Once again, the wrong 'dreng-bu glyphs were listed in the Tibetan! 5.1 docs -- they were na-ro glyphs, actually.

This commit is contained in:
dchandler 2003-11-08 21:17:18 +00:00
parent f626a04d72
commit 06edf17b04

View file

@ -576,9 +576,9 @@ r+d+h+r~46,4~~7,54~1,109~8,122~1,123~1,125~8,108~8,115~f62,fa2,fb2
r+p~47,4~~7,55~1,109~8,120~1,123~1,125~8,106~8,113~f62,fa4
r+b+p~48,4~~7,56~1,109~8,121~1,123~1,125~8,107~8,114~f62,fa6,fa4
r+b+b~49,4~~7,57~1,109~8,121~1,123~1,125~8,107~8,114~f62,fa6,fa6
r+b+h~50,4~~7,58~1,110~8,124~1,125~1,125~8,110~8,117~f62,fa6,fb7
r+m+m~51,4~~7,59~1,110~8,121~1,125~1,125~8,107~8,114~f62,fa8,fa8
r+y~52,4~~7,60~1,110~8,120~1,125~1,125~8,106~8,113~f62,fbb
r+b+h~50,4~~7,58~1,110~8,124~1,123~1,125~8,110~8,117~f62,fa6,fb7
r+m+m~51,4~~7,59~1,110~8,121~1,123~1,125~8,107~8,114~f62,fa8,fa8
r+y~52,4~~7,60~1,110~8,120~1,123~1,125~8,106~8,113~f62,fbb
r+w~196,4~~7,61~1,109~8,120~1,123~1,125~8,106~8,113~f62,fba
r+sh~53,4~~7,62~1,109~8,120~1,123~1,125~8,106~8,113~f62,fb4
r+sh+y~54,4~~7,63~1,109~8,122~1,123~1,125~8,108~8,115~f62,fb4,fb1