Kuee reported a corner case where the tnum becomes constant after the call
to __reg_bound_offset(), but the register's bounds are not, that is, its
min bounds are still not equal to the register's max bounds.
This in turn allows to leak pointers through turning a pointer register as
is into an unknown scalar via adjust_ptr_min_max_vals().
Before:
func#0 @0
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
0: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0))
1: (b7) r3 = 0 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
2: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar()
3: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar()
4: (47) r3 |= 32767 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=-9223372036854743041,umin=32767,var_off=(0x7fff; 0xffffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881)
5: (75) if r3 s>= 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R3_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854808575,var_off=(0x8000000000007fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767)
6: (95) exit
from 5 to 7: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
7: (d5) if r3 s<= 0x8000 goto pc+1 ; R3=scalar(umin=32769,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767)
8: (95) exit
from 7 to 9: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
9: (07) r3 += -32767 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) <--- [*]
10: (95) exit
What can be seen here is that R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff;
0x8000)) after the operation R3 += -32767 results in a 'malformed' constant, that
is, R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)). Intersecting with var_off has
not been done at that point via __update_reg_bounds(), which would have improved
the umax to be equal to umin.
Refactor the tnum <> min/max bounds information flow into a reg_bounds_sync()
helper and use it consistently everywhere. After the fix, bounds have been
corrected to R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) and thus the register
is regarded as a 'proper' constant scalar of 0.
After:
func#0 @0
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
0: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0))
1: (b7) r3 = 0 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
2: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar()
3: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar()
4: (47) r3 |= 32767 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=-9223372036854743041,umin=32767,var_off=(0x7fff; 0xffffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881)
5: (75) if r3 s>= 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R3_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854808575,var_off=(0x8000000000007fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767)
6: (95) exit
from 5 to 7: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
7: (d5) if r3 s<= 0x8000 goto pc+1 ; R3=scalar(umin=32769,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767)
8: (95) exit
from 7 to 9: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
9: (07) r3 += -32767 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) <--- [*]
10: (95) exit
Fixes: b03c9f9fdc ("bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values")
Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220701124727.11153-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
Kuee reported a quirk in the jmp32's jeq/jne simulation, namely that the
register value does not match expectations for the fall-through path. For
example:
Before fix:
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (b7) r2 = 0 ; R2_w=P0
1: (b7) r6 = 563 ; R6_w=P563
2: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar()
3: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar()
4: (4c) w2 |= w6 ; R2_w=Pscalar(umin=563,umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x233; 0xfffffdcc),s32_min=-2147483085) R6_w=P563
5: (56) if w2 != 0x8 goto pc+1 ; R2_w=P571 <--- [*]
6: (95) exit
R0 !read_ok
After fix:
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (b7) r2 = 0 ; R2_w=P0
1: (b7) r6 = 563 ; R6_w=P563
2: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar()
3: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar()
4: (4c) w2 |= w6 ; R2_w=Pscalar(umin=563,umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x233; 0xfffffdcc),s32_min=-2147483085) R6_w=P563
5: (56) if w2 != 0x8 goto pc+1 ; R2_w=P8 <--- [*]
6: (95) exit
R0 !read_ok
As can be seen on line 5 for the branch fall-through path in R2 [*] is that
given condition w2 != 0x8 is false, verifier should conclude that r2 = 8 as
upper 32 bit are known to be zero. However, verifier incorrectly concludes
that r2 = 571 which is far off.
The problem is it only marks false{true}_reg as known in the switch for JE/NE
case, but at the end of the function, it uses {false,true}_{64,32}off to
update {false,true}_reg->var_off and they still hold the prior value of
{false,true}_reg->var_off before it got marked as known. The subsequent
__reg_combine_32_into_64() then propagates this old var_off and derives new
bounds. The information between min/max bounds on {false,true}_reg from
setting the register to known const combined with the {false,true}_reg->var_off
based on the old information then derives wrong register data.
Fix it by detangling the BPF_JEQ/BPF_JNE cases and updating relevant
{false,true}_{64,32}off tnums along with the register marking to known
constant.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220701124727.11153-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
This patch adds a new helper function
void *bpf_dynptr_data(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len);
which returns a pointer to the underlying data of a dynptr. *len*
must be a statically known value. The bpf program may access the returned
data slice as a normal buffer (eg can do direct reads and writes), since
the verifier associates the length with the returned pointer, and
enforces that no out of bounds accesses occur.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-6-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Currently, our only way of writing dynamically-sized data into a ring
buffer is through bpf_ringbuf_output but this incurs an extra memcpy
cost. bpf_ringbuf_reserve + bpf_ringbuf_commit avoids this extra
memcpy, but it can only safely support reservation sizes that are
statically known since the verifier cannot guarantee that the bpf
program won’t access memory outside the reserved space.
