related invocations to the proper spots in the locking
code, similar to the mutex based variant.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211304.966139174@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 19:05:23 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 715f7f9ece locking/rtmutex: Squash !RT tasks to DEFAULT_PRIO
Ensure all !RT tasks have the same prio such that they end up in FIFO
order and aren't split up according to nice level.

The reason why nice levels were taken into account so far is historical. In
the early days of the rtmutex code it was done to give the PI boosting and
deboosting a larger coverage.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.938676930@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:51:02 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 1c143c4b65 locking/rtmutex: Provide the spin/rwlock core lock function
A simplified version of the rtmutex slowlock function, which neither handles
signals nor timeouts, and is careful about preserving the state of the
blocked task across the lock operation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.770228446@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:45:37 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner e17ba59b7e locking/rtmutex: Guard regular sleeping locks specific functions
Guard the regular sleeping lock specific functionality, which is used for
rtmutex on non-RT enabled kernels and for mutex, rtmutex and semaphores on
RT enabled kernels so the code can be reused for the RT specific
implementation of spinlocks and rwlocks in a different compilation unit.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.311535693@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:23:27 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 456cfbc65c locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks
Add an rtlock_task pointer to rt_mutex_wake_q, which allows to handle the RT
specific wakeup for spin/rwlock waiters. The pointer is just consuming 4/8
bytes on the stack so it is provided unconditionaly to avoid #ifdeffery all
over the place.

This cannot use a regular wake_q, because a task can have concurrent wakeups which
would make it miss either lock or the regular wakeups, depending on what gets
queued first, unless task struct gains a separate wake_q_node for this, which
would be overkill, because there can only be a single task which gets woken
up in the spin/rw_lock unlock path.

No functional change for non-RT enabled kernels.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.253614678@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:21:09 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 7980aa397c locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head
Prepare for the required state aware handling of waiter wakeups via wake_q
and switch the rtmutex code over to the rtmutex specific wrapper.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.197113263@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:20:14 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner b576e640ce locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_wake_q_head and helpers
To handle the difference between wakeups for regular sleeping locks (mutex,
rtmutex, rw_semaphore) and the wakeups for 'sleeping' spin/rwlocks on
PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels correctly, it is required to provide a
wake_q_head construct which allows to keep them separate.

Provide a wrapper around wake_q_head and the required helpers, which will be
extended with the state handling later.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.139337655@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:18:15 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner c014ef69b3 locking/rtmutex: Add wake_state to rt_mutex_waiter
Regular sleeping locks like mutexes, rtmutexes and rw_semaphores are always
entering and leaving a blocking section with task state == TASK_RUNNING.

On a non-RT kernel spinlocks and rwlocks never affect the task state, but
on RT kernels these locks are converted to rtmutex based 'sleeping' locks.

So in case of contention the task goes to block, which requires to carefully
preserve the task state, and restore it after acquiring the lock taking
regular wakeups for the task into account, which happened while the task was
blocked. This state preserving is achieved by having a separate task state
for blocking on a RT spin/rwlock and a saved_state field in task_struct
along with careful handling of these wakeup scenarios in try_to_wake_up().

To avoid conditionals in the rtmutex code, store the wake state which has
to be used for waking a lock waiter in rt_mutex_waiter which allows to
handle the regular and RT spin/rwlocks by handing it to wake_up_state().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.079800739@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:15:36 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner ebbdc41e90 locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_slowlock_locked()
Split the inner workings of rt_mutex_slowlock() out into a separate
function, which can be reused by the upcoming RT lock substitutions,
e.g. for rw_semaphores.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.841971086@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:04:09 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 830e6acc8a locking/rtmutex: Split out the inner parts of 'struct rtmutex'
RT builds substitutions for rwsem, mutex, spinlock and rwlock around
rtmutexes. Split the inner working out so each lock substitution can use
them with the appropriate lockdep annotations. This avoids having an extra
unused lockdep map in the wrapped rtmutex.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.784739994@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:04:01 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 531ae4b06a locking/rtmutex: Split API from implementation
Prepare for reusing the inner functions of rtmutex for RT lock
substitutions: introduce kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c and move
them there.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.726560996@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:03:07 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 709e0b6286 locking/rtmutex: Switch to from cmpxchg_*() to try_cmpxchg_*()
Allows the compiler to generate better code depending on the architecture.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.668958502@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:01:47 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 785159301b locking/rtmutex: Convert macros to inlines
Inlines are type-safe...

