When skb replaces another one in ooo queue, I forgot to also
update tp->ooo_last_skb as well, if the replaced skb was the last one
in the queue.
To fix this, we simply can re-use the code that runs after an insertion,
trying to merge skbs at the right of current skb.
This not only fixes the bug, but also remove all small skbs that might
be a subset of the new one.
Example:
We receive segments 2001:3001, 4001:5001
Then we receive 2001:8001 : We should replace 2001:3001 with the big
skb, but also remove 4001:50001 from the queue to save space.
packetdrill test demonstrating the bug
0.000 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1) = 0
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7>
+0.100 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1024
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+0.01 < . 1001:2001(1000) ack 1 win 1024
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1 <nop,nop, sack 1001:2001>
+0.01 < . 1001:3001(2000) ack 1 win 1024
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1 <nop,nop, sack 1001:2001 1001:3001>
Fixes: 9f5afeae51 ("tcp: use an RB tree for ooo receive queue")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: Yaogong Wang <wygivan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
76f0dcbb5a