The bpf_dynptr abstraction allows for dynamically-sized ring buffer
reservations without the extra memcpy.
There are 3 new APIs:
long bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr(void *ringbuf, u32 size, u64 flags, struct bpf_dynptr *ptr);
void bpf_ringbuf_submit_dynptr(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u64 flags);
void bpf_ringbuf_discard_dynptr(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u64 flags);
These closely follow the functionalities of the original ringbuf APIs.
For example, all ringbuffer dynptrs that have been reserved must be
either submitted or discarded before the program exits.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-4-joannelkoong@gmail.com
This patch adds a new api bpf_dynptr_from_mem:
long bpf_dynptr_from_mem(void *data, u32 size, u64 flags, struct bpf_dynptr *ptr);
which initializes a dynptr to point to a bpf program's local memory. For now
only local memory that is of reg type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE is supported.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com
This patch adds the bulk of the verifier work for supporting dynamic
pointers (dynptrs) in bpf.
A bpf_dynptr is opaque to the bpf program. It is a 16-byte structure
defined internally as:
struct bpf_dynptr_kern {
void *data;
u32 size;
u32 offset;
} __aligned(8);
The upper 8 bits of *size* is reserved (it contains extra metadata about
read-only status and dynptr type). Consequently, a dynptr only supports
memory less than 16 MB.
There are different types of dynptrs (eg malloc, ringbuf, ...). In this
patchset, the most basic one, dynptrs to a bpf program's local memory,
is added. For now only local memory that is of reg type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE
is supported.
In the verifier, dynptr state information will be tracked in stack
slots. When the program passes in an uninitialized dynptr
(ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_UNINIT), the stack slots corresponding
to the frame pointer where the dynptr resides at are marked
STACK_DYNPTR. For helper functions that take in initialized dynptrs (eg
bpf_dynptr_read + bpf_dynptr_write which are added later in this
patchset), the verifier enforces that the dynptr has been initialized
properly by checking that their corresponding stack slots have been
marked as STACK_DYNPTR.
The 6th patch in this patchset adds test cases that the verifier should
successfully reject, such as for example attempting to use a dynptr
after doing a direct write into it inside the bpf program.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Kernel Test Robot complains about passing zero to PTR_ERR for the said
line, suppress it by using PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO.
Fixes: c0a5a21c25 ("bpf: Allow storing referenced kptr in map")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220521132620.1976921-1-memxor@gmail.com
This patch implements a new struct bpf_func_proto, named
bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock_proto. Define a new bpf_id BTF_SOCK_TYPE_MPTCP,
and a new helper bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock(), which invokes another new
helper bpf_mptcp_sock_from_subflow() in net/mptcp/bpf.c to get struct
mptcp_sock from a given subflow socket.
v2: Emit BTF type, add func_id checks in verifier.c and bpf_trace.c,
remove build check for CONFIG_BPF_JIT
v5: Drop EXPORT_SYMBOL (Martin)
Co-developed-by: Nicolas Rybowski <nicolas.rybowski@tessares.net>
Co-developed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rybowski <nicolas.rybowski@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220519233016.105670-2-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com
Instead of having uninitialized versions of arguments as separate
bpf_arg_types (eg ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM as the uninitialized version
of ARG_PTR_TO_MEM), we can instead use MEM_UNINIT as a bpf_type_flag
modifier to denote that the argument is uninitialized.
Doing so cleans up some of the logic in the verifier. We no longer
need to do two checks against an argument type (eg "if
(base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM || base_type(arg_type) ==
ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)"), since uninitialized and initialized
versions of the same argument type will now share the same base type.
In the near future, MEM_UNINIT will be used by dynptr helper functions
as well.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220509224257.3222614-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add new ebpf helpers bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem.
The implementation method is relatively simple, refer to the implementation
method of map_lookup_elem of percpu map, increase the parameters of cpu, and
obtain it according to the specified cpu.
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511093854.411-2-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The func_id parameter in find_kfunc_desc_btf() is not used, get rid of it.
Fixes: 2357672c54 ("bpf: Introduce BPF support for kernel module function calls")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220505070114.3522522-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
The current of behavior of btf_struct_ids_match for release arguments is
that when type match fails, it retries with first member type again
(recursively). Since the offset is already 0, this is akin to just
casting the pointer in normal C, since if type matches it was just
embedded inside parent sturct as an object. However, we want to reject
cases for release function type matching, be it kfunc or BPF helpers.
An example is the following:
struct foo {
struct bar b;
};
struct foo *v = acq_foo();
rel_bar(&v->b); // btf_struct_ids_match fails btf_types_are_same, then
// retries with first member type and succeeds, while
// it should fail.