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.610830960@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 17:00:48 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner b41cda0376 locking/rtmutex: Set proper wait context for lockdep
RT mutexes belong to the LD_WAIT_SLEEP class. Make them so.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.031014562@linutronix.de
2021-08-17 16:38:50 +02:00
Zhen Lei 07d25971b2 locking/rtmutex: Use the correct rtmutex debugging config option
It's CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES not CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEX.

Fixes: f7efc4799f ("locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check")
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210731123011.4555-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-08-10 08:21:52 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 2f064a59a1 sched: Change task_struct::state
Change the type and name of task_struct::state. Drop the volatile and
shrink it to an 'unsigned int'. Rename it in order to find all uses
such that we can use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE as appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611082838.550736351@infradead.org
2021-06-18 11:43:09 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner a51a327f3b locking/rtmutex: Clean up signal handling in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
The signal handling in __rt_mutex_slowlock() is open coded.

Use signal_pending_state() instead.

Aside of the cleanup this also prepares for the RT lock substituions which
require support for TASK_KILLABLE.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.533811987@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:05 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner c2c360ed7f locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug
The warning as written is expensive and not really required for a
production kernel. Make it depend on rt mutex debugging and use !in_task()
for the condition which generates far better code and gives the same
answer.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.436565064@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 82cd5b1039 locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in rt_mutex_postunlock()
Preemption is disabled in mark_wakeup_next_waiter(,) not in
rt_mutex_slowunlock().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.341734608@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 70c80103aa locking/rtmutex: Consolidate the fast/slowpath invocation
The indirection via a function pointer (which is at least optimized into a
tail call by the compiler) is making the code hard to read.

Clean it up and move the futex related trylock functions down to the futex
section.

Move the wake_q wakeup into rt_mutex_slowunlock(). No point in handing it
to the caller. The futex code uses a different function.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.247927548@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner d7a2edb890 locking/rtmutex: Make text section and inlining consistent
rtmutex is half __sched and the other half is not. If the compiler decides
to not inline larger static functions then part of the code ends up in the
regular text section.

There are also quite some performance related small helpers which are
either static or plain inline. Force inline those which make sense and mark
the rest __sched.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153944.152977820@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:04 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner f5a98866e5 locking/rtmutex: Decrapify __rt_mutex_init()
The conditional debug handling is just another layer of obfuscation. Split
the function so rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked() can invoke the inner init and
__rt_mutex_init() gets the full treatment.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.955697588@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner f7efc4799f locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check
There is no point for this wrapper at all.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.754254046@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner fae37feee0 locking/rtmutex: Move rt_mutex_debug_task_free() to rtmutex.c
Prepare for removing the header maze.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.646359691@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner 8188d74e68 locking/rtmutex: Remove empty and unused debug stubs
No users or useless and therefore just ballast.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.549192485@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:03 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 6d41c675a5 locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock detector
The rtmutex specific deadlock detector predates lockdep coverage of rtmutex
and since commit f5694788ad ("rt_mutex: Add lockdep annotations") it
contains a lot of redundant functionality:

 - lockdep will detect an potential deadlock before rtmutex-debug
   has a chance to do so

 - the deadlock debugging is restricted to rtmutexes which are not
   associated to futexes and have an active waiter, which is covered by
   lockdep already

Remove the redundant functionality and move actual deadlock WARN() into the
deadlock code path. The latter needs a seperate cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.320398604@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:02 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2d445c3e4a locking/rtmutex: Remove rtmutex deadlock tester leftovers
The following debug members of 'struct rtmutex' are unused:

 - save_state: No users

 - file,line: Printed if ::name is NULL. This is only used for non-futex
	      locks so ::name is never NULL

 - magic:     Assigned to NULL by rt_mutex_destroy(), no further usage

Remove them along with unused inline and macro leftovers related to
the long gone deadlock tester.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.195064296@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:02 +02:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior c15380b72d locking/rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_timed_lock()
rt_mutex_timed_lock() has no callers since:

  c051b21f71 ("rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex")

Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326153943.061103415@linutronix.de
2021-03-29 15:57:02 +02:00
Ingo Molnar e2db7592be locking: Fix typos in comments
Fix ~16 single-word typos in locking code comments.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2021-03-22 02:45:52 +01:00
Davidlohr Bueso 9a4b99fce6 kernel/futex: Kill rt_mutex_next_owner()
Update wake_futex_pi() and kill the call altogether. This is possible because:

(i) The case of fixup_owner() in which the pi_mutex was stolen from the
signaled enqueued top-waiter which fails to trylock and doesn't see a
current owner of the rtmutex but needs to acknowledge an non-enqueued
higher priority waiter, which is the other alternative. This used to be
handled by rt_mutex_next_owner(), which guaranteed fixup_pi_state_owner('newowner')
never to be nil. Nowadays the logic is handled by an EAGAIN loop, without
the need of rt_mutex_next_owner(). Specifically:

    c1e2f0eaf0 (futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex)
    9f5d1c336a (futex: Handle transient "ownerless" rtmutex state correctly)

(ii) rt_mutex_next_owner() and rt_mutex_top_waiter() are semantically
equivalent, as of:

    c28d62cf52 (locking/rtmutex: Handle non enqueued waiters gracefully in remove_waiter())

So instead of keeping the call around, just use the good ole rt_mutex_top_waiter().
No change in semantics.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210226175029.50335-1-dave@stgolabs.net
2021-03-11 19:19:17 +01:00
Randy Dunlap c034f48e99 kernel: delete repeated words in comments
Drop repeated words in kernel/events/.
{if, the, that, with, time}

Drop repeated words in kernel/locking/.
{it, no, the}

Drop repeated words in kernel/sched/.
{in, not}

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210127023412.26292-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>	[kernel/locking/]
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-26 09:41:03 -08:00
Linus Torvalds 657bd90c93 Scheduler updates for v5.12:
[ NOTE: unfortunately this tree had to be freshly rebased today,
         it's a same-content tree of 82891be90f3c (-next published)
         merged with v5.11.
 
         The main reason for the rebase was an authorship misattribution
         problem with a new commit, which we noticed in the last minute,
         and which we didn't want to be merged upstream. The offending
         commit was deep in the tree, and dependent commits had to be
         rebased as well. ]
 
 - Core scheduler updates:
 
   - Add CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC: this in its current form adds the
     preempt=none/voluntary/full boot options (default: full),
     to allow distros to build a PREEMPT kernel but fall back to
     close to PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY (or PREEMPT_NONE) runtime scheduling
     behavior via a boot time selection.
 
     There's also the /debug/sched_debug switch to do this runtime.
 
     This feature is implemented via runtime patching (a new variant of static calls).
 
     The scope of the runtime patching can be best reviewed by looking
     at the sched_dynamic_update() function in kernel/sched/core.c.
 
     ( Note that the dynamic none/voluntary mode isn't 100% identical,
       for example preempt-RCU is available in all cases, plus the
       preempt count is maintained in all models, which has runtime
       overhead even with the code patching. )
 
     The PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY/PREEMPT_NONE models, used by the vast majority
     of distributions, are supposed to be unaffected.
 
   - Fix ignored rescheduling after rcu_eqs_enter(). This is a bug that
     was found via rcutorture triggering a hang. The bug is that
     rcu_idle_enter() may wake up a NOCB kthread, but this happens after
     the last generic need_resched() check. Some cpuidle drivers fix it
     by chance but many others don't.
 
     In true 2020 fashion the original bug fix has grown into a 5-patch
     scheduler/RCU fix series plus another 16 RCU patches to address
     the underlying issue of missed preemption events. These are the
     initial fixes that should fix current incarnations of the bug.
 
   - Clean up rbtree usage in the scheduler, by providing & using the following
     consistent set of rbtree APIs:
 
      partial-order; less() based:
        - rb_add(): add a new entry to the rbtree
        - rb_add_cached(): like rb_add(), but for a rb_root_cached
 
      total-order; cmp() based:
        - rb_find(): find an entry in an rbtree
        - rb_find_add(): find an entry, and add if not found
 
        - rb_find_first(): find the first (leftmost) matching entry
        - rb_next_match(): continue from rb_find_first()
        - rb_for_each(): iterate a sub-tree using the previous two
 
   - Improve the SMP/NUMA load-balancer: scan for an idle sibling in a single pass.
     This is a 4-commit series where each commit improves one aspect of the idle
     sibling scan logic.
 
