Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Woodhouse
cf1d88b36b KVM: Remove dirty handling from gfn_to_pfn_cache completely
It isn't OK to cache the dirty status of a page in internal structures
for an indefinite period of time.

Any time a vCPU exits the run loop to userspace might be its last; the
VMM might do its final check of the dirty log, flush the last remaining
dirty pages to the destination and complete a live migration. If we
have internal 'dirty' state which doesn't get flushed until the vCPU
is finally destroyed on the source after migration is complete, then
we have lost data because that will escape the final copy.

This problem already exists with the use of kvm_vcpu_unmap() to mark
pages dirty in e.g. VMX nesting.

Note that the actual Linux MM already considers the page to be dirty
since we have a writeable mapping of it. This is just about the KVM
dirty logging.

For the nesting-style use cases (KVM_GUEST_USES_PFN) we will need to
track which gfn_to_pfn_caches have been used and explicitly mark the
corresponding pages dirty before returning to userspace. But we would
have needed external tracking of that anyway, rather than walking the
full list of GPCs to find those belonging to this vCPU which are dirty.

So let's rely *solely* on that external tracking, and keep it simple
rather than laying a tempting trap for callers to fall into.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303154127.202856-3-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-04-02 05:34:41 -04:00
Sean Christopherson
d0d96121d0 KVM: Use enum to track if cached PFN will be used in guest and/or host
Replace the guest_uses_pa and kernel_map booleans in the PFN cache code
with a unified enum/bitmask. Using explicit names makes it easier to
review and audit call sites.

Opportunistically add a WARN to prevent passing garbage; instantating a
cache without declaring its usage is either buggy or pointless.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303154127.202856-2-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-04-02 05:34:41 -04:00
Sean Christopherson
df06dae3f2 KVM: Don't actually set a request when evicting vCPUs for GFN cache invd
Don't actually set a request bit in vcpu->requests when making a request
purely to force a vCPU to exit the guest.  Logging a request but not
actually consuming it would cause the vCPU to get stuck in an infinite
loop during KVM_RUN because KVM would see the pending request and bail
from VM-Enter to service the request.

Note, it's currently impossible for KVM to set KVM_REQ_GPC_INVALIDATE as
nothing in KVM is wired up to set guest_uses_pa=true.  But, it'd be all
too easy for arch code to introduce use of kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_init()
without implementing handling of the request, especially since getting
test coverage of MMU notifier interaction with specific KVM features
usually requires a directed test.

Opportunistically rename gfn_to_pfn_cache_invalidate_start()'s wake_vcpus
to evict_vcpus.  The purpose of the request is to get vCPUs out of guest
mode, it's supposed to _avoid_ waking vCPUs that are blocking.

Opportunistically rename KVM_REQ_GPC_INVALIDATE to be more specific as to
what it wants to accomplish, and to genericize the name so that it can
used for similar but unrelated scenarios, should they arise in the future.
Add a comment and documentation to explain why the "no action" request
exists.

Add compile-time assertions to help detect improper usage.  Use the inner
assertless helper in the one s390 path that makes requests without a
hardcoded request.

Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220223165302.3205276-1-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-04-02 05:34:39 -04:00
David Woodhouse
79593c086e KVM: avoid double put_page with gfn-to-pfn cache
If the cache's user host virtual address becomes invalid, there
is still a path from kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_refresh() where __release_gpc()
could release the pfn but the gpc->pfn field has not been overwritten
with an error value.  If this happens, kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_unmap will
call put_page again on the same page.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 982ed0de47 ("KVM: Reinstate gfn_to_pfn_cache with invalidation support")
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-04-02 05:34:39 -04:00
David Woodhouse
982ed0de47 KVM: Reinstate gfn_to_pfn_cache with invalidation support
This can be used in two modes. There is an atomic mode where the cached
mapping is accessed while holding the rwlock, and a mode where the
physical address is used by a vCPU in guest mode.

For the latter case, an invalidation will wake the vCPU with the new
KVM_REQ_GPC_INVALIDATE, and the architecture will need to refresh any
caches it still needs to access before entering guest mode again.

Only one vCPU can be targeted by the wake requests; it's simple enough
to make it wake all vCPUs or even a mask but I don't see a use case for
that additional complexity right now.

Invalidation happens from the invalidate_range_start MMU notifier, which
needs to be able to sleep in order to wake the vCPU and wait for it.

This means that revalidation potentially needs to "wait" for the MMU
operation to complete and the invalidate_range_end notifier to be
invoked. Like the vCPU when it takes a page fault in that period, we
just spin — fixing that in a future patch by implementing an actual
*wait* may be another part of shaving this particularly hirsute yak.

As noted in the comments in the function itself, the only case where
the invalidate_range_start notifier is expected to be called *without*
being able to sleep is when the OOM reaper is killing the process. In
that case, we expect the vCPU threads already to have exited, and thus
there will be nothing to wake, and no reason to wait. So we clear the
KVM_REQUEST_WAIT bit and send the request anyway, then complain loudly
if there actually *was* anything to wake up.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <20211210163625.2886-3-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-01-07 10:44:44 -05:00