Hence, don't walk the struct and only rely on btf_types_are_same for
strict mode. All users of strict mode must be dealing with zero offset
anyway, since otherwise they would want the struct to be walked.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-10-memxor@gmail.com
While we can guarantee that even for unreferenced kptr, the object
pointer points to being freed etc. can be handled by the verifier's
exception handling (normal load patching to PROBE_MEM loads), we still
cannot allow the user to pass these pointers to BPF helpers and kfunc,
because the same exception handling won't be done for accesses inside
the kernel. The same is true if a referenced pointer is loaded using
normal load instruction. Since the reference is not guaranteed to be
held while the pointer is used, it must be marked as untrusted.
Hence introduce a new type flag, PTR_UNTRUSTED, which is used to mark
all registers loading unreferenced and referenced kptr from BPF maps,
and ensure they can never escape the BPF program and into the kernel by
way of calling stable/unstable helpers.
In check_ptr_to_btf_access, the !type_may_be_null check to reject type
flags is still correct, as apart from PTR_MAYBE_NULL, only MEM_USER,
MEM_PERCPU, and PTR_UNTRUSTED may be set for PTR_TO_BTF_ID. The first
two are checked inside the function and rejected using a proper error
message, but we still want to allow dereference of untrusted case.
Also, we make sure to inherit PTR_UNTRUSTED when chain of pointers are
walked, so that this flag is never dropped once it has been set on a
PTR_TO_BTF_ID (i.e. trusted to untrusted transition can only be in one
direction).
In convert_ctx_accesses, extend the switch case to consider untrusted
PTR_TO_BTF_ID in addition to normal PTR_TO_BTF_ID for PROBE_MEM
conversion for BPF_LDX.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-5-memxor@gmail.com
Extending the code in previous commits, introduce referenced kptr
support, which needs to be tagged using 'kptr_ref' tag instead. Unlike
unreferenced kptr, referenced kptr have a lot more restrictions. In
addition to the type matching, only a newly introduced bpf_kptr_xchg
helper is allowed to modify the map value at that offset. This transfers
the referenced pointer being stored into the map, releasing the
references state for the program, and returning the old value and
creating new reference state for the returned pointer.
Similar to unreferenced pointer case, return value for this case will
also be PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL. The reference for the returned pointer
must either be eventually released by calling the corresponding release
function, otherwise it must be transferred into another map.
It is also allowed to call bpf_kptr_xchg with a NULL pointer, to clear
the value, and obtain the old value if any.
BPF_LDX, BPF_STX, and BPF_ST cannot access referenced kptr. A future
commit will permit using BPF_LDX for such pointers, but attempt at
making it safe, since the lifetime of object won't be guaranteed.
There are valid reasons to enforce the restriction of permitting only
bpf_kptr_xchg to operate on referenced kptr. The pointer value must be
consistent in face of concurrent modification, and any prior values
contained in the map must also be released before a new one is moved
into the map. To ensure proper transfer of this ownership, bpf_kptr_xchg
returns the old value, which the verifier would require the user to
either free or move into another map, and releases the reference held
for the pointer being moved in.
In the future, direct BPF_XCHG instruction may also be permitted to work
like bpf_kptr_xchg helper.
Note that process_kptr_func doesn't have to call
check_helper_mem_access, since we already disallow rdonly/wronly flags
for map, which is what check_map_access_type checks, and we already
ensure the PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE refers to kptr by obtaining its off_desc,
so check_map_access is also not required.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-4-memxor@gmail.com
Add a new type flag for bpf_arg_type that when set tells verifier that
for a release function, that argument's register will be the one for
which meta.ref_obj_id will be set, and which will then be released
using release_reference. To capture the regno, introduce a new field
release_regno in bpf_call_arg_meta.
This would be required in the next patch, where we may either pass NULL
or a refcounted pointer as an argument to the release function
bpf_kptr_xchg. Just releasing only when meta.ref_obj_id is set is not
enough, as there is a case where the type of argument needed matches,
but the ref_obj_id is set to 0. Hence, we must enforce that whenever
meta.ref_obj_id is zero, the register that is to be released can only
be NULL for a release function.
Since we now indicate whether an argument is to be released in
bpf_func_proto itself, is_release_function helper has lost its utitlity,
hence refactor code to work without it, and just rely on
meta.release_regno to know when to release state for a ref_obj_id.
Still, the restriction of one release argument and only one ref_obj_id
passed to BPF helper or kfunc remains. This may be lifted in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-3-memxor@gmail.com
This commit introduces a new pointer type 'kptr' which can be embedded
in a map value to hold a PTR_TO_BTF_ID stored by a BPF program during
its invocation. When storing such a kptr, BPF program's PTR_TO_BTF_ID
register must have the same type as in the map value's BTF, and loading
a kptr marks the destination register as PTR_TO_BTF_ID with the correct
kernel BTF and BTF ID.
