Commit Graph

282 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Zijlstra 6ddaca6b20 lockdep: Fix block chain corruption
[ Upstream commit bca4104b00 ]

Kent reported an occasional KASAN splat in lockdep. Mark then noted:

> I suspect the dodgy access is to chain_block_buckets[-1], which hits the last 4
> bytes of the redzone and gets (incorrectly/misleadingly) attributed to
> nr_large_chain_blocks.

That would mean @size == 0, at which point size_to_bucket() returns -1
and the above happens.

alloc_chain_hlocks() has 'size - req', for the first with the
precondition 'size >= rq', which allows the 0.

This code is trying to split a block, del_chain_block() takes what we
need, and add_chain_block() puts back the remainder, except in the
above case the remainder is 0 sized and things go sideways.

Fixes: 810507fe6f ("locking/lockdep: Reuse freed chain_hlocks entries")
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231121114126.GH8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-12-03 07:31:23 +01:00
Nick Desaulniers f9571a9699 lockdep: Fix -Wunused-parameter for _THIS_IP_
[ Upstream commit 8b023accc8 ]

While looking into a bug related to the compiler's handling of addresses
of labels, I noticed some uses of _THIS_IP_ seemed unused in lockdep.
Drive by cleanup.

-Wunused-parameter:
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1383:22: warning: unused parameter 'ip'
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4246:48: warning: unused parameter 'ip'
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4844:19: warning: unused parameter 'ip'

Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220314221909.2027027-1-ndesaulniers@google.com
Stable-dep-of: 54c3931957 ("tracing: hold caller_addr to hardirq_{enable,disable}_ip")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-09-20 12:39:42 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra e0067e6d54 locking/lockdep: Fix lockdep_init_map_*() confusion
[ Upstream commit eae6d58d67 ]

Commit dfd5e3f5fe ("locking/lockdep: Mark local_lock_t") added yet
another lockdep_init_map_*() variant, but forgot to update all the
existing users of the most complicated version.

This could lead to a loss of lock_type and hence an incorrect report.
Given the relative rarity of both local_lock and these annotations,
this is unlikely to happen in practise, still, best fix things.

Fixes: dfd5e3f5fe ("locking/lockdep: Mark local_lock_t")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YqyEDtoan20K0CVD@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-08-17 14:23:08 +02:00
Waiman Long 1388c10b32 locking/lockdep: Iterate lock_classes directly when reading lockdep files
[ Upstream commit fb7275acd6 ]

When dumping lock_classes information via /proc/lockdep, we can't take
the lockdep lock as the lock hold time is indeterminate. Iterating
over all_lock_classes without holding lock can be dangerous as there
is a slight chance that it may branch off to other lists leading to
infinite loop or even access invalid memory if changes are made to
all_lock_classes list in parallel.

To avoid this problem, iteration of lock classes is now done directly
on the lock_classes array itself. The lock_classes_in_use bitmap is
checked to see if the lock class is being used. To avoid iterating
the full array all the times, a new max_lock_class_idx value is added
to track the maximum lock_class index that is currently being used.

We can theoretically take the lockdep lock for iterating all_lock_classes
when other lockdep files (lockdep_stats and lock_stat) are accessed as
the lock hold time will be shorter for them. For consistency, they are
also modified to iterate the lock_classes array directly.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220211035526.1329503-2-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-08 14:23:57 +02:00
Waiman Long 03f836fcb6 locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class
commit 61cc4534b6 upstream.

It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may
potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key()
is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This
is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key()
fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process.

After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed
but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to
it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep
is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if
KASAN is enabled.

To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always
search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and
zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/

Fixes: 8b39adbee8 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-08 14:22:48 +02:00
Cheng Jui Wang 5dcc365697 lockdep: Correct lock_classes index mapping
commit 28df029d53 upstream.

A kernel exception was hit when trying to dump /proc/lockdep_chains after
lockdep report "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!":

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00054005450e05c3
...
00054005450e05c3] address between user and kernel address ranges
...
pc : [0xffffffece769b3a8] string+0x50/0x10c
lr : [0xffffffece769ac88] vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c
...
 Call trace:
  string+0x50/0x10c
  vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c
  seq_printf+0x8c/0xd8
  print_name+0x64/0xf4
  lc_show+0xb8/0x128
  seq_read_iter+0x3cc/0x5fc
  proc_reg_read_iter+0xdc/0x1d4

The cause of the problem is the function lock_chain_get_class() will
shift lock_classes index by 1, but the index don't need to be shifted
anymore since commit 01bb6f0af9 ("locking/lockdep: Change the range
of class_idx in held_lock struct") already change the index to start
from 0.

The lock_classes[-1] located at chain_hlocks array. When printing
lock_classes[-1] after the chain_hlocks entries are modified, the
exception happened.

The output of lockdep_chains are incorrect due to this problem too.

Fixes: f611e8cf98 ("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey")
Signed-off-by: Cheng Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220210105011.21712-1-cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-02-23 12:03:22 +01:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior c401830b01 lockdep: Let lock_is_held_type() detect recursive read as read
[ Upstream commit 2507003a1d ]

lock_is_held_type(, 1) detects acquired read locks. It only recognized
locks acquired with lock_acquire_shared(). Read locks acquired with
lock_acquire_shared_recursive() are not recognized because a `2' is
stored as the read value.

Rework the check to additionally recognise lock's read value one and two
as a read held lock.

