alloc_trace_uprobe() sets TRACE_EVENT_FL_USE_CALL_FILTER for unknown
reason and this is simply wrong. Fortunately this has no effect because
register_uprobe_event() clears call->flags after that.
Kill both. This trace_uprobe was kzalloc'ed and we rely on this fact
anyway.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20140715184824.GA20505@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The usage of uprobe_buffer_enable() added by dcad1a20 is very wrong,
1. uprobe_buffer_enable() and uprobe_buffer_disable() are not balanced,
_enable() should be called only if !enabled.
2. If uprobe_buffer_enable() fails probe_event_enable() should clear
tp.flags and free event_file_link.
3. If uprobe_register() fails it should do uprobe_buffer_disable().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20140627170146.GA18332@redhat.com
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Fixes: dcad1a204f "tracing/uprobes: Fetch args before reserving a ring buffer"
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
I do not know why dd9fa555d7 "tracing/uprobes: Move argument fetching
to uprobe_dispatcher()" added the UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE, but it looks
wrong.
OK, perhaps it makes sense to avoid store_trace_args() if the tracee is
nacked by uprobe_perf_filter(). But then we should kill the same code
in uprobe_perf_func() and unify the TRACE/PROFILE filtering (we need to
do this anyway to mix perf/ftrace). Until then this code actually adds
the pessimization because uprobe_perf_filter() will be called twice and
return T in likely case.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20140627170143.GA18329@redhat.com
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This reverts commit 43fe98913c.
This patch is very wrong. Firstly, this change leads to unbalanced
uprobe_unregister(). Just for example,
# perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 syscall
# echo 1 >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/probe_libc/enable
# perf record -e probe_libc:syscall whatever
after that uprobe is dead (unregistered) but the user of ftrace/perf
can't know this, and it looks as if nobody hits this probe.
This would be easy to fix, but there are other reasons why it is not
simple to mix ftrace and perf. If nothing else, they can't share the
same ->consumer.filter. This is fixable too, but probably we need to
fix the poorly designed uprobe_register() interface first. At least
"register" and "apply" should be clearly separated.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20140627170136.GA18319@redhat.com
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.14
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
uprobe_perf_open()->uprobe_apply() can fail, but this error is wrongly
ignored. Change uprobe_perf_open() to do uprobe_perf_close() and return
the error code in this case.
Change uprobe_perf_close() to propogate the error from uprobe_apply()
as well, although it should not fail.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Preparation. Move uprobe_perf_close() up before uprobe_perf_open() to
avoid the forward declaration in the next patch and make it readable.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
There is no need to prohibit probing on the functions
used for preparation and uprobe only fetch functions.
Those are safely probed because those are not invoked
from kprobe's breakpoint/fault/debug handlers. So there
is no chance to cause recursive exceptions.
Following functions are now removed from the kprobes blacklist:
update_bitfield_fetch_param
free_bitfield_fetch_param
kprobe_register
FETCH_FUNC_NAME(stack, type) in trace_uprobe.c
FETCH_FUNC_NAME(memory, type) in trace_uprobe.c
FETCH_FUNC_NAME(memory, string) in trace_uprobe.c
FETCH_FUNC_NAME(memory, string_size) in trace_uprobe.c
FETCH_FUNC_NAME(file_offset, type) in trace_uprobe.c
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140417081800.26341.56504.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Register/unregister tracepoint probes with struct tracepoint pointer
rather than tracepoint name.
This change, which vastly simplifies tracepoint.c, has been proposed by
Steven Rostedt. It also removes 8.8kB (mostly of text) to the vmlinux
size.
From this point on, the tracers need to pass a struct tracepoint pointer
to probe register/unregister. A probe can now only be connected to a
tracepoint that exists. Moreover, tracers are responsible for
unregistering the probe before the module containing its associated
tracepoint is unloaded.
text data bss dec hex filename
10443444 4282528 10391552 25117524 17f4354 vmlinux.orig
10434930 4282848 10391552 25109330 17f2352 vmlinux
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1396992381-23785-2-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>
CC: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
[ SDR - fixed return val in void func in tracepoint_module_going() ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
It seems there's no reason to prevent mixed used of ftrace and perf
for a single uprobe event. At least the kprobes already support it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389946120-19610-6-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Add support for event triggering to uprobes. This is same as kprobes
support added by Tom (plus cleanup by Steven).
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389946120-19610-5-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Support multi-buffer on uprobe-based dynamic events by
using ftrace_event_file.
This patch is based kprobe-based dynamic events multibuffer
support work initially, commited by Masami(commit 41a7dd420c),
but revised as below:
Oleg changed the kprobe-based multibuffer design from
array-pointers of ftrace_event_file into simple list,
so this patch also change to the list design.
rcu_read_lock/unlock added into uprobe_trace_func/uretprobe_trace_func,
to synchronize with ftrace_event_file list add and delete.
