29fd189707
While it might be really clear to MM developers that gfp reclaim modifiers are applicable only to sleepable allocations (those with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) it seems that actual users of the API are not always sure. Make it explicit that they are not applicable for GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC allocations which are the most commonly used non-sleepable allocation masks. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200403083543.11552-3-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpi | ||
asm-generic | ||
clocksource | ||
crypto | ||
drm | ||
dt-bindings | ||
keys | ||
kunit | ||
kvm | ||
linux | ||
math-emu | ||
media | ||
misc | ||
net | ||
pcmcia | ||
ras | ||
rdma | ||
scsi | ||
soc | ||
sound | ||
target | ||
trace | ||
uapi | ||
vdso | ||
video | ||
xen |