Fixes: e918188611 ("locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210903084001.lblecrvz4esl4mrr@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18 19:16:23 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra d120d005b9 locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr fail
[ Upstream commit ce0b9c805d ]

vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18 19:16:09 +01:00
Linus Torvalds 28e92f9903 Merge branch 'core-rcu-2021.07.04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu
Pull RCU updates from Paul McKenney:

 - Bitmap parsing support for "all" as an alias for all bits

 - Documentation updates

 - Miscellaneous fixes, including some that overlap into mm and lockdep

 - kvfree_rcu() updates

 - mem_dump_obj() updates, with acks from one of the slab-allocator
   maintainers

 - RCU NOCB CPU updates, including limited deoffloading

 - SRCU updates

 - Tasks-RCU updates

 - Torture-test updates

* 'core-rcu-2021.07.04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu: (78 commits)
  tasks-rcu: Make show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads() be static inline
  rcu-tasks: Make ksoftirqd provide RCU Tasks quiescent states
  rcu: Add missing __releases() annotation
  rcu: Remove obsolete rcu_read_unlock() deadlock commentary
  rcu: Improve comments describing RCU read-side critical sections
  rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer
  srcu: Early test SRCU polling start
  rcu: Fix various typos in comments
  rcu/nocb: Unify timers
  rcu/nocb: Prepare for fine-grained deferred wakeup
  rcu/nocb: Only cancel nocb timer if not polling
  rcu/nocb: Delete bypass_timer upon nocb_gp wakeup
  rcu/nocb: Cancel nocb_timer upon nocb_gp wakeup
  rcu/nocb: Allow de-offloading rdp leader
  rcu/nocb: Directly call __wake_nocb_gp() from bypass timer
  rcu: Don't penalize priority boosting when there is nothing to boost
  rcu: Point to documentation of ordering guarantees
  rcu: Make rcu_gp_cleanup() be noinline for tracing
  rcu: Restrict RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD to at most four CPUs
  rcu: Make show_rcu_gp_kthreads() dump rcu_node structures blocking GP
  ...
2021-07-04 12:58:33 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 54a728dc5e Scheduler udpates for this cycle:
- Changes to core scheduling facilities:
 
     - Add "Core Scheduling" via CONFIG_SCHED_CORE=y, which enables
       coordinated scheduling across SMT siblings. This is a much
       requested feature for cloud computing platforms, to allow
       the flexible utilization of SMT siblings, without exposing
       untrusted domains to information leaks & side channels, plus
       to ensure more deterministic computing performance on SMT
       systems used by heterogenous workloads.
 
       There's new prctls to set core scheduling groups, which
       allows more flexible management of workloads that can share
       siblings.
 
     - Fix task->state access anti-patterns that may result in missed
       wakeups and rename it to ->__state in the process to catch new
       abuses.
 
  - Load-balancing changes:
 
      - Tweak newidle_balance for fair-sched, to improve
        'memcache'-like workloads.
 
      - "Age" (decay) average idle time, to better track & improve workloads
        such as 'tbench'.
 
      - Fix & improve energy-aware (EAS) balancing logic & metrics.
 
      - Fix & improve the uclamp metrics.
 
      - Fix task migration (taskset) corner case on !CONFIG_CPUSET.
 
      - Fix RT and deadline utilization tracking across policy changes
 
      - Introduce a "burstable" CFS controller via cgroups, which allows
        bursty CPU-bound workloads to borrow a bit against their future
        quota to improve overall latencies & batching. Can be tweaked
        via /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/<X>/cpu.cfs_burst_us.
 
      - Rework assymetric topology/capacity detection & handling.
 
  - Scheduler statistics & tooling:
 
      - Disable delayacct by default, but add a sysctl to enable
        it at runtime if tooling needs it. Use static keys and
        other optimizations to make it more palatable.
 
      - Use sched_clock() in delayacct, instead of ktime_get_ns().
 
  - Misc cleanups and fixes.
 
 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJFBAABCgAvFiEEBpT5eoXrXCwVQwEKEnMQ0APhK1gFAmDZcPoRHG1pbmdvQGtl
 cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEnMQ0APhK1g3yw//WfhIqy7Psa9d/MBMjQDRGbTuO4+w22Dj
 vmWFU44Q4KJxQHWeIgUlrK+dzvYWvNmflUs2CUUOiDVzxFTHMIyBtL4qCBUbx4Ns
 vKAcB9wsWZge2o3WzZqpProRhdoRaSKw8egUr2q7rACVBkckY7eGP/OjWxXU8BdA
 b7D0LPWwuIBFfN4pFYeCDLn32Dqr9s6Chyj+ZecabdG7EE6Gu+f1diVcxy7JE/mc
 4WWL0D1RqdgpGrBEuMJIxPYekdrZiuy4jtEbztz5gbTBteN1cj3BLfqn0Pc/e6rO
 Vyuc5mXCAmzRVi18z6g6bsVl+IA/nrbErENB2OHOhOYtqiZxqGTd4GPWZszMyY17
 5AsEO5+5pcaBsy4gyp09qURggBu9zhJnMVmOI3rIHZkmkhwzc6uUJlyhDCTiFWOz
 3ZF3LjbZEyCKodMD8qMHbs3axIBpIfZqjzkvSKyFnvfXEGVytVse7NUuWtQ36u92
 GnURxVeYY1TDVXvE1Y8owNKMxknKQ6YRlypP7Dtbeo/qG6hShp0xmS7qDLDi0ybZ
 ZlK+bDECiVoDf3nvJo+8v5M82IJ3CBt4UYldeRJsa1YCK/FsbK8tp91fkEfnXVue
 +U6LPX0AmMpXacR5HaZfb3uBIKRw/QMdP/7RFtBPhpV6jqCrEmuqHnpPQiEVtxwO
 UmG7bt94Trk=
 =3VDr
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'sched-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull scheduler udpates from Ingo Molnar:

 - Changes to core scheduling facilities:

    - Add "Core Scheduling" via CONFIG_SCHED_CORE=y, which enables
      coordinated scheduling across SMT siblings. This is a much
      requested feature for cloud computing platforms, to allow the
      flexible utilization of SMT siblings, without exposing untrusted
      domains to information leaks & side channels, plus to ensure more
      deterministic computing performance on SMT systems used by
      heterogenous workloads.

      There are new prctls to set core scheduling groups, which allows
      more flexible management of workloads that can share siblings.

    - Fix task->state access anti-patterns that may result in missed
      wakeups and rename it to ->__state in the process to catch new
      abuses.

 - Load-balancing changes:

    - Tweak newidle_balance for fair-sched, to improve 'memcache'-like
      workloads.

    - "Age" (decay) average idle time, to better track & improve
      workloads such as 'tbench'.

