mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-10-06 08:46:46 +00:00
a9306a6363
The might_sleep_if() assertions in __pm_runtime_idle(), __pm_runtime_suspend() and __pm_runtime_resume() may generate false-positive warnings in some situations. For example, that happens if a nested pm_runtime_get_sync()/pm_runtime_put() pair is executed with disabled interrupts within an outer pm_runtime_get_sync()/pm_runtime_put() section for the same device. [Generally, pm_runtime_get_sync() may sleep, so it should not be called with disabled interrupts, but in this particular case the previous pm_runtime_get_sync() guarantees that the device will not be suspended, so the inner pm_runtime_get_sync() will return immediately after incrementing the device's usage counter.] That started to happen in the i915 driver in 4.10-rc, leading to the following splat: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1032 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1500, name: Xorg 1 lock held by Xorg/1500: #0: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0680c13>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x43/0x140 [i915] CPU: 0 PID: 1500 Comm: Xorg Not tainted Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xc2 ___might_sleep+0x196/0x260 __might_sleep+0x53/0xb0 __pm_runtime_resume+0x7a/0x90 intel_runtime_pm_get+0x25/0x90 [i915] aliasing_gtt_bind_vma+0xaa/0xf0 [i915] i915_vma_bind+0xaf/0x1e0 [i915] i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate_entry+0x513/0x6f0 [i915] i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate_vma.isra.34+0x188/0x250 [i915] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 ? i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve_vma.isra.31+0x152/0x1f0 [i915] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve.isra.32+0x372/0x3a0 [i915] i915_gem_do_execbuffer.isra.38+0xa70/0x1a40 [i915] ? __might_fault+0x4e/0xb0 i915_gem_execbuffer2+0xc5/0x260 [i915] ? __might_fault+0x4e/0xb0 drm_ioctl+0x206/0x450 [drm] ? i915_gem_execbuffer+0x340/0x340 [i915] ? __fget+0x5/0x200 do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x6f0 ? __fget+0x111/0x200 ? __fget+0x5/0x200 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 even though the code triggering it is correct. Unfortunately, the might_sleep_if() assertions in question are too coarse-grained to cover such cases correctly, so make them a bit less sensitive in order to avoid the false-positives. Reported-and-tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| opp | ||
| clock_ops.c | ||
| common.c | ||
| domain.c | ||
| domain_governor.c | ||
| generic_ops.c | ||
| main.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| power.h | ||
| qos.c | ||
| runtime.c | ||
| sysfs.c | ||
| trace.c | ||
| wakeirq.c | ||
| wakeup.c | ||