"sgom pa'm ", not "sgom pa'am", is now used. "pe'm " was being

produced already, so the code was inconsistent.  If it turns out that
"pe'am " is preferred, I'll fix it later.  Consistency is very
appealing.
This commit is contained in:
dchandler 2003-03-31 01:38:27 +00:00
parent 33b3080068
commit d836b850e8
3 changed files with 6 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ public class LegalTshegBarTest extends TestCase implements UnicodeConstants {
}
/** Tests the getThdlWylie() method to see if we
handle "le'u'i'o", "sgom pa'am", "sgom pa'ang", etc.
handle "le'u'i'o", "sgom pa'm", "sgom pa'ng", etc.
*/
public void testGetThdlWylieForLongSuffixLikeThings() {
assertTrue(new LegalTshegBar(EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT, EWC_la,
@ -61,15 +61,15 @@ public class LegalTshegBarTest extends TestCase implements UnicodeConstants {
EWC_achung, EWV_o,
EWC_achung, EWC_ma
}),
EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT).getThdlWylie().toString().equals("la'u'i'o'am'ang'o'am"));
EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT).getThdlWylie().toString().equals("la'u'i'o'm'ng'o'm"));
assertTrue(new LegalTshegBar(EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT, EWC_pa,
EW_ABSENT, false, false,
new String(new char[] { EWC_achung, EWC_ma }),
EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT).getThdlWylie().toString().equals("pa'am"));
EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT).getThdlWylie().toString().equals("pa'm"));
assertTrue(new LegalTshegBar(EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT, EWC_pa,
EW_ABSENT, false, false,
new String(new char[] { EWC_achung, EWC_nga }),
EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT).getThdlWylie().toString().equals("pa'ang"));
EW_ABSENT, EW_ABSENT).getThdlWylie().toString().equals("pa'ng"));
}
/** Tests the getThdlWylie() method and one of the constructors. */