Pull RCU updates from Paul McKenney:
- Bitmap parsing support for "all" as an alias for all bits
- Documentation updates
- Miscellaneous fixes, including some that overlap into mm and lockdep
- kvfree_rcu() updates
- mem_dump_obj() updates, with acks from one of the slab-allocator
maintainers
- RCU NOCB CPU updates, including limited deoffloading
- SRCU updates
- Tasks-RCU updates
- Torture-test updates
* 'core-rcu-2021.07.04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu: (78 commits)
tasks-rcu: Make show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads() be static inline
rcu-tasks: Make ksoftirqd provide RCU Tasks quiescent states
rcu: Add missing __releases() annotation
rcu: Remove obsolete rcu_read_unlock() deadlock commentary
rcu: Improve comments describing RCU read-side critical sections
rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer
srcu: Early test SRCU polling start
rcu: Fix various typos in comments
rcu/nocb: Unify timers
rcu/nocb: Prepare for fine-grained deferred wakeup
rcu/nocb: Only cancel nocb timer if not polling
rcu/nocb: Delete bypass_timer upon nocb_gp wakeup
rcu/nocb: Cancel nocb_timer upon nocb_gp wakeup
rcu/nocb: Allow de-offloading rdp leader
rcu/nocb: Directly call __wake_nocb_gp() from bypass timer
rcu: Don't penalize priority boosting when there is nothing to boost
rcu: Point to documentation of ordering guarantees
rcu: Make rcu_gp_cleanup() be noinline for tracing
rcu: Restrict RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD to at most four CPUs
rcu: Make show_rcu_gp_kthreads() dump rcu_node structures blocking GP
...
- Changes to core scheduling facilities:
- Add "Core Scheduling" via CONFIG_SCHED_CORE=y, which enables
coordinated scheduling across SMT siblings. This is a much
requested feature for cloud computing platforms, to allow
the flexible utilization of SMT siblings, without exposing
untrusted domains to information leaks & side channels, plus
to ensure more deterministic computing performance on SMT
systems used by heterogenous workloads.
There's new prctls to set core scheduling groups, which
allows more flexible management of workloads that can share
siblings.
- Fix task->state access anti-patterns that may result in missed
wakeups and rename it to ->__state in the process to catch new
abuses.
- Load-balancing changes:
- Tweak newidle_balance for fair-sched, to improve
'memcache'-like workloads.
- "Age" (decay) average idle time, to better track & improve workloads
such as 'tbench'.
- Fix & improve energy-aware (EAS) balancing logic & metrics.
- Fix & improve the uclamp metrics.
- Fix task migration (taskset) corner case on !CONFIG_CPUSET.
- Fix RT and deadline utilization tracking across policy changes
- Introduce a "burstable" CFS controller via cgroups, which allows
bursty CPU-bound workloads to borrow a bit against their future
quota to improve overall latencies & batching. Can be tweaked
via /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/<X>/cpu.cfs_burst_us.
- Rework assymetric topology/capacity detection & handling.
- Scheduler statistics & tooling:
- Disable delayacct by default, but add a sysctl to enable
it at runtime if tooling needs it. Use static keys and
other optimizations to make it more palatable.
- Use sched_clock() in delayacct, instead of ktime_get_ns().
- Misc cleanups and fixes.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=3VDr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'sched-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduler udpates from Ingo Molnar:
- Changes to core scheduling facilities:
- Add "Core Scheduling" via CONFIG_SCHED_CORE=y, which enables
coordinated scheduling across SMT siblings. This is a much
requested feature for cloud computing platforms, to allow the
flexible utilization of SMT siblings, without exposing untrusted
domains to information leaks & side channels, plus to ensure more
deterministic computing performance on SMT systems used by
heterogenous workloads.
There are new prctls to set core scheduling groups, which allows
more flexible management of workloads that can share siblings.
- Fix task->state access anti-patterns that may result in missed
wakeups and rename it to ->__state in the process to catch new
abuses.
- Load-balancing changes:
- Tweak newidle_balance for fair-sched, to improve 'memcache'-like
workloads.
- "Age" (decay) average idle time, to better track & improve
workloads such as 'tbench'.
- Fix & improve energy-aware (EAS) balancing logic & metrics.
