Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Maximilian Luz
b09ee1cd59 platform/surface: aggregator: Rename top-level request functions to avoid ambiguities
We currently have a struct ssam_request_sync and a function
ssam_request_sync(). While this is valid C, there are some downsides to
it.

One of these is that current Sphinx versions (>= 3.0) cannot
disambiguate between the two (see disucssion and pull request linked
below). It instead emits a "WARNING: Duplicate C declaration" and links
for the struct and function in the resulting documentation link to the
same entry (i.e. both to either function or struct documentation)
instead of their respective own entries.

While we could just ignore that and wait for a fix, there's also a point
to be made that the current naming can be somewhat confusing when
searching (e.g. via grep) or trying to understand the levels of
abstraction at play:

We currently have struct ssam_request_sync and associated functions
ssam_request_sync_[alloc|free|init|wait|...]() operating on this struct.
However, function ssam_request_sync() is one abstraction level above
this. Similarly, ssam_request_sync_with_buffer() is not a function
operating on struct ssam_request_sync, but rather a sibling to
ssam_request_sync(), both using the struct under the hood.

Therefore, rename the top level request functions:

  ssam_request_sync() -> ssam_request_do_sync()
  ssam_request_sync_with_buffer() -> ssam_request_do_sync_with_buffer()
  ssam_request_sync_onstack() -> ssam_request_do_sync_onstack()

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/085e0ada65c11da9303d07e70c510dc45f21315b.1656756450.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
Link: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/8313
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220175608.1436273-2-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2023-02-02 22:48:20 +01:00
Maximilian Luz
3f88b459a7 platform/surface: aggregator: Improve documentation and handling of message target and source IDs
The `tid_in` and `tid_out` fields of the serial hub protocol command
struct (struct ssh_command) are actually source and target IDs,
indicating the peer from which the message originated and the peer for
which it is intended.

Change the naming of those fields accordingly and improve the protocol
documentation. Additionally, introduce an enum containing all currently
known peers, i.e. targets and sources.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202223327.690880-3-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2023-02-02 22:48:20 +01:00
Maximilian Luz
5c1e88b98c platform/surface: aggregator: Allow notifiers to avoid communication on unregistering
When SSAM client devices have been (physically) hot-removed,
communication attempts with those devices may fail and time out. This
can even extend to event notifiers, due to which timeouts may occur
during device removal, slowing down that process.

Add a parameter to the notifier unregister function that allows skipping
communication with the EC to prevent this. Furthermore, add wrappers for
registering and unregistering notifiers belonging to SSAM client devices
that automatically check if the device has been marked as hot-removed
and communication should be avoided.

Note that non-SSAM client devices can generally not be hot-removed, so
also add a convenience wrapper for those, defaulting to allow
communication.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-4-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2022-06-13 17:25:07 +02:00
Maximilian Luz
03ee318391 platform/surface: aggregator: Make SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_x define static functions
The SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_x() macros are intended to reduce
boiler-plate code for SSAM request definitions by defining a wrapper
function for the specified request. The client device variants of those
macros, i.e. SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_CL_x() in particular rely on the
multi-device (MD) variants, e.g.:

    #define SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_CL_R(name, rtype, spec...)   \
        SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_MD_R(__raw_##name, rtype, spec)  \
        int name(struct ssam_device *sdev, rtype *ret)            \
        {                                                         \
            return __raw_##name(sdev->ctrl, sdev->uid.target,     \
                                sdev->uid.instance, ret);         \
        }

This now creates the problem that it is not possible to declare the
generated functions static via

    static SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_CL_R(...)

as this will only apply to the function defined by the multi-device
macro, i.e. SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_MD_R(). Thus compiling with
`-Wmissing-prototypes' rightfully complains that there is a 'static'
keyword missing.

To solve this, make all SSAM_DEFINE_SYNC_REQUEST_x() macros define
static functions. Non-client-device macros are also changed for
consistency. In general, we expect those functions to be only used
locally in the respective drivers for the corresponding interfaces, so
having to define a wrapper function to be able to export this should be
the odd case out.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: b78b4982d7 ("platform/surface: Add platform profile driver")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304190524.1172197-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-03-08 11:33:28 +01:00
Maximilian Luz
8d7792823d docs: driver-api: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem documentation
Add documentation for the Surface Aggregator subsystem and its client
drivers, giving an overview of the subsystem, its use-cases, its
internal structure and internal API, as well as its external API for
writing client drivers.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201221183959.1186143-8-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2021-01-07 00:06:39 +01:00