    - Fix & improve energy-aware (EAS) balancing logic & metrics.

    - Fix & improve the uclamp metrics.

    - Fix task migration (taskset) corner case on !CONFIG_CPUSET.

    - Fix RT and deadline utilization tracking across policy changes

    - Introduce a "burstable" CFS controller via cgroups, which allows
      bursty CPU-bound workloads to borrow a bit against their future
      quota to improve overall latencies & batching. Can be tweaked via
      /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/<X>/cpu.cfs_burst_us.

    - Rework assymetric topology/capacity detection & handling.

 - Scheduler statistics & tooling:

    - Disable delayacct by default, but add a sysctl to enable it at
      runtime if tooling needs it. Use static keys and other
      optimizations to make it more palatable.

    - Use sched_clock() in delayacct, instead of ktime_get_ns().

 - Misc cleanups and fixes.

* tag 'sched-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (72 commits)
  sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits
  sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection
  sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag
  psi: Fix race between psi_trigger_create/destroy
  sched/fair: Introduce the burstable CFS controller
  sched/uclamp: Fix uclamp_tg_restrict()
  sched/rt: Fix Deadline utilization tracking during policy change
  sched/rt: Fix RT utilization tracking during policy change
  sched: Change task_struct::state
  sched,arch: Remove unused TASK_STATE offsets
  sched,timer: Use __set_current_state()
  sched: Add get_current_state()
  sched,perf,kvm: Fix preemption condition
  sched: Introduce task_is_running()
  sched: Unbreak wakeups
  sched/fair: Age the average idle time
  sched/cpufreq: Consider reduced CPU capacity in energy calculation
  sched/fair: Take thermal pressure into account while estimating energy
  thermal/cpufreq_cooling: Update offline CPUs per-cpu thermal_pressure
  sched/fair: Return early from update_tg_cfs_load() if delta == 0
  ...
2021-06-28 12:14:19 -07:00
Linus Torvalds a15286c63d Locking changes for this cycle:
- Core locking & atomics:
 
      - Convert all architectures to ARCH_ATOMIC: move every
        architecture to ARCH_ATOMIC, then get rid of ARCH_ATOMIC
        and all the transitory facilities and #ifdefs.
 
        Much reduction in complexity from that series:
 
            63 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 4094 deletions(-)
 
      - Self-test enhancements
 
  - Futexes:
 
      - Add the new FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 ABI, which is a variant that
        doesn't set FLAGS_CLOCKRT (.e. uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC).
 
        [ The temptation to repurpose FUTEX_LOCK_PI's implicit
          setting of FLAGS_CLOCKRT & invert the flag's meaning
          to avoid having to introduce a new variant was
          resisted successfully. ]
 
      - Enhance futex self-tests
 
  - Lockdep:
 
      - Fix dependency path printouts
      - Optimize trace saving
      - Broaden & fix wait-context checks
 
  - Misc cleanups and fixes.
 
 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJFBAABCgAvFiEEBpT5eoXrXCwVQwEKEnMQ0APhK1gFAmDZaEYRHG1pbmdvQGtl
 cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEnMQ0APhK1hPdxAAiNCsxL6X1cZ8zqbWsvLefT9Zqhzgs5u6
 gdZele7PNibvbYdON26b5RUzuKfOW/hgyX6LKqr+AiNYTT9PGhcY+tycUr2PGk5R
 LMyhJWmmX5cUVPU92ky+z5hEHB2gr4XPJcvgpKKUL0XB1tBaSvy2DtgwPuhXOoT1
 1sCQfy63t71snt2RfEnibVW6xovwaA2lsqL81lLHJN4iRFWvqO498/m4+PWkylsm
 ig/+VT1Oz7t4wqu3NhTqNNZv+4K4W2asniyo53Dg2BnRm/NjhJtgg4jRibrb0ssb
 67Xdq6y8+xNBmEAKj+Re8VpMcu4aj346Ctk7d4gst2ah/Rc0TvqfH6mezH7oq7RL
 hmOrMBWtwQfKhEE/fDkng30nrVxc/98YXP0n2rCCa0ySsaF6b6T185mTcYDRDxFs
 BVNS58ub+zxrF9Zd4nhIHKaEHiL2ZdDimqAicXN0RpywjIzTQ/y11uU7I1WBsKkq
 WkPYs+FPHnX7aBv1MsuxHhb8sUXjG924K4JeqnjF45jC3sC1crX+N0jv4wHw+89V
 h4k20s2Tw6m5XGXlgGwMJh0PCcD6X22Vd9Uyw8zb+IJfvNTGR9Rp1Ec+1gMRSll+
 xsn6G6Uy9bcNU0SqKlBSfelweGKn4ZxbEPn76Jc8KWLiepuZ6vv5PBoOuaujWht9
 KAeOC5XdjMk=
 =tH//
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'locking-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

 - Core locking & atomics:

     - Convert all architectures to ARCH_ATOMIC: move every architecture
       to ARCH_ATOMIC, then get rid of ARCH_ATOMIC and all the
       transitory facilities and #ifdefs.

       Much reduction in complexity from that series:

           63 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 4094 deletions(-)

     - Self-test enhancements

 - Futexes:

     - Add the new FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 ABI, which is a variant that doesn't
       set FLAGS_CLOCKRT (.e. uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC).

       [ The temptation to repurpose FUTEX_LOCK_PI's implicit setting of
         FLAGS_CLOCKRT & invert the flag's meaning to avoid having to
         introduce a new variant was resisted successfully. ]

     - Enhance futex self-tests

 - Lockdep:

     - Fix dependency path printouts

     - Optimize trace saving

     - Broaden & fix wait-context checks

 - Misc cleanups and fixes.

