mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-09-06 02:50:43 +00:00
![Joao Martins](/assets/img/avatar_default.png)
A compound devmap is a dev_pagemap with @vmemmap_shift > 0 and it means that pages are mapped at a given huge page alignment and utilize uses compound pages as opposed to order-0 pages. Take advantage of the fact that most tail pages look the same (except the first two) to minimize struct page overhead. Allocate a separate page for the vmemmap area which contains the head page and separate for the next 64 pages. The rest of the subsections then reuse this tail vmemmap page to initialize the rest of the tail pages. Sections are arch-dependent (e.g. on x86 it's 64M, 128M or 512M) and when initializing compound devmap with big enough @vmemmap_shift (e.g. 1G PUD) it may cross multiple sections. The vmemmap code needs to consult @pgmap so that multiple sections that all map the same tail data can refer back to the first copy of that data for a given gigantic page. On compound devmaps with 2M align, this mechanism lets 6 pages be saved out of the 8 necessary PFNs necessary to set the subsection's 512 struct pages being mapped. On a 1G compound devmap it saves 4094 pages. Altmap isn't supported yet, given various restrictions in altmap pfn allocator, thus fallback to the already in use vmemmap_populate(). It is worth noting that altmap for devmap mappings was there to relieve the pressure of inordinate amounts of memmap space to map terabytes of pmem. With compound pages the motivation for altmaps for pmem gets reduced. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220420155310.9712-5-joao.m.martins@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
223 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
223 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
|
|
=========================================
|
|
A vmemmap diet for HugeTLB and Device DAX
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
HugeTLB
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
The struct page structures (page structs) are used to describe a physical
|
|
page frame. By default, there is a one-to-one mapping from a page frame to
|
|
it's corresponding page struct.
|
|
|
|
HugeTLB pages consist of multiple base page size pages and is supported by many
|
|
architectures. See Documentation/admin-guide/mm/hugetlbpage.rst for more
|
|
details. On the x86-64 architecture, HugeTLB pages of size 2MB and 1GB are
|
|
currently supported. Since the base page size on x86 is 4KB, a 2MB HugeTLB page
|
|
consists of 512 base pages and a 1GB HugeTLB page consists of 4096 base pages.
|
|
For each base page, there is a corresponding page struct.
|
|
|
|
Within the HugeTLB subsystem, only the first 4 page structs are used to
|
|
contain unique information about a HugeTLB page. __NR_USED_SUBPAGE provides
|
|
this upper limit. The only 'useful' information in the remaining page structs
|
|
is the compound_head field, and this field is the same for all tail pages.
|
|
|
|
By removing redundant page structs for HugeTLB pages, memory can be returned
|
|
to the buddy allocator for other uses.
|
|
|
|
Different architectures support different HugeTLB pages. For example, the
|
|
following table is the HugeTLB page size supported by x86 and arm64
|
|
architectures. Because arm64 supports 4k, 16k, and 64k base pages and
|
|
supports contiguous entries, so it supports many kinds of sizes of HugeTLB
|
|
page.
|
|
|
|
+--------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
|
| Architecture | Page Size | HugeTLB Page Size |
|
|
+--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
|
|
| x86-64 | 4KB | 2MB | 1GB | | |
|
|
+--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
|
|
| | 4KB | 64KB | 2MB | 32MB | 1GB |
|
|
| +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
|
|
| arm64 | 16KB | 2MB | 32MB | 1GB | |
|
|
| +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
|
|
| | 64KB | 2MB | 512MB | 16GB | |
|
|
+--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
|
|
|
|
When the system boot up, every HugeTLB page has more than one struct page
|
|
structs which size is (unit: pages)::
|
|
|
|
struct_size = HugeTLB_Size / PAGE_SIZE * sizeof(struct page) / PAGE_SIZE
|
|
|
|
Where HugeTLB_Size is the size of the HugeTLB page. We know that the size
|
|
of the HugeTLB page is always n times PAGE_SIZE. So we can get the following
|
|
relationship::
|
|
|
|
HugeTLB_Size = n * PAGE_SIZE
|
|
|
|
Then::
|
|
|
|
struct_size = n * PAGE_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE * sizeof(struct page) / PAGE_SIZE
|
|
= n * sizeof(struct page) / PAGE_SIZE
|
|
|
|
We can use huge mapping at the pud/pmd level for the HugeTLB page.
|
|
|
|
For the HugeTLB page of the pmd level mapping, then::
|
|
|
|
struct_size = n * sizeof(struct page) / PAGE_SIZE
|
|
= PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(pte_t) * sizeof(struct page) / PAGE_SIZE
|
|
= sizeof(struct page) / sizeof(pte_t)
|
|
= 64 / 8
|
|
= 8 (pages)
|
|
|
|
Where n is how many pte entries which one page can contains. So the value of
|
|
n is (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(pte_t)).
|
|
|
|
This optimization only supports 64-bit system, so the value of sizeof(pte_t)
|
|
is 8. And this optimization also applicable only when the size of struct page
|
|
is a power of two. In most cases, the size of struct page is 64 bytes (e.g.
|
|
x86-64 and arm64). So if we use pmd level mapping for a HugeTLB page, the
|
|
size of struct page structs of it is 8 page frames which size depends on the
|
|
size of the base page.
