Russell reported that since 5.13, KVM's probing of the PMU has
started to fail on his HW. As it turns out, there is an implicit
ordering dependency between the architectural PMU probing code and
and KVM's own probing. If, due to probe ordering reasons, KVM probes
before the PMU driver, it will fail to detect the PMU and prevent it
from being advertised to guests as well as the VMM.
Obviously, this is one probing too many, and we should be able to
deal with any ordering.
Add a callback from the PMU code into KVM to advertise the registration
of a host CPU PMU, allowing for any probing order.
Fixes: 5421db1be3 ("KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers")
Reported-by: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YUYRKVflRtUytzy5@shell.armlinux.org.uk
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
KVM/arm64 is the sole user of perf_num_counters(), and really
could do without it. Stop using the obsolete API by relying on
the existing probing code.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414134409.1266357-2-maz@kernel.org
The host currently writes directly in EL2 per-CPU data sections from
the PMU code when running in nVHE. In preparation for unmapping the EL2
sections from the host stage 2, disable PMU support in protected mode as
we currently do not have a use-case for it.
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319100146.1149909-38-qperret@google.com
We currently find out about the presence of a HW PMU (or the handling
of that PMU by perf, which amounts to the same thing) in a fairly
roundabout way, by checking the number of counters available to perf.
That's good enough for now, but we will soon need to find about about
that on paths where perf is out of reach (in the world switch).
Instead, let's turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209114844.3278746-2-maz@kernel.org
Message-Id: <20210305185254.3730990-5-maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Now that the 32bit KVM/arm host is a distant memory, let's move the
whole of the KVM/arm64 code into the arm64 tree.
As they said in the song: Welcome Home (Sanitarium).
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200513104034.74741-1-maz@kernel.org
