mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-11-01 08:58:07 +00:00
23f61f0fe1
Why record task_work_add() call stack? Syzbot reports many use-after-free issues for task_work, see [1]. After seeing the free stack and the current auxiliary stack, we think they are useless, we don't know where the work was registered. This work may be the free call stack, so we miss the root cause and don't solve the use-after-free. Add the task_work_add() call stack into the KASAN auxiliary stack in order to improve KASAN reports. It helps programmers solve use-after-free issues. [1]: https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/search?q=kasan%20use-after-free%20task_work_run Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316024410.19967-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> Suggested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
169 lines
4.6 KiB
C
169 lines
4.6 KiB
C
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
|
#include <linux/task_work.h>
|
|
#include <linux/tracehook.h>
|
|
|
|
static struct callback_head work_exited; /* all we need is ->next == NULL */
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* task_work_add - ask the @task to execute @work->func()
|
|
* @task: the task which should run the callback
|
|
* @work: the callback to run
|
|
* @notify: how to notify the targeted task
|
|
*
|
|
* Queue @work for task_work_run() below and notify the @task if @notify
|
|
* is @TWA_RESUME or @TWA_SIGNAL. @TWA_SIGNAL works like signals, in that the
|
|
* it will interrupt the targeted task and run the task_work. @TWA_RESUME
|
|
* work is run only when the task exits the kernel and returns to user mode,
|
|
* or before entering guest mode. Fails if the @task is exiting/exited and thus
|
|
* it can't process this @work. Otherwise @work->func() will be called when the
|
|
* @task goes through one of the aforementioned transitions, or exits.
|
|
*
|
|
* If the targeted task is exiting, then an error is returned and the work item
|
|
* is not queued. It's up to the caller to arrange for an alternative mechanism
|
|
* in that case.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: there is no ordering guarantee on works queued here. The task_work
|
|
* list is LIFO.
|
|
*
|
|
* RETURNS:
|
|
* 0 if succeeds or -ESRCH.
|
|
*/
|
|
int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work,
|
|
enum task_work_notify_mode notify)
|
|
{
|
|
struct callback_head *head;
|
|
|
|
/* record the work call stack in order to print it in KASAN reports */
|
|
kasan_record_aux_stack(work);
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
head = READ_ONCE(task->task_works);
|
|
if (unlikely(head == &work_exited))
|
|
return -ESRCH;
|
|
work->next = head;
|
|
} while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, head, work) != head);
|
|
|
|
switch (notify) {
|
|
case TWA_NONE:
|
|
break;
|
|
case TWA_RESUME:
|
|
set_notify_resume(task);
|
|
break;
|
|
case TWA_SIGNAL:
|
|
set_notify_signal(task);
|
|
break;
|
|
default:
|
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* task_work_cancel_match - cancel a pending work added by task_work_add()
|
|
* @task: the task which should execute the work
|
|
* @match: match function to call
|
|
*
|
|
* RETURNS:
|
|
* The found work or NULL if not found.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct callback_head *
|
|
task_work_cancel_match(struct task_struct *task,
|
|
bool (*match)(struct callback_head *, void *data),
|
|
void *data)
|
|
{
|
|
struct callback_head **pprev = &task->task_works;
|
|
struct callback_head *work;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!task->task_works))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
/*
|
|
* If cmpxchg() fails we continue without updating pprev.
|
|
* Either we raced with task_work_add() which added the
|
|
* new entry before this work, we will find it again. Or
|
|
* we raced with task_work_run(), *pprev == NULL/exited.
|
|
*/
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
|
while ((work = READ_ONCE(*pprev))) {
|
|
if (!match(work, data))
|
|
pprev = &work->next;
|
|
else if (cmpxchg(pprev, work, work->next) == work)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
return work;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool task_work_func_match(struct callback_head *cb, void *data)
|
|
{
|
|
return cb->func == data;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* task_work_cancel - cancel a pending work added by task_work_add()
|
|
* @task: the task which should execute the work
|
|
* @func: identifies the work to remove
|
|
*
|
|
* Find the last queued pending work with ->func == @func and remove
|
|
* it from queue.
|
|
*
|
|
* RETURNS:
|
|
* The found work or NULL if not found.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct callback_head *
|
|
task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
|
|
{
|
|
return task_work_cancel_match(task, task_work_func_match, func);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* task_work_run - execute the works added by task_work_add()
|
|
*
|
|
* Flush the pending works. Should be used by the core kernel code.
|
|
* Called before the task returns to the user-mode or stops, or when
|
|
* it exits. In the latter case task_work_add() can no longer add the
|
|
* new work after task_work_run() returns.
|
|
*/
|
|
void task_work_run(void)
|
|
{
|
|
struct task_struct *task = current;
|
|
struct callback_head *work, *head, *next;
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* work->func() can do task_work_add(), do not set
|
|
* work_exited unless the list is empty.
|
|
*/
|
|
do {
|
|
head = NULL;
|
|
work = READ_ONCE(task->task_works);
|
|
if (!work) {
|
|
if (task->flags & PF_EXITING)
|
|
head = &work_exited;
|
|
else
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
} while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, work, head) != work);
|
|
|
|
if (!work)
|
|
break;
|
|
/*
|
|
* Synchronize with task_work_cancel(). It can not remove
|
|
* the first entry == work, cmpxchg(task_works) must fail.
|
|
* But it can remove another entry from the ->next list.
|
|
*/
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
next = work->next;
|
|
work->func(work);
|
|
work = next;
|
|
cond_resched();
|
|
} while (work);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|