mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-10-30 08:02:30 +00:00
cac616db39
Currently, when considering the branches that may be taken for a jump instruction if the register being compared is a pointer the verifier assumes both branches may be taken. But, if the jump instruction is comparing if a pointer is NULL we have this information in the verifier encoded in the reg->type so we can do better in these cases. Specifically, these two common cases can be handled. * If the instruction is BPF_JEQ and we are comparing against a zero value. This test is 'if ptr == 0 goto +X' then using the type information in reg->type we can decide if the ptr is not null. This allows us to avoid pushing both branches onto the stack and instead only use the != 0 case. For example PTR_TO_SOCK and PTR_TO_SOCK_OR_NULL encode the null pointer. Note if the type is PTR_TO_SOCK_OR_NULL we can not learn anything. And also if the value is non-zero we learn nothing because it could be any arbitrary value a different pointer for example * If the instruction is BPF_JNE and ware comparing against a zero value then a similar analysis as above can be done. The test in asm looks like 'if ptr != 0 goto +X'. Again using the type information if the non null type is set (from above PTR_TO_SOCK) we know the jump is taken. In this patch we extend is_branch_taken() to consider this extra information and to return only the branch that will be taken. This resolves a verifier issue reported with C code like the following. See progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c in selftests. sk = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(skb, tuple, tuple_len, BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS, 0); bpf_printk("sk=%d\n", sk ? 1 : 0); if (sk) bpf_sk_release(sk); return sk ? TC_ACT_OK : TC_ACT_UNSPEC; In the above the bpf_printk() will resolve the pointer from PTR_TO_SOCK_OR_NULL to PTR_TO_SOCK. Then the second test guarding the release will cause the verifier to walk both paths resulting in the an unreleased sock reference. See verifier/ref_tracking.c in selftests for an assembly version of the above. After the above additional logic is added the C code above passes as expected. Reported-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/159009164651.6313.380418298578070501.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
arraymap.c | ||
bpf_iter.c | ||
bpf_lru_list.c | ||
bpf_lru_list.h | ||
bpf_lsm.c | ||
bpf_struct_ops.c | ||
bpf_struct_ops_types.h | ||
btf.c | ||
cgroup.c | ||
core.c | ||
cpumap.c | ||
devmap.c | ||
disasm.c | ||
disasm.h | ||
dispatcher.c | ||
hashtab.c | ||
helpers.c | ||
inode.c | ||
local_storage.c | ||
lpm_trie.c | ||
Makefile | ||
map_in_map.c | ||
map_in_map.h | ||
map_iter.c | ||
offload.c | ||
percpu_freelist.c | ||
percpu_freelist.h | ||
queue_stack_maps.c | ||
reuseport_array.c | ||
stackmap.c | ||
syscall.c | ||
sysfs_btf.c | ||
task_iter.c | ||
tnum.c | ||
trampoline.c | ||
verifier.c |