mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-11-01 17:08:10 +00:00
664ef2123f
Commit 3ae36655b9 (x86-64: Rework vsyscall
emulation and add vsyscall= parameter) removed the special use of the
0xcc IDT vector.
Remove it from Documentation/x86/entry_64.txt also.
Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@MIT.EDU>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1313447210-9149-1-git-send-email-cesarb@cesarb.net
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
95 lines
3.6 KiB
Text
95 lines
3.6 KiB
Text
This file documents some of the kernel entries in
|
|
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S. A lot of this explanation is adapted from
|
|
an email from Ingo Molnar:
|
|
|
|
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20110529191055.GC9835%40elte.hu>
|
|
|
|
The x86 architecture has quite a few different ways to jump into
|
|
kernel code. Most of these entry points are registered in
|
|
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c and implemented in arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
|
|
and arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S.
|
|
|
|
The IDT vector assignments are listed in arch/x86/include/irq_vectors.h.
|
|
|
|
Some of these entries are:
|
|
|
|
- system_call: syscall instruction from 64-bit code.
|
|
|
|
- ia32_syscall: int 0x80 from 32-bit or 64-bit code; compat syscall
|
|
either way.
|
|
|
|
- ia32_syscall, ia32_sysenter: syscall and sysenter from 32-bit
|
|
code
|
|
|
|
- interrupt: An array of entries. Every IDT vector that doesn't
|
|
explicitly point somewhere else gets set to the corresponding
|
|
value in interrupts. These point to a whole array of
|
|
magically-generated functions that make their way to do_IRQ with
|
|
the interrupt number as a parameter.
|
|
|
|
- APIC interrupts: Various special-purpose interrupts for things
|
|
like TLB shootdown.
|
|
|
|
- Architecturally-defined exceptions like divide_error.
|
|
|
|
There are a few complexities here. The different x86-64 entries
|
|
have different calling conventions. The syscall and sysenter
|
|
instructions have their own peculiar calling conventions. Some of
|
|
the IDT entries push an error code onto the stack; others don't.
|
|
IDT entries using the IST alternative stack mechanism need their own
|
|
magic to get the stack frames right. (You can find some
|
|
documentation in the AMD APM, Volume 2, Chapter 8 and the Intel SDM,
|
|
Volume 3, Chapter 6.)
|
|
|
|
Dealing with the swapgs instruction is especially tricky. Swapgs
|
|
toggles whether gs is the kernel gs or the user gs. The swapgs
|
|
instruction is rather fragile: it must nest perfectly and only in
|
|
single depth, it should only be used if entering from user mode to
|
|
kernel mode and then when returning to user-space, and precisely
|
|
so. If we mess that up even slightly, we crash.
|
|
|
|
So when we have a secondary entry, already in kernel mode, we *must
|
|
not* use SWAPGS blindly - nor must we forget doing a SWAPGS when it's
|
|
not switched/swapped yet.
|
|
|
|
Now, there's a secondary complication: there's a cheap way to test
|
|
which mode the CPU is in and an expensive way.
|
|
|
|
The cheap way is to pick this info off the entry frame on the kernel
|
|
stack, from the CS of the ptregs area of the kernel stack:
|
|
|
|
xorl %ebx,%ebx
|
|
testl $3,CS+8(%rsp)
|
|
je error_kernelspace
|
|
SWAPGS
|
|
|
|
The expensive (paranoid) way is to read back the MSR_GS_BASE value
|
|
(which is what SWAPGS modifies):
|
|
|
|
movl $1,%ebx
|
|
movl $MSR_GS_BASE,%ecx
|
|
rdmsr
|
|
testl %edx,%edx
|
|
js 1f /* negative -> in kernel */
|
|
SWAPGS
|
|
xorl %ebx,%ebx
|
|
1: ret
|
|
|
|
and the whole paranoid non-paranoid macro complexity is about whether
|
|
to suffer that RDMSR cost.
|
|
|
|
If we are at an interrupt or user-trap/gate-alike boundary then we can
|
|
use the faster check: the stack will be a reliable indicator of
|
|
whether SWAPGS was already done: if we see that we are a secondary
|
|
entry interrupting kernel mode execution, then we know that the GS
|
|
base has already been switched. If it says that we interrupted
|
|
user-space execution then we must do the SWAPGS.
|
|
|
|
But if we are in an NMI/MCE/DEBUG/whatever super-atomic entry context,
|
|
which might have triggered right after a normal entry wrote CS to the
|
|
stack but before we executed SWAPGS, then the only safe way to check
|
|
for GS is the slower method: the RDMSR.
|
|
|
|
So we try only to mark those entry methods 'paranoid' that absolutely
|
|
need the more expensive check for the GS base - and we generate all
|
|
'normal' entry points with the regular (faster) entry macros.
|