Currently, kunit_parser.py is stripping all leading whitespace to make
parsing easier. But this means we can't accurately show kernel output
for failing tests or when the kernel crashes.
Embarassingly, this affects even KUnit's own output, e.g.
[13:40:46] Expected 2 + 1 == 2, but
[13:40:46] 2 + 1 == 3 (0x3)
[13:40:46] not ok 1 example_simple_test
[13:40:46] [FAILED] example_simple_test
After this change, here's what the output in context would look like
[13:40:46] =================== example (4 subtests) ===================
[13:40:46] # example_simple_test: initializing
[13:40:46] # example_simple_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:29
[13:40:46] Expected 2 + 1 == 2, but
[13:40:46] 2 + 1 == 3 (0x3)
[13:40:46] [FAILED] example_simple_test
[13:40:46] [SKIPPED] example_skip_test
[13:40:46] [SKIPPED] example_mark_skipped_test
[13:40:46] [PASSED] example_all_expect_macros_test
[13:40:46] # example: initializing suite
[13:40:46] # example: pass:1 fail:1 skip:2 total:4
[13:40:46] # Totals: pass:1 fail:1 skip:2 total:4
[13:40:46] ===================== [FAILED] example =====================
This example shows one minor cosmetic defect this approach has.
The test counts lines prevent us from dedenting the suite-level output.
But at the same time, any form of non-KUnit output would do the same
unless it happened to be indented as well.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When --raw_output is set (to any value), we don't actually parse the
test results. So asking to print the test results as json doesn't make
sense.
We internally create a fake test with one passing subtest, so --json
would actually print out something misleading.
This patch:
* Rewords the flag descriptions so hopefully this is more obvious.
* Also updates --raw_output's description to note the default behavior
is to print out only "KUnit" results (actually any KTAP results)
* also renames and refactors some related logic for clarity (e.g.
test_result => test, it's a kunit_parser.Test object).
Notably, this patch does not make it an error to specify --json and
--raw_output together. This is an edge case, but I know of at least one
wrapper around kunit.py that always sets --json. You'd never be able to
use --raw_output with that wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Context:
1. all_tests_uml.config used to be UML specific back when users to
manually specify CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML=y to enable CONFIG_PCI=y.
2. --alltests used allyesconfig along with a curated list of options to
disable. It's only ever worked for brief periods of time and has
perennially been broken due to compile issues.
Now all_tests_uml.config should work across ~all architectures.
Let's instead use this to implement --alltests.
Note: if anyone was using all_tests_uml.config, this change breaks them.
I think that's unlikely since it was added in 5.19 and was a lot to
type: --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests_uml.config.
We could make it a symlink to the new name, but I don't think the
caution is warranted here.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
With
$ kunit.py run --raw_output=all ...
you get the raw output from the kernel, e.g. something like
> TAP version 14
> 1..26
> # Subtest: time_test_cases
> 1..1
> ok 1 - time64_to_tm_test_date_range
> ok 1 - time_test_cases
But --raw_output=kunit or equivalently --raw_output, you get
> TAP version 14
> 1..26
> # Subtest: time_test_cases
> 1..1
> ok 1 - time64_to_tm_test_date_range
> ok 1 - time_test_cases
It looks less readable in my opinion, and it also isn't "raw output."
This is due to sharing code with kunit_parser.py, which wants to strip
leading whitespace since it uses anchored regexes.
We could update the kunit_parser.py code to tolerate leaading spaces,
but this patch takes the easier way out and adds a bool flag.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig
be repeatable [1][2].
This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g.
$ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
or equivalently:
$ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice.
And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more
config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML
coverage [2], variants of tests [3].
There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple
--kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]).
Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be
incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case
where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values,
but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be
potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better.
Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you
either have to do to specify the current build_dir
> --kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config
or
> --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config
each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir,
doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc.
Example with conflicting values:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin <<EOF
> CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n
> CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> EOF
> ...
> kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig:
> CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> vs from /dev/stdin
> CONFIG_KUNIT=m
>
> CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y
> vs from /dev/stdin
> # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set
[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUUMaP5mwwbK8uNVtA@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJMbRqo2xRFv9kX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Example usage:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 \
--kconfig_add=CONFIG_SMP=y --qemu_args='-smp 8'
Looking in the test.log, one can see
> smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> .... node #0, CPUs: #1#2#3#4#5#6#7
> smp: Brought up 1 node, 8 CPUs
This flag would allow people to make tweaks like this without having to
create custom qemu_config files.
For consistency with --kernel_args, we allow users to repeat this
argument, e.g. you can tack on a --qemu_args='-m 2048', or you could
just append it to the first string ('-smp 8 -m 2048').
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Context:
* kunit_kernel.py is importing kunit_parser.py just to use the
print_with_timestamp() function
* the parser is directly printing to stdout, which will become an issue
if we ever try to run multiple kernels in parallel
This patch introduces a kunit_printer.py file and migrates callers of
kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp() to call
kunit_printer.stdout.print_with_timestamp() instead.
Future changes:
If we want to support showing results for parallel runs, we could then
create new Printer's that don't directly write to stdout and refactor
the code to pass around these Printer objects.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Our main function currently has an optional `linux` argument which is
used to by our unit tests to inject a mock.
We currently have the same code copy-pasted several times to do
if not linux:
linux = MakeRealInstance(cli_args.foo, cli_args.bar, ...)
But in python, dependency injection isn't necessary or idiomatic when we
can just use mock.patch() to mock things out.
This change
1. adds a helper to create a LinuxSourceTree from the cli_args
2. drops the `linux` parameter in favor of mocking the __init__ func.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This primarily comes from running pylint over kunit tool code and
ignoring some warnings we don't care about.
If we ever got a fully clean setup, we could add this to run_checks.py,
but we're not there yet.
Fix things like
* Drop unused imports
* check `is None`, not `== None` (see PEP 8)
* remove redundant parens around returns
* remove redundant `else` / convert `elif` to `if` where appropriate
* rename make_arch_qemuconfig() param to base_kunitconfig (this is the
name used in the subclass, and it's a better one)
* kunit_tool_test: check the exit code for SystemExit (could be 0)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Before, our help output contained lines like
--kconfig_add KCONFIG_ADD
--qemu_config qemu_config
--jobs jobs
They're not very helpful.
The former kind come from the automatic 'metavar' we get from argparse,
the uppercase version of the flag name.
The latter are where we manually specified metavar as the flag name.
After:
--build_dir DIR
--make_options X=Y
--kunitconfig PATH
--kconfig_add CONFIG_X=Y
--arch ARCH
--cross_compile PREFIX
--qemu_config FILE
--jobs N
--timeout SECONDS
--raw_output [{all,kunit}]
--json [FILE]
This patch tries to make the code more clear by specifying the _type_ of
input we expect, e.g. --build_dir is a DIR, --qemu_config is a FILE.
I also switched it to uppercase since it looked more clearly like
placeholder text that way.
This patch also changes --raw_output to specify `choices` to make it
more clear what the options are, and this way argparse can validate it
for us, as shown by the added test case.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Before, kunit.py always printed "arch": "UM" in its json output, but...
1. With `kunit.py parse`, we could be parsing output from anywhere, so
we can't say that.
2. Capitalizing it is probably wrong, as it's `ARCH=um`
3. Commit 87c9c16317 ("kunit: tool: add support for QEMU") made it so
kunit.py could knowingly run a different arch, yet we'd still always
claim "UM".
This patch addresses all of those. E.g.
1.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse .kunit/test.log --json | grep -o '"arch.*' | sort -u
"arch": "",
2.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json | ...
"arch": "um",
3.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json --arch=x86_64 | ...
"arch": "x86_64",
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When using --json, kunit.py run/exec/parse will produce results in
KernelCI json format.
As part of that, we include the build_dir that was used, and we
(incorrectly) hardcode in the arch, etc.
We'll want a way to plumb more values (as well as the correct `arch`),
so this patch groups those fields into kunit_json.Metadata type.
This patch should have no user visible changes.
And since we only used build_dir in KunitParseRequest for json, we can
now move it out of that struct and add it into KunitExecRequest, which
needs it and used to get it via inheritance.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit be886ba90c ("kunit: run kunit_tool from any directory")
introduced this variable, but it was unused even in that commit.
