There is a spelling mistake in an option description. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630080029.15614-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To keep perf building in systems where types and defines used in this
new benchmark are not available, such as:
12 13.46 centos:stream : FAIL gcc version 8.5.0 20210514 (Red Hat 8.5.0-20) (GCC)
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c: In function 'user_notif_syscall':
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:55:27: error: 'SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO'?
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/git/perf-6.6.0-rc1/tools/include/uapi/linux/filter.h:49:59: note: in definition of macro 'BPF_STMT'
#define BPF_STMT(code, k) { (unsigned short)(code), 0, 0, k }
^
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:55:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/git/perf-6.6.0-rc1/tools/include/uapi/linux/filter.h:49:59: note: in definition of macro 'BPF_STMT'
#define BPF_STMT(code, k) { (unsigned short)(code), 0, 0, k }
^
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:55:3: error: missing initializer for field 'k' of 'struct sock_filter' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF),
^~~~~~~~
In file included from bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:5:
/git/perf-6.6.0-rc1/tools/include/uapi/linux/filter.h:28:8: note: 'k' declared here
__u32 k; /* Generic multiuse field */
^
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c: In function 'user_notification_sync_loop':
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:70:28: error: storage size of 'resp' isn't known
struct seccomp_notif_resp resp;
^~~~
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:71:23: error: storage size of 'req' isn't known
struct seccomp_notif req;
^~~
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:76:23: error: 'SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT'?
if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV, &req))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:86:23: error: 'SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SECCOMP_RET_ACTION'?
if (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND, &resp))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SECCOMP_RET_ACTION
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:71:23: error: unused variable 'req' [-Werror=unused-variable]
struct seccomp_notif req;
^~~
bench/sched-seccomp-notify.c:70:28: error: unused variable 'resp' [-Werror=unused-variable]
struct seccomp_notif_resp resp;
^~~~
14 11.31 debian:10 : FAIL gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6)
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Kook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZQGhjaojgOGtSNk6@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The benchmark is similar to the pipe benchmark. It creates two processes,
one is calling syscalls, and another process is handling them via seccomp
user notifications. It measures the time required to run a specified number
of interations.
$ ./perf bench sched seccomp-notify --sync-mode --loop 1000000
# Running 'sched/seccomp-notify' benchmark:
# Executed 1000000 system calls
Total time: 2.769 [sec]
2.769629 usecs/op
361059 ops/sec
$ ./perf bench sched seccomp-notify
# Running 'sched/seccomp-notify' benchmark:
# Executed 1000000 system calls
Total time: 8.571 [sec]
8.571119 usecs/op
116670 ops/sec
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
Acked-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308073201.3102738-7-avagin@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630051953.454638-1-avagin@gmail.com
[kees: Added PRIu64 format string]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