- Fix & improve the uclamp metrics.
- Fix task migration (taskset) corner case on !CONFIG_CPUSET.
- Fix RT and deadline utilization tracking across policy changes
- Introduce a "burstable" CFS controller via cgroups, which allows
bursty CPU-bound workloads to borrow a bit against their future
quota to improve overall latencies & batching. Can be tweaked via
/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/<X>/cpu.cfs_burst_us.
- Rework assymetric topology/capacity detection & handling.
- Scheduler statistics & tooling:
- Disable delayacct by default, but add a sysctl to enable it at
runtime if tooling needs it. Use static keys and other
optimizations to make it more palatable.
- Use sched_clock() in delayacct, instead of ktime_get_ns().
- Misc cleanups and fixes.
* tag 'sched-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (72 commits)
sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits
sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection
sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag
psi: Fix race between psi_trigger_create/destroy
sched/fair: Introduce the burstable CFS controller
sched/uclamp: Fix uclamp_tg_restrict()
sched/rt: Fix Deadline utilization tracking during policy change
sched/rt: Fix RT utilization tracking during policy change
sched: Change task_struct::state
sched,arch: Remove unused TASK_STATE offsets
sched,timer: Use __set_current_state()
sched: Add get_current_state()
sched,perf,kvm: Fix preemption condition
sched: Introduce task_is_running()
sched: Unbreak wakeups
sched/fair: Age the average idle time
sched/cpufreq: Consider reduced CPU capacity in energy calculation
sched/fair: Take thermal pressure into account while estimating energy
thermal/cpufreq_cooling: Update offline CPUs per-cpu thermal_pressure
sched/fair: Return early from update_tg_cfs_load() if delta == 0
...
- Core locking & atomics:
- Convert all architectures to ARCH_ATOMIC: move every
architecture to ARCH_ATOMIC, then get rid of ARCH_ATOMIC
and all the transitory facilities and #ifdefs.
Much reduction in complexity from that series:
63 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 4094 deletions(-)
- Self-test enhancements
- Futexes:
- Add the new FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 ABI, which is a variant that
doesn't set FLAGS_CLOCKRT (.e. uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC).
[ The temptation to repurpose FUTEX_LOCK_PI's implicit
setting of FLAGS_CLOCKRT & invert the flag's meaning
to avoid having to introduce a new variant was
resisted successfully. ]
- Enhance futex self-tests
- Lockdep:
- Fix dependency path printouts
- Optimize trace saving
- Broaden & fix wait-context checks
- Misc cleanups and fixes.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=tH//
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'locking-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
- Core locking & atomics:
- Convert all architectures to ARCH_ATOMIC: move every architecture
to ARCH_ATOMIC, then get rid of ARCH_ATOMIC and all the
transitory facilities and #ifdefs.
Much reduction in complexity from that series:
63 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 4094 deletions(-)
- Self-test enhancements
- Futexes:
- Add the new FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 ABI, which is a variant that doesn't
set FLAGS_CLOCKRT (.e. uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC).
[ The temptation to repurpose FUTEX_LOCK_PI's implicit setting of
FLAGS_CLOCKRT & invert the flag's meaning to avoid having to
introduce a new variant was resisted successfully. ]
- Enhance futex self-tests
- Lockdep:
- Fix dependency path printouts
- Optimize trace saving
- Broaden & fix wait-context checks
- Misc cleanups and fixes.
* tag 'locking-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (52 commits)
locking/lockdep: Correct the description error for check_redundant()
futex: Provide FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 to support clock selection
futex: Prepare futex_lock_pi() for runtime clock selection
lockdep/selftest: Remove wait-type RCU_CALLBACK tests
lockdep/selftests: Fix selftests vs PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
lockdep: Fix wait-type for empty stack
locking/selftests: Add a selftest for check_irq_usage()
lockding/lockdep: Avoid to find wrong lock dep path in check_irq_usage()
locking/lockdep: Remove the unnecessary trace saving
locking/lockdep: Fix the dep path printing for backwards BFS
selftests: futex: Add futex compare requeue test
selftests: futex: Add futex wait test
seqlock: Remove trailing semicolon in macros
locking/lockdep: Reduce LOCKDEP dependency list
locking/lockdep,doc: Improve readability of the block matrix
locking/atomics: atomic-instrumented: simplify ifdeffery
locking/atomic: delete !ARCH_ATOMIC remnants
locking/atomic: xtensa: move to ARCH_ATOMIC
locking/atomic: sparc: move to ARCH_ATOMIC
locking/atomic: sh: move to ARCH_ATOMIC
...