* tag 'locking-core-2021-06-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (52 commits)
  locking/lockdep: Correct the description error for check_redundant()
  futex: Provide FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 to support clock selection
  futex: Prepare futex_lock_pi() for runtime clock selection
  lockdep/selftest: Remove wait-type RCU_CALLBACK tests
  lockdep/selftests: Fix selftests vs PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
  lockdep: Fix wait-type for empty stack
  locking/selftests: Add a selftest for check_irq_usage()
  lockding/lockdep: Avoid to find wrong lock dep path in check_irq_usage()
  locking/lockdep: Remove the unnecessary trace saving
  locking/lockdep: Fix the dep path printing for backwards BFS
  selftests: futex: Add futex compare requeue test
  selftests: futex: Add futex wait test
  seqlock: Remove trailing semicolon in macros
  locking/lockdep: Reduce LOCKDEP dependency list
  locking/lockdep,doc: Improve readability of the block matrix
  locking/atomics: atomic-instrumented: simplify ifdeffery
  locking/atomic: delete !ARCH_ATOMIC remnants
  locking/atomic: xtensa: move to ARCH_ATOMIC
  locking/atomic: sparc: move to ARCH_ATOMIC
  locking/atomic: sh: move to ARCH_ATOMIC
  ...
2021-06-28 11:45:29 -07:00
Xiongwei Song 0e8a89d49d locking/lockdep: Correct the description error for check_redundant()
If there is no matched result, check_redundant() will return BFS_RNOMATCH.

Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210618130230.123249-1-sxwjean@me.com
2021-06-22 16:42:09 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra f8b298cc39 lockdep: Fix wait-type for empty stack
Even the very first lock can violate the wait-context check, consider
the various IRQ contexts.

Fixes: de8f5e4f2d ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617190313.256987481@infradead.org
2021-06-22 16:42:08 +02:00
Boqun Feng 7b1f8c6179 lockding/lockdep: Avoid to find wrong lock dep path in check_irq_usage()
In the step #3 of check_irq_usage(), we seach backwards to find a lock
whose usage conflicts the usage of @target_entry1 on safe/unsafe.
However, we should only keep the irq-unsafe usage of @target_entry1 into
consideration, because it could be a case where a lock is hardirq-unsafe
but soft-safe, and in check_irq_usage() we find it because its
hardirq-unsafe could result into a hardirq-safe-unsafe deadlock, but
currently since we don't filter out the other usage bits, so we may find
a lock dependency path softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, which in fact
doesn't cause a deadlock. And this may cause misleading lockdep splats.

Fix this by only keeping LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_ALL bits when we try the
backwards search.

Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2021-06-22 16:42:07 +02:00
Boqun Feng d4c157c7b1 locking/lockdep: Remove the unnecessary trace saving
In print_bad_irq_dependency(), save_trace() is called to set the ->trace
for @prev_root as the current call trace, however @prev_root corresponds
to the the held lock, which may not be acquired in current call trace,
therefore it's wrong to use save_trace() to set ->trace of @prev_root.
Moreover, with our adjustment of printing backwards dependency path, the
->trace of @prev_root is unncessary, so remove it.

Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2021-06-22 16:42:07 +02:00
Boqun Feng 69c7a5fb24 locking/lockdep: Fix the dep path printing for backwards BFS
We use the same code to print backwards lock dependency path as the
forwards lock dependency path, and this could result into incorrect
printing because for a backwards lock_list ->trace is not the call trace
where the lock of ->class is acquired.

Fix this by introducing a separate function on printing the backwards
dependency path. Also add a few comments about the printing while we are
at it.

Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2021-06-22 16:42:06 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 49faa77759 locking/lockdep: Improve noinstr vs errors
Better handle the failure paths.

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: debug_locks_off()+0x23: call to console_verbose() leaves .noinstr.text section
  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: debug_locks_off()+0x19: call to __kasan_check_write() leaves .noinstr.text section

  debug_locks_off+0x19/0x40:
  instrument_atomic_write at include/linux/instrumented.h:86
  (inlined by) __debug_locks_off at include/linux/debug_locks.h:17
  (inlined by) debug_locks_off at lib/debug_locks.c:41

Fixes: 6eebad1ad3 ("lockdep: __always_inline more for noinstr")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210621120120.784404944@infradead.org
2021-06-22 13:56:43 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra b03fbd4ff2 sched: Introduce task_is_running()
Replace a bunch of 'p->state == TASK_RUNNING' with a new helper:
task_is_running(p).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611082838.222401495@infradead.org
2021-06-18 11:43:07 +02:00
Leo Yan 89e70d5c58 locking/lockdep: Correct calling tracepoints
The commit eb1f00237a ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") reverses
tracepoints for lock_contended() and lock_acquired(), thus the ftrace
log shows the wrong locking sequence that "acquired" event is prior to
"contended" event:

  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501685: lock_acquire: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501686: lock_acquired: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501689: lock_contended: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
  <idle>-0       [001] d.s3 20803.501690: lock_release: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock

This patch fixes calling tracepoints for lock_contended() and
lock_acquired().

Fixes: eb1f00237a ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints")
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210512120937.90211-1-leo.yan@linaro.org
2021-05-18 12:53:50 +02:00
Paul E. McKenney 1feb2cc8db lockdep: Explicitly flag likely false-positive report
The reason that lockdep_rcu_suspicious() prints the value of debug_locks
is because a value of zero indicates a likely false positive.  This can
work, but is a bit obtuse.  This commit therefore explicitly calls out
the possibility of a false positive.

Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-05-10 16:22:54 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 0ff0edb550 Locking changes for this cycle were:
- rtmutex cleanup & spring cleaning pass that removes ~400 lines of code
  - Futex simplifications & cleanups
  - Add debugging to the CSD code, to help track down a tenacious race (or hw problem)
  - Add lockdep_assert_not_held(), to allow code to require a lock to not be held,
    and propagate this into the ath10k driver
  - Misc LKMM documentation updates
  - Misc KCSAN updates: cleanups & documentation updates
  - Misc fixes and cleanups
  - Fix locktorture bugs with ww_mutexes
 
