Commit Graph

21 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sean Christopherson fb35d30fe5 x86/cpufeatures: Assign dedicated feature word for CPUID_0x8000001F[EAX]
Collect the scattered SME/SEV related feature flags into a dedicated
word.  There are now five recognized features in CPUID.0x8000001F.EAX,
with at least one more on the horizon (SEV-SNP).  Using a dedicated word
allows KVM to use its automagic CPUID adjustment logic when reporting
the set of supported features to userspace.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122204047.2860075-2-seanjc@google.com
2021-01-28 17:41:24 +01:00
Sean Christopherson e7b6385b01 x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel SGX hardware bits
Populate X86_FEATURE_SGX feature from CPUID and tie it to the Kconfig
option with disabled-features.h.

IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_ENABLE must be examined in addition to the CPUID
bits to enable full SGX support.  The BIOS must both set this bit and lock
IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL for SGX to be supported (Intel SDM section 36.7.1).
The setting or clearing of this bit has no impact on the CPUID bits above,
which is why it needs to be detected separately.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112220135.165028-4-jarkko@kernel.org
2020-11-17 14:36:13 +01:00
Fenghua Yu 1478b99a76 x86/cpufeatures: Mark ENQCMD as disabled when configured out
Currently, the ENQCMD feature depends on CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT. Add
X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD to the disabled features mask so that it gets
disabled when the IOMMU config option above is not enabled.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1600187413-163670-9-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
2020-09-17 20:22:15 +02:00
Linus Torvalds ccaaaf6fe5 MPX requires recompiling applications, which requires compiler support.
Unfortunately, GCC 9.1 is expected to be be released without support for
 MPX.  This means that there was only a relatively small window where
 folks could have ever used MPX.  It failed to gain wide adoption in the
 industry, and Linux was the only mainstream OS to ever support it widely.
 
 Support for the feature may also disappear on future processors.
 
 This set completes the process that we started during the 5.4 merge window.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJeK1/pAAoJEGg1lTBwyZKwgC8QAIiVn1d7A9Uj/WpnpgfCChCZ
 9XiV6Ak999qD9fbAcrgNfPjieaD4mtokocSRVJuRgJu5iLnIJCINlozLPe4yVl7P
 7zebnxkLq0CIA8d56bEUoFlC0J+oWYlDVQePZzNQsSk5KHVGXVLpF6U4vDVzZeQy
 cprgvdeY+ehB7G6IIo0MWTg5ylKYAsOAyVvK8NIGpKY2k6/YqCnsptnsVE7bvlHy
 TrEOiUWLv+hh0bMkZdP1PwKQKEuMO/IZly0HtviFbMN7T4TB1spfg7ELoBucEq3T
 s4EVbYRe+nIE4tuEAveaX3CgxJek8cY5MlticskdaKSEACBwabdOF55qsZy0u+WA
 PYC4iUIXfbOH8OgieKWtGX4IuSkRYdQ2nP4BOpe4ZX4+zvU7zOCIyVSKRrwkX8cc
 ADtWI5FAtB36KCgUuWnHGHNZpOxPTbTLBuBataFY4Q2uBNJEBJpscZ5H9ObtyGFU
 ZjlzqFnM0nFNDKEI1EEtv9jLzgZTU1RQ46s7EFeSeEQ2/s9wJ3+s5sBlVbljsmus
 o658bLOEaRWC/aF15dgmEXW9GAO6uifNdmbzGnRn7oEMYyFQPTWbZvi1zGz58QaG
 Y6WTtigVtsSrHS4wpYd+p+n1W06VnB6J3BpBM4G1VQv1Vm0dNd1tUOfkqOzPjg7c
 33Itmsz2LaW1mb67GlgZ
 =g4cC
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'mpx-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx

Pull x86 MPX removal from Dave Hansen:
 "MPX requires recompiling applications, which requires compiler
  support. Unfortunately, GCC 9.1 is expected to be be released without
  support for MPX. This means that there was only a relatively small
  window where folks could have ever used MPX. It failed to gain wide
  adoption in the industry, and Linux was the only mainstream OS to ever
  support it widely.

  Support for the feature may also disappear on future processors.

  This set completes the process that we started during the 5.4 merge
  window when the MPX prctl()s were removed. XSAVE support is left in
  place, which allows MPX-using KVM guests to continue to function"

* tag 'mpx-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx:
  x86/mpx: remove MPX from arch/x86
  mm: remove arch_bprm_mm_init() hook
  x86/mpx: remove bounds exception code
  x86/mpx: remove build infrastructure
  x86/alternatives: add missing insn.h include
2020-01-30 16:11:50 -08:00
Dave Hansen 45fc24e89b x86/mpx: remove MPX from arch/x86
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

MPX is being removed from the kernel due to a lack of support
in the toolchain going forward (gcc).