Even though we allow multi-uprobes instances now,
but TP_FLAG_PROFILE/TP_FLAG_TRACE are still mutually exclusive
in probe_event_enable currently, this means we cannot allow
one user is using uprobe-tracer, and another user is using
perf-probe on same uprobe concurrently.
(Perhaps this will be fix in future, kprobe don't have this
limitation now)
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389946120-19610-4-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
A single uprobe event might serve different users like ftrace and
perf. And this is especially important for upcoming multi buffer
support. But in this case it'll fetch (same) data from userspace
multiple times. So move it to the beginning of the dispatcher
function and reuse it for each users.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389946120-19610-3-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The uprobe_{trace,perf}_print functions are misnomers since what they
do is not printing. There's also a real print function named
print_uprobe_event() so they'll only increase confusion IMHO.
Rename them with double underscores to follow convention of kprobe.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389946120-19610-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
When kprobe-based dynamic event tracer is not enabled, it caused
following build error:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `traceprobe_update_arg':
(.text+0x10c8dd): undefined reference to `fetch_symbol_u8'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `traceprobe_update_arg':
(.text+0x10c8e9): undefined reference to `fetch_symbol_u16'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `traceprobe_update_arg':
(.text+0x10c8f5): undefined reference to `fetch_symbol_u32'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `traceprobe_update_arg':
(.text+0x10c901): undefined reference to `fetch_symbol_u64'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `traceprobe_update_arg':
(.text+0x10c909): undefined reference to `fetch_symbol_string'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `traceprobe_update_arg':
(.text+0x10c913): undefined reference to `fetch_symbol_string_size'
...
It was due to the fetch methods are referred from CHECK_FETCH_FUNCS
macro and since it was only defined in trace_kprobe.c. Move NULL
definition of such fetch functions to the header file.
Note, it also requires CONFIG_BRANCH_PROFILING enabled to trigger
this failure as well. This is because the "fetch_symbol_*" variables
are referenced in a "else if" statement that will only call
update_symbol_cache(), which is a static inline stub function
when CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT is not enabled. gcc is smart enough
to optimize this "else if" out and that also removes the code that
references the undefined variables.
But when BRANCH_PROFILING is enabled, it fools gcc into keeping
the if statement around and thus references the undefined symbols
and fails to build.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Enable to fetch data from a file offset. Currently it only supports
fetching from same binary uprobe set. It'll translate the file offset
to a proper virtual address in the process.
The syntax is "@+OFFSET" as it does similar to normal memory fetching
(@ADDR) which does no address translation.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Fetching from user space should be done in a non-atomic context. So
use a per-cpu buffer and copy its content to the ring buffer
atomically. Note that we can migrate during accessing user memory
thus use a per-cpu mutex to protect concurrent accesses.
This is needed since we'll be able to fetch args from an user memory
which can be swapped out. Before that uprobes could fetch args from
registers only which saved in a kernel space.
While at it, use __get_data_size() and store_trace_args() to reduce
code duplication. And add struct uprobe_cpu_buffer and its helpers as
suggested by Oleg.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Currently uprobes don't pass is_return to the argument parser so that
it cannot make use of "$retval" fetch method since it only works for
return probes.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Use separate method to fetch from memory. Move existing functions to
trace_kprobe.c and make them static. Also add new memory fetch
implementation for uprobes.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Move existing functions to trace_kprobe.c and add NULL entries to the
uprobes fetch type table. I don't make them static since some generic
routines like update/free_XXX_fetch_param() require pointers to the
functions.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Use separate method to fetch from stack. Move existing functions to
trace_kprobe.c and make them static. Also add new stack fetch
implementation for uprobes.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Use separate fetch_type_table for kprobes and uprobes. It currently
shares all fetch methods but some of them will be implemented
differently later.
This is not to break build if [ku]probes is configured alone (like
!CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT and CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENT). So I added '__weak'
to the table declaration so that it can be safely omitted when it
configured out.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
The set_print_fmt() functions are implemented almost same for
[ku]probes. Move it to a common place and get rid of the duplication.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Convert struct trace_uprobe to make use of the common trace_probe
structure.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
The uprobe syntax requires an offset after a file path not a symbol.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
The trace event filters are still tied to event calls rather than
event files, which means you don't get what you'd expect when using
filters in the multibuffer case:
Before:
# echo 'bytes_alloc > 8192' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
bytes_alloc > 8192
# mkdir /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/test1
# echo 'bytes_alloc > 2048' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/test1/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
bytes_alloc > 2048
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/test1/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
bytes_alloc > 2048
Setting the filter in tracing/instances/test1/events shouldn't affect
the same event in tracing/events as it does above.
