mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-10-31 16:38:12 +00:00
8ebe34731a
Add lockdep annotations. Not only this can help to find the potential problems, we do not want the false warnings if, say, the task takes two different percpu_rw_semaphore's for reading. IOW, at least ->rw_sem should not use a single class. This patch exposes this internal lock to lockdep so that it represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore. This way we do not need to add another "fake" ->lockdep_map and lock_class_key. More importantly, this also makes the output from lockdep much more understandable if it finds the problem. In short, with this patch from lockdep pov percpu_down_read() and percpu_up_read() acquire/release ->rw_sem for reading, this matches the actual semantics. This abuses __up_read() but I hope this is fine and in fact I'd like to have down_read_no_lockdep() as well, percpu_down_read_recursive_readers() will need it. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
165 lines
5 KiB
C
165 lines
5 KiB
C
#include <linux/atomic.h>
|
|
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
|
|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
|
|
#include <linux/wait.h>
|
|
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
|
|
#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
|
|
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include <linux/errno.h>
|
|
|
|
int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw,
|
|
const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwsem_key)
|
|
{
|
|
brw->fast_read_ctr = alloc_percpu(int);
|
|
if (unlikely(!brw->fast_read_ctr))
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
/* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */
|
|
__init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key);
|
|
atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0);
|
|
atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0);
|
|
init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
|
|
{
|
|
free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr);
|
|
brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read, it only needs to ensure
|
|
* there is no pending writer (atomic_read(write_ctr) == 0) and inc/dec the
|
|
* fast per-cpu counter. The writer uses synchronize_sched_expedited() to
|
|
* serialize with the preempt-disabled section below.
|
|
*
|
|
* The nontrivial part is that we should guarantee acquire/release semantics
|
|
* in case when
|
|
*
|
|
* R_W: down_write() comes after up_read(), the writer should see all
|
|
* changes done by the reader
|
|
* or
|
|
* W_R: down_read() comes after up_write(), the reader should see all
|
|
* changes done by the writer
|
|
*
|
|
* If this helper fails the callers rely on the normal rw_semaphore and
|
|
* atomic_dec_and_test(), so in this case we have the necessary barriers.
|
|
*
|
|
* But if it succeeds we do not have any barriers, atomic_read(write_ctr) or
|
|
* __this_cpu_add() below can be reordered with any LOAD/STORE done by the
|
|
* reader inside the critical section. See the comments in down_write and
|
|
* up_write below.
|
|
*/
|
|
static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val)
|
|
{
|
|
bool success = false;
|
|
|
|
preempt_disable();
|
|
if (likely(!atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr))) {
|
|
__this_cpu_add(*brw->fast_read_ctr, val);
|
|
success = true;
|
|
}
|
|
preempt_enable();
|
|
|
|
return success;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Like the normal down_read() this is not recursive, the writer can
|
|
* come after the first percpu_down_read() and create the deadlock.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: returns with lock_is_held(brw->rw_sem) == T for lockdep,
|
|
* percpu_up_read() does rwsem_release(). This pairs with the usage
|
|
* of ->rw_sem in percpu_down/up_write().
|
|
*/
|
|
void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
|
|
{
|
|
might_sleep();
|
|
if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) {
|
|
rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
down_read(&brw->rw_sem);
|
|
atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr);
|
|
/* avoid up_read()->rwsem_release() */
|
|
__up_read(&brw->rw_sem);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
|
|
{
|
|
rwsem_release(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
|
|
|
|
if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, -1)))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
/* false-positive is possible but harmless */
|
|
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->slow_read_ctr))
|
|
wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int sum = 0;
|
|
int cpu;
|
|
|
|
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
|
|
sum += per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu);
|
|
per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu) = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return sum;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* A writer increments ->write_ctr to force the readers to switch to the
|
|
* slow mode, note the atomic_read() check in update_fast_ctr().
|
|
*
|
|
* After that the readers can only inc/dec the slow ->slow_read_ctr counter,
|
|
* ->fast_read_ctr is stable. Once the writer moves its sum into the slow
|
|
* counter it represents the number of active readers.
|
|
*
|
|
* Finally the writer takes ->rw_sem for writing and blocks the new readers,
|
|
* then waits until the slow counter becomes zero.
|
|
*/
|
|
void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
|
|
{
|
|
/* tell update_fast_ctr() there is a pending writer */
|
|
atomic_inc(&brw->write_ctr);
|
|
/*
|
|
* 1. Ensures that write_ctr != 0 is visible to any down_read/up_read
|
|
* so that update_fast_ctr() can't succeed.
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. Ensures we see the result of every previous this_cpu_add() in
|
|
* update_fast_ctr().
|
|
*
|
|
* 3. Ensures that if any reader has exited its critical section via
|
|
* fast-path, it executes a full memory barrier before we return.
|
|
* See R_W case in the comment above update_fast_ctr().
|
|
*/
|
|
synchronize_sched_expedited();
|
|
|
|
/* exclude other writers, and block the new readers completely */
|
|
down_write(&brw->rw_sem);
|
|
|
|
/* nobody can use fast_read_ctr, move its sum into slow_read_ctr */
|
|
atomic_add(clear_fast_ctr(brw), &brw->slow_read_ctr);
|
|
|
|
/* wait for all readers to complete their percpu_up_read() */
|
|
wait_event(brw->write_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->slow_read_ctr));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
|
|
{
|
|
/* release the lock, but the readers can't use the fast-path */
|
|
up_write(&brw->rw_sem);
|
|
/*
|
|
* Insert the barrier before the next fast-path in down_read,
|
|
* see W_R case in the comment above update_fast_ctr().
|
|
*/
|
|
synchronize_sched_expedited();
|
|
/* the last writer unblocks update_fast_ctr() */
|
|
atomic_dec(&brw->write_ctr);
|
|
}
|