Since it's still unused now and callers can instead use
get_kernel_root_path(), delete this var.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently kunit_json.get_json_result() will output the JSON-ified test
output to json_path, but iff it's not "stdout".
Instead, move the responsibility entirely over to the one caller.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This field is only used to pass along the parsed Test object from
parse_tests().
Everywhere else the `result` field is ignored.
Instead make parse_tests() explicitly return a KunitResult and Test so
we can retire the `result` field.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The --jobs parameter for kunit_tool currently defaults to 8 CPUs,
regardless of the number available. For systems with significantly more
(or less), this is not as efficient. Instead, default --jobs to the
number of CPUs available to the process: while there are as many
superstitions as to exactly what the ideal jobs:CPU ratio is, this seems
sufficiently sensible to me.
A new helper function to get the default number of jobs is added:
get_default_jobs() -- this is used in kunit_tool_test instead of a
hardcoded value, or an explicit call to len(os.sched_getaffinity()), so
should be more flexible if this needs to change in the future.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If I created a kunitconfig file that was incomplete, then
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build --kunitconfig=my_kunitconfig
would silently drop all the options with unmet dependencies!
This is because it doesn't do the config check that `kunit.py config`
does.
So if I want to safely build a kernel for testing, I have to do
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config <flags>
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build <flags, again>
It seems unlikely that any user of kunit.py would want the current
`build` semantics.
So make it effectively do `kunit.py config` + `kunit.py build`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The `log` field is unused, and the `status` field is accessible via
`test.status`.
So it's simpler to just return the main `Test` object directly.
And since we're no longer returning a namedtuple, which has no type
annotations, this hopefully means typecheckers are better equipped to
find any errors.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
namedtuple is a terse way of defining a collection of fields.
However, it does not allow us to annotate the type of these fields.
It also doesn't let us have any sort of inheritance between types.
Since commit df4b0807ca ("kunit: tool: Assert the version
requirement"), kunit.py has asserted that it's running on python >=3.7.
So in that case use a 3.7 feature, dataclasses, to replace these.
Changes in detail:
* Make KunitExecRequest contain all the fields needed for exec_tests
* Use inheritance to dedupe fields
* also allows us to e.g. pass a KUnitRequest in as a KUnitParseRequest
* this has changed around the order of some fields
* Use named arguments when constructing all request objects in kunit.py
* This is to prevent accidentally mixing up fields, etc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py isn't very clear that
1) it stashes a copy of the unparsed output in $BUILD_DIR/test.log
2) it sets $BUILD_DIR=.kunit by default
So it's trickier than it should be for a user to come up with the right
command to do so.
Make kunit.py print out a command for this if
a) we saw a test case crash
b) we only ran one kernel (test.log only contains output from the last)
Example suggested command:
$ scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh .kunit/vmlinux .kunit < .kunit/test.log | tee .kunit/decoded.log | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse
Without debug info a user might see something like
[14:11:25] Call Trace:
[14:11:25] ? kunit_binary_assert_format (:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_try_run_case (test.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? __kthread_parkme (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] ? kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (try-catch.c:?)
[14:11:25] kthread (kthread.c:?)
[14:11:25] new_thread_handler (:?)
[14:11:25] [CRASHED]
`tee` is in GNU coreutils, so it seems fine to add that into the
pipeline by default, that way users can inspect the otuput in more
detail.
Note: to turn on debug info, users would need to do something like
$ echo -e 'CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y' >> .kunit/.kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
$ <then run decode_stacktrace.sh now vmlinux is updated>
This feels too clunky to include in the instructions.
With --kconfig_add [1], it would become a bit less painful.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211106013058.2621799-2-dlatypov@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
E.g. run tests but with KASAN
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
This also works with --kunitconfig
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kunitconfig=fs/ext4 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
This flag is inspired by TuxMake's --kconfig-add, see
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/tuxmake#examples.
Our version just uses "_" as the delimiter for consistency with
pre-existing flags like --build_dir, --make_options, --kernel_args, etc.
Note: this does make it easier to run into a pre-existing edge case:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64
This second invocation ^ still has KASAN enabled!
kunit.py won't call olddefconfig if our current .config is already a
superset of the provided kunitconfig.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py currently crashes and fails to parse kernel output if it's not
fully valid utf-8.
