linux-stable/include/linux/refcount.h
Linus Torvalds 4a557a5d1a sparse: introduce conditional lock acquire function attribute
The kernel tends to try to avoid conditional locking semantics because
it makes it harder to think about and statically check locking rules,
but we do have a few fundamental locking primitives that take locks
conditionally - most obviously the 'trylock' functions.

That has always been a problem for 'sparse' checking for locking
imbalance, and we've had a special '__cond_lock()' macro that we've used
to let sparse know how the locking works:

    # define __cond_lock(x,c)        ((c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 1; }) : 0)

so that you can then use this to tell sparse that (for example) the
spinlock trylock macro ends up acquiring the lock when it succeeds, but
not when it fails:

    #define raw_spin_trylock(lock)  __cond_lock(lock, _raw_spin_trylock(lock))

and then sparse can follow along the locking rules when you have code like

        if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock))
                return LRU_SKIP;
	.. sparse sees that the lock is held here..
        spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);

and sparse ends up happy about the lock contexts.

However, this '__cond_lock()' use does result in very ugly header files,
and requires you to basically wrap the real function with that macro
that uses '__cond_lock'.  Which has made PeterZ NAK things that try to
fix sparse warnings over the years [1].

To solve this, there is now a very experimental patch to sparse that
basically does the exact same thing as '__cond_lock()' did, but using a
function attribute instead.  That seems to make PeterZ happy [2].

Note that this does not replace existing use of '__cond_lock()', but
only exposes the new proposed attribute and uses it for the previously
unannotated 'refcount_dec_and_lock()' family of functions.

For existing sparse installations, this will make no difference (a
negative output context was ignored), but if you have the experimental
sparse patch it will make sparse now understand code that uses those
functions, the same way '__cond_lock()' makes sparse understand the very
similar 'atomic_dec_and_lock()' uses that have the old '__cond_lock()'
annotations.

Note that in some cases this will silence existing context imbalance
warnings.  But in other cases it may end up exposing new sparse warnings
for code that sparse just didn't see the locking for at all before.

This is a trial, in other words.  I'd expect that if it ends up being
successful, and new sparse releases end up having this new attribute,
we'll migrate the old-style '__cond_lock()' users to use the new-style
'__cond_acquires' function attribute.

The actual experimental sparse patch was posted in [3].

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20130930134434.GC12926@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yr60tWxN4P568x3W@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjZfO9hGqJ2_hGQG3U_XzSh9_XaXze=HgPdvJbgrvASfA@mail.gmail.com/ [3]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-07-03 11:32:22 -07:00

