Now when sending stream reset request, it closes the streams to
block further xmit of data until this request is completed, then
calls sctp_send_reconf to send the chunk.
But if sctp_send_reconf returns err, and it doesn't recover the
streams' states back, which means the request chunk would not be
queued and sent, so the asoc will get stuck, streams are closed
and no packet is even queued.
This patch is to fix it by recovering the streams' states when
it fails to send the request, it is also to fix a return value.
Fixes: 7f9d68ac94 ("sctp: implement sender-side procedures for SSN Reset Request Parameter")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch is to implement sender-side procedures for the Outgoing
and Incoming SSN Reset Request Parameter described in rfc6525 section
5.1.2 and 5.1.3.
It is also add sockopt SCTP_RESET_STREAMS in rfc6525 section 6.3.2
for users.
Note that the new asoc member strreset_outstanding is to make sure
only one reconf request chunk on the fly as rfc6525 section 5.1.1
demands.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sctp stream reconf, described in RFC 6525, needs a structure to
save per stream information in assoc, like stream state.
In the future, sctp stream scheduler also needs it to save some
stream scheduler params and queues.
This patchset is to prepare the stream array in assoc for stream
reconf. It defines sctp_stream that includes stream arrays inside
to replace ssnmap.
Note that we use different structures for IN and OUT streams, as
the members in per OUT stream will get more and more different
from per IN stream.
v1->v2:
- put these patches into a smaller group.
v2->v3:
- define sctp_stream to contain stream arrays, and create stream.c
to put stream-related functions.
- merge 3 patches into 1, as new sctp_stream has the same name
with before.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
