Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vladimir Oltean
bd954b8260 net: dsa: move tagging protocol code to tag.{c,h}
It would be nice if tagging protocol drivers could include just the
header they need, since they are (mostly) data path and isolated from
most of the other DSA core code does.

Create a tag.c and a tag.h file which are meant to support tagging
protocol drivers.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-11-22 20:41:50 -08:00
Vladimir Oltean
94793a56b3 net: dsa: provide a second modalias to tag proto drivers based on their name
Currently, tagging protocol drivers have a modalias of
"dsa_tag:id-<number>", where the number is one of DSA_TAG_PROTO_*_VALUE.

This modalias makes it possible for the request_module() call in
dsa_tag_driver_get() to work, given the input it has - an integer
returned by ds->ops->get_tag_protocol().

It is also possible to change tagging protocols at (pseudo-)runtime, via
sysfs or via device tree, and this works via the name string of the
tagging protocol rather than via its id (DSA_TAG_PROTO_*_VALUE).

In the latter case, there is no request_module() call, because there is
no association that the DSA core has between the string name and the ID,
to construct the modalias. The module is simply assumed to have been
inserted. This is actually slightly problematic when the tagging
protocol change should take place at probe time, since it's expected
that the dependency module should get autoloaded.

For this purpose, let's introduce a second modalias, so that the DSA
core can call request_module() by name. There is no reason to make the
modalias by name optional, so just modify the MODULE_ALIAS_DSA_TAG_DRIVER()
macro to take both the ID and the name as arguments, and generate two
modaliases behind the scenes.

Suggested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> # on kontron-sl28 w/ ocelot_8021q
Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-11-17 21:16:41 -08:00
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
3126b731ce net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: fix typo in modalias name
DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4L is not defined. It should be
DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL8_4T.

Fixes: cd87fecded ("net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: add rtl8_4t trailing variant")
Reported-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220309175641.12943-1-luizluca@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-03-09 20:36:24 -08:00
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
cd87fecded net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: add rtl8_4t trailing variant
Realtek switches supports the same tag both before ethertype or between
payload and the CRC.

Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-03-05 11:04:25 +00:00
Alvin Šipraga
1521d5adfc net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: add realtek 8 byte protocol 4 tag
This commit implements a basic version of the 8 byte tag protocol used
in the Realtek RTL8365MB-VC unmanaged switch, which carries with it a
protocol version of 0x04.

The implementation itself only handles the parsing of the EtherType
value and Realtek protocol version, together with the source or
destination port fields. The rest is left unimplemented for now.

The tag format is described in a confidential document provided to my
company by Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Permission has been granted by
the vendor to publish this driver based on that material, together with
an extract from the document describing the tag format and its fields.
It is hoped that this will help future implementors who do not have
access to the material but who wish to extend the functionality of
drivers for chips which use this protocol.

In addition, two possible values of the REASON field are specified,
based on experiments on my end. Realtek does not specify what value this
field can take.

Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-18 14:02:56 +01:00