mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-08-26 02:39:48 +00:00
![Jakub Kicinski](/assets/img/avatar_default.png)
Add basic documentation about NAPI. We can stop linking to the ancient doc on the LF wiki. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230315223044.471002-1-kuba@kernel.org/ Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Acked-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> # for ctucanfd-driver.rst Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322053848.198452-1-kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
254 lines
9.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
254 lines
9.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
|
|
|
|
.. _napi:
|
|
|
|
====
|
|
NAPI
|
|
====
|
|
|
|
NAPI is the event handling mechanism used by the Linux networking stack.
|
|
The name NAPI no longer stands for anything in particular [#]_.
|
|
|
|
In basic operation the device notifies the host about new events
|
|
via an interrupt.
|
|
The host then schedules a NAPI instance to process the events.
|
|
The device may also be polled for events via NAPI without receiving
|
|
interrupts first (:ref:`busy polling<poll>`).
|
|
|
|
NAPI processing usually happens in the software interrupt context,
|
|
but there is an option to use :ref:`separate kernel threads<threaded>`
|
|
for NAPI processing.
|
|
|
|
All in all NAPI abstracts away from the drivers the context and configuration
|
|
of event (packet Rx and Tx) processing.
|
|
|
|
Driver API
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The two most important elements of NAPI are the struct napi_struct
|
|
and the associated poll method. struct napi_struct holds the state
|
|
of the NAPI instance while the method is the driver-specific event
|
|
handler. The method will typically free Tx packets that have been
|
|
transmitted and process newly received packets.
|
|
|
|
.. _drv_ctrl:
|
|
|
|
Control API
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
netif_napi_add() and netif_napi_del() add/remove a NAPI instance
|
|
from the system. The instances are attached to the netdevice passed
|
|
as argument (and will be deleted automatically when netdevice is
|
|
unregistered). Instances are added in a disabled state.
|
|
|
|
napi_enable() and napi_disable() manage the disabled state.
|
|
A disabled NAPI can't be scheduled and its poll method is guaranteed
|
|
to not be invoked. napi_disable() waits for ownership of the NAPI
|
|
instance to be released.
|
|
|
|
The control APIs are not idempotent. Control API calls are safe against
|
|
concurrent use of datapath APIs but an incorrect sequence of control API
|
|
calls may result in crashes, deadlocks, or race conditions. For example,
|
|
calling napi_disable() multiple times in a row will deadlock.
|
|
|
|
Datapath API
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
napi_schedule() is the basic method of scheduling a NAPI poll.
|
|
Drivers should call this function in their interrupt handler
|
|
(see :ref:`drv_sched` for more info). A successful call to napi_schedule()
|
|
will take ownership of the NAPI instance.
|
|
|
|
Later, after NAPI is scheduled, the driver's poll method will be
|
|
called to process the events/packets. The method takes a ``budget``
|
|
argument - drivers can process completions for any number of Tx
|
|
packets but should only process up to ``budget`` number of
|
|
Rx packets. Rx processing is usually much more expensive.
|
|
|
|
In other words, it is recommended to ignore the budget argument when
|
|
performing TX buffer reclamation to ensure that the reclamation is not
|
|
arbitrarily bounded; however, it is required to honor the budget argument
|
|
for RX processing.
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
|
|
The ``budget`` argument may be 0 if core tries to only process Tx completions
|
|
and no Rx packets.
|
|
|
|
The poll method returns the amount of work done. If the driver still
|
|
has outstanding work to do (e.g. ``budget`` was exhausted)
|
|
the poll method should return exactly ``budget``. In that case,
|
|
the NAPI instance will be serviced/polled again (without the
|
|
need to be scheduled).
|
|
|
|
If event processing has been completed (all outstanding packets
|
|
processed) the poll method should call napi_complete_done()
|
|
before returning. napi_complete_done() releases the ownership
|
|
of the instance.
|
|
|
|
.. warning::
|
|
|
|
The case of finishing all events and using exactly ``budget``
|
|
must be handled carefully. There is no way to report this
|
|
(rare) condition to the stack, so the driver must either
|
|
not call napi_complete_done() and wait to be called again,
|
|
or return ``budget - 1``.
|
|
|
|
If the ``budget`` is 0 napi_complete_done() should never be called.
|
|
|
|
Call sequence
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
Drivers should not make assumptions about the exact sequencing
|
|
of calls. The poll method may be called without the driver scheduling
|
|
the instance (unless the instance is disabled). Similarly,
|
|
it's not guaranteed that the poll method will be called, even
|
|
if napi_schedule() succeeded (e.g. if the instance gets disabled).
|
|
|
|
As mentioned in the :ref:`drv_ctrl` section - napi_disable() and subsequent
|
|
calls to the poll method only wait for the ownership of the instance
|
|
to be released, not for the poll method to exit. This means that
|
|
drivers should avoid accessing any data structures after calling
|
|
napi_complete_done().
|
|
|
|
.. _drv_sched:
|
|
|
|
Scheduling and IRQ masking
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
Drivers should keep the interrupts masked after scheduling
|
|
the NAPI instance - until NAPI polling finishes any further
|
|
interrupts are unnecessary.
