Lots of conflicts, by happily all cases of overlapping
changes, parallel adds, things of that nature.
Thanks to Stephen Rothwell, Saeed Mahameed, and others
for their guidance in these resolutions.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We are returning thoff from the flow dissector, not the nhoff. Pass
thoff along with nhoff to the bpf program (initially thoff == nhoff)
and expect flow dissector amend/return thoff, not nhoff.
This avoids confusion, when by the time bpf flow dissector exits,
nhoff == thoff, which doesn't make much sense.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Makes it compatible with the logic that derives program type
from section name in libbpf_prog_type_by_name.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This eBPF program extracts basic/control/ip address/ports keys from
incoming packets. It supports recursive parsing for IP encapsulation,
and VLAN, along with IPv4/IPv6 and extension headers. This program is
meant to show how flow dissection and key extraction can be done in
eBPF.
Link: http://vger.kernel.org/netconf2017_files/rx_hardening_and_udp_gso.pdf
Signed-off-by: Petar Penkov <ppenkov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
