thdltools/Jskad
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added UI for EWTS->Tibetan conversions. GUI is disabled except in

Browse source 
debug mode for now.

I tested against a really simple-but-real document, found a bug with '*', tried
to implement TMW vowel code but I don't trust it yet.  Differentiated EWTS
code from ACIP where needed.

Several bugs in ewts->tibetan have been exposed; see the TODO
comments.
This commit is contained in:
dchandler 2005-06-20 09:30:35 +00:00
parent 7198f23361
commit 2678fc134a
9 changed files with 150 additions and 34 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

76
source/org/thdl/tib/text/ttt/EWTSTraits.java
View file

@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ package org.thdl.tib.text.ttt;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import org.thdl.tib.text.DuffCode;
import org.thdl.tib.text.THDLWylieConstants;
import org.thdl.tib.text.TibTextUtils;
import org.thdl.tib.text.TibetanMachineWeb;
import org.thdl.util.ThdlDebug;
@ -154,7 +156,70 @@ public final class EWTSTraits implements TTraits {
public TTshegBarScanner scanner() { return EWTSTshegBarScanner.instance(); }
public void getDuffForWowel(ArrayList duff, DuffCode preceding, String wowel) {
throw new Error("TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]");
// TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]: I have no confidence in this! test, test, test.
// Order matters here.
boolean context_added[] = new boolean[] { false };
if (wowel.equals(THDLWylieConstants.WYLIE_aVOWEL)) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.WYLIE_aVOWEL, context_added);
} else {
// TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]: test vowel stacking
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.U_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.U_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.reverse_I_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.reverse_I_VOWEL, context_added);
} else if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.I_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.I_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.A_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.A_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.ai_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.ai_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.au_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.au_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.reverse_i_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.reverse_i_VOWEL, context_added);
} else if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.i_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.i_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.e_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.e_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.o_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.o_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf(THDLWylieConstants.u_VOWEL) >= 0) {
TibTextUtils.getVowel(duff, preceding, THDLWylieConstants.u_VOWEL, context_added);
}
if (wowel.indexOf("~X") >= 0) { // TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]: introduce THDLWylieConstants.blah
duff.add(TibetanMachineWeb.getGlyph("~X"));
} else if (wowel.indexOf("X") >= 0) { // TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]: introduce THDLWylieConstants.blah
duff.add(TibetanMachineWeb.getGlyph("X"));
}
}
// FIXME: Use TMW9.61, the "o'i" special combination, when appropriate.
if (wowel.indexOf('M') >= 0) {
DuffCode last = null;
if (duff.size() > 0) {
last = (DuffCode)duff.get(duff.size() - 1);
duff.remove(duff.size() - 1); // getBindu will add it back...
// TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]: is this okay???? when is a bindu okay to be alone???
}
TibTextUtils.getBindu(duff, last);
}
if (wowel.indexOf('H') >= 0)
duff.add(TibetanMachineWeb.getGlyph("H"));
// TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]: verify that no part of wowel is discarded! acip does that. 'jam~X I think we screw up, e.g.
// TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]:: are bindus are screwed up in the unicode output? i see (with tmuni font) lone bindus without glyphs to stack on
}
public String getUnicodeForWowel(String wowel) {
@ -218,12 +283,17 @@ public final class EWTSTraits implements TTraits {
}
public String getUnicodeFor(String l, boolean subscribed) {
// First, handle "\u0f71\u0f84\u0f86", "", "\u0f74", etc.
{
boolean already_done = true;
for (int i = 0; i < l.length(); i++) {
if (!(l.charAt(0) >= '\u0f00' && l.charAt(0) <= '\u0fff')) {
char ch = l.charAt(i);
if ((ch < '\u0f00' || ch > '\u0fff')
&& '\n' != ch
&& '\r' != ch) {
// TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan]: Is this the place
// where we want to interpret how newlines work???
already_done = false;
break;
}