The arch support status files don't match reality as of v5.19-rc1,
use the features-refresh.sh to refresh all the arch-support.txt files
in place. The main effect is to add entries for the new loong
architecture.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609025656.143460-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
* 'remove-h8300' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc:
remove the h8300 architecture
This is clearly the least actively maintained architecture we have at
the moment, and probably the least useful. It is now the only one that
does not support MMUs at all, and most of the boards only support 4MB
of RAM, out of which the defconfig kernel needs more than half just
for .text/.data.
Guenter Roeck did the original patch to remove the architecture in 2013
after it had already been obsolete for a while, and Yoshinori Sato brought
it back in a much more modern form in 2015. Looking at the git history
since the reinstantiation, it's clear that almost all commits in the tree
are build fixes or cross-architecture cleanups:
$ git log --no-merges --format=%an v4.5.. arch/h8300/ | sort | uniq
-c | sort -rn | head -n 12
25 Masahiro Yamada
18 Christoph Hellwig
14 Mike Rapoport
9 Arnd Bergmann
8 Mark Rutland
7 Peter Zijlstra
6 Kees Cook
6 Ingo Molnar
6 Al Viro
5 Randy Dunlap
4 Yury Norov
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The nds32 architecture, also known as AndeStar V3, is a custom 32-bit
RISC target designed by Andes Technologies. Support was added to the
kernel in 2016 as the replacement RISC-V based V5 processors were
already announced, and maintained by (current or former) Andes
employees.
As explained by Alan Kao, new customers are now all using RISC-V,
and all known nds32 users are already on longterm stable kernels
provided by Andes, with no development work going into mainline
support any more.
While the port is still in a reasonably good shape, it only gets
worse over time without active maintainers, so it seems best
to remove it before it becomes unusable. As always, if it turns
out that there are mainline users after all, and they volunteer
to maintain the port in the future, the removal can be reverted.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YhdWNLUhk+x9RAzU@yamatobi.andestech.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220302065213.82702-1-alankao@andestech.com/
Link: https://www.andestech.com/en/products-solutions/andestar-architecture/
Signed-off-by: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
[arnd: rewrite changelog to provide more background]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Since commit bcf9033e54 ("sched: move CPU field back into thread_info
if THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y"), the CPU field in thread_info went back to
being managed by the core code, so we no longer have to keep it in sync
in arch code.
While at it, mark THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK as done for ARM in the
documentation.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
This implements the CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK option.
With this change:
- before thread_info was part of the stack and located at the beginning of the stack
- now the thread_info struct is moved and located inside the task_struct structure
- the stack is allocated and handled like the major other platforms
- drop the cpu field of thread_info and use instead the one in task_struct
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