This can come from memory corruption or just inadvertently printing
out binary data as strings.
E.g. adding this line into a kunit test
pr_info("\x80")
will cause this exception
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x80 in position
1961: invalid start byte
We can tell Python how to handle errors, see
https://docs.python.org/3/library/codecs.html#error-handlers
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like there's a way to specify this in
just one location, so we need to repeat ourselves quite a bit.
Specify `errors='backslashreplace'` so we instead:
* print out the offending byte as '\x80'
* try and continue parsing the output.
* as long as the TAP lines themselves are valid, we're fine.
Fixed spelling/grammar in commit log:
Shuah Khan <<skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Update to kunit_parser to improve compatibility with KTAP
specification including arbitrarily nested tests. Patch accomplishes
three major changes:
- Use a general Test object to represent all tests rather than TestCase
and TestSuite objects. This allows for easier implementation of arbitrary
levels of nested tests and promotes the idea that both test suites and test
cases are tests.
- Print errors incrementally rather than all at once after the
parsing finishes to maximize information given to the user in the
case of the parser given invalid input and to increase the helpfulness
of the timestamps given during printing. Note that kunit.py parse does
not print incrementally yet. However, this fix brings us closer to
this feature.
- Increase compatibility for different formats of input. Arbitrary levels
of nested tests supported. Also, test cases and test suites are now
supported to be present on the same level of testing.
This patch now implements the draft KTAP specification here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+GJov6tdjvY9x12JsJT14qn6c7NViJxqaJk+r-K1YJzPggFDQ@mail.gmail.com/
We'll update the parser as the spec evolves.
This patch adjusts the kunit_tool_test.py file to check for
the correct outputs from the new parser and adds a new test to check
the parsing for a KTAP result log with correct format for multiple nested
subtests (test_is_test_passed-all_passed_nested.log).
This patch also alters the kunit_json.py file to allow for arbitrarily
nested tests.
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The new --run_isolated flag makes the tool boot the kernel once per
suite or test, preventing leftover state from one suite to impact the
other. This can be useful as a starting point to debugging test
hermeticity issues.
Note: it takes a lot longer, so people should not use it normally.
Consider the following very simplified example:
bool disable_something_for_test = false;
void function_being_tested() {
...
if (disable_something_for_test) return;
...
}
static void test_before(struct kunit *test)
{
disable_something_for_test = true;
function_being_tested();
/* oops, we forgot to reset it back to false */
}
static void test_after(struct kunit *test)
{
/* oops, now "fixing" test_before can cause test_after to fail! */
function_being_tested();
}
Presented like this, the issues are obvious, but it gets a lot more
complicated to track down as the amount of test setup and helper
functions increases.
Another use case is memory corruption. It might not be surfaced as a
failure/crash in the test case or suite that caused it. I've noticed in
kunit's own unit tests, the 3rd suite after might be the one to finally
crash after an out-of-bounds write, for example.
Example usage:
Per suite:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
....
Testing complete. 5 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/7)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit-try-catch-test ========
...
Per test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Starting KUnit Kernel (2/23)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] filter_subsuite_test
...
It works with filters as well:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite example
...
Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] example ========
...
It also handles test filters, '*.*skip*' runs these 3 tests:
kunit_status.kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
example.example_skip_test
example.example_mark_skipped_test
Fixed up merge conflict between:
d8c23ead70 ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)") and
6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This is a long standing bug in kunit tool.
Since these files were added, run_kernel() has always yielded lines.
That means, the call to run_kernel() returns before the kernel finishes
executing tests, potentially before a single line of output is even
produced.
So code like this
time_start = time.time()
result = linux.run_kernel(...)
time_end = time.time()
would only measure the time taken for python to give back the generator
object.
From a caller's perspective, the only way to know the kernel has exited
is for us to consume all the output from the `result` generator object.
Alternatively, we could change run_kernel() to try and do its own book
keeping and return the total time, but that doesn't seem worth it.
This change makes us record `time_end` after we're done parsing all the
output (which should mean we've consumed all of it, or errored out).
