We've seen this in a packet capture - I've intermixed what I
think was going on. The fix here is to grab the so_lock sooner.
1964379 -> #1 open (for write) reply seqid=1
1964393 -> #2 open (for read) reply seqid=2
__nfs4_close(), state->n_wronly--
nfs4_state_set_mode_locked(), changes state->state = [R]
state->flags is [RW]
state->state is [R], state->n_wronly == 0, state->n_rdonly == 1
1964398 -> #3 open (for write) call -> because close is already running
1964399 -> downgrade (to read) call seqid=2 (close of #1)
1964402 -> #3 open (for write) reply seqid=3
__update_open_stateid()
nfs_set_open_stateid_locked(), changes state->flags
state->flags is [RW]
state->state is [R], state->n_wronly == 0, state->n_rdonly == 1
new sequence number is exposed now via nfs4_stateid_copy()
next step would be update_open_stateflags(), pending so_lock
1964403 -> downgrade reply seqid=2, fails with OLD_STATEID (close of #1)
nfs4_close_prepare() gets so_lock and recalcs flags -> send close
1964405 -> downgrade (to read) call seqid=3 (close of #1 retry)
__update_open_stateid() gets so_lock
* update_open_stateflags() updates state->n_wronly.
nfs4_state_set_mode_locked() updates state->state
state->flags is [RW]
state->state is [RW], state->n_wronly == 1, state->n_rdonly == 1
* should have suppressed the preceding nfs4_close_prepare() from
sending open_downgrade
1964406 -> write call
1964408 -> downgrade (to read) reply seqid=4 (close of #1 retry)
nfs_clear_open_stateid_locked()
state->flags is [R]
state->state is [RW], state->n_wronly == 1, state->n_rdonly == 1
1964409 -> write reply (fails, openmode)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Elble <aweits@rit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger,kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>