Such kptr are unreferenced, i.e. by the time another invocation of the
BPF program loads this pointer, the object which the pointer points to
may not longer exist. Since PTR_TO_BTF_ID loads (using BPF_LDX) are
patched to PROBE_MEM loads by the verifier, it would safe to allow user
to still access such invalid pointer, but passing such pointers into
BPF helpers and kfuncs should not be permitted. A future patch in this
series will close this gap.
The flexibility offered by allowing programs to dereference such invalid
pointers while being safe at runtime frees the verifier from doing
complex lifetime tracking. As long as the user may ensure that the
object remains valid, it can ensure data read by it from the kernel
object is valid.
The user indicates that a certain pointer must be treated as kptr
capable of accepting stores of PTR_TO_BTF_ID of a certain type, by using
a BTF type tag 'kptr' on the pointed to type of the pointer. Then, this
information is recorded in the object BTF which will be passed into the
kernel by way of map's BTF information. The name and kind from the map
value BTF is used to look up the in-kernel type, and the actual BTF and
BTF ID is recorded in the map struct in a new kptr_off_tab member. For
now, only storing pointers to structs is permitted.
An example of this specification is shown below:
#define __kptr __attribute__((btf_type_tag("kptr")))
struct map_value {
...
struct task_struct __kptr *task;
...
};
Then, in a BPF program, user may store PTR_TO_BTF_ID with the type
task_struct into the map, and then load it later.
Note that the destination register is marked PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL, as
the verifier cannot know whether the value is NULL or not statically, it
must treat all potential loads at that map value offset as loading a
possibly NULL pointer.
Only BPF_LDX, BPF_STX, and BPF_ST (with insn->imm = 0 to denote NULL)
are allowed instructions that can access such a pointer. On BPF_LDX, the
destination register is updated to be a PTR_TO_BTF_ID, and on BPF_STX,
it is checked whether the source register type is a PTR_TO_BTF_ID with
same BTF type as specified in the map BTF. The access size must always
be BPF_DW.
For the map in map support, the kptr_off_tab for outer map is copied
from the inner map's kptr_off_tab. It was chosen to do a deep copy
instead of introducing a refcount to kptr_off_tab, because the copy only
needs to be done when paramterizing using inner_map_fd in the map in map
case, hence would be unnecessary for all other users.
It is not permitted to use MAP_FREEZE command and mmap for BPF map
having kptrs, similar to the bpf_timer case. A kptr also requires that
BPF program has both read and write access to the map (hence both
BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG and BPF_F_WRONLY_PROG are disallowed).
Note that check_map_access must be called from both
check_helper_mem_access and for the BPF instructions, hence the kptr
check must distinguish between ACCESS_DIRECT and ACCESS_HELPER, and
reject ACCESS_HELPER cases. We rename stack_access_src to bpf_access_src
and reuse it for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-2-memxor@gmail.com
Some functions in next patch want to use this function, and those
functions will be called by check_map_access, hence move it before
check_map_access.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220415160354.1050687-3-memxor@gmail.com
It is not permitted to write to PTR_TO_MAP_KEY, but the current code in
check_helper_mem_access would allow for it, reject this case as well, as
helpers taking ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM also take PTR_TO_MAP_KEY.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The commit being fixed was aiming to disallow users from incorrectly
obtaining writable pointer to memory that is only meant to be read. This
is enforced now using a MEM_RDONLY flag.
For instance, in case of global percpu variables, when the BTF type is
not struct (e.g. bpf_prog_active), the verifier marks register type as
PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY from bpf_this_cpu_ptr or bpf_per_cpu_ptr
helpers. However, when passing such pointer to kfunc, global funcs, or
BPF helpers, in check_helper_mem_access, there is no expectation
MEM_RDONLY flag will be set, hence it is checked as pointer to writable
memory. Later, verifier sets up argument type of global func as
PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL, so user can use a global func to get around
the limitations imposed by this flag.
This check will also cover global non-percpu variables that may be
introduced in kernel BTF in future.
Also, we update the log message for PTR_TO_BUF case to be similar to
PTR_TO_MEM case, so that the reason for error is clear to user.
Fixes: 34d3a78c68 ("bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.")
Reviewed-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When passing pointer to some map value to kfunc or global func, in
verifier we are passing meta as NULL to various functions, which uses
meta->raw_mode to check whether memory is being written to. Since some
kfunc or global funcs may also write to memory pointers they receive as
arguments, we must check for write access to memory. E.g. in some case
map may be read only and this will be missed by current checks.
However meta->raw_mode allows for uninitialized memory (e.g. on stack),
since there is not enough info available through BTF, we must perform
one call for read access (raw_mode = false), and one for write access
(raw_mode = true).
Fixes: e5069b9c23 ("bpf: Support pointers in global func args")
Fixes: d583691c47 ("bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This reverts commit 97ee4d20ee.