If there is no matched result, check_redundant() will return BFS_RNOMATCH.
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210618130230.123249-1-sxwjean@me.com
Even the very first lock can violate the wait-context check, consider
the various IRQ contexts.
Fixes: de8f5e4f2d ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617190313.256987481@infradead.org
In the step #3 of check_irq_usage(), we seach backwards to find a lock
whose usage conflicts the usage of @target_entry1 on safe/unsafe.
However, we should only keep the irq-unsafe usage of @target_entry1 into
consideration, because it could be a case where a lock is hardirq-unsafe
but soft-safe, and in check_irq_usage() we find it because its
hardirq-unsafe could result into a hardirq-safe-unsafe deadlock, but
currently since we don't filter out the other usage bits, so we may find
a lock dependency path softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, which in fact
doesn't cause a deadlock. And this may cause misleading lockdep splats.
Fix this by only keeping LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_ALL bits when we try the
backwards search.
Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com
In print_bad_irq_dependency(), save_trace() is called to set the ->trace
for @prev_root as the current call trace, however @prev_root corresponds
to the the held lock, which may not be acquired in current call trace,
therefore it's wrong to use save_trace() to set ->trace of @prev_root.
Moreover, with our adjustment of printing backwards dependency path, the
->trace of @prev_root is unncessary, so remove it.
Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com
We use the same code to print backwards lock dependency path as the
forwards lock dependency path, and this could result into incorrect
printing because for a backwards lock_list ->trace is not the call trace
where the lock of ->class is acquired.
Fix this by introducing a separate function on printing the backwards
dependency path. Also add a few comments about the printing while we are
at it.
Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Replace a bunch of 'p->state == TASK_RUNNING' with a new helper:
task_is_running(p).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611082838.222401495@infradead.org
The reason that lockdep_rcu_suspicious() prints the value of debug_locks
is because a value of zero indicates a likely false positive. This can
work, but is a bit obtuse. This commit therefore explicitly calls out
the possibility of a false positive.
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
- rtmutex cleanup & spring cleaning pass that removes ~400 lines of code
- Futex simplifications & cleanups
- Add debugging to the CSD code, to help track down a tenacious race (or hw problem)
- Add lockdep_assert_not_held(), to allow code to require a lock to not be held,
and propagate this into the ath10k driver
- Misc LKMM documentation updates
- Misc KCSAN updates: cleanups & documentation updates
- Misc fixes and cleanups
- Fix locktorture bugs with ww_mutexes
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=cOOk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'locking-core-2021-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
- rtmutex cleanup & spring cleaning pass that removes ~400 lines of
code
- Futex simplifications & cleanups
- Add debugging to the CSD code, to help track down a tenacious race
(or hw problem)
- Add lockdep_assert_not_held(), to allow code to require a lock to not
be held, and propagate this into the ath10k driver
- Misc LKMM documentation updates
- Misc KCSAN updates: cleanups & documentation updates
- Misc fixes and cleanups
- Fix locktorture bugs with ww_mutexes
* tag 'locking-core-2021-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (44 commits)
kcsan: Fix printk format string
static_call: Relax static_call_update() function argument type
static_call: Fix unused variable warn w/o MODULE
locking/rtmutex: Clean up signal handling in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug
locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in rt_mutex_postunlock()
locking/rtmutex: Consolidate the fast/slowpath invocation
locking/rtmutex: Make text section and inlining consistent
locking/rtmutex: Move debug functions as inlines into common header
locking/rtmutex: Decrapify __rt_mutex_init()
locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs
locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check
locking/rtmutex: Move rt_mutex_debug_task_free() to rtmutex.c
locking/rtmutex: Remove empty and unused debug stubs
locking/rtmutex: Consolidate rt_mutex_init()
locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock detector
locking/rtmutex: Remove rtmutex deadlock tester leftovers
locking/rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_timed_lock()
MAINTAINERS: Add myself as futex reviewer
locking/mutex: Remove repeated declaration
...