That means we're including in the parsing time as well, but that should
be quite small, and it's better than claiming it took 0s to run tests.
Let's use this as an example:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit example
Before:
Elapsed time: 7.684s total, 0.001s configuring, 4.692s building, 0.000s running
After:
Elapsed time: 6.283s total, 0.001s configuring, 3.202s building, 3.079s running
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently this code is copy-pasted between the normal "run" subcommand
and the "exec" subcommand.
Given we don't have any interest in just executing the tests without
giving the user any indication what happened (i.e. parsing the output),
make a function that does both this things and can be reused.
This will be useful when we allow more complicated ways of running
tests, e.g. invoking the kernel multiple times instead of just once,
etc.
We remove input_data from the ParseRequest so the callers don't have to
pass in a dummy value for this field. Named tuples are also immutable,
so if they did pass in a dummy, exec_tests() would need to make a copy
to call parse_tests().
Removing it also makes KunitParseRequest match the other *Request types,
as they only contain user arguments/flags, not data.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Drop some variables in unit tests that were unused and/or add assertions
based on them.
For ExitStack, it was imported, but the `es` variable wasn't used so it
didn't do anything, and we were leaking the file objects.
Refactor it to just use nested `with` statements to properly close them.
And drop the direct use of .close() on file objects in the kunit tool
unit test, as these can be leaked if test assertions fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 1d71307a6f ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by
names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob.
This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases
inside of suites as well.
This is quite useful when, e.g.
* trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on
* trying to debug issues with test hermeticity
Examples:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*'
...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests'
...
[ERROR] no tests run!
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Problem:
What does this do?
$ kunit.py run --json
Well, it runs all the tests and prints test results out as JSON.
And next is
$ kunit.py run my-test-suite --json
This runs just `my-test-suite` and prints results out as JSON.
But what about?
$ kunit.py run --json my-test-suite
This runs all the tests and stores the json results in a "my-test-suite"
file.
Why:
--json, and now --raw_output are actually string flags. They just have a
default value. --json in particular takes the name of an output file.
It was intended that you'd do
$ kunit.py run --json=my_output_file my-test-suite
if you ever wanted to specify the value.
Workaround:
It doesn't seem like there's a way to make
https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html only accept arg values
after a '='.
I believe that `--json` should "just work" regardless of where it is.
So this patch automatically rewrites a bare `--json` to `--json=stdout`.
That makes the examples above work the same way.
Add a regression test that can catch this for --raw_output.
Fixes: 6a499c9c42 ("kunit: tool: make --raw_output support only showing kunit output")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
--raw_output is nice, but it would be nicer if could show only output
after KUnit tests have started.
So change the flag to allow specifying a string ('kunit').
Make it so `--raw_output` alone will default to `--raw_output=all` and
have the same original behavior.
Drop the small kunit_parser.raw_output() function since it feels wrong
to put it in "kunit_parser.py" when the point of it is to not parse
anything.
E.g.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output=kunit
...
[15:24:07] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
TAP version 14
1..1
# Subtest: example
1..3
# example_simple_test: initializing
ok 1 - example_simple_test
# example_skip_test: initializing
# example_skip_test: You should not see a line below.
ok 2 - example_skip_test # SKIP this test should be skipped
# example_mark_skipped_test: initializing
# example_mark_skipped_test: You should see a line below.
# example_mark_skipped_test: You should see this line.
ok 3 - example_mark_skipped_test # SKIP this test should be skipped
ok 1 - example
[15:24:10] Elapsed time: 6.487s total, 0.001s configuring, 3.510s building, 0.000s running
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit.py currently does not make it possible for users to specify module
parameters (/kernel arguments more generally) unless one directly tweaks
the kunit.py code itself.
This hasn't mattered much so far, but this would make it easier to port
existing tests that expose module parameters over to KUnit and/or let
current KUnit tests take advantage of them.
Tested using an kunit internal parameter:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit \
--kernel_args=kunit.filter_glob=kunit_status
...
Testing complete. 2 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 87c9c16317 ("kunit: tool: add support for QEMU") on the 'next'
tree adds 'from __future__ import annotations' in 'kunit_kernel.py'.