 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJFBAABCgAvFiEEBpT5eoXrXCwVQwEKEnMQ0APhK1gFAmCJDn0RHG1pbmdvQGtl
 cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEnMQ0APhK1hPrRAAryS4zPnuDsfkVk0smxo7a0lK5ljbH2Xo
 28QUZXOl6upnEV8dzbjwG7eAjt5ZJVI5tKIeG0PV0NUJH2nsyHwESdtULGGYuPf/
 4YUzNwZJa+nI/jeBnVsXCimLVxxnNCRdR7yOVOHm4ukEwa+YTNt1pvlYRmUd4YyH
 Q5cCrpb3THvLka3AAamEbqnHnAdGxHKuuHYVRkODpMQ+zrQvtN8antYsuk8kJsqM
 m+GZg/dVCuLEPah5k+lOACtcq/w7HCmTlxS8t4XLvD52jywFZLcCPvi1rk0+JR+k
 Vd9TngC09GJ4jXuDpr42YKkU9/X6qy2Es39iA/ozCvc1Alrhspx/59XmaVSuWQGo
 XYuEPx38Yuo/6w16haSgp0k4WSay15A4uhCTQ75VF4vli8Bqgg9PaxLyQH1uG8e2
 xk8U90R7bDzLlhKYIx1Vu5Z0t7A1JtB5CJtgpcfg/zQLlzygo75fHzdAiU5fDBDm
 3QQXSU2Oqzt7c5ZypioHWazARk7tL6th38KGN1gZDTm5zwifpaCtHi7sml6hhZ/4
 ATH6zEPzIbXJL2UqumSli6H4ye5ORNjOu32r7YPqLI4IDbzpssfoSwfKYlQG4Tvn
 4H1Ukirzni0gz5+wbleItzf2aeo1rocs4YQTnaT02j8NmUHUz4AzOHGOQFr5Tvh0
 wk/P4MIoSb0=
 =cOOk
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'locking-core-2021-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:

 - rtmutex cleanup & spring cleaning pass that removes ~400 lines of
   code

 - Futex simplifications & cleanups

 - Add debugging to the CSD code, to help track down a tenacious race
   (or hw problem)

 - Add lockdep_assert_not_held(), to allow code to require a lock to not
   be held, and propagate this into the ath10k driver

 - Misc LKMM documentation updates

 - Misc KCSAN updates: cleanups & documentation updates

 - Misc fixes and cleanups

 - Fix locktorture bugs with ww_mutexes

* tag 'locking-core-2021-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (44 commits)
  kcsan: Fix printk format string
  static_call: Relax static_call_update() function argument type
  static_call: Fix unused variable warn w/o MODULE
  locking/rtmutex: Clean up signal handling in __rt_mutex_slowlock()
  locking/rtmutex: Restrict the trylock WARN_ON() to debug
  locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in rt_mutex_postunlock()
  locking/rtmutex: Consolidate the fast/slowpath invocation
  locking/rtmutex: Make text section and inlining consistent
  locking/rtmutex: Move debug functions as inlines into common header
  locking/rtmutex: Decrapify __rt_mutex_init()
  locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs
  locking/rtmutex: Inline chainwalk depth check
  locking/rtmutex: Move rt_mutex_debug_task_free() to rtmutex.c
  locking/rtmutex: Remove empty and unused debug stubs
  locking/rtmutex: Consolidate rt_mutex_init()
  locking/rtmutex: Remove output from deadlock detector
  locking/rtmutex: Remove rtmutex deadlock tester leftovers
  locking/rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_timed_lock()
  MAINTAINERS: Add myself as futex reviewer
  locking/mutex: Remove repeated declaration
  ...
2021-04-28 12:37:53 -07:00
Linus Torvalds ffc766b31e This is an irregular pull request for sending a lockdep patch.
Peter Zijlstra asked us to find bad annotation that blows up the lockdep
 storage [1][2][3] but we could not find such annotation [4][5], and
 Peter cannot give us feedback any more [6]. Since we tested this patch
 on linux-next.git without problems, and keeping this problem unresolved
 discourages kernel testing which is more painful, I'm sending this patch
 without forever waiting for response from Peter.
 
 [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200916115057.GO2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
 [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201118142357.GW3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
 [3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201118151038.GX3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
 [4] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+asqRbjaN9ras=P5DcxKgzsnV0fvV0tYb2VkT+P00pFvQ@mail.gmail.com
 [5] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4b89985e-99f9-18bc-0bf1-c883127dc70c@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
 [6] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+YnHFV1p5mbhby2nyOaNTy8c_yoVk86z5avo14KWs0s1A@mail.gmail.com
 
  kernel/locking/lockdep.c           |    2 -
  kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h |    8 +++----
  lib/Kconfig.debug                  |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJghetlAAoJEEJfEo0MZPUqMaEP/i0pkfOyKBdUe61Y9g0A2TmN
 h5I59KiSsgmx7dK90Q2GP1kUQE9ROCiqIz9qHzCzWfk9jljgFgRfECBKHqH+K7Tq
 AlQQkJmAiwpg+1scSkhoxBOrSGXHe2xB4qvazvw7tAAIDPjcV/pkFlNKaUtItzr2
 VPr4t6Eis/MZ7Pau2xLFLX2gRn5KvpsbcL+wydrDfqlXx3pNXlBvChBxixk90HS6
 0BC5pgb68pXm8Emzbp3+iloy0VuG/BHDA/vy02k5zUjMM7Zy+aGxR/cl2jvc+lWd
 wyRWhwbSjTUrYs3Olmjkybj15lsgl573oIptVhIIrXuvjpyY5v1IH1gkLoxJgr5d
 yaKSdYwyN/OPI3KireEfaSgc6IqrJ1K9gLh1Knqw4JeoJngEVEkmBwBg/izpiXoL
 WVlWZuLkYtOTWxpsTOiCtzv4KkFhFtE61IEAIEsvvj9oeLQJu7JUR8oW0ZQtdfXg
 Em0IbObS8VGW322MNmb1p9SsaYvOueWyKzImEVlCBAb2g6PUYuiAwiOw8/tvsDFr
 KPXCPpaqKCFtp+BG21fn6GpTqJ4GteWy6JK6C9i/xhIWmv+QRijNEmPlyYQ0YMkd
 a8z8rqRqexknlPCJy/9AZWfBo6kg5Dt3icrrNVKoXLVC/LNYaHQvIKsGzZaQ1Pyq
 W6rnMbLCRD199sqoEFrH
 =E7U/
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'tomoyo-pr-20210426' of git://git.osdn.net/gitroot/tomoyo/tomoyo-test1

Pull lockdep capacity limit updates from Tetsuo Handa:
 "syzbot is occasionally reporting that fuzz testing is terminated due
  to hitting upper limits lockdep can track.