Peter Zijlstra asked us to find bad annotation that blows up the lockdep
storage [1][2][3] but we could not find such annotation [4][5], and
Peter cannot give us feedback any more [6]. Since we tested this patch
on linux-next.git without problems, and keeping this problem unresolved
discourages kernel testing which is more painful, I'm sending this patch
without forever waiting for response from Peter.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200916115057.GO2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201118142357.GW3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
[3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201118151038.GX3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
[4] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+asqRbjaN9ras=P5DcxKgzsnV0fvV0tYb2VkT+P00pFvQ@mail.gmail.com
[5] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4b89985e-99f9-18bc-0bf1-c883127dc70c@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
[6] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+YnHFV1p5mbhby2nyOaNTy8c_yoVk86z5avo14KWs0s1A@mail.gmail.com
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 -
kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 8 +++----
lib/Kconfig.debug | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=E7U/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'tomoyo-pr-20210426' of git://git.osdn.net/gitroot/tomoyo/tomoyo-test1
Pull lockdep capacity limit updates from Tetsuo Handa:
"syzbot is occasionally reporting that fuzz testing is terminated due
to hitting upper limits lockdep can track.
Analysis via /proc/lockdep* did not show any obvious culprits, allow
tuning tracing capacity constants"
* tag 'tomoyo-pr-20210426' of git://git.osdn.net/gitroot/tomoyo/tomoyo-test1:
lockdep: Allow tuning tracing capacity constants.
Clang doesn't like format strings that truncate a 32-bit
value to something shorter:
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:709:4: error: format specifies type 'short' but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
In this case, the warning is a slightly questionable, as it could realize
that both class->wait_type_outer and class->wait_type_inner are in fact
8-bit struct members, even though the result of the ?: operator becomes an
'int'.
However, there is really no point in printing the number as a 16-bit
'short' rather than either an 8-bit or 32-bit number, so just change
it to a normal %d.
Fixes: de8f5e4f2d ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210322115531.3987555-1-arnd@kernel.org
Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g.
kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()),
suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects
were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing.
[ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ]
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Adds defines for lock state returns from lock_is_held_type() based on
Johannes Berg's suggestions as it make it easier to read and maintain
the lock states. These are defines and a enum to avoid changes to
lock_is_held_type() and lockdep_is_held() return types.
Updates to lock_is_held_type() and __lock_is_held() to use the new
defines.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/871rdmu9z9.fsf@codeaurora.org/
Some kernel functions must be called without holding a specific lock.
Add lockdep_assert_not_held() to be used in these functions to detect
incorrect calls while holding a lock.
lockdep_assert_not_held() provides the opposite functionality of
lockdep_assert_held() which is used to assert calls that require
holding a specific lock.
Incorporates suggestions from Peter Zijlstra to avoid misfires when
lockdep_off() is employed.
The need for lockdep_assert_not_held() came up in a discussion on
ath10k patch. ath10k_drain_tx() and i915_vma_pin_ww() are examples
of functions that can use lockdep_assert_not_held().
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/871rdmu9z9.fsf@codeaurora.org/
Commit f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
inversions") overlooked that print_usage_bug() releases the graph_lock
and called it without the graph lock held.
Fixes: f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YBfkuyIfB1+VRxXP@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
The purpose of local_lock_t is to abstract: preempt_disable() /
local_bh_disable() / local_irq_disable(). These are the traditional
means of gaining access to per-cpu data, but are fundamentally
non-preemptible.
local_lock_t provides a per-cpu lock, that on !PREEMPT_RT reduces to
no-ops, just like regular spinlocks do on UP.
This gives rise to:
CPU0 CPU1
local_lock(B) spin_lock_irq(A)
<IRQ>
spin_lock(A) local_lock(B)
Where lockdep then figures things will lock up; which would be true if
B were any other kind of lock. However this is a false positive, no
such deadlock actually exists.
For !RT the above local_lock(B) is preempt_disable(), and there's
obviously no deadlock; alternatively, CPU0's B != CPU1's B.
For RT the argument is that since local_lock() nests inside
spin_lock(), it cannot be used in hardirq context, and therefore CPU0
cannot in fact happen. Even though B is a real lock, it is a
preemptible lock and any threaded-irq would simply schedule out and
let the preempted task (which holds B) continue such that the task on
CPU1 can make progress, after which the threaded-irq resumes and can
finish.
