Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jakub Kicinski f117c48c0d docs: networking: extend the statistics documentation
Make the lack of expectations for switching NICs explicit,
describe the new stats.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-04-16 16:59:20 -07:00
Jakub Kicinski be85dbfeb3 ethtool: add FEC statistics
Similarly to pause statistics add stats for FEC.

The IEEE standard mandates two sets of counters:
 - 30.5.1.1.17 aFECCorrectedBlocks
 - 30.5.1.1.18 aFECUncorrectableBlocks
where block is a block of bits FEC operates on.
Each of these counters is defined per lane (PCS instance).

Multiple vendors provide number of corrected _bits_ rather
than/as well as blocks.

This set adds the 2 standard-based block counters and a extra
one for corrected bits.

Counters are exposed to user space via netlink in new attributes.
Each attribute carries an array of u64s, first element is
the total count, and the following ones are a per-lane break down.

Much like with pause stats the operation will not fail when driver
does not implement the get_fec_stats callback (nor can the driver
fail the operation by returning an error). If stats can't be
reported the relevant attributes will be empty.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-04-15 17:08:29 -07:00
Mauro Carvalho Chehab 97e44c4f0c docs: net: statistics.rst: remove a duplicated kernel-doc
include/linux/ethtool.h is included twice with kernel-doc,
both to document ethtool_pause_stats(). The first one is
at statistics.rst, and the second one at ethtool-netlink.rst.

Replace one of the references to use the name of the
function. The automarkup.py extension should create the
cross-references.

Solves this warning:

	../Documentation/networking/ethtool-netlink.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'networking/statistics'.
	Declaration is 'ethtool_pause_stats'.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fdbf853bbdaf3bc1d38f32744b739d175c5c31f5.1603791716.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-10-28 11:26:10 -06:00
Jakub Kicinski 8c00bd936f docs: net: include the new ethtool pause stats in the stats doc
Tell people that there now is an interface for querying pause frames.
A little bit of restructuring is needed given this is a first source
of such statistics.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-15 13:26:28 -07:00
Jakub Kicinski 0db0c34cfb net: tighten the definition of interface statistics
This patch is born out of an investigation into which IEEE statistics
correspond to which struct rtnl_link_stats64 members. Turns out that
there seems to be reasonable consensus on the matter, among many drivers.
To save others the time (and it took more time than I'm comfortable
admitting) I'm adding comments referring to IEEE attributes to
struct rtnl_link_stats64.

Up until now we had two forms of documentation for stats - in
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net-statistics and the comments
on struct rtnl_link_stats64 itself. While the former is very cautious
in defining the expected behavior, the latter feel quite dated and
may not be easy to understand for modern day driver author
(e.g. rx_over_errors). At the same time modern systems are far more
complex and once obvious definitions lost their clarity. For example
- does rx_packet count at the MAC layer (aFramesReceivedOK)?
packets processed correctly by hardware? received by the driver?
or maybe received by the stack?

I tried to clarify the expectations, further clarifications from
others are very welcome.

The part hardest to untangle is rx_over_errors vs rx_fifo_errors
vs rx_missed_errors. After much deliberation I concluded that for
modern HW only two of the counters will make sense. The distinction
between internal FIFO overflow and packets dropped due to back-pressure
from the host is likely too implementation (driver and device) specific
to expose in the standard stats.

Now - which two of those counters we select to use is anyone's pick:

sysfs documentation suggests rx_over_errors counts packets which
did not fit into buffers due to MTU being too small, which I reused.
There don't seem to be many modern drivers using it (well, CAN drivers
seem to love this statistic).

Of the remaining two I picked rx_missed_errors to report device drops.
bnxt reports it and it's folded into "drop"s in procfs (while
rx_fifo_errors is an error, and modern devices usually receive the frame
OK, they just can't admit it into the pipeline).

Of the drivers I looked at only AMD Lance-like and NS8390-like use all
three of these counters. rx_missed_errors counts missed frames,
rx_over_errors counts overflow events, and rx_fifo_errors counts frames
which were truncated because they didn't fit into buffers. This suggests
that rx_fifo_errors may be the correct stat for truncated packets, but
I'd think a FIFO stat counting truncated packets would be very confusing
to a modern reader.

v2:
 - add driver developer notes about ethtool stat count and reset
 - replace Ethernet with IEEE 802.3 to better indicate source of attrs
 - mention byte counters don't count FCS
 - clarify RX counter is from device to host
 - drop "sightly" from sysfs paragraph
 - add examples of ethtool stats
 - s/incoming/received/ s/incoming/transmitted/

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-09-07 15:08:05 -07:00