Throwing our __uint128_t idioms at csum_ipv6_magic() makes it
about 1.3x-2x faster across a range of microarchitecture/compiler
combinations. Not much in absolute terms, but every little helps.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
In validating the checksumming results of the new routine, I sadly
neglected to test its not-checksumming results. Thus it slipped through
that the one case where @buff is already dword-aligned and @len = 0
manages to defeat the tail-masking logic and behave as if @len = 8.
For a zero length it doesn't make much sense to deference @buff anyway,
so just add an early return (which has essentially zero impact on
performance).
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Apparently there exist certain workloads which rely heavily on software
checksumming, for which the generic do_csum() implementation becomes a
significant bottleneck. Therefore let's give arm64 its own optimised
version - for ease of maintenance this foregoes assembly or intrisics,
and is thus not actually arm64-specific, but does rely heavily on C
idioms that translate well to the A64 ISA and the typical load/store
capabilities of most ARMv8 CPU cores.
The resulting increase in checksum throughput scales nicely with buffer
size, tending towards 4x for a small in-order core (Cortex-A53), and up
to 6x or more for an aggressive big core (Ampere eMAG).
Reported-by: Lingyan Huang <huanglingyan2@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Lingyan Huang <huanglingyan2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