This removes all the remaining (dead at this point) MPX handling
code remaining in the tree.  The only remaining code is the XSAVE
support for MPX state which is currently needd for KVM to handle
VMs which might use MPX.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
2020-01-23 10:41:20 -08:00
Babu Moger b971880fe7 x86/Kconfig: Rename UMIP config parameter
AMD 2nd generation EPYC processors support the UMIP (User-Mode
Instruction Prevention) feature. So, rename X86_INTEL_UMIP to
generic X86_UMIP and modify the text to cover both Intel and AMD.

 [ bp: take of the disabled-features.h copy in tools/ too. ]

Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/157298912544.17462.2018334793891409521.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com
2019-11-07 11:07:29 +01:00
Andy Lutomirski dae0a10593 x86/cpufeatures, x86/fault: Mark SMAP as disabled when configured out
Add X86_FEATURE_SMAP to the disabled features mask as appropriate
and use cpu_feature_enabled() in the fault code.  This lets us get
rid of a redundant IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_SMAP).

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fe93332eded3d702f0b0b4cf83928d6830739ba3.1542667307.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-20 08:44:28 +01:00
Linus Torvalds 6304672b7f Merge branch 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86/pti updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "Another set of melted spectrum related changes:

   - Code simplifications and cleanups for RSB and retpolines.

   - Make the indirect calls in KVM speculation safe.

   - Whitelist CPUs which are known not to speculate from Meltdown and
     prepare for the new CPUID flag which tells the kernel that a CPU is
     not affected.

   - A less rigorous variant of the module retpoline check which merily
     warns when a non-retpoline protected module is loaded and reflects
     that fact in the sysfs file.

   - Prepare for Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier support.

   - Prepare for exposure of the Speculation Control MSRs to guests, so
     guest OSes which depend on those "features" can use them. Includes
     a blacklist of the broken microcodes. The actual exposure of the
     MSRs through KVM is still being worked on"

* 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/speculation: Simplify indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
  x86/retpoline: Simplify vmexit_fill_RSB()
  x86/cpufeatures: Clean up Spectre v2 related CPUID flags
  x86/cpu/bugs: Make retpoline module warning conditional
  x86/bugs: Drop one "mitigation" from dmesg
  x86/nospec: Fix header guards names
  x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers
  x86/speculation: Add basic IBPB (Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier) support
  x86/cpufeature: Blacklist SPEC_CTRL/PRED_CMD on early Spectre v2 microcodes
  x86/pti: Do not enable PTI on CPUs which are not vulnerable to Meltdown
  x86/msr: Add definitions for new speculation control MSRs
  x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD feature bits for Speculation Control
  x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel feature bits for Speculation Control
  x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID_7_EDX CPUID leaf
  module/retpoline: Warn about missing retpoline in module
  KVM: VMX: Make indirect call speculation safe
  KVM: x86: Make indirect calls in emulator speculation safe
2018-01-29 19:08:02 -08:00
David Woodhouse 95ca0ee863 x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID_7_EDX CPUID leaf
This is a pure feature bits leaf. There are two AVX512 feature bits in it
already which were handled as scattered bits, and three more from this leaf
are going to be added for speculation control features.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: karahmed@amazon.de
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: gregkh@linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1516896855-7642-2-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk
2018-01-26 15:53:16 +01:00
Linus Torvalds 5aa90a8458 Merge branch 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 page table isolation updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "This is the final set of enabling page table isolation on x86:

   - Infrastructure patches for handling the extra page tables.

   - Patches which map the various bits and pieces which are required to
     get in and out of user space into the user space visible page
     tables.

   - The required changes to have CR3 switching in the entry/exit code.

   - Optimizations for the CR3 switching along with documentation how
     the ASID/PCID mechanism works.