Following change is adding more complexity to bpf_get_func_ip
helper for kprobe_multi programs, which can't be inlined easily.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321070113.1449167-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Currently, local storage memory can only be allocated atomically
(GFP_ATOMIC). This restriction is too strict for sleepable bpf
programs.
In this patch, the verifier detects whether the program is sleepable,
and passes the corresponding GFP_KERNEL or GFP_ATOMIC flag as a
5th argument to bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_get. This flag will propagate
down to the local storage functions that allocate memory.
Please note that bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem functions are
invoked by userspace applications through syscalls. Preemption is
disabled before bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem is called, which
means they will always have to allocate memory atomically.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220318045553.3091807-2-joannekoong@fb.com
It is the bpf_jit_harden counterpart to commit 60b58afc96 ("bpf: fix
net.core.bpf_jit_enable race"). bpf_jit_harden will be tested twice
for each subprog if there are subprogs in bpf program and constant
blinding may increase the length of program, so when running
"./test_progs -t subprogs" and toggling bpf_jit_harden between 0 and 2,
jit_subprogs may fail because constant blinding increases the length
of subprog instructions during extra passs.
So cache the value of bpf_jit_blinding_enabled() during program
allocation, and use the cached value during constant blinding, subprog
JITing and args tracking of tail call.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220309123321.2400262-4-houtao1@huawei.com
Use offsetofend() instead of offsetof() + sizeof() to simplify
MIN_BPF_LINEINFO_SIZE macro definition.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220310161518.534544-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Instead of determining buf_info string in the caller of check_buffer_access(),
we can determine whether the register type is read-only through
type_is_rdonly_mem() helper inside check_buffer_access() and construct
buf_info, making the code slightly cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YiWYLnAkEZXBP/gH@syu-laptop
With the introduction of the btf_type_tag "percpu", we can add a
MEM_PERCPU to identify those pointers that point to percpu memory.
The ability of differetiating percpu pointers from regular memory
pointers have two benefits:
1. It forbids unexpected use of percpu pointers, such as direct loads.
In kernel, there are special functions used for accessing percpu
memory. Directly loading percpu memory is meaningless. We already
have BPF helpers like bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() that
wrap the kernel percpu functions. So we can now convert percpu
pointers into regular pointers in a safe way.
2. Previously, bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() only work on
PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID, a special reg_type which describes static
percpu variables in kernel (we rely on pahole to encode them into
vmlinux BTF). Now, since we can identify __percpu tagged pointers,
we can also identify dynamically allocated percpu memory as well.
It means we can use bpf_xxx_cpu_ptr() on dynamic percpu memory.
This would be very convenient when accessing fields like
"cgroup->rstat_cpu".
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-4-haoluo@google.com
With the introduction of MEM_USER in
commit c6f1bfe89a ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way")
PTR_TO_BTF_ID can be combined with a MEM_USER tag. Therefore, most
likely, when we compare reg_type against PTR_TO_BTF_ID, we want to use
the reg's base_type. Previously the check in check_mem_access() wants
to say: if the reg is BTF_ID but not NULL, the execution flow falls
into the 'then' branch. But now a reg of (BTF_ID | MEM_USER), which
should go into the 'then' branch, goes into the 'else'.
The end results before and after this patch are the same: regs tagged
with MEM_USER get rejected, but not in a way we intended. So fix the
condition, the error message now is correct.
Before (log from commit 696c390115):
$ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3
...
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_'
Now:
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 104036 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,ref_obj_id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access user memory: off=0
Note the error message for the reason of rejection.
Fixes: c6f1bfe89a ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-2-haoluo@google.com
Let's ensure that the PTR_TO_BTF_ID reg being passed in to release BPF
helpers and kfuncs always has its offset set to 0. While not a real
problem now, there's a very real possibility this will become a problem
when more and more kfuncs are exposed, and more BPF helpers are added
which can release PTR_TO_BTF_ID.
Previous commits already protected against non-zero var_off. One of the
case we are concerned about now is when we have a type that can be
returned by e.g. an acquire kfunc:
struct foo {
int a;
int b;
struct bar b;
};
... and struct bar is also a type that can be returned by another
acquire kfunc.
Then, doing the following sequence:
struct foo *f = bpf_get_foo(); // acquire kfunc
if (!f)
return 0;
bpf_put_bar(&f->b); // release kfunc
... would work with the current code, since the btf_struct_ids_match
takes reg->off into account for matching pointer type with release kfunc
argument type, but would obviously be incorrect, and most likely lead to
a kernel crash. A test has been included later to prevent regressions in
this area.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-5-memxor@gmail.com
check_ptr_off_reg only allows fixed offset to be set for PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
where reg->off < 0 doesn't make sense. This would shift the pointer
backwards, and fails later in btf_struct_ids_match or btf_struct_walk
due to out of bounds access (since offset is interpreted as unsigned).
Improve the verifier by rejecting this case by using a better error
message for BPF helpers and kfunc, by putting a check inside the
check_func_arg_reg_off function.
