linux-stable/include/linux/mm_inline.h
Hugh Dickins 07ca760673 mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable
Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count.
The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is
no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to
overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head,
which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be
added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement).

But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec
lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits
by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an
unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list).

The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with
page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can
be done.  As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0),
and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds
out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid
is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages.

I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);":
if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then
we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting
it on its destination list immediately.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-17 11:56:57 -05:00

279 lines
7.8 KiB
C

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#ifndef LINUX_MM_INLINE_H
#define LINUX_MM_INLINE_H
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/huge_mm.h>
#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
/**
* folio_is_file_lru - Should the folio be on a file LRU or anon LRU?
* @folio: The folio to test.
*
* We would like to get this info without a page flag, but the state
* needs to survive until the folio is last deleted from the LRU, which
* could be as far down as __page_cache_release.
*
* Return: An integer (not a boolean!) used to sort a folio onto the
* right LRU list and to account folios correctly.
* 1 if @folio is a regular filesystem backed page cache folio
* or a lazily freed anonymous folio (e.g. via MADV_FREE).
* 0 if @folio is a normal anonymous folio, a tmpfs folio or otherwise
* ram or swap backed folio.
*/
static inline int folio_is_file_lru(struct folio *folio)
{
return !folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
}
static inline int page_is_file_lru(struct page *page)
{
return folio_is_file_lru(page_folio(page));
}
static __always_inline void update_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec,
enum lru_list lru, enum zone_type zid,
long nr_pages)
{
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
__mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
__mod_zone_page_state(&pgdat->node_zones[zid],
NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, zid, nr_pages);
#endif
}
/**
* __folio_clear_lru_flags - Clear page lru flags before releasing a page.
* @folio: The folio that was on lru and now has a zero reference.
*/
static __always_inline void __folio_clear_lru_flags(struct folio *folio)
{
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_lru(folio), folio);
__folio_clear_lru(folio);
/* this shouldn't happen, so leave the flags to bad_page() */
if (folio_test_active(folio) && folio_test_unevictable(folio))
return;
__folio_clear_active(folio);
__folio_clear_unevictable(folio);
}
static __always_inline void __clear_page_lru_flags(struct page *page)
{
__folio_clear_lru_flags(page_folio(page));
}
/**
* folio_lru_list - Which LRU list should a folio be on?
* @folio: The folio to test.
*
* Return: The LRU list a folio should be on, as an index
* into the array of LRU lists.
*/
static __always_inline enum lru_list folio_lru_list(struct folio *folio)
{
enum lru_list lru;
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_active(folio) && folio_test_unevictable(folio), folio);
if (folio_test_unevictable(folio))
return LRU_UNEVICTABLE;
lru = folio_is_file_lru(folio) ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON;
if (folio_test_active(folio))
lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
return lru;
}
static __always_inline
void lruvec_add_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
{
enum lru_list lru = folio_lru_list(folio);
update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, folio_zonenum(folio),
folio_nr_pages(folio));
if (lru != LRU_UNEVICTABLE)
list_add(&folio->lru, &lruvec->lists[lru]);
}
static __always_inline void add_page_to_lru_list(struct page *page,
struct lruvec *lruvec)
{
lruvec_add_folio(lruvec, page_folio(page));
}
static __always_inline
void lruvec_add_folio_tail(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
{
enum lru_list lru = folio_lru_list(folio);
update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, folio_zonenum(folio),
folio_nr_pages(folio));
/* This is not expected to be used on LRU_UNEVICTABLE */
list_add_tail(&folio->lru, &lruvec->lists[lru]);
}
static __always_inline void add_page_to_lru_list_tail(struct page *page,
struct lruvec *lruvec)
{
lruvec_add_folio_tail(lruvec, page_folio(page));
}
static __always_inline
void lruvec_del_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
{
enum lru_list lru = folio_lru_list(folio);
if (lru != LRU_UNEVICTABLE)
list_del(&folio->lru);
update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, folio_zonenum(folio),
-folio_nr_pages(folio));
}
static __always_inline void del_page_from_lru_list(struct page *page,
struct lruvec *lruvec)
{
lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, page_folio(page));
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME
/*
* mmap_lock should be read-locked when calling vma_anon_name() and while using
* the returned pointer.
*/
extern const char *vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
/*
* mmap_lock should be read-locked for orig_vma->vm_mm.
* mmap_lock should be write-locked for new_vma->vm_mm or new_vma should be
* isolated.
*/
extern void dup_vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *orig_vma,
struct vm_area_struct *new_vma);
/*
* mmap_lock should be write-locked or vma should have been isolated under
* write-locked mmap_lock protection.
*/
extern void free_vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
/* mmap_lock should be read-locked */
static inline bool is_same_vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
const char *name)
{
const char *vma_name = vma_anon_name(vma);
/* either both NULL, or pointers to same string */
if (vma_name == name)
return true;
return name && vma_name && !strcmp(name, vma_name);
}
#else /* CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME */
static inline const char *vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
return NULL;
}
static inline void dup_vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *orig_vma,
struct vm_area_struct *new_vma) {}
static inline void free_vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline bool is_same_vma_anon_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
const char *name)
{
return true;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME */
static inline void init_tlb_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
atomic_set(&mm->tlb_flush_pending, 0);
}
static inline void inc_tlb_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
atomic_inc(&mm->tlb_flush_pending);
/*
* The only time this value is relevant is when there are indeed pages
* to flush. And we'll only flush pages after changing them, which
* requires the PTL.
*
* So the ordering here is:
*
* atomic_inc(&mm->tlb_flush_pending);
* spin_lock(&ptl);
* ...
* set_pte_at();
* spin_unlock(&ptl);
*
* spin_lock(&ptl)
* mm_tlb_flush_pending();
* ....
* spin_unlock(&ptl);
*
* flush_tlb_range();
* atomic_dec(&mm->tlb_flush_pending);
*
* Where the increment if constrained by the PTL unlock, it thus
* ensures that the increment is visible if the PTE modification is
* visible. After all, if there is no PTE modification, nobody cares
* about TLB flushes either.
*
* This very much relies on users (mm_tlb_flush_pending() and
* mm_tlb_flush_nested()) only caring about _specific_ PTEs (and
* therefore specific PTLs), because with SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS and RCpc
* locks (PPC) the unlock of one doesn't order against the lock of
* another PTL.
*
* The decrement is ordered by the flush_tlb_range(), such that
* mm_tlb_flush_pending() will not return false unless all flushes have
* completed.
*/
}
static inline void dec_tlb_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
/*
* See inc_tlb_flush_pending().
*
* This cannot be smp_mb__before_atomic() because smp_mb() simply does
* not order against TLB invalidate completion, which is what we need.
*
* Therefore we must rely on tlb_flush_*() to guarantee order.
*/
atomic_dec(&mm->tlb_flush_pending);
}
static inline bool mm_tlb_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
/*
* Must be called after having acquired the PTL; orders against that
* PTLs release and therefore ensures that if we observe the modified
* PTE we must also observe the increment from inc_tlb_flush_pending().
*
* That is, it only guarantees to return true if there is a flush
* pending for _this_ PTL.
*/
return atomic_read(&mm->tlb_flush_pending);
}
static inline bool mm_tlb_flush_nested(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
/*
* Similar to mm_tlb_flush_pending(), we must have acquired the PTL
* for which there is a TLB flush pending in order to guarantee
* we've seen both that PTE modification and the increment.
*
* (no requirement on actually still holding the PTL, that is irrelevant)
*/
return atomic_read(&mm->tlb_flush_pending) > 1;
}
#endif