This means that we can never form an IRQ inversion on a local_lock
dependency, so terminate the graph walk when looking for IRQ
inversions when we encounter one.
One consequence is that (for LOCKDEP_SMALL) when we look for redundant
dependencies, A -> B is not redundant in the presence of A -> L -> B.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
[peterz: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
In preparation for adding an TRACE_IRQFLAGS dependent skip function to
check_redundant(), move it below the TRACE_IRQFLAGS #ifdef.
While there, provide a stub function to reduce #ifdef usage.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Some __bfs() walks will have additional iteration constraints (beyond
the path being strong). Provide an additional function to allow
terminating graph walks.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
The local_lock_t's are special, because they cannot form IRQ
inversions, make sure we can tell them apart from the rest of the
locks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
When the compiler doesn't feel like inlining, it causes a noinstr
fail:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0xb: call to lockdep_enabled() leaves .noinstr.text section
Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.592595176@infradead.org
A warning was hit when running xfstests/generic/068 in a Hyper-V guest:
[...] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())
[...] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1350 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5280 check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Workqueue: events pwq_unbound_release_workfn
[...] RIP: 0010:check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Call Trace:
[...] lock_is_held_type+0x72/0x150
[...] ? lock_acquire+0x16e/0x4a0
[...] rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[...] __send_ipi_one+0x14d/0x1b0
[...] hv_send_ipi+0x12/0x30
[...] __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0xd1/0x110
[...] __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0x11/0x20
[...] .slowpath+0x9/0xe
[...] lockdep_unregister_key+0x128/0x180
[...] pwq_unbound_release_workfn+0xbb/0xf0
[...] process_one_work+0x227/0x5c0
[...] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[...] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
[...] kthread+0x153/0x170
[...] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
[...] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
The cause of the problem is we have call chain lockdep_unregister_key()
-> <irq disabled by raw_local_irq_save()> lockdep_unlock() ->
arch_spin_unlock() -> __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath() -> pv_kick() ->
__send_ipi_one() -> trace_hyperv_send_ipi_one().
Although this particular warning is triggered because Hyper-V has a
trace point in ipi sending, but in general arch_spin_unlock() may call
another function having a trace point in it, so put the arch_spin_lock()
and arch_spin_unlock() after lock_recursion protection to fix this
problem and avoid similiar problems.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113110512.1056501-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Chris Wilson reported a problem spotted by check_chain_key(): a chain
key got changed in validate_chain() because we modify the ->read in
validate_chain() to skip checks for dependency adding, and ->read is
taken into calculation for chain key since commit f611e8cf98
("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate
chainkey").
Fix this by avoiding to modify ->read in validate_chain() based on two
facts: a) since we now support recursive read lock detection, there is
no need to skip checks for dependency adding for recursive readers, b)
since we have a), there is only one case left (nest_lock) where we want
to skip checks in validate_chain(), we simply remove the modification
for ->read and rely on the return value of check_deadlock() to skip the
dependency adding.
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102053743.450459-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Chris reported that commit 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix
usage_traceoverflow") breaks the nr_unused_locks validation code
triggered by /proc/lockdep_stats.
By fully splitting LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ it becomes a bad
indicator for accounting nr_unused_locks; simplyfy by using any first
bit.
Fixes: 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix usage_traceoverflow")
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027124834.GL2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
I initially thought raw_cpu_read() was OK, since if it is !0 we have
IRQs disabled and can't get migrated, so if we get migrated both CPUs
must have 0 and it doesn't matter which 0 we read.
And while that is true; it isn't the whole store, on pretty much all
architectures (except x86) this can result in computing the address for
one CPU, getting migrated, the old CPU continuing execution with another
task (possibly setting recursion) and then the new CPU reading the value
of the old CPU, which is no longer 0.
Similer to:
baffd723e4 ("lockdep: Revert "lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables"")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201026152256.GB2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().
Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.
Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Steve reported that lockdep_assert*irq*(), when nested inside lockdep
itself, will trigger a false-positive.
One example is the stack-trace code, as called from inside lockdep,
triggering tracing, which in turn calls RCU, which then uses
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled().