369 lines
12 KiB
C

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
/*
* Variant of atomic_t specialized for reference counts.
*
* The interface matches the atomic_t interface (to aid in porting) but only
* provides the few functions one should use for reference counting.
*
* Saturation semantics
* ====================
*
* refcount_t differs from atomic_t in that the counter saturates at
* REFCOUNT_SATURATED and will not move once there. This avoids wrapping the
* counter and causing 'spurious' use-after-free issues. In order to avoid the
* cost associated with introducing cmpxchg() loops into all of the saturating
* operations, we temporarily allow the counter to take on an unchecked value
* and then explicitly set it to REFCOUNT_SATURATED on detecting that underflow
* or overflow has occurred. Although this is racy when multiple threads
* access the refcount concurrently, by placing REFCOUNT_SATURATED roughly
* equidistant from 0 and INT_MAX we minimise the scope for error:
*
* INT_MAX REFCOUNT_SATURATED UINT_MAX
* 0 (0x7fff_ffff) (0xc000_0000) (0xffff_ffff)
* +--------------------------------+----------------+----------------+
* <---------- bad value! ---------->
*
* (in a signed view of the world, the "bad value" range corresponds to
* a negative counter value).
*
* As an example, consider a refcount_inc() operation that causes the counter
* to overflow:
*
* int old = atomic_fetch_add_relaxed(r);
* // old is INT_MAX, refcount now INT_MIN (0x8000_0000)
* if (old < 0)
* atomic_set(r, REFCOUNT_SATURATED);
*
* If another thread also performs a refcount_inc() operation between the two
* atomic operations, then the count will continue to edge closer to 0. If it
* reaches a value of 1 before /any/ of the threads reset it to the saturated
* value, then a concurrent refcount_dec_and_test() may erroneously free the
* underlying object.
* Linux limits the maximum number of tasks to PID_MAX_LIMIT, which is currently
* 0x400000 (and can't easily be raised in the future beyond FUTEX_TID_MASK).
* With the current PID limit, if no batched refcounting operations are used and
* the attacker can't repeatedly trigger kernel oopses in the middle of refcount
* operations, this makes it impossible for a saturated refcount to leave the
* saturation range, even if it is possible for multiple uses of the same
* refcount to nest in the context of a single task:
*
* (UINT_MAX+1-REFCOUNT_SATURATED) / PID_MAX_LIMIT =
* 0x40000000 / 0x400000 = 0x100 = 256
*
* If hundreds of references are added/removed with a single refcounting
* operation, it may potentially be possible to leave the saturation range; but
* given the precise timing details involved with the round-robin scheduling of
* each thread manipulating the refcount and the need to hit the race multiple
* times in succession, there doesn't appear to be a practical avenue of attack
* even if using refcount_add() operations with larger increments.
*
* Memory ordering
* ===============
*
* Memory ordering rules are slightly relaxed wrt regular atomic_t functions
* and provide only what is strictly required for refcounts.
*
* The increments are fully relaxed; these will not provide ordering. The
* rationale is that whatever is used to obtain the object we're increasing the
* reference count on will provide the ordering. For locked data structures,
* its the lock acquire, for RCU/lockless data structures its the dependent
* load.
*
* Do note that inc_not_zero() provides a control dependency which will order
* future stores against the inc, this ensures we'll never modify the object
* if we did not in fact acquire a reference.
*
* The decrements will provide release order, such that all the prior loads and
* stores will be issued before, it also provides a control dependency, which
* will order us against the subsequent free().
*
* The control dependency is against the load of the cmpxchg (ll/sc) that
* succeeded. This means the stores aren't fully ordered, but this is fine
* because the 1->0 transition indicates no concurrency.
*
* Note that the allocator is responsible for ordering things between free()
* and alloc().
*
* The decrements dec_and_test() and sub_and_test() also provide acquire
* ordering on success.
*
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_REFCOUNT_H
#define _LINUX_REFCOUNT_H
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/limits.h>
#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
struct mutex;
/**
* typedef refcount_t - variant of atomic_t specialized for reference counts
* @refs: atomic_t counter field
*
* The counter saturates at REFCOUNT_SATURATED and will not move once
* there. This avoids wrapping the counter and causing 'spurious'
* use-after-free bugs.
*/
typedef struct refcount_struct {
atomic_t refs;
} refcount_t;
#define REFCOUNT_INIT(n) { .refs = ATOMIC_INIT(n), }
#define REFCOUNT_MAX INT_MAX
#define REFCOUNT_SATURATED (INT_MIN / 2)
enum refcount_saturation_type {
REFCOUNT_ADD_NOT_ZERO_OVF,
REFCOUNT_ADD_OVF,
REFCOUNT_ADD_UAF,
REFCOUNT_SUB_UAF,
REFCOUNT_DEC_LEAK,
};
void refcount_warn_saturate(refcount_t *r, enum refcount_saturation_type t);
/**
* refcount_set - set a refcount's value
* @r: the refcount
* @n: value to which the refcount will be set
*/
static inline void refcount_set(refcount_t *r, int n)
{
atomic_set(&r->refs, n);
}
/**
* refcount_read - get a refcount's value
* @r: the refcount
*
* Return: the refcount's value
*/
static inline unsigned int refcount_read(const refcount_t *r)
{
return atomic_read(&r->refs);
}
static inline __must_check bool __refcount_add_not_zero(int i, refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
int old = refcount_read(r);
do {
if (!old)
break;
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&r->refs, &old, old + i));
if (oldp)
*oldp = old;
if (unlikely(old < 0 || old + i < 0))
refcount_warn_saturate(r, REFCOUNT_ADD_NOT_ZERO_OVF);
return old;
}
/**
* refcount_add_not_zero - add a value to a refcount unless it is 0
* @i: the value to add to the refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Will saturate at REFCOUNT_SATURATED and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the