Also, update existing verifier selftests to work with new error string.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-4-memxor@gmail.com
Lift the list of register types allowed for having fixed and variable
offsets when passed as helper function arguments into a common helper,
so that they can be reused for kfunc checks in later commits. Keeping a
common helper aids maintainability and allows us to follow the same
consistent rules across helpers and kfuncs. Also, convert check_func_arg
to use this function.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-2-memxor@gmail.com
In particular these include:
1) Remove output of inv for scalars in print_verifier_state
2) Replace inv with scalar in verifier error messages
3) Remove _value suffixes for umin/umax/s32_min/etc (except map_value)
4) Remove output of id=0
5) Remove output of ref_obj_id=0
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220301222745.1667206-1-mykolal@fb.com
Now kfunc call uses s32 to represent the offset between the address of
kfunc and __bpf_call_base, but it doesn't check whether or not s32 will
be overflowed. The overflow is possible when kfunc is in module and the
offset between module and kernel is greater than 2GB. Take arm64 as an
example, before commit b2eed9b588 ("arm64/kernel: kaslr: reduce module
randomization range to 2 GB"), the offset between module symbol and
__bpf_call_base will in 4GB range due to KASLR and may overflow s32.
So add an extra checking to reject these invalid kfunc calls.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220215065732.3179408-1-houtao1@huawei.com
Using prog->jited_len is simpler and more accurate than current
estimation (header + header->size).
Also, fix missing prog->jited_len with multi function program. This hasn't
been a real issue before this.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220204185742.271030-5-song@kernel.org
BPF verifier supports direct memory access for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING type
of bpf programs, e.g., a->b. If "a" is a pointer
pointing to kernel memory, bpf verifier will allow user to write
code in C like a->b and the verifier will translate it to a kernel
load properly. If "a" is a pointer to user memory, it is expected
that bpf developer should be bpf_probe_read_user() helper to
get the value a->b. Without utilizing BTF __user tagging information,
current verifier will assume that a->b is a kernel memory access
and this may generate incorrect result.
Now BTF contains __user information, it can check whether the
pointer points to a user memory or not. If it is, the verifier
can reject the program and force users to use bpf_probe_read_user()
helper explicitly.
In the future, we can easily extend btf_add_space for other
address space tagging, for example, rcu/percpu etc.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154606.654961-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-01-24
We've added 80 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain
a total of 128 files changed, 4990 insertions(+), 895 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add XDP multi-buffer support and implement it for the mvneta driver,
from Lorenzo Bianconi, Eelco Chaudron and Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.
2) Add unstable conntrack lookup helpers for BPF by using the BPF kfunc
infra, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
3) Extend BPF cgroup programs to export custom ret value to userspace via
two helpers bpf_get_retval() and bpf_set_retval(), from YiFei Zhu.
4) Add support for AF_UNIX iterator batching, from Kuniyuki Iwashima.
5) Complete missing UAPI BPF helper description and change bpf_doc.py script
to enforce consistent & complete helper documentation, from Usama Arif.
6) Deprecate libbpf's legacy BPF map definitions and streamline XDP APIs to
follow tc-based APIs, from Andrii Nakryiko.
7) Support BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF programs attached to sockmap, from Di Zhu.
8) Deprecate libbpf's bpf_map__def() API and replace users with proper getters
and setters, from Christy Lee.
9) Extend libbpf's btf__add_btf() with an additional hashmap for strings to
reduce overhead, from Kui-Feng Lee.
10) Fix bpftool and libbpf error handling related to libbpf's hashmap__new()
utility function, from Mauricio Vásquez.
11) Add support to BTF program names in bpftool's program dump, from Raman Shukhau.
12) Fix resolve_btfids build to pick up host flags, from Connor O'Brien.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (80 commits)
selftests, bpf: Do not yet switch to new libbpf XDP APIs
selftests, xsk: Fix rx_full stats test
bpf: Fix flexible_array.cocci warnings
xdp: disable XDP_REDIRECT for xdp frags
bpf: selftests: add CPUMAP/DEVMAP selftests for xdp frags
bpf: selftests: introduce bpf_xdp_{load,store}_bytes selftest
net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_pointer utility routine
bpf: generalise tail call map compatibility check
libbpf: Add SEC name for xdp frags programs
bpf: selftests: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include xdp frags
bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature
bpf: introduce frags support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()
bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init
bpf: add frags support to xdp copy helpers
bpf: add frags support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API
bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper
net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames if the loaded XDP program support frags
bpf: introduce BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS flag in prog_flags loading the ebpf program
net: mvneta: add frags support to XDP_TX
xdp: add frags support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124221235.18993-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument, and thus both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.
While the non-NULL memory from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() can be passed to other
helpers, the two sinks (bpf_ringbuf_submit(), bpf_ringbuf_discard()) right now
only enforce a register type of PTR_TO_MEM.