Fixes: a21ee6055c ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Basically print_lock_class_header()'s for loop is out of sync with the
the size of of ->usage_traces[].
Also clean things up a bit while at it, to avoid such mishaps in the future.
Fixes: 23870f1227 ("locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Debugged-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930094937.GE2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Qian Cai reported a BFS_EQUEUEFULL warning [1] after read recursive
deadlock detection merged into tip tree recently. Unlike the previous
lockep graph searching, which iterate every lock class (every node in
the graph) exactly once, the graph searching for read recurisve deadlock
detection needs to iterate every lock dependency (every edge in the
graph) once, as a result, the maximum memory cost of the circular queue
changes from O(V), where V is the number of lock classes (nodes or
vertices) in the graph, to O(E), where E is the number of lock
dependencies (edges), because every lock class or dependency gets
enqueued once in the BFS. Therefore we hit the BFS_EQUEUEFULL case.
However, actually we don't need to enqueue all dependencies for the BFS,
because every time we enqueue a dependency, we almostly enqueue all
other dependencies in the same dependency list ("almostly" is because
we currently check before enqueue, so if a dependency doesn't pass the
check stage we won't enqueue it, however, we can always do in reverse
ordering), based on this, we can only enqueue the first dependency from
a dependency list and every time we want to fetch a new dependency to
work, we can either:
1) fetch the dependency next to the current dependency in the
dependency list
or
2) if the dependency in 1) doesn't exist, fetch the dependency from
the queue.
With this approach, the "max bfs queue depth" for a x86_64_defconfig +
lockdep and selftest config kernel can get descreased from:
max bfs queue depth: 201
to (after apply this patch)
max bfs queue depth: 61
While I'm at it, clean up the code logic a little (e.g. directly return
other than set a "ret" value and goto the "exit" label).
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17343f6f7f2438fc376125384133c5ba70c2a681.camel@redhat.com/
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+62ebe501c1ce9a91f68c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917080210.108095-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
During the LPC RCU BoF Paul asked how come the "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
detector doesn't trip over rcu_read_lock()'s lockdep annotation.
Looking into this I found a very embarrasing typo in
verify_lock_unused():
- if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCK_USED))
+ if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED))
fixing that will indeed cause rcu_read_lock() to insta-splat :/
The above typo means that instead of testing for: 0x100 (1 <<
LOCK_USED), we test for 8 (LOCK_USED), which corresponds to (1 <<
LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ).
So instead of testing for _any_ used lock, it will only match any lock
used with interrupts enabled.
The rcu_read_lock() annotation uses .check=0, which means it will not
set any of the interrupt bits and will thus never match.
In order to properly fix the situation and allow rcu_read_lock() to
correctly work, split LOCK_USED into LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ and by
having .read users set USED_READ and test USED, pure read-recursive
locks are permitted.
Fixes: f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902160323.GK1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Currently, the chainkey of a lock chain is a hash sum of the class_idx
of all the held locks, the read/write status are not taken in to
consideration while generating the chainkey. This could result into a
problem, if we have:
P1()
{
read_lock(B);
lock(A);
}
P2()
{
lock(A);
read_lock(B);
}
P3()
{
lock(A);
write_lock(B);
}
, and P1(), P2(), P3() run one by one. And when running P2(), lockdep
detects such a lock chain A -> B is not a deadlock, then it's added in
the chain cache, and then when running P3(), even if it's a deadlock, we
could miss it because of the hit of chain cache. This could be confirmed
by self testcase "chain cached mixed R-L/L-W ".
To resolve this, we use concept "hlock_id" to generate the chainkey, the
hlock_id is a tuple (hlock->class_idx, hlock->read), which fits in a u16
type. With this, the chainkeys are different is the lock sequences have
the same locks but different read/write status.
Besides, since we use "hlock_id" to generate chainkeys, the chain_hlocks
array now store the "hlock_id"s rather than lock_class indexes.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-15-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Since we have all the fundamental to handle recursive read locks, we now
add them into the dependency graph.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-13-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Currently, in safe->unsafe detection, lockdep misses the fact that a
LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ usage and a LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ usage may
cause deadlock too, for example:
P1 P2
<irq disabled>
write_lock(l1); <irq enabled>
read_lock(l2);
write_lock(l2);
<in irq>
read_lock(l1);
Actually, all of the following cases may cause deadlocks:
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ
LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ
To fix this, we need to 1) change the calculation of exclusive_mask() so
that READ bits are not dropped and 2) always call usage() in
mark_lock_irq() to check usage deadlocks, even when the new usage of the
lock is READ.
