The pcode mailbox has two data registers. So far we've only ever used
the one, but that's about to change. Expose the second data register to
the callers of sandybridge_pcode_read().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521164025.30225-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Since intel_sideband_read and intel_sideband_write differ by only a
couple of lines (depending on whether we feed the value in or out),
merge the two into a single common accessor.
v2: Restore vlv_flisdsi_read() lost during rebasing.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426081725.31217-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We now have two locks for sideband access. The general one covering
sideband access across all generation, sb_lock, and a specific one
covering sideband access via the punit on vlv/chv. After lifting the
sb_lock around the punit into the callers, the pcu_lock is now redudant
and can be separated from its other use to regulate RPS (essentially
giving RPS a lock all of its own).
v2: Extract a couple of minor bug fixes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426081725.31217-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Lift the sideband acquisition for vlv_punit_read and vlv_punit_write
into their callers, so that we can lock the sideband once for a sequence
of operations, rather than perform the heavyweight acquisition on each
request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426081725.31217-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we now employ a very heavy pm_qos around the punit access, we want to
minimise the number of synchronous requests by performing one for the
whole punit sequence rather than around individual accesses. The
sideband lock is used for this, so push the pm_qos into the sideband
lock acquisition and release, moving it from the lowlevel punit rw
routine to the callers. In the first step, we move the punit magic into
the common sideband lock so that we can acquire a bunch of ports
simultaneously, and if need be extend the workaround protection later.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426081725.31217-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
While we talk to the punit over its sideband, we need to prevent the cpu
from sleeping in order to prevent a potential machine hang.
Note that by itself, it appears that pm_qos_update_request (via
intel_idle) doesn't provide a sufficient barrier to ensure that all core
are indeed awake (out of Cstate) and that the package is awake. To do so,
we need to supplement the pm_qos with a manual ping on_each_cpu.
v2: Restrict the heavy-weight wakeup to just the ISOF_PORT_PUNIT, there
is insufficient evidence to implicate a wider problem atm. Similarly,
restrict the w/a to Valleyview, as Cherryview doesn't have an angry cadre
of users.
The working theory, courtesy of Ville and Hans, is the issue lies within
the power delivery and so is likely to be unit and board specific and
occurs when both the unit/fw require extra power at the same time as the
cpu package is changing its own power state.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195255
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426081725.31217-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.
While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
In order to separate GT PM related functionality into new structure
we are updating rps structure. hw_lock in it is used for display
related PCU communication too hence move it to dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1507360055-19948-8-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171010213010.7415-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
After initiating a sideband transaction, we only want to wait for the
transaction to become idle. If, as we are, we wait for both the busy
and error flag to clear, if an error is raised we just spin until the
timeout. Once the hw is idle, we can then check to see if the hw flagged
an error, and report it distinctly.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170223141020.13250-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
As the previous punit i/o may have failed, the contents of the PDATA are
undefined. Always clear it to 0 prior to sending the command.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170125134808.6152-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
The write to the punit may fail, so propagate the error code back to its
callers. Of particular interest are the RPS writes, so add appropriate
user error codes and logging.
v2: Add DEBUG for failed frequency changes during RPS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170126101919.13211-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-59-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-58-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-57-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-56-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-55-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-54-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Make the gpio read/write functions more generic iosf sideband read/write
functions, taking the iosf port as argument.
v2: rebase
v3: rebase
v4 by Jani: address Ville's review
v5 by Jani: drop the PCI_DEVFN change (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454604915-17142-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
Rename dpio_lock to sb_lock to inform the reader that its primary
purpose is to protect the sideband mailbox rather than some DPIO
state.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
As per the specififcation, the SB_DevFn is the PCI_DEVFN of the target
device and not the source. So PCI_DEVFN(2,0) is not correct. Further the
port ID should be enough to identify devices unless they are MFD. The
SB_DevFn was intended to remove ambiguity in case of these MFD devices.
For non MFD devices the recommendation for the target device IP was to
ignore these fields, but not all of them followed the recommendation.
Some like CCK ignore these fields and hence PCI_DEVFN(2, 0) works and so
does PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) as it works for DPIO. The issue came to light because
of GPIONC which was not getting programmed correctly with PCI_DEVFN(2, 0).
It turned out that this did not follow the recommendation and expected 0
in this field.
In general the recommendation is to use SB_DevFn as PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) for
all devices except target PCI devices.
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Looks like latest BSW/CHV production system has sideband address > 128.
Use u32 data types to cover new offset/address range :)
Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
So far we used the wrong opcodes to access the DSI registers, so the
register writes during DSI programming didn't actually succeed and left
the registers unchanged. This wasn't a problem for the initial modeset,
where the BIOS-programmed values happened to work, but after resuming
from s0ix these registers are reset and failing to program them results
in a blank screen.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
These opcodes are not specific for an endpoint, but are the same for all
endpoints. So rename them accordingly, using the name the VLV2 sideband
HAS uses. Also move the macros to the .c file, since they aren't used
anywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
DPIO reads from groups/broadcast register offsets for PCS and
TX return all 1's. If that result gets used for something
we'll probably end up doing something wrong. So warn when that
happens.
FIXME there might be some registers where all 1's is a valid value,
so ideally we should check the register offset instead...
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: copypaste the FIXME comment into the code.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
vlv_dpio_read/write should be describe more in PHY centric instead of
display controller centric.
Create a enum dpio_channel for channel index and enum dpio_phy for PHY
index. This should better to gather for upcoming platform.
v2: Rebase the code based on
drm/i915/vlv: Fix typo in the DPIO register define.
v3: Rename vlv_phy to dpio_phy_iosf_port and define additional macro
DPIO_PHY, and remove unrelated change. (Ville)
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
So digging out the right ones is a little easier.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The patch doesn't contain functional change, but is to prepare for
future platform which has different DPIO phy. The additional pipe
parameter will use to select which phy to target for.
v2: Update the commit message and add static for the new function.
(Jani/Ville)
Signed-off-by: Chon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
For GPIO NC, CCK, CCU, and GPS CORE.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We never check the return values, and there's not much we could do on
errors anyway. Just simplify the signatures. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Rename all VLV IOSF sideband register accessor functions to
vlv_<port>_{read,write}. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Both the intel_dpio_{read,write} and valleyview_{punit,nc}_{read,write}
use the IOSF sideband interface. They access the same registers and do
mostly the same stuff, but no shared code. There are even duplicate
register defines for the same registers. Both have locking, but the
former use dpio_lock and the latter rps.hw_lock. It's racy.
This patch refactors the sideband access to a single function that
expects dpio_lock to be held. The dpio_lock is only used for sideband
stuff, so it's a better match than rps.hw_lock for the purpose. The rps
stuff still needs rps.hw_lock, since it's used to protect more than just
the register access, so rps code will need to hold both locks.
Based on the work by Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com> and Yogesh
Mohan Marimuthu <yogesh.mohan.marimuthu@intel.com>.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Group both the HSW/LPT SBI interface and VLV IOSF sideband register
accessor functions into a new file. No functional changes.
v2: also move intel_sbi_{read,write} (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