Because it is supported on only >=3.7 Python, people using older Python
will get below error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 20, in <module>
import kunit_kernel
File "/home/sjpark/linux/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py", line 9
from __future__ import annotations
^
SyntaxError: future feature annotations is not defined
This commit adds a version assertion in 'kunit.py', so that people get
more explicit error message like below:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 15, in <module>
assert sys.version_info >= (3, 7), "Python version is too old"
AssertionError: Python version is too old
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add basic support to run QEMU via kunit_tool. Add support for i386,
x86_64, arm, arm64, and a bunch more.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
TL;DR
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit
Per suggestion from Ted [1], we can reduce the amount of typing by
assuming a convention that these files are named '.kunitconfig'.
In the case of [1], we now have
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4
Also add in such a fragment for kunit itself so we can give that as an
example more close to home (and thus less likely to be accidentally
broken).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YCNF4yP1dB97zzwD@mit.edu/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This allows running different subsets of tests, e.g.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec 'list*'
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec 'kunit*'
This passes the "kunit_filter.glob" commandline option to the UML
kernel, which currently only supports filtering by suite name.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig
file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit.
This changes makes it so users can pass in a path to a kunitconfig.
One of the imagined use cases is having kunitconfig fragments in-tree
to formalize interesting sets of tests for features/subsystems, e.g.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunticonfig=fs/ext4/kunitconfig
For now, this hypothetical fs/ext4/kunitconfig would contain
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y
CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS=y
At the moment, it's not hard to manually whip up this file, but as more
and more tests get added, this will get tedious.
It also opens the door to documenting how to run all the tests relevant
to a specific subsystem or feature as a simple one-liner.
This can be seen as an analogue to tools/testing/selftests/*/config
But in the case of KUnit, the tests live in the same directory as the
code-under-test, so it feels more natural to allow the kunitconfig
fragments to live anywhere. (Though, people could create a separate
directory if wanted; this patch imposes no restrictions on the path).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
LinuxSourceTree will unceremoniously crash if the user doesn't call
read_kunitconfig() first in a number of functions.
And currently every place we create an instance, the caller also calls
create_kunitconfig() and read_kunitconfig().
Move these instead into __init__() so they can't be forgotten and to
reduce copy-paste.
The https://github.com/google/pytype type-checker complained that
_config wasn't initialized. With this, kunit_tool now type checks
under both pytype and mypy.
Add an optional boolean that can be used to disable this for use cases
in the future where we might not need/want to load the config.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The authors of this tool were more familiar with a different
type-checker, https://github.com/google/pytype.
That's open source, but mypy seems more prevalent (and runs faster).
And unlike pytype, mypy doesn't try to infer types so it doesn't check
unanotated functions.
So annotate ~all functions in kunit tool to increase type-checking
coverage.
Note: per https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/, `__init__()` should
be annotated as `-> None`.
Doing so makes mypy discover a number of new violations.
Exclude main() since we reuse `request` for the different types of
requests, which mypy isn't happy about.
This commit fixes all but one error, where `TestSuite.status` might be
None.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Change every shebang which does not need an argument to use /usr/bin/env.
This is needed as not every distro has everything under /usr/bin,
sometimes not even bash.
Signed-off-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
When --build_dir is provided use it and do not pollute source directory
which even can be mounted over network or read-only.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When JSON support was added in [1], the KunitParseRequest tuple was
updated to contain a 'build_dir' field, but kunit.py parse doesn't
accept --build_dir as an option. The code nevertheless tried to access
it, resulting in this error:
AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'build_dir'
Given that the parser only uses the build_dir variable to set the
'build_environment' json field, we set it to None (which gives the JSON
'null') for now. Ultimately, we probably do want to be able to set this,
but since it's new functionality which (for the parse subcommand) never
worked, this is the quickest way of getting it back up and running.
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit-fixes&id=21a6d1780d5bbfca0ce9b8104ca6233502fcbf86
Fixes: 21a6d1780d ("kunit: tool: allow generating test results in JSON")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Right now .kunitconfig and the build dir are automatically created if
the build dir does not exists; however, if the build dir is present and
.kunitconfig is not, kunit_tool will crash.
Fix this by checking for both the build dir as well as the .kunitconfig.