   - Updates to dump pagetables to cover the user space page tables for
     W+X scans and extra debugfs files to analyze both the kernel and
     the user space visible page tables

  The whole functionality is compile time controlled via a config switch
  and can be turned on/off on the command line as well"

* 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (32 commits)
  x86/ldt: Make the LDT mapping RO
  x86/mm/dump_pagetables: Allow dumping current pagetables
  x86/mm/dump_pagetables: Check user space page table for WX pages
  x86/mm/dump_pagetables: Add page table directory to the debugfs VFS hierarchy
  x86/mm/pti: Add Kconfig
  x86/dumpstack: Indicate in Oops whether PTI is configured and enabled
  x86/mm: Clarify the whole ASID/kernel PCID/user PCID naming
  x86/mm: Use INVPCID for __native_flush_tlb_single()
  x86/mm: Optimize RESTORE_CR3
  x86/mm: Use/Fix PCID to optimize user/kernel switches
  x86/mm: Abstract switching CR3
  x86/mm: Allow flushing for future ASID switches
  x86/pti: Map the vsyscall page if needed
  x86/pti: Put the LDT in its own PGD if PTI is on
  x86/mm/64: Make a full PGD-entry size hole in the memory map
  x86/events/intel/ds: Map debug buffers in cpu_entry_area
  x86/cpu_entry_area: Add debugstore entries to cpu_entry_area
  x86/mm/pti: Map ESPFIX into user space
  x86/mm/pti: Share entry text PMD
  x86/entry: Align entry text section to PMD boundary
  ...
2017-12-29 17:02:49 -08:00
Thomas Gleixner a89f040fa3 x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_BUG_CPU_INSECURE
Many x86 CPUs leak information to user space due to missing isolation of
user space and kernel space page tables. There are many well documented
ways to exploit that.

The upcoming software migitation of isolating the user and kernel space
page tables needs a misfeature flag so code can be made runtime
conditional.

Add the BUG bits which indicates that the CPU is affected and add a feature
bit which indicates that the software migitation is enabled.

Assume for now that _ALL_ x86 CPUs are affected by this. Exceptions can be
made later.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: aliguori@amazon.com
Cc: daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: keescook@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-23 21:12:59 +01:00
Ricardo Neri 3522c2a6a4 x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions
User-Mode Instruction Prevention is a security feature present in new
Intel processors that, when set, prevents the execution of a subset of
instructions if such instructions are executed in user mode (CPL > 0).
Attempting to execute such instructions causes a general protection
exception.

The subset of instructions comprises:

 * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
 * SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
 * SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
 * SMSW - Store Machine Status Word
 * STR  - Store Task Register

This feature is also added to the list of disabled-features to allow
a cleaner handling of build-time configuration.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-7-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-08 11:16:21 +01:00
Andy Lutomirski cba4671af7 x86/mm: Disable PCID on 32-bit kernels
32-bit kernels on new hardware will see PCID in CPUID, but PCID can
only be used in 64-bit mode.  Rather than making all PCID code
conditional, just disable the feature on 32-bit builds.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2e391769192a4d31b808410c383c6bf0734bc6ea.1498751203.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-07-05 10:52:57 +02:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 3677d4c6a2 x86/boot: Detect 5-level paging support
In this initial implementation we force-require 5-level paging support
from the hardware, when compiled with CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y. (The kernel
will panic during boot on CPUs that don't support 5-level paging.)

We will implement boot-time switch between 4- and 5-level paging later.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170330080731.65421-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-04 08:22:33 +02:00
Dave Hansen 1e61f78baf x86/cpufeature: Make sure DISABLED/REQUIRED macros are updated
x86 has two macros which allow us to evaluate some CPUID-based
features at compile time:

	REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET()
	DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET()

They're both defined by having the compiler check the bit
argument against some constant masks of features.

But, when adding new CPUID leaves, we need to check new words
for these macros.  So make sure that those macros and the
REQUIRED_MASK* and DISABLED_MASK* get updated when necessary.

This looks kinda silly to have an open-coded value ("18" in
this case) open-coded in 5 places in the code.  But, we really do
need 5 places updated when NCAPINTS gets bumped, so now we just
force the issue.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629200108.92466F6F@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-30 09:11:32 +02:00
Dave Hansen 6e17cb9c2d x86/cpufeature: Update cpufeaure macros
We had a new CPUID "NCAPINT" word added, but the REQUIRED_MASK and
DISABLED_MASK macros did not get updated.  Update them.

None of the features was needed in these masks, so there was no
harm, but we should keep them updated anyway.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629200107.8D3C9A31@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-06-30 09:11:32 +02:00
Dave Hansen e8df1a95b6 x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Fix broken compile-time disabling of pkeys
When I added support for the Memory Protection Keys processor
feature, I had to reindent the REQUIRED/DISABLED_MASK macros, and
also consult the later cpufeature words.