Besides, adjust usage_match() and usage_acculumate() to recursive read
lock changes.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-12-boqun.feng@gmail.com
check_redundant() will report redundancy if it finds a path could
replace the about-to-add dependency in the BFS search. With recursive
read lock changes, we certainly need to change the match function for
the check_redundant(), because the path needs to match not only the lock
class but also the dependency kinds. For example, if the about-to-add
dependency @prev -> @next is A -(SN)-> B, and we find a path A -(S*)->
.. -(*R)->B in the dependency graph with __bfs() (for simplicity, we can
also say we find an -(SR)-> path from A to B), we can not replace the
dependency with that path in the BFS search. Because the -(SN)->
dependency can make a strong path with a following -(S*)-> dependency,
however an -(SR)-> path cannot.
Further, we can replace an -(SN)-> dependency with a -(EN)-> path, that
means if we find a path which is stronger than or equal to the
about-to-add dependency, we can report the redundancy. By "stronger", it
means both the start and the end of the path are not weaker than the
start and the end of the dependency (E is "stronger" than S and N is
"stronger" than R), so that we can replace the dependency with that
path.
To make sure we find a path whose start point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we use a trick: the ->only_xr of the root
(start point) of __bfs() is initialized as @prev-> == 0, therefore if
@prev is E, __bfs() will pick only -(E*)-> for the first dependency,
otherwise, __bfs() can pick -(E*)-> or -(S*)-> for the first dependency.
To make sure we find a path whose end point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we replace the match function for __bfs()
check_redundant(), we check for the case that either @next is R
(anything is not weaker than it) or the end point of the path is N
(which is not weaker than anything).
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-11-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Currently, lockdep only has limit support for deadlock detection for
recursive read locks.
This patch support deadlock detection for recursive read locks. The
basic idea is:
We are about to add dependency B -> A in to the dependency graph, we use
check_noncircular() to find whether we have a strong dependency path
A -> .. -> B so that we have a strong dependency circle (a closed strong
dependency path):
A -> .. -> B -> A
, which doesn't have two adjacent dependencies as -(*R)-> L -(S*)->.
Since A -> .. -> B is already a strong dependency path, so if either
B -> A is -(E*)-> or A -> .. -> B is -(*N)->, the circle A -> .. -> B ->
A is strong, otherwise not. So we introduce a new match function
hlock_conflict() to replace the class_equal() for the deadlock check in
check_noncircular().
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-10-boqun.feng@gmail.com
The "match" parameter of __bfs() is used for checking whether we hit a
match in the search, therefore it should return a boolean value rather
than an integer for better readability.
This patch then changes the return type of the function parameter and the
match functions to bool.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-9-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Now we have four types of dependencies in the dependency graph, and not
all the pathes carry real dependencies (the dependencies that may cause
a deadlock), for example:
Given lock A and B, if we have:
CPU1 CPU2
============= ==============
write_lock(A); read_lock(B);
read_lock(B); write_lock(A);
(assuming read_lock(B) is a recursive reader)
then we have dependencies A -(ER)-> B, and B -(SN)-> A, and a
dependency path A -(ER)-> B -(SN)-> A.
In lockdep w/o recursive locks, a dependency path from A to A
means a deadlock. However, the above case is obviously not a
deadlock, because no one holds B exclusively, therefore no one
waits for the other to release B, so who get A first in CPU1 and
CPU2 will run non-blockingly.
As a result, dependency path A -(ER)-> B -(SN)-> A is not a
real/strong dependency that could cause a deadlock.
From the observation above, we know that for a dependency path to be
real/strong, no two adjacent dependencies can be as -(*R)-> -(S*)->.
Now our mission is to make __bfs() traverse only the strong dependency
paths, which is simple: we record whether we only have -(*R)-> for the
previous lock_list of the path in lock_list::only_xr, and when we pick a
dependency in the traverse, we 1) filter out -(S*)-> dependency if the
previous lock_list only has -(*R)-> dependency (i.e. ->only_xr is true)
and 2) set the next lock_list::only_xr to true if we only have -(*R)->
left after we filter out dependencies based on 1), otherwise, set it to
false.