   - Improve the cpufreq cooling driver by getting the effective CPU utilization
     metrics from the scheduler
 
   - Improve the fair scheduler's active load-balancing logic by reducing the number
     of active LB attempts & lengthen the load-balancing interval. This improves
     stress-ng mmapfork performance.
 
   - Fix CFS's estimated utilization (util_est) calculation bug that can result in
     too high utilization values
 
 - Misc updates & fixes:
 
    - Fix the HRTICK reprogramming & optimization feature
    - Fix SCHED_SOFTIRQ raising race & warning in the CPU offlining code
    - Reduce dl_add_task_root_domain() overhead
    - Fix uprobes refcount bug
    - Process pending softirqs in flush_smp_call_function_from_idle()
    - Clean up task priority related defines, remove *USER_*PRIO and
      USER_PRIO()
    - Simplify the sched_init_numa() deduplication sort
    - Documentation updates
    - Fix EAS bug in update_misfit_status(), which degraded the quality
      of energy-balancing
    - Smaller cleanups
 
 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJFBAABCgAvFiEEBpT5eoXrXCwVQwEKEnMQ0APhK1gFAmAtHBsRHG1pbmdvQGtl
 cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEnMQ0APhK1itgg/+NGed12pgPjYBzesdou60Lvx7LZLGjfOt
 M1F1EnmQGn/hEH2fCY6ZoqIZQTVltm7GIcBNabzYTzlaHZsdtyuDUJBZyj19vTlk
 zekcj7WVt+qvfjChaNwEJhQ9nnOM/eohMgEOHMAAJd9zlnQvve7NOLQ56UDM+kn/
 9taFJ5ZPvb4avP6C5p3KivvKex6Bjof/Tl0m3utpNyPpI/qK3FyGxwdgCxU0yepT
 ABWQX5ZQCufFvo1bgnBPfqyzab4MqhoM3bNKBsLQfuAlssG1xRv4KQOev4dRwrt9
 pXJikV5C9yez5d2lGe5p0ltH5IZS/l9x2yI/ZQj3OUDTFyV1ic6WfFAqJgDzVF8E
 i/vvA4NPQiI241Bkps+ErcCw4aVOgiY6TWli74cHjLUIX0+As6aHrFWXGSxUmiHB
 WR+B8KmdfzRTTlhOxMA+cvlpZcKCfxWkJJmXzr/lDZzIuKPqM3QCE2wD9sixkfVo
 JNICT0IvZghWOdbMEfZba8Psh/e2LVI9RzdpEiuYJz1ZrVlt1hO0M6jBxY0hMz9n
 k54z81xODw0a8P2FHMtpmB1vhAeqCmvwA6DO8z0Oxs0DFi+KM2bLf2efHsCKafI+
 Bm5v9YFaOk/55R76hJVh+aYLlyFgFkKd+P/niJTPDnxOk3SqJuXvTrql1HeGHkNr
 kYgQa23dsZk=
 =pyaG
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'sched-core-2021-02-17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "Core scheduler updates:

   - Add CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC: this in its current form adds the
     preempt=none/voluntary/full boot options (default: full), to allow
     distros to build a PREEMPT kernel but fall back to close to
     PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY (or PREEMPT_NONE) runtime scheduling behavior via
     a boot time selection.

     There's also the /debug/sched_debug switch to do this runtime.

     This feature is implemented via runtime patching (a new variant of
     static calls).

     The scope of the runtime patching can be best reviewed by looking
     at the sched_dynamic_update() function in kernel/sched/core.c.

     ( Note that the dynamic none/voluntary mode isn't 100% identical,
       for example preempt-RCU is available in all cases, plus the
       preempt count is maintained in all models, which has runtime
       overhead even with the code patching. )

     The PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY/PREEMPT_NONE models, used by the vast
     majority of distributions, are supposed to be unaffected.

   - Fix ignored rescheduling after rcu_eqs_enter(). This is a bug that
     was found via rcutorture triggering a hang. The bug is that
     rcu_idle_enter() may wake up a NOCB kthread, but this happens after
     the last generic need_resched() check. Some cpuidle drivers fix it
     by chance but many others don't.

