7198f23361
table exactly and I fear that it makes the ACIP->Tibetan converter code a lot uglier. The TODO(DLC)[EWTS->Tibetan] comments littered throughout are part of the ugliness; they point to the ugliness. If each were addressed, cleanliness could perhaps be achieved. I've largely forgotten exactly what this change does, but it attempts to improve EWTS->Tibetan conversion. The lexer is probably really, really primitive. I concentrate here on converting a single tsheg bar rather than a whole document. Eclipse was used during part of my journey here and some imports were reorganized merely because I could. :) (Eclipse was needed when the usual ant build failed to run a new test EWTSTest. And I wanted its debugger.) Next steps: end-to-end EWTS tests should bring many problems to light. Fix those. Triage all the TODO comments. I don't know that I'll ever really trust the implementation. The tests are valuable, though. A clean implementation of EWTS->Tibetan in Jython might hold enough interest for me; I'd like to learn Python.
530 lines
22 KiB
Java
530 lines
22 KiB
Java
/*
|
|
The contents of this file are subject to the THDL Open Community License
|
|
Version 1.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
|
|
with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License on the THDL web site
|
|
(http://www.thdl.org/).
|
|
|
|
Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis,
|
|
WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
|
|
License for the specific terms governing rights and limitations under the
|
|
License.
|
|
|
|
The Initial Developer of this software is the Tibetan and Himalayan Digital
|
|
Library (THDL). Portions created by the THDL are Copyright 2001 THDL.
|
|
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
Contributor(s): ______________________________________.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
package org.thdl.tib.text.tshegbar;
|
|
|
|
/** <p>This non-instantiable class contains utility routines for
|
|
* dealing with Tibetan Unicode codepoints and strings of such
|
|
* codepoints.</p>
|
|
*
|
|
* @author David Chandler */
|
|
public class UnicodeUtils implements UnicodeConstants {
|
|
/** Do not use this, as this class is not instantiable. */
|
|
private UnicodeUtils() { super(); }
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff x is a Unicode codepoint that represents a
|
|
consonant or two-consonant stack that has a Unicode code
|
|
point. Returns true only for the usual suspects (like
|
|
<code>U+0F40</code>) and for Sanskrit consonants (like
|
|
<code>U+0F71</code>) and the simple two-consonant stacks in
|
|
Unicode (like <code>U+0F43</code>). Returns false for, among
|
|
other things, subjoined consonants like
|
|
<code>U+0F90</code>. */
|
|
public static boolean isNonSubjoinedConsonant(char x) {
|
|
return ((x != '\u0F48' /* reserved in Unicode 3.2, but not in use */)
|
|
&& (x >= '\u0F40' && x <= '\u0F6A'));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff x is a Unicode codepoint that represents a
|
|
subjoined consonant or subjoined two-consonant stack that has
|
|
a Unicode code point. Returns true only for the usual
|
|
suspects (like <code>U+0F90</code>) and for Sanskrit
|
|
consonants (like <code>U+0F9C</code>) and the simple
|
|
two-consonant stacks in Unicode (like <code>U+0FAC</code>).
|
|
Returns false for, among other things, non-subjoined
|
|
consonants like <code>U+0F40</code>. */
|
|
public static boolean isSubjoinedConsonant(char x) {
|
|
return ((x != '\u0F98' /* reserved in Unicode 3.2, but not in use */)
|
|
&& (x >= '\u0F90' && x <= '\u0FBC'));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff x is the preferred representation of a
|
|
Tibetan or Sanskrit consonant and cannot be broken down any
|
|
further. Returns false for, among other things, subjoined
|
|
consonants like <code>U+0F90</code>, two-component consonants
|
|
like <code>U+0F43</code>, and fixed-form consonants like
|
|
<code>U+0F6A</code>. The new consonants (for transcribing
|
|
Chinese, I believe) "\u0F55\u0F39" (which EWTS calls
|
|
"fa"), "\u0F56\u0F39" ("va"), and
|
|
"\u0F5F\u0F39" ("Dza") are two-codepoint sequences,
|
|
but you should be aware of them also. */
|
|
public static boolean isPreferredFormOfConsonant(char x) {
|
|
return ((x != '\u0F48' /* reserved in Unicode 3.2, but not in use */)
|
|
&& (x >= '\u0F40' && x <= '\u0F68')
|
|
&& (x != '\u0F43')
|
|
&& (x != '\u0F4D')
|
|
&& (x != '\u0F52')
|
|
&& (x != '\u0F57')
|
|
&& (x != '\u0F5C'));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff unicodeCP is a codepoint from the Unicode
|
|
range U+0F00-U+0FFF.
