c718a0bad7
LoongArch: Fix some build warnings with W=1
...
There are some building warnings when building LoongArch kernel with W=1
as following, this patch fixes them.
arch/loongarch/kernel/acpi.c:284:13: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_numa_arch_fixup’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
284 | void __init acpi_numa_arch_fixup(void) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/time.c:32:13: warning: no previous prototype for ‘constant_timer_interrupt’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
32 | irqreturn_t constant_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c:496:25: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_fpe' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
496 | asmlinkage void noinstr do_fpe(struct pt_regs *regs
| ^~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c:813:22: warning: variable ‘opcode’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
813 | unsigned int opcode;
| ^~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/signal.c:895:14: warning: no previous prototype for ‘get_sigframe’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
895 | void __user *get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/syscall.c:21:40: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
21 | #define __SYSCALL(nr, call) [nr] = (call),
| ^
arch/loongarch/kernel/syscall.c:40:14: warning: no previous prototype for ‘do_syscall’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
40 | void noinstr do_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/smp.c:502:17: warning: no previous prototype for ‘start_secondary’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
502 | asmlinkage void start_secondary(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/process.c:309:15: warning: no previous prototype for ‘arch_align_stack’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
309 | unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/topology.c:13:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘arch_register_cpu’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
13 | int arch_register_cpu(int cpu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/topology.c:27:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘arch_unregister_cpu’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
27 | void arch_unregister_cpu(int cpu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/kernel/module-sections.c:103:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘module_frob_arch_sections’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
103 | int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/loongarch/mm/hugetlbpage.c:56:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘is_aligned_hugepage_range’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
56 | int is_aligned_hugepage_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-09-20 14:26:28 +08:00
be769645a2
LoongArch: Add system call support
...
Add system call support and related uaccess.h for LoongArch.
Q: Why keep _ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE definition while there is clone3:
A: The latest glibc release has some basic support for clone3 but it is
not complete. E.g., pthread_create() and spawni() have converted to
use clone3 but fork() will still use clone. Moreover, some seccomp
related applications can still not work perfectly with clone3. E.g.,
Chromium sandbox cannot work at all and there is no solution for it,
which is more terrible than the fork() story [1].
[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2936184
Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name>
Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-06-03 20:09:28 +08:00
Bibo Mao