for_each_mem_range() uses a loop variable, yet looking into code it is
not just iteration counter but more complex entity which encodes
information about memblock. Thus condition i == 0 looks fragile.
Indeed, it broke boot of R-class platforms since it never took i == 0
path (due to i was set to 1). Fix that with restoring original flag
check.
Fixes: b10d6bca87 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
There are several occurrences of the following pattern:
for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
start = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg);
end = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));
/* do something with start and end */
}
Using for_each_mem_range() iterator is more appropriate in such cases and
allows simpler and cleaner code.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c build]
[rppt@linux.ibm.com: mips: fix cavium-octeon build caused by memblock refactoring]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827124549.GD167163@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-13-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Remove unneeded semicolon.
[vladimir] proper tags in subject line
Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
ARMv8R/M architecture defines new memory protection scheme - PMSAv8
which is not compatible with PMSAv7.
Key differences to PMSAv7 are:
- Region geometry is defined by base and limit addresses
- Addresses need to be either 32 or 64 byte aligned
- No region priority due to overlapping regions are not allowed
- It is unified, i.e. no distinction between data/instruction regions
- Memory attributes are controlled via MAIR
This patch implements support for PMSAv8 MPU defined by ARMv8R/M
architecture.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