|
|
|
|
For the HugeTLB page of the pud level mapping, then::
|
|
|
|
struct_size = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(pmd_t) * struct_size(pmd)
|
|
= PAGE_SIZE / 8 * 8 (pages)
|
|
= PAGE_SIZE (pages)
|
|
|
|
Where the struct_size(pmd) is the size of the struct page structs of a
|
|
HugeTLB page of the pmd level mapping.
|
|
|
|
E.g.: A 2MB HugeTLB page on x86_64 consists in 8 page frames while 1GB
|
|
HugeTLB page consists in 4096.
|
|
|
|
Next, we take the pmd level mapping of the HugeTLB page as an example to
|
|
show the internal implementation of this optimization. There are 8 pages
|
|
struct page structs associated with a HugeTLB page which is pmd mapped.
|
|
|
|
Here is how things look before optimization::
|
|
|
|
HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages)
|
|
+-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+
|
|
| | | 0 | -------------> | 0 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 1 | -------------> | 1 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 2 | -------------> | 2 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 3 | -------------> | 3 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 4 | -------------> | 4 |
|
|
| PMD | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| level | | 5 | -------------> | 5 |
|
|
| mapping | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 6 | -------------> | 6 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 7 | -------------> | 7 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
+-----------+
|
|
|
|
The value of page->compound_head is the same for all tail pages. The first
|
|
page of page structs (page 0) associated with the HugeTLB page contains the 4
|
|
page structs necessary to describe the HugeTLB. The only use of the remaining
|
|
pages of page structs (page 1 to page 7) is to point to page->compound_head.
|
|
Therefore, we can remap pages 1 to 7 to page 0. Only 1 page of page structs
|
|
will be used for each HugeTLB page. This will allow us to free the remaining
|
|
7 pages to the buddy allocator.
|
|
|
|
Here is how things look after remapping::
|
|
|
|
HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages)
|
|
+-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+
|
|
| | | 0 | -------------> | 0 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 1 | ---------------^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
|
|
| | +-----------+ | | | | | |
|
|
| | | 2 | -----------------+ | | | | |
|
|
| | +-----------+ | | | | |
|
|
| | | 3 | -------------------+ | | | |
|
|
| | +-----------+ | | | |
|
|
| | | 4 | ---------------------+ | | |
|
|
| PMD | +-----------+ | | |
|
|
| level | | 5 | -----------------------+ | |
|
|
| mapping | +-----------+ | |
|
|
| | | 6 | -------------------------+ |
|
|
| | +-----------+ |
|
|
| | | 7 | ---------------------------+
|
|
| | +-----------+
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
+-----------+
|
|
|
|
When a HugeTLB is freed to the buddy system, we should allocate 7 pages for
|
|
vmemmap pages and restore the previous mapping relationship.
|
|
|
|
For the HugeTLB page of the pud level mapping. It is similar to the former.
|
|
We also can use this approach to free (PAGE_SIZE - 1) vmemmap pages.
|
|
|
|
Apart from the HugeTLB page of the pmd/pud level mapping, some architectures
|
|
(e.g. aarch64) provides a contiguous bit in the translation table entries
|
|
that hints to the MMU to indicate that it is one of a contiguous set of
|
|
entries that can be cached in a single TLB entry.
|
|
|
|
The contiguous bit is used to increase the mapping size at the pmd and pte
|
|
(last) level. So this type of HugeTLB page can be optimized only when its
|
|
size of the struct page structs is greater than 1 page.
|
|
|
|
Notice: The head vmemmap page is not freed to the buddy allocator and all
|
|
tail vmemmap pages are mapped to the head vmemmap page frame. So we can see
|
|
more than one struct page struct with PG_head (e.g. 8 per 2 MB HugeTLB page)
|
|
associated with each HugeTLB page. The compound_head() can handle this
|
|
correctly (more details refer to the comment above compound_head()).
|
|
|
|
Device DAX
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The device-dax interface uses the same tail deduplication technique explained
|
|
in the previous chapter, except when used with the vmemmap in
|
|
the device (altmap).
|
|
|
|
The following page sizes are supported in DAX: PAGE_SIZE (4K on x86_64),
|
|
PMD_SIZE (2M on x86_64) and PUD_SIZE (1G on x86_64).
|
|
|
|
The differences with HugeTLB are relatively minor.
|
|
|
|
It only use 3 page structs for storing all information as opposed
|
|
to 4 on HugeTLB pages.
|
|
|
|
There's no remapping of vmemmap given that device-dax memory is not part of
|
|
System RAM ranges initialized at boot. Thus the tail page deduplication
|
|
happens at a later stage when we populate the sections. HugeTLB reuses the
|
|
the head vmemmap page representing, whereas device-dax reuses the tail
|
|
vmemmap page. This results in only half of the savings compared to HugeTLB.
|
|
|
|
Deduplicated tail pages are not mapped read-only.
|
|
|
|
Here's how things look like on device-dax after the sections are populated::
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+
|
|
| | | 0 | -------------> | 0 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 1 | -------------> | 1 |
|
|
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
| | | 2 | ----------------^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
|
|
| | +-----------+ | | | | |
|
|
| | | 3 | ------------------+ | | | |
|
|
| | +-----------+ | | | |
|
|
| | | 4 | --------------------+ | | |
|
|
| PMD | +-----------+ | | |
|
|
| level | | 5 | ----------------------+ | |
|
|
| mapping | +-----------+ | |
|
|
| | | 6 | ------------------------+ |
|
|
| | +-----------+ |
|
|
| | | 7 | --------------------------+
|
|
| | +-----------+
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
+-----------+
|