mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-09-12 05:48:40 +00:00
b73026b9c9
When the ladder governor sees the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_INVALID flag, it unconditionally causes a state promotion by setting last_residency to a number higher than the state's promotion_time: last_residency = last_state->threshold.promotion_time + 1 It does this for fear that cpuidle_get_last_residency() will be in-accurate, because cpuidle_enter_state() invoked a state with CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_INVALID. But the only state with CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_INVALID is acpi_safe_halt(), which may return well after its actual idle duration because it enables interrupts, so cpuidle_enter_state() also measures interrupt service time. So what? In ladder, a huge invalid last_residency has exactly the same effect as the current code -- it unconditionally causes a state promotion. In the case where the idle residency plus measured interrupt handling time is less than the state's demotion_time -- we should use that timestamp to give ladder a chance to demote, rather than unconditionally promoting. This can be done by simply ignoring the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_INVALID, and using the "invalid" time, as it is either equal to what we are doing today, or better. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| governors | ||
| coupled.c | ||
| cpuidle-arm64.c | ||
| cpuidle-at91.c | ||
| cpuidle-big_little.c | ||
| cpuidle-calxeda.c | ||
| cpuidle-clps711x.c | ||
| cpuidle-cps.c | ||
| cpuidle-exynos.c | ||
| cpuidle-kirkwood.c | ||
| cpuidle-mvebu-v7.c | ||
| cpuidle-powernv.c | ||
| cpuidle-pseries.c | ||
| cpuidle-ux500.c | ||
| cpuidle-zynq.c | ||
| cpuidle.c | ||
| cpuidle.h | ||
| driver.c | ||
| dt_idle_states.c | ||
| dt_idle_states.h | ||
| governor.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Kconfig.arm | ||
| Kconfig.arm64 | ||
| Kconfig.mips | ||
| Kconfig.powerpc | ||
| Makefile | ||
| sysfs.c | ||