* object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency
* and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top.
*
* Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting
* use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these
* cases, refcount_inc(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to
* increment a reference count.
*
* Return: false if the passed refcount is 0, true otherwise
*/
static inline __must_check bool refcount_add_not_zero(int i, refcount_t *r)
{
return __refcount_add_not_zero(i, r, NULL);
}
static inline void __refcount_add(int i, refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
int old = atomic_fetch_add_relaxed(i, &r->refs);
if (oldp)
*oldp = old;
if (unlikely(!old))
refcount_warn_saturate(r, REFCOUNT_ADD_UAF);
else if (unlikely(old < 0 || old + i < 0))
refcount_warn_saturate(r, REFCOUNT_ADD_OVF);
}
/**
* refcount_add - add a value to a refcount
* @i: the value to add to the refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_add(), but will saturate at REFCOUNT_SATURATED and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the
* object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency
* and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top.
*
* Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting
* use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these
* cases, refcount_inc(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to
* increment a reference count.
*/
static inline void refcount_add(int i, refcount_t *r)
{
__refcount_add(i, r, NULL);
}
static inline __must_check bool __refcount_inc_not_zero(refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
return __refcount_add_not_zero(1, r, oldp);
}
/**
* refcount_inc_not_zero - increment a refcount unless it is 0
* @r: the refcount to increment
*
* Similar to atomic_inc_not_zero(), but will saturate at REFCOUNT_SATURATED
* and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller has guaranteed the
* object memory to be stable (RCU, etc.). It does provide a control dependency
* and thereby orders future stores. See the comment on top.
*
* Return: true if the increment was successful, false otherwise
*/
static inline __must_check bool refcount_inc_not_zero(refcount_t *r)
{
return __refcount_inc_not_zero(r, NULL);
}
static inline void __refcount_inc(refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
__refcount_add(1, r, oldp);
}
/**
* refcount_inc - increment a refcount
* @r: the refcount to increment
*
* Similar to atomic_inc(), but will saturate at REFCOUNT_SATURATED and WARN.
*
* Provides no memory ordering, it is assumed the caller already has a
* reference on the object.
*
* Will WARN if the refcount is 0, as this represents a possible use-after-free
* condition.
*/
static inline void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r)
{
__refcount_inc(r, NULL);
}
static inline __must_check bool __refcount_sub_and_test(int i, refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
int old = atomic_fetch_sub_release(i, &r->refs);
if (oldp)
*oldp = old;
if (old == i) {
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
return true;
}
if (unlikely(old < 0 || old - i < 0))
refcount_warn_saturate(r, REFCOUNT_SUB_UAF);
return false;
}
/**
* refcount_sub_and_test - subtract from a refcount and test if it is 0
* @i: amount to subtract from the refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_dec_and_test(), but it will WARN, return false and
* ultimately leak on underflow and will fail to decrement when saturated
* at REFCOUNT_SATURATED.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before, and provides an acquire ordering on success such that free()
* must come after.
*
* Use of this function is not recommended for the normal reference counting
* use case in which references are taken and released one at a time. In these
* cases, refcount_dec(), or one of its variants, should instead be used to
* decrement a reference count.
*
* Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise
*/
static inline __must_check bool refcount_sub_and_test(int i, refcount_t *r)
{
return __refcount_sub_and_test(i, r, NULL);
}
static inline __must_check bool __refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
return __refcount_sub_and_test(1, r, oldp);
}
/**
* refcount_dec_and_test - decrement a refcount and test if it is 0
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_dec_and_test(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to
* decrement when saturated at REFCOUNT_SATURATED.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before, and provides an acquire ordering on success such that free()
* must come after.
*
* Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise
*/
static inline __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
{
return __refcount_dec_and_test(r, NULL);
}
static inline void __refcount_dec(refcount_t *r, int *oldp)
{
int old = atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, &r->refs);
if (oldp)
*oldp = old;
if (unlikely(old <= 1))
refcount_warn_saturate(r, REFCOUNT_DEC_LEAK);
}
/**
* refcount_dec - decrement a refcount
* @r: the refcount
*
* Similar to atomic_dec(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to decrement
* when saturated at REFCOUNT_SATURATED.
*
* Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
* before.
*/
static inline void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r)
{
__refcount_dec(r, NULL);
}
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_if_one(refcount_t *r);
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r);
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(refcount_t *r, struct mutex *lock) __cond_acquires(lock);
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_lock(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock) __cond_acquires(lock);
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave(refcount_t *r,
spinlock_t *lock,
unsigned long *flags) __cond_acquires(lock);
#endif /* _LINUX_REFCOUNT_H */