After:
# echo 'bytes_alloc > 8192' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
bytes_alloc > 8192
# mkdir /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/test1
# echo 'bytes_alloc > 2048' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/test1/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
bytes_alloc > 8192
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/test1/events/kmem/kmalloc/filter
bytes_alloc > 2048
We'd like to just move the filter directly from ftrace_event_call to
ftrace_event_file, but there are a couple cases that don't yet have
multibuffer support and therefore have to continue using the current
event_call-based filters. For those cases, a new USE_CALL_FILTER bit
is added to the event_call flags, whose main purpose is to keep the
old behavior for those cases until they can be updated with
multibuffer support; at that point, the USE_CALL_FILTER flag (and the
new associated call_filter_check_discard() function) can go away.
The multibuffer support also made filter_current_check_discard()
redundant, so this change removes that function as well and replaces
it with filter_check_discard() (or call_filter_check_discard() as
appropriate).
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f16e9ce4270c62f46b2e966119225e1c3cca7e60.1382620672.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Uprobes suffer the same problem that kprobes have. There's a race between
writing to the "enable" file and removing the probe. The probe checks for
it being in use and if it is not, goes about deleting the probe and the
event that represents it. But the problem with that is, after it checks
if it is in use it can be enabled, and the deletion of the event (access
to the probe) will fail, as it is in use. But the uprobe will still be
deleted. This is a problem as the event can reference the uprobe that
was deleted.
The fix is to remove the event first, and check to make sure the event
removal succeeds. Then it is safe to remove the probe.
When the event exists, either ftrace or perf can enable the probe and
prevent the event from being removed.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130704034038.991525256@goodmis.org
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Every perf_trace_buf_prepare() caller does
WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, message) and "message" is
almost the same.
Shift this WARN_ONCE() into perf_trace_buf_prepare(). This changes
the meaning of _ONCE, but I think this is fine.
- 4947014 2932448 10104832 17984294 1126b26 vmlinux
+ 4948422 2932448 10104832 17985702 11270a6 vmlinux
on my build.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130617170211.GA19813@redhat.com
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
perf_trace_buf_prepare() + perf_trace_buf_submit() make no sense
if this task/CPU has no active counters. Change uprobe_perf_print()
to return if hlist_empty(call->perf_events).
Note: this is not uprobe-specific, we can change other users too.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
uprobe_perf_print() passes addr=ip to perf_trace_buf_submit() for
no reason. This sets perf_sample_data->addr for PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR,
we already have perf_sample_data->ip initialized if PERF_SAMPLE_IP.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Finally change create_trace_uprobe() to check if argv[0][0] == 'r'
and pass the correct "is_ret" to alloc_trace_uprobe().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Change probes_seq_show() and print_uprobe_event() to check
is_ret_probe() and print the correct data.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Change uprobe_event_define_fields(), and __set_print_fmt() to check
is_ret_probe() and use the appropriate format/fields.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Change uprobe_trace_print() and uprobe_perf_print() to check
is_ret_probe() and fill ring_buffer_event accordingly.
Also change uprobe_trace_func() and uprobe_perf_func() to not
_print() if is_ret_probe() is true. Note that we keep ->handler()
nontrivial even for uretprobe, we need this for filtering and for
other potential extensions.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Create the new functions we need to support uretprobes, and change
alloc_trace_uprobe() to initialize consumer.ret_handler if the new
"is_ret" argument is true. Curently this argument is always false,
so the new code is never called and is_ret_probe(tu) is false too.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Extract the output code from uprobe_trace_func() and uprobe_perf_func()
into the new helpers, they will be used by ->ret_handler() too. We also
add the unused "unsigned long func" argument in advance, to simplify the
next changes.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
struct uprobe_trace_entry_head has a single member for reporting,
"unsigned long ip". If we want to support uretprobes we need to
create another struct which has "func" and "ret_ip" and duplicate
a lot of functions, like trace_kprobe.c does.
To avoid this copy-and-paste horror we turn ->ip into ->vaddr[]
and add couple of trivial helpers to calculate sizeof/data. This
uglifies the code a bit, but this allows us to avoid a lot more
complications later, when we add the support for ret-probes.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
uprobe_trace_func() is never called with irqs or preemption
disabled, no need to ask preempt_count() or local_save_flags().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
seq_print_ip_sym(ip) in print_uprobe_event() is pointless,
kallsyms_lookup(ip) can not resolve a user-space address.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
uprobe_trace_func() and uprobe_perf_func() do not need task_pt_regs(),
we already have "struct pt_regs *regs".