NOTE: This depends on commit 5578d008d9 ("kunit: tool: fix running
kunit_tool from outside kernel tree")
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?id=5578d008d9e06bb531fb3e62dd17096d9fd9c853
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a --json flag, which when specified generates JSON formatted test
results conforming to the KernelCI API test_group spec[1]. The user can
use the new flag to specify a filename to print the json formatted
results to.
Link[1]: https://api.kernelci.org/schema-test-group.html#post
Signed-off-by: Heidi Fahim <heidifahim@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently kunit_tool does not work correctly when executed from a path
outside of the kernel tree, so make sure that the current working
directory is correct and the kunit_dir is properly initialized before
running.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This Kunit update for Linux 5.9-rc1 consists of:
- Adds a generic kunit_resource API extending it to support
resources that are passed in to kunit in addition kunit
allocated resources. In addition, KUnit resources are now
refcounted to avoid passed in resources being released while
in use by kunit.
- Add support for named resources.
- Important bug fixes from Brendan Higgins and Will Chen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=kIIk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
Pull kunit updates from Shuah Khan:
- Add a generic kunit_resource API extending it to support resources
that are passed in to kunit in addition kunit allocated resources. In
addition, KUnit resources are now refcounted to avoid passed in
resources being released while in use by kunit.
- Add support for named resources.
- Important bug fixes from Brendan Higgins and Will Chen
* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
kunit: tool: fix improper treatment of file location
kunit: tool: fix broken default args in unit tests
kunit: capture stderr on all make subprocess calls
Documentation: kunit: Remove references to --defconfig
kunit: add support for named resources
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources
Commit 01397e822a ("kunit: Fix TabError, remove defconfig code and
handle when there is no kunitconfig") and commit 45ba7a893a ("kunit:
kunit_tool: Separate out config/build/exec/parse") introduced two
closely related issues which built off of each other: they excessively
created the build directory when not present and modified a constant
(constants in Python only exist by convention).
Together these issues broken a number of unit tests for KUnit tool, so
fix them.
Fixed up commit log to fic checkpatch commit description style error.
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Fixes: 01397e822a ("kunit: Fix TabError, remove defconfig code and handle when there is no kunitconfig")
Fixes: 45ba7a893a ("kunit: kunit_tool: Separate out config/build/exec/parse")
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When separating out different phases of running tests[1]
(build/exec/parse/etc), the format of the KunitResult tuple changed
(adding an elapsed_time variable). This is not populated during a build
failure, causing kunit.py to crash.
This fixes [1] to probably populate the result variable, causing a
failing build to be reported properly.
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=45ba7a893ad89114e773b3dc32f6431354c465d6
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The identation before this code
(`if not os.path.exists(cli_args.build_dir):``)
was with spaces instead of tabs after fixed up merge conflits,
this commit revert spaces to tabs:
[iha@bbking linux]$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 247
if not linux:
^
TabError: inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation
[iha@bbking linux]$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 338, in <module>
main(sys.argv[1:])
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 215, in main
add_config_opts(config_parser)
[iha@bbking linux]$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 337, in <module>
main(sys.argv[1:])
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 255, in main
result = run_tests(linux, request)
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 133, in run_tests
request.defconfig,
AttributeError: 'KunitRequest' object has no attribute 'defconfig'
Handles when there is no .kunitconfig, the error due to merge conflicts
between the following:
commit 9bdf64b351 ("kunit: use KUnit defconfig by default")
commit 45ba7a893a ("kunit: kunit_tool: Separate out
config/build/exec/parse")
[iha@bbking linux]$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 335, in <module>
main(sys.argv[1:])
File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 246, in main
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree()
File "../tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py", line 109, in __init__
self._kconfig.read_from_file(kunitconfig_path)
File "t../ools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py", line 88, in read_from_file
with open(path, 'r') as f:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '.kunit/.kunitconfig'
Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To improve the usability of KUnit, defconfig is used
by default if no kunitconfig is present.
* https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205259
Fixed up minor merge conflicts - Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To make KUnit easier to use, and to avoid overwriting object and
.config files, the default KUnit build directory is set to .kunit
* Related bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205221
Fixed up minor merge conflicts - Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Daniel Latypov