With this extension for __bfs(), we now need to initialize the root of
__bfs() properly (with a correct ->only_xr), to do so, we introduce some
helper functions, which also cleans up a little bit for the __bfs() root
initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-8-boqun.feng@gmail.com
To add recursive read locks into the dependency graph, we need to store
the types of dependencies for the BFS later. There are four types of
dependencies:
* Exclusive -> Non-recursive dependencies: EN
e.g. write_lock(prev) held and try to acquire write_lock(next)
or non-recursive read_lock(next), which can be represented as
"prev -(EN)-> next"
* Shared -> Non-recursive dependencies: SN
e.g. read_lock(prev) held and try to acquire write_lock(next) or
non-recursive read_lock(next), which can be represented as
"prev -(SN)-> next"
* Exclusive -> Recursive dependencies: ER
e.g. write_lock(prev) held and try to acquire recursive
read_lock(next), which can be represented as "prev -(ER)-> next"
* Shared -> Recursive dependencies: SR
e.g. read_lock(prev) held and try to acquire recursive
read_lock(next), which can be represented as "prev -(SR)-> next"
So we use 4 bits for the presence of each type in lock_list::dep. Helper
functions and macros are also introduced to convert a pair of locks into
lock_list::dep bit and maintain the addition of different types of
dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-7-boqun.feng@gmail.com
lock_list::distance is always not greater than MAX_LOCK_DEPTH (which
is 48 right now), so a u16 will fit. This patch reduces the size of
lock_list::distance to save space, so that we can introduce other fields
to help detect recursive read lock deadlocks without increasing the size
of lock_list structure.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-6-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Currently, __bfs() will do a breadth-first search in the dependency
graph and visit each lock class in the graph exactly once, so for
example, in the following graph:
A ---------> B
| ^
| |
+----------> C
a __bfs() call starts at A, will visit B through dependency A -> B and
visit C through dependency A -> C and that's it, IOW, __bfs() will not
visit dependency C -> B.
This is OK for now, as we only have strong dependencies in the
dependency graph, so whenever there is a traverse path from A to B in
__bfs(), it means A has strong dependencies to B (IOW, B depends on A
strongly). So no need to visit all dependencies in the graph.
However, as we are going to add recursive-read lock into the dependency
graph, as a result, not all the paths mean strong dependencies, in the
same example above, dependency A -> B may be a weak dependency and
traverse A -> C -> B may be a strong dependency path. And with the old
way of __bfs() (i.e. visiting every lock class exactly once), we will
miss the strong dependency path, which will result into failing to find
a deadlock. To cure this for the future, we need to find a way for
__bfs() to visit each dependency, rather than each class, exactly once
in the search until we find a match.
The solution is simple:
We used to mark lock_class::lockdep_dependency_gen_id to indicate a
class has been visited in __bfs(), now we change the semantics a little
bit: we now mark lock_class::lockdep_dependency_gen_id to indicate _all
the dependencies_ in its lock_{after,before} have been visited in the
__bfs() (note we only take one direction in a __bfs() search). In this
way, every dependency is guaranteed to be visited until we find a match.
Note: the checks in mark_lock_accessed() and lock_accessed() are
removed, because after this modification, we may call these two
functions on @source_entry of __bfs(), which may not be the entry in
"list_entries"
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com
__bfs() could return four magic numbers:
1: search succeeds, but none match.
0: search succeeds, find one match.
-1: search fails because of the cq is full.
-2: search fails because a invalid node is found.
This patch cleans things up by using a enum type for the return value
of __bfs() and its friends, this improves the code readability of the
code, and further, could help if we want to extend the BFS.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com
On the archs using QUEUED_RWLOCKS, read_lock() is not always a recursive
read lock, actually it's only recursive if in_interrupt() is true. So
change the annotation accordingly to catch more deadlocks.
Note we used to treat read_lock() as pure recursive read locks in
lib/locking-seftest.c, and this is useful, especially for the lockdep
development selftest, so we keep this via a variable to force switching
lock annotation for read_lock().
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com
