Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christoph Hellwig
84adede312 hfsplus: use atomic bitops for the superblock flags
The flags in the HFS+-specific superlock do get modified during runtime,
use atomic bitops to make the modifications SMP safe.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
2010-10-01 05:45:20 +02:00
Christoph Hellwig
dd73a01a30 hfsplus: fix HFSPLUS_SB calling convention
HFSPLUS_SB doesn't return a pointer to the hfsplus-specific superblock
information like all other FOO_SB macros, but dereference the pointer in a way
that made it look like a direct struct derefence.  This only works as long
as the HFSPLUS_SB macro is used directly and prevents us from keepig a local
hfsplus_sb_info pointer.  Fix the calling convention and introduce a local
sbi variable in all functions that use it constantly.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
2010-10-01 05:42:59 +02:00
Ben Hutchings
5c36fe3d87 hfsplus: refuse to mount volumes larger than 2TB
As found in <http://bugs.debian.org/550010>, hfsplus is using type u32
rather than sector_t for some sector number calculations.

In particular, hfsplus_get_block() does:

        u32 ablock, dblock, mask;
...
        map_bh(bh_result, sb, (dblock << HFSPLUS_SB(sb).fs_shift) + HFSPLUS_SB(sb).blockoffset + (iblock & mask));

I am not confident that I can find and fix all cases where a sector number
may be truncated.  For now, avoid data loss by refusing to mount HFS+
volumes with more than 2^32 sectors (2TB).

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix 32 and 64-bit issues]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-10-29 07:39:27 -07:00
Harvey Harrison
8b3789e5d5 hfsplus: use get/put_unaligned_* helpers
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-29 08:06:28 -07:00
David Elliott
2179d372d9 [PATCH] hfs: add HFSX support
Add support for HFSX, which allows for case-sensitive filenames.

Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-18 19:20:23 -08:00
Roman Zippel
634725a929 [PATCH] hfs: cleanup HFS+ prints
Add the log level and a "hfs: " prefix to all kernel prints.  (HFS and HFS+
will use the same prefix, as they share some code and could be merged at some
point.)

Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-18 19:20:22 -08:00
Olaf Hering
733482e445 [PATCH] changing CONFIG_LOCALVERSION rebuilds too much, for no good reason
This patch removes almost all inclusions of linux/version.h.  The 3
#defines are unused in most of the touched files.

A few drivers use the simple KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) macro, which is
unfortunatly in linux/version.h.

There are also lots of #ifdef for long obsolete kernels, this was not
touched.  In a few places, the linux/version.h include was move to where
the LINUX_VERSION_CODE was used.

quilt vi `find * -type f -name "*.[ch]"|xargs grep -El '(UTS_RELEASE|LINUX_VERSION_CODE|KERNEL_VERSION|linux/version.h)'|grep -Ev '(/(boot|coda|drm)/|~$)'`

search pattern:
/UTS_RELEASE\|LINUX_VERSION_CODE\|KERNEL_VERSION\|linux\/\(utsname\|version\).h

Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-11-09 07:55:57 -08:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00