I'm not quite sure how I bungled it, but I consulted the wrong
word at the end.  This only affected required or disabled cpu
features in cpufeature words 14, 15 and 16.  So, only Protection
Keys itself was screwed over here.

The result was that if you disabled pkeys in your .config, you
might still see some code show up that should have been compiled
out.  There should be no functional problems, though.

In verifying this patch I also realized that the DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE
macros were defined backwards and that the cpu_has() check in
setup_pku() was not doing the compile-time disabled checks.

So also fix the macro for DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE and add a compile-time
check for pkeys being enabled in setup_pku().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Fixes: dfb4a70f20 ("x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160513221328.C200930B@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-05-16 12:59:23 +02:00
Dave Hansen dfb4a70f20 x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions
There are two CPUID bits for protection keys.  One is for whether
the CPU contains the feature, and the other will appear set once
the OS enables protection keys.  Specifically:

	Bit 04: OSPKE. If 1, OS has set CR4.PKE to enable
	Protection keys (and the RDPKRU/WRPKRU instructions)

This is because userspace can not see CR4 contents, but it can
see CPUID contents.

X86_FEATURE_PKU is referred to as "PKU" in the hardware documentation:

	CPUID.(EAX=07H,ECX=0H):ECX.PKU [bit 3]

X86_FEATURE_OSPKE is "OSPKU":

	CPUID.(EAX=07H,ECX=0H):ECX.OSPKE [bit 4]

These are the first CPU features which need to look at the
ECX word in CPUID leaf 0x7, so this patch also includes
fetching that word in to the cpuinfo->x86_capability[] array.

Add it to the disabled-features mask when its config option is
off.  Even though we are not using it here, we also extend the
REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET() macro to keep it mirroring the
DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET() version.

This means that in almost all code, you should use:

	cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PKU)

and *not* the CONFIG option.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160212210201.7714C250@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-02-16 10:11:13 +01:00
Dave Hansen 95290cf13e x86, mpx: Add MPX to disabled features
This allows us to use cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX) as
both a runtime and compile-time check.

When CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX is disabled,
cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX) will evaluate at
compile-time to 0. If CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX=y, then the cpuid
flag will be checked at runtime.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114151823.B358EAD2@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-11-18 00:58:53 +01:00
Dave Hansen 9298b815ef x86: Add more disabled features
The original motivation for these patches was for an Intel CPU
feature called MPX.  The patch to add a disabled feature for it
will go in with the other parts of the support.

But, in the meantime, there are a few other features than MPX
that we can make assumptions about at compile-time based on
compile options.  Add them to disabled-features.h and check them
with cpu_feature_enabled().

Note that this gets rid of the last things that needed an #ifdef
CONFIG_X86_64 in cpufeature.h.  Yay!

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140911211524.C0EC332A@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-09-11 14:30:17 -07:00
Dave Hansen 381aa07a9b x86: Introduce disabled-features
I believe the REQUIRED_MASK aproach was taken so that it was
easier to consult in assembly (arch/x86/kernel/verify_cpu.S).
DISABLED_MASK does not have the same restriction, but I
implemented it the same way for consistency.

We have a REQUIRED_MASK... which does two things:
1. Keeps a list of cpuid bits to check in very early boot and
   refuse to boot if those are not present.
2. Consulted during cpu_has() checks, which allows us to
   optimize out things at compile-time.  In other words, if we
   *KNOW* we will not boot with the feature off, then we can
   safely assume that it will be present forever.

But, we don't have a similar mechanism for CPU features which
may be present but that we know we will not use.  We simply
use our existing mechanisms to repeatedly check the status of
the bit at runtime (well, the alternatives patching helps here
but it does not provide compile-time optimization).

Adding a feature to disabled-features.h allows the bit to be
checked via a new macro: cpu_feature_enabled().  Note that
for features in DISABLED_MASK, checks with this macro have
all of the benefits of an #ifdef.  Before, we would have done
this in a header:

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
#define cpu_has_mpx cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MPX)
#else
#define cpu_has_mpx 0
#endif

and this in the code:

	if (cpu_has_mpx)
		do_some_mpx_thing();

Now, just add your feature to DISABLED_MASK and you can do this
everywhere, and get the same benefits you would have from
#ifdefs:

	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX))
		do_some_mpx_thing();

We need a new function and *not* a modification to cpu_has()
because there are cases where we actually need to check the CPU
itself, despite what features the kernel supports.  The best
example of this is a hypervisor which has no control over what
features its guests are using and where the guest does not depend
on the host for support.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140911211513.9E35E931@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-09-11 14:30:02 -07:00