  Analysis via /proc/lockdep* did not show any obvious culprits, allow
  tuning tracing capacity constants"

* tag 'tomoyo-pr-20210426' of git://git.osdn.net/gitroot/tomoyo/tomoyo-test1:
  lockdep: Allow tuning tracing capacity constants.
2021-04-26 08:44:23 -07:00
Tetsuo Handa 5dc33592e9 lockdep: Allow tuning tracing capacity constants.
Since syzkaller continues various test cases until the kernel crashes,
syzkaller tends to examine more locking dependencies than normal systems.
As a result, syzbot is reporting that the fuzz testing was terminated
due to hitting upper limits lockdep can track [1] [2] [3]. Since analysis
via /proc/lockdep* did not show any obvious culprit [4] [5], we have no
choice but allow tuning tracing capacity constants.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3d97ba93fb3566000c1c59691ea427370d33ea1b
[2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=381cb436fe60dc03d7fd2a092b46d7f09542a72a
[3] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a588183ac34c1437fc0785e8f220e88282e5a29f
[4] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4b8f7a57-fa20-47bd-48a0-ae35d860f233@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
[5] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1c351187-253b-2d49-acaf-4563c63ae7d2@i-love.sakura.ne.jp

References: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1595640639-9310-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
2021-04-05 20:33:57 +09:00
Arnd Bergmann 6d48b7912c lockdep: Address clang -Wformat warning printing for %hd
Clang doesn't like format strings that truncate a 32-bit
value to something shorter:

  kernel/locking/lockdep.c:709:4: error: format specifies type 'short' but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]

In this case, the warning is a slightly questionable, as it could realize
that both class->wait_type_outer and class->wait_type_inner are in fact
8-bit struct members, even though the result of the ?: operator becomes an
'int'.

However, there is really no point in printing the number as a 16-bit
'short' rather than either an 8-bit or 32-bit number, so just change
it to a normal %d.

Fixes: de8f5e4f2d ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210322115531.3987555-1-arnd@kernel.org
2021-03-22 22:07:09 +01:00
Ingo Molnar e2db7592be locking: Fix typos in comments
Fix ~16 single-word typos in locking code comments.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2021-03-22 02:45:52 +01:00
Tetsuo Handa 3a85969e9d lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message
Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g.
kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()),
suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects
were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing.

[ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ]

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2021-03-21 11:59:57 +01:00
Shuah Khan f8cfa46608 lockdep: Add lockdep lock state defines
Adds defines for lock state returns from lock_is_held_type() based on
Johannes Berg's suggestions as it make it easier to read and maintain
the lock states. These are defines and a enum to avoid changes to
lock_is_held_type() and lockdep_is_held() return types.

Updates to lock_is_held_type() and  __lock_is_held() to use the new
defines.

Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/871rdmu9z9.fsf@codeaurora.org/
2021-03-06 12:51:10 +01:00
Shuah Khan 3e31f94752 lockdep: Add lockdep_assert_not_held()
Some kernel functions must be called without holding a specific lock.
Add lockdep_assert_not_held() to be used in these functions to detect
incorrect calls while holding a lock.

lockdep_assert_not_held() provides the opposite functionality of
lockdep_assert_held() which is used to assert calls that require
holding a specific lock.

Incorporates suggestions from Peter Zijlstra to avoid misfires when
lockdep_off() is employed.

The need for lockdep_assert_not_held() came up in a discussion on
ath10k patch. ath10k_drain_tx() and i915_vma_pin_ww() are examples
of functions that can use lockdep_assert_not_held().

Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/871rdmu9z9.fsf@codeaurora.org/
2021-03-06 12:51:05 +01:00
Ingo Molnar 62137364e3 Merge branch 'linus' into locking/core, to pick up upstream fixes
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2021-02-12 12:54:58 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 7f82e631d2 locking/lockdep: Avoid unmatched unlock
Commit f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
inversions") overlooked that print_usage_bug() releases the graph_lock
and called it without the graph lock held.

Fixes: f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YBfkuyIfB1+VRxXP@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2021-02-05 17:20:15 +01:00
Boqun Feng 5f2962401c locking/lockdep: Exclude local_lock_t from IRQ inversions
The purpose of local_lock_t is to abstract: preempt_disable() /
local_bh_disable() / local_irq_disable(). These are the traditional
means of gaining access to per-cpu data, but are fundamentally
non-preemptible.

local_lock_t provides a per-cpu lock, that on !PREEMPT_RT reduces to
no-ops, just like regular spinlocks do on UP.

This gives rise to:

	CPU0			CPU1

	local_lock(B)		spin_lock_irq(A)
	<IRQ>
	  spin_lock(A)		local_lock(B)

Where lockdep then figures things will lock up; which would be true if
B were any other kind of lock. However this is a false positive, no
such deadlock actually exists.

For !RT the above local_lock(B) is preempt_disable(), and there's
obviously no deadlock; alternatively, CPU0's B != CPU1's B.

For RT the argument is that since local_lock() nests inside
spin_lock(), it cannot be used in hardirq context, and therefore CPU0
cannot in fact happen. Even though B is a real lock, it is a
preemptible lock and any threaded-irq would simply schedule out and
let the preempted task (which holds B) continue such that the task on
CPU1 can make progress, after which the threaded-irq resumes and can
finish.

This means that we can never form an IRQ inversion on a local_lock
dependency, so terminate the graph walk when looking for IRQ
inversions when we encounter one.

One consequence is that (for LOCKDEP_SMALL) when we look for redundant
dependencies, A -> B is not redundant in the presence of A -> L -> B.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
[peterz: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-01-14 11:20:17 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 175b1a60e8 locking/lockdep: Clean up check_redundant() a bit
In preparation for adding an TRACE_IRQFLAGS dependent skip function to
check_redundant(), move it below the TRACE_IRQFLAGS #ifdef.

