With help of neovim, LSP and clangd we can identify header files that
are not actually needed to be included in the .c files. This is focused
only on removal (with minor fixups), further cleanups are possible but
will require doing the header files properly with forward declarations,
minimized includes and include-what-you-use care.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
After the conversion to folio interfaces (but without the patch to
enable larger folio allocation), there is an LTP report about observable
performance drop on metadata heavy operations.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/202312221750.571925bd-oliver.sang@intel.com/
This drop is caused by the extra code of calculating the
folio_size()/folio_shift(), instead of the old hard coded
PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SHIFT.
To slightly reduce the overhead, just cache both folio_size and
folio_shift in extent_buffer.
The two new members (u32 folio_size and u8 folio_shift) are stored
inside the holes of extent_buffer. folio_size is shared with len, which
is reduced to u32. The size of eb does not change.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
These two functions are still using the old page based code, which is
not going to handle larger folios at all.
The migration itself is going to involve the following changes:
- PAGE_SIZE -> folio_size()
- PAGE_SHIFT -> folio_shift()
- get_eb_page_index() -> get_eb_folio_index()
- get_eb_offset_in_page() -> get_eb_offset_in_folio()
And since we're going to support larger folios, although above straight
conversion is good enough, this patch would add extra comments in the
involved functions to explain why the same single line code can now
cover 3 cases:
- folio_size == PAGE_SIZE, sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE, nodesize >= PAGE_SIZE
The common, non-subpage case with per-page folio.
- folio_size > PAGE_SIZE, sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE, nodesize >= PAGE_SIZE
The incoming larger folio, non-subpage case.
- folio_size == PAGE_SIZE, sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE, nodesize < PAGE_SIZE
The existing subpage case, we won't larger folio anyway.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For now extent_buffer::pages[] are still only accepting single page
pointer, thus we can migrate to folios pretty easily.
As for single page, page and folio are 1:1 mapped, including their page
flags.
This patch would just do the conversion from struct page to struct
folio, providing the first step to higher order folio in the future.
This conversion is pretty simple:
- extent_buffer::pages[] -> extent_buffer::folios[]
- page_address(eb->pages[i]) -> folio_address(eb->pages[i])
- eb->pages[i] -> folio_page(eb->folios[i], 0)
There would be more specific cleanups preparing for the incoming higher
order folio support.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is a change needed for extent tree v2, as we will be growing the
header size. This exists in btrfs-progs currently, and not having it
makes syncing accessors.[ch] more problematic. So make this change to
set us up for extent tree v2 and match what btrfs-progs does to make
syncing easier.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is specific to the item-accessor code, move it out of ctree.h into
accessor.h/.c and then update the users to include the new header file.
This un-inlines btrfs_init_map_token, however this is only called once
per function so it's not critical to be inlined. This also saves 904
bytes of code on a release build.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Rename struct-funcs.c to accessors.c so we can move the item accessors
out of ctree.h. accessors.c is a better description of the code that is
contained in these files.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