This can lead to potential type confusion since it would allow other PTR_TO_MEM
memory to be passed into the two sinks which did not come from bpf_ringbuf_reserve().
Add a new MEM_ALLOC composable type attribute for PTR_TO_MEM, and enforce that:
- bpf_ringbuf_reserve() returns NULL or PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
- bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() only take PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
but not plain PTR_TO_MEM arguments via ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
- however, other helpers might treat PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC as plain PTR_TO_MEM
to populate the memory area when they use ARG_PTR_TO_{UNINIT_,}MEM in their
func proto description
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Both bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument. They both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.
Meaning, after a NULL check in the code, the verifier will promote the register
type in the non-NULL branch to a PTR_TO_MEM and in the NULL branch to a known
zero scalar. Generally, pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_MEM is allowed, so the
latter could have an offset.
The ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM expects a PTR_TO_MEM register type. However, the non-
zero result from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() must be fed into either bpf_ringbuf_submit()
or bpf_ringbuf_discard() but with the original offset given it will then read
out the struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr mapping.
The verifier missed to enforce a zero offset, so that out of bounds access
can be triggered which could be used to escalate privileges if unprivileged
BPF was enabled (disabled by default in kernel).
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: <tr3e.wang@gmail.com> (SecCoder Security Lab)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Right now the assertion on check_ptr_off_reg() is only enforced for register
types PTR_TO_CTX (and open coded also for PTR_TO_BTF_ID), however, this is
insufficient since many other PTR_TO_* register types such as PTR_TO_FUNC do
not handle/expect register offsets when passed to helper functions.
Given this can slip-through easily when adding new types, make this an explicit
allow-list and reject all other current and future types by default if this is
encountered.
Also, extend check_ptr_off_reg() to handle PTR_TO_BTF_ID as well instead of
duplicating it. For PTR_TO_BTF_ID, reg->off is used for BTF to match expected
BTF ids if struct offset is used. This part still needs to be allowed, but the
dynamic off from the tnum must be rejected.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similar as with other pointer types where we use ldimm64, clear the register
content to zero first, and then populate the PTR_TO_FUNC type and subprogno
number. Currently this is not done, and leads to reuse of stale register
tracking data.
Given for special ldimm64 cases we always clear the register offset, make it
common for all cases, so it won't be forgotten in future.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Generalize the check_ctx_reg() helper function into a more generic named one
so that it can be reused for other register types as well to check whether
their offset is non-zero. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch adds verifier support for PTR_TO_BTF_ID return type of kfunc
to be a reference, by reusing acquire_reference_state/release_reference
support for existing in-kernel bpf helpers.
We make use of the three kfunc types:
- BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_ACQUIRE
Return true if kfunc_btf_id is an acquire kfunc. This will
acquire_reference_state for the returned PTR_TO_BTF_ID (this is the
only allow return value). Note that acquire kfunc must always return a
PTR_TO_BTF_ID{_OR_NULL}, otherwise the program is rejected.
- BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RELEASE
Return true if kfunc_btf_id is a release kfunc. This will release the
reference to the passed in PTR_TO_BTF_ID which has a reference state
(from earlier acquire kfunc).
The btf_check_func_arg_match returns the regno (of argument register,
hence > 0) if the kfunc is a release kfunc, and a proper referenced
PTR_TO_BTF_ID is being passed to it.
This is similar to how helper call check uses bpf_call_arg_meta to
store the ref_obj_id that is later used to release the reference.
Similar to in-kernel helper, we only allow passing one referenced
PTR_TO_BTF_ID as an argument. It can also be passed in to normal
kfunc, but in case of release kfunc there must always be one
PTR_TO_BTF_ID argument that is referenced.
- BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RET_NULL
For kfunc returning PTR_TO_BTF_ID, tells if it can be NULL, hence
force caller to mark the pointer not null (using check) before
accessing it. Note that taking into account the case fixed by commit
93c230e3f5 ("bpf: Enforce id generation for all may-be-null register type")
we assign a non-zero id for mark_ptr_or_null_reg logic. Later, if more
return types are supported by kfunc, which have a _OR_NULL variant, it
might be better to move this id generation under a common
reg_type_may_be_null check, similar to the case in the commit.
Referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is currently only limited to kfunc, but can be
extended in the future to other BPF helpers as well. For now, we can
rely on the btf_struct_ids_match check to ensure we get the pointer to
the expected struct type. In the future, care needs to be taken to avoid
ambiguity for reference PTR_TO_BTF_ID passed to release function, in
case multiple candidates can release same BTF ID.
e.g. there might be two release kfuncs (or kfunc and helper):
foo(struct abc *p);
bar(struct abc *p);
... such that both release a PTR_TO_BTF_ID with btf_id of struct abc. In
this case we would need to track the acquire function corresponding to
the release function to avoid type confusion, and store this information
in the register state so that an incorrect program can be rejected. This
is not a problem right now, hence it is left as an exercise for the
future patch introducing such a case in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF helpers can associate two adjacent arguments together to pass memory
of certain size, using ARG_PTR_TO_MEM and ARG_CONST_SIZE arguments.
