linux-stable/Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/genetlink-legacy.rst

97 lines
2.8 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
=================================================================
Netlink specification support for legacy Generic Netlink families
=================================================================
This document describes the many additional quirks and properties
required to describe older Generic Netlink families which form
the ``genetlink-legacy`` protocol level.
The spec is a work in progress, some of the quirks are just documented
for future reference.
Specification (defined)
=======================
Attribute type nests
--------------------
New Netlink families should use ``multi-attr`` to define arrays.
Older families (e.g. ``genetlink`` control family) attempted to
define array types reusing attribute type to carry information.
For reference the ``multi-attr`` array may look like this::
[ARRAY-ATTR]
[INDEX (optionally)]
[MEMBER1]
[MEMBER2]
[SOME-OTHER-ATTR]
[ARRAY-ATTR]
[INDEX (optionally)]
[MEMBER1]
[MEMBER2]
where ``ARRAY-ATTR`` is the array entry type.
array-nest
~~~~~~~~~~
``array-nest`` creates the following structure::
[SOME-OTHER-ATTR]
[ARRAY-ATTR]
[ENTRY]
[MEMBER1]
[MEMBER2]
[ENTRY]
[MEMBER1]
[MEMBER2]
It wraps the entire array in an extra attribute (hence limiting its size
to 64kB). The ``ENTRY`` nests are special and have the index of the entry
as their type instead of normal attribute type.
type-value
~~~~~~~~~~
``type-value`` is a construct which uses attribute types to carry
information about a single object (often used when array is dumped
entry-by-entry).
``type-value`` can have multiple levels of nesting, for example
genetlink's policy dumps create the following structures::
[POLICY-IDX]
[ATTR-IDX]
[POLICY-INFO-ATTR1]
[POLICY-INFO-ATTR2]
Where the first level of nest has the policy index as it's attribute
type, it contains a single nest which has the attribute index as its
type. Inside the attr-index nest are the policy attributes. Modern
Netlink families should have instead defined this as a flat structure,
the nesting serves no good purpose here.
Other quirks (todo)
===================
Structures
----------
Legacy families can define C structures both to be used as the contents
of an attribute and as a fixed message header. The plan is to define
the structs in ``definitions`` and link the appropriate attrs.
Multi-message DO
----------------
New Netlink families should never respond to a DO operation with multiple
replies, with ``NLM_F_MULTI`` set. Use a filtered dump instead.
At the spec level we can define a ``dumps`` property for the ``do``,
perhaps with values of ``combine`` and ``multi-object`` depending
on how the parsing should be implemented (parse into a single reply
vs list of objects i.e. pretty much a dump).