The rtc-generic and opal-rtc are failing to run this test as they do not
support all the features. Let's treat the error returns and skip to the
following test.
Theoretically the test_DATE should be also adjusted, but as it's enabled
on demand I think it makes sense to fail in such case.
Signed-off-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Some dates could be problematic because they reach the limits of
RTC hardware capabilities.
This patch add various of them but since it will change RTC date
it will be activated only when 'd' args is set.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
A call to ioctl(..., RTC_IRQP_SET, ...) should never result in
ENOTTY. All new style RTC drivers implement it and all of the old style
drivers return EINVAL when they don't support periodic IRQs.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
A call to ioctl(..., RTC_IRQP_READ, ...) should never result in
ENOTTY. All new style RTC drivers implement it and all of the old style
drivers return EINVAL when they don't support periodic IRQs.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
For old style drivers, call a call to ioctl(..., RTC_ALM_SET, ...):
- char/ds1302.c will always return -EINVAL
- char/genrtc.c: will always return -EINVAL
- char/rtc.c will succeed regardless if IRQs are supported or not
- char/efirtc.c will always return -EINVAL
- input/misc/hp_sdc_rtc.c ... that ioctl code is a good lesson about
ifdefing code out and punting implementation ... and it will
always return -EINVAL
For new style rtc drivers, a call to ioctl(..., RTC_ALM_SET, ...) never
results in a call to __rtc_set_alarm, since struct rtc_wkalarm passed to
rtc_set_alarm has 'enabled' field set to 0. This means that
rtc->ops->set_alarm driver hook is never called in that ioctl. Since no
driver code interaction happens as a part of that call, using its
results to ascertain properties of the driver is not going to work. To
remedy this - use the result of RTC_AIE_ON to make the judgement.
This patch also changes ENOTTY to EINVAL as an error code value that
would tell us that IRQs are not supported. There are three reason for
this:
- As mentioned above old style driver never returns ENOTTY for this
ioctl
- In it's code __rtc_set_alarm() returns -EINVAL if rtc->ops->set_alarm
method is not provided by the driver, so one reason for change is to
be consistent with that code path.
- A call to ioctl(..., RTC_UIE_ON, ...) will result in a call to
rtc_update_irq_enable() and then __rtc_set_alarm(), which, if IRQs
are not supported by the driver, will result in a non-zero error
code. Returning ENOTTY in that case would:
a) Not be consistent with other codepaths of
rtc_update_irq_enable, for example the check of
rtc->uie_unsupported
b) Would break update IRQ emulation code since that codpath
expects EINVAL
c) Would break test's logic for feature support detection in
the case of RTC_UIE_ON ioctl
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Calling ioctl(..., RTC_UIE_ON, ...) without CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV_UIE_EMUL
either ends in rtc_update_irq_enable if rtc->uie_unsupported is true
or in __rtc_set_alarm in the if (!rtc->ops->set_alarm) branch. In both
cases the return value is -EINVAL. So check for that one instead of
ENOTTY.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
rtctest.c checks to see if PIE is functioning by testing if 20 interrupts occur
at rates from 2HZ to 64HZ. While this check is good, it does not check to
see if the correct amount of time has actually passed. This misses
situations where the RTC may be operating at a higher or lower frequency
than expected.
This patch introduces a simple check to verify if the time passed is
less than 10% of what was programmed into the RTC.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: shuahkh@osg.samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
This patch splits rtc.txt into two separate files, one for the
documentation itself, and the other for the rtctest.c file. The rtctest
file is moved into the kernel tools/testing/selftests/timers directory.
This will make automated testing easier. Note that the only difference in
the rtc.txt file is that the location of the rtctest.c file has changed.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: shuahkh@osg.samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