While there, provide a stub function to reduce #ifdef usage.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-01-14 11:20:17 +01:00
Boqun Feng bc2dd71b28 locking/lockdep: Add a skip() function to __bfs()
Some __bfs() walks will have additional iteration constraints (beyond
the path being strong). Provide an additional function to allow
terminating graph walks.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-01-14 11:20:17 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra dfd5e3f5fe locking/lockdep: Mark local_lock_t
The local_lock_t's are special, because they cannot form IRQ
inversions, make sure we can tell them apart from the rest of the
locks.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-01-14 11:20:17 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 77ca93a6b1 locking/lockdep: Avoid noinstr warning for DEBUG_LOCKDEP
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0x60: call to check_flags.part.0() leaves .noinstr.text section

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.652218215@infradead.org
2021-01-12 21:10:59 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 0afda3a888 locking/lockdep: Cure noinstr fail
When the compiler doesn't feel like inlining, it causes a noinstr
fail:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0xb: call to lockdep_enabled() leaves .noinstr.text section

Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.592595176@infradead.org
2021-01-12 21:10:59 +01:00
Boqun Feng 43be4388e9 lockdep: Put graph lock/unlock under lock_recursion protection
A warning was hit when running xfstests/generic/068 in a Hyper-V guest:

[...] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())
[...] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1350 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5280 check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Workqueue: events pwq_unbound_release_workfn
[...] RIP: 0010:check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Call Trace:
[...]  lock_is_held_type+0x72/0x150
[...]  ? lock_acquire+0x16e/0x4a0
[...]  rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[...]  __send_ipi_one+0x14d/0x1b0
[...]  hv_send_ipi+0x12/0x30
[...]  __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0xd1/0x110
[...]  __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0x11/0x20
[...]  .slowpath+0x9/0xe
[...]  lockdep_unregister_key+0x128/0x180
[...]  pwq_unbound_release_workfn+0xbb/0xf0
[...]  process_one_work+0x227/0x5c0
[...]  worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[...]  ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
[...]  kthread+0x153/0x170
[...]  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
[...]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

The cause of the problem is we have call chain lockdep_unregister_key()
-> <irq disabled by raw_local_irq_save()> lockdep_unlock() ->
arch_spin_unlock() -> __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath() -> pv_kick() ->
__send_ipi_one() -> trace_hyperv_send_ipi_one().

Although this particular warning is triggered because Hyper-V has a
trace point in ipi sending, but in general arch_spin_unlock() may call
another function having a trace point in it, so put the arch_spin_lock()
and arch_spin_unlock() after lock_recursion protection to fix this
problem and avoid similiar problems.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113110512.1056501-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-11-17 13:15:35 +01:00
Boqun Feng d61fc96a37 lockdep: Avoid to modify chain keys in validate_chain()
Chris Wilson reported a problem spotted by check_chain_key(): a chain
key got changed in validate_chain() because we modify the ->read in
validate_chain() to skip checks for dependency adding, and ->read is
taken into calculation for chain key since commit f611e8cf98
("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate
chainkey").

Fix this by avoiding to modify ->read in validate_chain() based on two
facts: a) since we now support recursive read lock detection, there is
no need to skip checks for dependency adding for recursive readers, b)
since we have a), there is only one case left (nest_lock) where we want
to skip checks in validate_chain(), we simply remove the modification
for ->read and rely on the return value of check_deadlock() to skip the
dependency adding.

Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102053743.450459-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-11-10 18:38:38 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 1a39340865 lockdep: Fix nr_unused_locks accounting
Chris reported that commit 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix
usage_traceoverflow") breaks the nr_unused_locks validation code
triggered by /proc/lockdep_stats.

By fully splitting LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ it becomes a bad
indicator for accounting nr_unused_locks; simplyfy by using any first
bit.

Fixes: 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix usage_traceoverflow")
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027124834.GL2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-10-30 17:07:18 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra d48e385003 locking/lockdep: Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage
I initially thought raw_cpu_read() was OK, since if it is !0 we have
IRQs disabled and can't get migrated, so if we get migrated both CPUs
must have 0 and it doesn't matter which 0 we read.

And while that is true; it isn't the whole store, on pretty much all
architectures (except x86) this can result in computing the address for
one CPU, getting migrated, the old CPU continuing execution with another
task (possibly setting recursion) and then the new CPU reading the value
of the old CPU, which is no longer 0.

Similer to:

  baffd723e4 ("lockdep: Revert "lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables"")

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201026152256.GB2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-10-30 17:07:18 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra f8e48a3dca lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().

Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.

Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2020-10-22 12:37:22 +02:00
Ingo Molnar e705d39796 Merge branch 'locking/urgent' into locking/core, to pick up fixes
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-10-09 08:55:17 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 4d004099a6 lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion
Steve reported that lockdep_assert*irq*(), when nested inside lockdep
itself, will trigger a false-positive.

One example is the stack-trace code, as called from inside lockdep,
triggering tracing, which in turn calls RCU, which then uses
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled().

Fixes: a21ee6055c ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-10-09 08:53:30 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 2bb8945bcc lockdep: Fix usage_traceoverflow
Basically print_lock_class_header()'s for loop is out of sync with the
the size of of ->usage_traces[].

Also clean things up a bit while at it, to avoid such mishaps in the future.

Fixes: 23870f1227 ("locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Debugged-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930094937.GE2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-10-09 08:53:08 +02:00
Boqun Feng 6d1823ccc4 lockdep: Optimize the memory usage of circular queue
Qian Cai reported a BFS_EQUEUEFULL warning [1] after read recursive
deadlock detection merged into tip tree recently. Unlike the previous
lockep graph searching, which iterate every lock class (every node in
the graph) exactly once, the graph searching for read recurisve deadlock
detection needs to iterate every lock dependency (every edge in the
graph) once, as a result, the maximum memory cost of the circular queue
changes from O(V), where V is the number of lock classes (nodes or
vertices) in the graph, to O(E), where E is the number of lock
dependencies (edges), because every lock class or dependency gets
enqueued once in the BFS. Therefore we hit the BFS_EQUEUEFULL case.