Since we don't use bpf_func_proto for kfunc, we need to leverage BTF to
implement similar support.
The ARG_CONST_SIZE processing for helpers is refactored into a common
check_mem_size_reg helper that is shared with kfunc as well. kfunc
ptr_to_mem support follows logic similar to global functions, where
verification is done as if pointer is not null, even when it may be
null.
This leads to a simple to follow rule for writing kfunc: always check
the argument pointer for NULL, except when it is PTR_TO_CTX. Also, the
PTR_TO_CTX case is also only safe when the helper expecting pointer to
program ctx is not exposed to other programs where same struct is not
ctx type. In that case, the type check will fall through to other cases
and would permit passing other types of pointers, possibly NULL at
runtime.
Currently, we require the size argument to be suffixed with "__sz" in
the parameter name. This information is then recorded in kernel BTF and
verified during function argument checking. In the future we can use BTF
tagging instead, and modify the kernel function definitions. This will
be a purely kernel-side change.
This allows us to have some form of backwards compatibility for
structures that are passed in to the kernel function with their size,
and allow variable length structures to be passed in if they are
accompanied by a size parameter.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Completely remove the old code for check_kfunc_call to help it work
with modules, and also the callback itself.
The previous commit adds infrastructure to register all sets and put
them in vmlinux or module BTF, and concatenates all related sets
organized by the hook and the type. Once populated, these sets remain
immutable for the lifetime of the struct btf.
Also, since we don't need the 'owner' module anywhere when doing
check_kfunc_call, drop the 'btf_modp' module parameter from
find_kfunc_desc_btf.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
env->scratched_stack_slots is a 64-bit value, we should use ULL
instead of UL literal values.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220108005854.658596-1-christylee@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
added support for BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback to
the __check_func_call() function. The test in __check_func_call() is
flaweed because it can mis-interpret a regular BPF-to-BPF pseudo-call
as a BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback callback call.
Consider the conditional in the code:
if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) &&
insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback) {
The BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback has value 170. This means that if you
have a BPF program that contains a pseudo-call with an instruction delta
of 170, this conditional will be found to be true by the verifier, and
it will interpret the pseudo-call as a callback. This leads to a mess
with the verification of the program because it makes the wrong
assumptions about the nature of this call.
Solution: include an explicit check to ensure that insn->src_reg == 0.
This ensures that calls cannot be mis-interpreted as an async callback
call.
Fixes: bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220105210150.GH1559@oracle.com
If we ever get to a point again where we convert a bogus looking <ptr>_or_null
typed register containing a non-zero fixed or variable offset, then lets not
reset these bounds to zero since they are not and also don't promote the register
to a <ptr> type, but instead leave it as <ptr>_or_null. Converting to a unknown
register could be an avenue as well, but then if we run into this case it would
allow to leak a kernel pointer this way.
Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-12-30
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 20 day(s) which contain
a total of 223 files changed, 3510 insertions(+), 1591 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Automatic setrlimit in libbpf when bpf is memcg's in the kernel, from Andrii.
2) Beautify and de-verbose verifier logs, from Christy.
3) Composable verifier types, from Hao.
4) bpf_strncmp helper, from Hou.
5) bpf.h header dependency cleanup, from Jakub.
6) get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers, from Jiri.
7) Sleepable local storage, from KP.
8) Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support, from Kumar.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs.
Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and inode
storage to be used from sleepable programs. This allows sleepable and
non-sleepable programs to provide shareable annotations on kernel
objects.
Sleepable programs run in trace RCU where as non-sleepable programs run
in a normal RCU critical section i.e. __bpf_prog_enter{_sleepable}
and __bpf_prog_exit{_sleepable}) (rcu_read_lock or rcu_read_lock_trace).
In order to make the local storage maps accessible to both sleepable
and non-sleepable programs, one needs to call both
call_rcu_tasks_trace and call_rcu to wait for both trace and classical
RCU grace periods to expire before freeing memory.
Paul's work on call_rcu_tasks_trace allows us to have per CPU queueing
for call_rcu_tasks_trace. This behaviour can be achieved by setting
rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim=<num_cpus> boot parameter.
In light of these new performance changes and to keep the local storage
code simple, avoid adding a new flag for sleepable maps / local storage
to select the RCU synchronization (trace / classical).
Also, update the dereferencing of the pointers to use
rcu_derference_check (with either the trace or normal RCU locks held)
with a common bpf_rcu_lock_held helper method.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211224152916.1550677-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