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
uprobe_perf_open/close call the costly uprobe_apply() every time,
we can avoid it if:
- "nr_systemwide != 0" is not changed.
- There is another process/thread with the same ->mm.
- copy_proccess() does inherit_event(). dup_mmap() preserves the
inserted breakpoints.
- event->attr.enable_on_exec == T, we can rely on uprobe_mmap()
called by exec/mmap paths.
- tp_target is exiting. Only _close() checks PF_EXITING, I don't
think TRACE_REG_PERF_OPEN can hit the dying task too often.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Change uprobe_trace_func() and uprobe_perf_func() to return "int". Change
uprobe_dispatcher() to return "trace_ret | perf_ret" although this is not
needed, currently TP_FLAG_TRACE/TP_FLAG_PROFILE are mutually exclusive.
The only functional change is that uprobe_perf_func() checks the filtering
too and returns UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE if nobody wants to trace current.
Testing:
# perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 syscall
# perf record -e probe_libc:syscall -i perl -e 'fork; syscall -1 for 1..10; wait'
# perf report --show-total-period
100.00% 10 perl libc-2.8.so [.] syscall
Before this patch:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
/lib/libc.so.6 syscall 20
A child process doesn't have a counter, but still it hits this breakoint
"copied" by dup_mmap().
After the patch:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
/lib/libc.so.6 syscall 11
The child process hits this int3 only once and does unapply_uprobe().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Finally implement uprobe_perf_filter() which checks ->nr_systemwide or
->perf_events to figure out whether we need to insert the breakpoint.
uprobe_perf_open/close are changed to do uprobe_apply(true/false) when
the new perf event comes or goes away.
Note that currently this is very suboptimal:
- uprobe_register() called by TRACE_REG_PERF_REGISTER becomes a
heavy nop, consumer->filter() always returns F at this stage.
As it was already discussed we need uprobe_register_only() to
avoid the costly register_for_each_vma() when possible.
- uprobe_apply() is oftenly overkill. Unless "nr_systemwide != 0"
changes we need uprobe_apply_mm(), unapply_uprobe() is almost
what we need.
- uprobe_apply() can be simply avoided sometimes, see the next
changes.
Testing:
# perf probe -x /lib/libc.so.6 syscall
# perl -e 'syscall -1 while 1' &
[1] 530
# perf record -e probe_libc:syscall perl -e 'syscall -1 for 1..10; sleep 1'
# perf report --show-total-period
100.00% 10 perl libc-2.8.so [.] syscall
Before this patch:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
/lib/libc.so.6 syscall 79291
A huge ->nrhit == 79291 reflects the fact that the background process
530 constantly hits this breakpoint too, even if doesn't contribute to
the output.
After the patch:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_profile
/lib/libc.so.6 syscall 10
This shows that only the target process was punished by int3.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Introduce "struct trace_uprobe_filter" which records the "active"
perf_event's attached to ftrace_event_call. For the start we simply
use list_head, we can optimize this later if needed. For example, we
do not really need to record an event with ->parent != NULL, we can
rely on parent->child_list. And we can certainly do some optimizations
for the case when 2 events have the same ->tp_target or tp_target->mm.
Change trace_uprobe_register() to process TRACE_REG_PERF_OPEN/CLOSE
and add/del this perf_event to the list.
We can probably avoid any locking, but lets start with the "obvioulsy
correct" trace_uprobe_filter->rwlock which protects everything.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Move tu->nhit++ from uprobe_trace_func() to uprobe_dispatcher().
->nhit counts how many time we hit the breakpoint inserted by this
uprobe, we do not want to loose this info if uprobe was enabled by
sys_perf_event_open().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
trace_uprobe->consumer and "struct uprobe_trace_consumer" add the
unnecessary indirection and complicate the code for no reason.
This patch simply embeds uprobe_consumer into "struct trace_uprobe",
all other changes only fix the compilation errors.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
probe_event_enable/disable() check tu->consumer != NULL to avoid the
wrong uprobe_register/unregister().
We are going to kill this pointer and "struct uprobe_trace_consumer",
so we add the new helper, is_trace_uprobe_enabled(), which can rely
on TP_FLAG_TRACE/TP_FLAG_PROFILE instead.
Note: the current logic doesn't look optimal, it is not clear why
TP_FLAG_TRACE/TP_FLAG_PROFILE are mutually exclusive, we will probably
change this later.
Also kill the unused TP_FLAG_UPROBE.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
probe_event_enable/disable() check tu->inode != NULL at the start.
This is ugly, if igrab() can fail create_trace_uprobe() should not
succeed and "postpone" the failure.
And S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) check added by d24d7dbf is not safe.
Note: alloc_uprobe() should probably check igrab() != NULL as well.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Oleg Nesterov