     In true 2020 fashion the original bug fix has grown into a 5-patch
     scheduler/RCU fix series plus another 16 RCU patches to address the
     underlying issue of missed preemption events. These are the initial
     fixes that should fix current incarnations of the bug.

   - Clean up rbtree usage in the scheduler, by providing & using the
     following consistent set of rbtree APIs:

       partial-order; less() based:
         - rb_add(): add a new entry to the rbtree
         - rb_add_cached(): like rb_add(), but for a rb_root_cached

       total-order; cmp() based:
         - rb_find(): find an entry in an rbtree
         - rb_find_add(): find an entry, and add if not found

         - rb_find_first(): find the first (leftmost) matching entry
         - rb_next_match(): continue from rb_find_first()
         - rb_for_each(): iterate a sub-tree using the previous two

   - Improve the SMP/NUMA load-balancer: scan for an idle sibling in a
     single pass. This is a 4-commit series where each commit improves
     one aspect of the idle sibling scan logic.

   - Improve the cpufreq cooling driver by getting the effective CPU
     utilization metrics from the scheduler

   - Improve the fair scheduler's active load-balancing logic by
     reducing the number of active LB attempts & lengthen the
     load-balancing interval. This improves stress-ng mmapfork
     performance.

   - Fix CFS's estimated utilization (util_est) calculation bug that can
     result in too high utilization values

  Misc updates & fixes:

   - Fix the HRTICK reprogramming & optimization feature

   - Fix SCHED_SOFTIRQ raising race & warning in the CPU offlining code

   - Reduce dl_add_task_root_domain() overhead

   - Fix uprobes refcount bug

   - Process pending softirqs in flush_smp_call_function_from_idle()

   - Clean up task priority related defines, remove *USER_*PRIO and
     USER_PRIO()

   - Simplify the sched_init_numa() deduplication sort

   - Documentation updates

   - Fix EAS bug in update_misfit_status(), which degraded the quality
     of energy-balancing

   - Smaller cleanups"

* tag 'sched-core-2021-02-17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (51 commits)
  sched,x86: Allow !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
  entry/kvm: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point
  entry: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point
  rcu/nocb: Trigger self-IPI on late deferred wake up before user resume
  rcu/nocb: Perform deferred wake up before last idle's need_resched() check
  rcu: Pull deferred rcuog wake up to rcu_eqs_enter() callers
  sched/features: Distinguish between NORMAL and DEADLINE hrtick
  sched/features: Fix hrtick reprogramming
  sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention in dl_add_task_root_domain()
  uprobes: (Re)add missing get_uprobe() in __find_uprobe()
  smp: Process pending softirqs in flush_smp_call_function_from_idle()
  sched: Harden PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
  static_call: Allow module use without exposing static_call_key
  sched: Add /debug/sched_preempt
  preempt/dynamic: Support dynamic preempt with preempt= boot option
  preempt/dynamic: Provide irqentry_exit_cond_resched() static call
  preempt/dynamic: Provide preempt_schedule[_notrace]() static calls
  preempt/dynamic: Provide cond_resched() and might_resched() static calls
  preempt: Introduce CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
  static_call: Provide DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0()
  ...
2021-02-21 12:35:04 -08:00
Peter Zijlstra 5a7987253e rbtree, rtmutex: Use rb_add_cached()
Reduce rbtree boiler plate by using the new helpers.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
2021-02-17 14:07:57 +01:00
Ingo Molnar 62137364e3 Merge branch 'linus' into locking/core, to pick up upstream fixes
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2021-02-12 12:54:58 +01:00
Alex Shi bf594bf400 locking/rtmutex: Add missing kernel-doc markup
To fix the following issues:
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1612: warning: Function parameter or member
'lock' not described in '__rt_mutex_futex_unlock'
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1612: warning: Function parameter or member
'wake_q' not described in '__rt_mutex_futex_unlock'
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1675: warning: Function parameter or member
'name' not described in '__rt_mutex_init'
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1675: warning: Function parameter or member
'key' not described in '__rt_mutex_init'

[ tglx: Change rt lock to rt_mutex for consistency sake ]

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605257895-5536-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
2021-01-28 13:20:18 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner 2156ac1934 rtmutex: Remove unused argument from rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()
Nothing uses the argument. Remove it as preparation to use
pi_state_update_owner().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2021-01-26 15:10:58 +01:00