|
|
|
|
Drivers which have to mask the interrupts explicitly (as opposed
|
|
to IRQ being auto-masked by the device) should use the napi_schedule_prep()
|
|
and __napi_schedule() calls:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c
|
|
|
|
if (napi_schedule_prep(&v->napi)) {
|
|
mydrv_mask_rxtx_irq(v->idx);
|
|
/* schedule after masking to avoid races */
|
|
__napi_schedule(&v->napi);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
IRQ should only be unmasked after a successful call to napi_complete_done():
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c
|
|
|
|
if (budget && napi_complete_done(&v->napi, work_done)) {
|
|
mydrv_unmask_rxtx_irq(v->idx);
|
|
return min(work_done, budget - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
napi_schedule_irqoff() is a variant of napi_schedule() which takes advantage
|
|
of guarantees given by being invoked in IRQ context (no need to
|
|
mask interrupts). Note that PREEMPT_RT forces all interrupts
|
|
to be threaded so the interrupt may need to be marked ``IRQF_NO_THREAD``
|
|
to avoid issues on real-time kernel configurations.
|
|
|
|
Instance to queue mapping
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
Modern devices have multiple NAPI instances (struct napi_struct) per
|
|
interface. There is no strong requirement on how the instances are
|
|
mapped to queues and interrupts. NAPI is primarily a polling/processing
|
|
abstraction without specific user-facing semantics. That said, most networking
|
|
devices end up using NAPI in fairly similar ways.
|
|
|
|
NAPI instances most often correspond 1:1:1 to interrupts and queue pairs
|
|
(queue pair is a set of a single Rx and single Tx queue).
|
|
|
|
In less common cases a NAPI instance may be used for multiple queues
|
|
or Rx and Tx queues can be serviced by separate NAPI instances on a single
|
|
core. Regardless of the queue assignment, however, there is usually still
|
|
a 1:1 mapping between NAPI instances and interrupts.
|
|
|
|
It's worth noting that the ethtool API uses a "channel" terminology where
|
|
each channel can be either ``rx``, ``tx`` or ``combined``. It's not clear
|
|
what constitutes a channel; the recommended interpretation is to understand
|
|
a channel as an IRQ/NAPI which services queues of a given type. For example,
|
|
a configuration of 1 ``rx``, 1 ``tx`` and 1 ``combined`` channel is expected
|
|
to utilize 3 interrupts, 2 Rx and 2 Tx queues.
|
|
|
|
User API
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
User interactions with NAPI depend on NAPI instance ID. The instance IDs
|
|
are only visible to the user thru the ``SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID`` socket option.
|
|
It's not currently possible to query IDs used by a given device.
|
|
|
|
Software IRQ coalescing
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
NAPI does not perform any explicit event coalescing by default.
|
|
In most scenarios batching happens due to IRQ coalescing which is done
|
|
by the device. There are cases where software coalescing is helpful.
|
|
|
|
NAPI can be configured to arm a repoll timer instead of unmasking
|
|
the hardware interrupts as soon as all packets are processed.
|
|
The ``gro_flush_timeout`` sysfs configuration of the netdevice
|
|
is reused to control the delay of the timer, while
|
|
``napi_defer_hard_irqs`` controls the number of consecutive empty polls
|
|
before NAPI gives up and goes back to using hardware IRQs.
|
|
|
|
.. _poll:
|
|
|
|
Busy polling
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
Busy polling allows a user process to check for incoming packets before
|
|
the device interrupt fires. As is the case with any busy polling it trades
|
|
off CPU cycles for lower latency (production uses of NAPI busy polling
|
|
are not well known).
|
|
|
|
Busy polling is enabled by either setting ``SO_BUSY_POLL`` on
|
|
selected sockets or using the global ``net.core.busy_poll`` and
|
|
``net.core.busy_read`` sysctls. An io_uring API for NAPI busy polling
|
|
also exists.
|
|
|
|
IRQ mitigation
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
While busy polling is supposed to be used by low latency applications,
|
|
a similar mechanism can be used for IRQ mitigation.
|
|
|
|
Very high request-per-second applications (especially routing/forwarding
|
|
applications and especially applications using AF_XDP sockets) may not
|
|
want to be interrupted until they finish processing a request or a batch
|
|
of packets.
|
|
|
|
Such applications can pledge to the kernel that they will perform a busy
|
|
polling operation periodically, and the driver should keep the device IRQs
|
|
permanently masked. This mode is enabled by using the ``SO_PREFER_BUSY_POLL``
|
|
socket option. To avoid system misbehavior the pledge is revoked
|
|
if ``gro_flush_timeout`` passes without any busy poll call.
|
|
|
|
The NAPI budget for busy polling is lower than the default (which makes
|
|
sense given the low latency intention of normal busy polling). This is
|
|
not the case with IRQ mitigation, however, so the budget can be adjusted
|
|
with the ``SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET`` socket option.
|
|
|
|
.. _threaded:
|
|
|
|
Threaded NAPI
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
Threaded NAPI is an operating mode that uses dedicated kernel
|
|
threads rather than software IRQ context for NAPI processing.
|
|
The configuration is per netdevice and will affect all
|
|
NAPI instances of that device. Each NAPI instance will spawn a separate
|
|
thread (called ``napi/${ifc-name}-${napi-id}``).
|
|
|
|
It is recommended to pin each kernel thread to a single CPU, the same
|
|
CPU as the CPU which services the interrupt. Note that the mapping
|
|
between IRQs and NAPI instances may not be trivial (and is driver
|
|
dependent). The NAPI instance IDs will be assigned in the opposite
|
|
order than the process IDs of the kernel threads.
|
|
|
|
Threaded NAPI is controlled by writing 0/1 to the ``threaded`` file in
|
|
netdev's sysfs directory.
|
|
|
|
.. rubric:: Footnotes
|
|
|
|
.. [#] NAPI was originally referred to as New API in 2.4 Linux.
|