However, actually we don't need to enqueue all dependencies for the BFS,
because every time we enqueue a dependency, we almostly enqueue all
other dependencies in the same dependency list ("almostly" is because
we currently check before enqueue, so if a dependency doesn't pass the
check stage we won't enqueue it, however, we can always do in reverse
ordering), based on this, we can only enqueue the first dependency from
a dependency list and every time we want to fetch a new dependency to
work, we can either:

  1)	fetch the dependency next to the current dependency in the
	dependency list
or

  2)	if the dependency in 1) doesn't exist, fetch the dependency from
	the queue.

With this approach, the "max bfs queue depth" for a x86_64_defconfig +
lockdep and selftest config kernel can get descreased from:

        max bfs queue depth:                   201

to (after apply this patch)

        max bfs queue depth:                   61

While I'm at it, clean up the code logic a little (e.g. directly return
other than set a "ret" value and goto the "exit" label).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17343f6f7f2438fc376125384133c5ba70c2a681.camel@redhat.com/

Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+62ebe501c1ce9a91f68c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917080210.108095-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-09-29 09:56:59 +02:00
peterz@infradead.org 23870f1227 locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions
During the LPC RCU BoF Paul asked how come the "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
detector doesn't trip over rcu_read_lock()'s lockdep annotation.

Looking into this I found a very embarrasing typo in
verify_lock_unused():

	-	if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCK_USED))
	+	if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED))

fixing that will indeed cause rcu_read_lock() to insta-splat :/

The above typo means that instead of testing for: 0x100 (1 <<
LOCK_USED), we test for 8 (LOCK_USED), which corresponds to (1 <<
LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ).

So instead of testing for _any_ used lock, it will only match any lock
used with interrupts enabled.

The rcu_read_lock() annotation uses .check=0, which means it will not
set any of the interrupt bits and will thus never match.

In order to properly fix the situation and allow rcu_read_lock() to
correctly work, split LOCK_USED into LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ and by
having .read users set USED_READ and test USED, pure read-recursive
locks are permitted.

Fixes: f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902160323.GK1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-09-03 11:19:42 +02:00
Boqun Feng f611e8cf98 lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey
Currently, the chainkey of a lock chain is a hash sum of the class_idx
of all the held locks, the read/write status are not taken in to
consideration while generating the chainkey. This could result into a
problem, if we have:

	P1()
	{
		read_lock(B);
		lock(A);
	}

	P2()
	{
		lock(A);
		read_lock(B);
	}

	P3()
	{
		lock(A);
		write_lock(B);
	}

, and P1(), P2(), P3() run one by one. And when running P2(), lockdep
detects such a lock chain A -> B is not a deadlock, then it's added in
the chain cache, and then when running P3(), even if it's a deadlock, we
could miss it because of the hit of chain cache. This could be confirmed
by self testcase "chain cached mixed R-L/L-W ".

To resolve this, we use concept "hlock_id" to generate the chainkey, the
hlock_id is a tuple (hlock->class_idx, hlock->read), which fits in a u16
type. With this, the chainkeys are different is the lock sequences have
the same locks but different read/write status.

Besides, since we use "hlock_id" to generate chainkeys, the chain_hlocks
array now store the "hlock_id"s rather than lock_class indexes.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-15-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:06 +02:00
Boqun Feng 621c9dac0e lockdep: Add recursive read locks into dependency graph
Since we have all the fundamental to handle recursive read locks, we now
add them into the dependency graph.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-13-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:06 +02:00
Boqun Feng f08e388857 lockdep: Fix recursive read lock related safe->unsafe detection
Currently, in safe->unsafe detection, lockdep misses the fact that a
LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ usage and a LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ usage may
cause deadlock too, for example:

	P1                          P2
	<irq disabled>
	write_lock(l1);             <irq enabled>
				    read_lock(l2);
	write_lock(l2);
				    <in irq>
				    read_lock(l1);

Actually, all of the following cases may cause deadlocks:

	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ
	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ

To fix this, we need to 1) change the calculation of exclusive_mask() so
that READ bits are not dropped and 2) always call usage() in
mark_lock_irq() to check usage deadlocks, even when the new usage of the
lock is READ.

Besides, adjust usage_match() and usage_acculumate() to recursive read
lock changes.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-12-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:05 +02:00
Boqun Feng 68e3056785 lockdep: Adjust check_redundant() for recursive read change
check_redundant() will report redundancy if it finds a path could
replace the about-to-add dependency in the BFS search. With recursive
read lock changes, we certainly need to change the match function for
the check_redundant(), because the path needs to match not only the lock
class but also the dependency kinds. For example, if the about-to-add
dependency @prev -> @next is A -(SN)-> B, and we find a path A -(S*)->
.. -(*R)->B in the dependency graph with __bfs() (for simplicity, we can
also say we find an -(SR)-> path from A to B), we can not replace the
dependency with that path in the BFS search. Because the -(SN)->
dependency can make a strong path with a following -(S*)-> dependency,
however an -(SR)-> path cannot.

Further, we can replace an -(SN)-> dependency with a -(EN)-> path, that
means if we find a path which is stronger than or equal to the
about-to-add dependency, we can report the redundancy. By "stronger", it
means both the start and the end of the path are not weaker than the
start and the end of the dependency (E is "stronger" than S and N is
"stronger" than R), so that we can replace the dependency with that
path.

To make sure we find a path whose start point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we use a trick: the ->only_xr of the root
(start point) of __bfs() is initialized as @prev-> == 0, therefore if
@prev is E, __bfs() will pick only -(E*)-> for the first dependency,
otherwise, __bfs() can pick -(E*)-> or -(S*)-> for the first dependency.

To make sure we find a path whose end point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we replace the match function for __bfs()
check_redundant(), we check for the case that either @next is R
(anything is not weaker than it) or the end point of the path is N
(which is not weaker than anything).

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-11-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:05 +02:00