|
|
@see #isEntirelyTibetanUnicode(String) */
|
|
public static boolean isInTibetanRange(char unicodeCP) {
|
|
return (unicodeCP >= '\u0F00' && unicodeCP <= '\u0FFF');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff unicodeString consists only of codepoints
|
|
from the Unicode range U+0F00-U+0FFF. (Note that these
|
|
codepoints are typically not enough to represent a Tibetan
|
|
text, you may need ZWSP (zero-width space) and various
|
|
whitespace from other ranges.) */
|
|
public static boolean isEntirelyTibetanUnicode(String unicodeString) {
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < unicodeString.length(); i++) {
|
|
if (!isInTibetanRange(unicodeString.charAt(i)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Puts the Tibetan codepoints in tibetanUnicode, a sequence of
|
|
Unicode codepoints, into either Normalization Form KD (NFKD),
|
|
D (NFD), or THDL (NFTHDL), depending on the value of normForm.
|
|
NFD and NFKD are specified by Unicode 3.2; NFTHDL is needed
|
|
for {@link org.thdl.tib.text.tshegbar.UnicodeGraphemeCluster}
|
|
because NFKD normalizes <code>U+0F0C</code> and neither NFD
|
|
nor NFKD breaks down <code>U+0F00</code> into its constituent
|
|
codepoints. NFTHDL uses a maximum of codepoints, and it never
|
|
uses codepoints whose use has been {@link #isDiscouraged(char)
|
|
discouraged}.
|
|
|
|
<p>The Tibetan passages of the returned string are in the
|
|
chosen normalized form, but codepoints outside of the {@link
|
|
#isInTibetanRange(char) range}
|
|
<code>U+0F00</code>-<code>U+0FFF</code> are not necessarily
|
|
put into normalized form.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Recall that normalized forms are not necessarily closed
|
|
under string concatenation, but are closed under
|
|
substringing.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Note well that only well-formed input guarantees
|
|
well-formed output.</p>
|
|
|
|
@param tibetanUnicode the codepoints to be decomposed
|
|
@param normForm NORM_NFKD, NORM_NFTHDL, or NORM_NFD */
|
|
public static void toMostlyDecomposedUnicode(StringBuffer tibetanUnicode,
|
|
byte normForm)
|
|
{
|
|
if (normForm != NORM_NFD && normForm != NORM_NFKD && normForm != NORM_NFTHDL)
|
|
throw new IllegalArgumentException("normForm must be NORM_NFD, NORM_NFTHDL, or NORM_NFKD for decomposition to work");
|
|
int offset = 0;
|
|
while (offset < tibetanUnicode.length()) {
|
|
String s
|
|
= toNormalizedForm(tibetanUnicode.charAt(offset), normForm);
|
|
if (null == s) {
|
|
++offset;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// modify tibetanUnicode and update offset.
|
|
tibetanUnicode.deleteCharAt(offset);
|
|
tibetanUnicode.insert(offset, s);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Like {@link #toMostlyDecomposedUnicode(StringBuffer, byte)},
|
|
but does not modify its input. Instead, it returns the NFKD-
|
|
or NFD-normalized version of tibetanUnicode. */
|
|
public static String toMostlyDecomposedUnicode(String tibetanUnicode,
|
|
byte normForm)
|
|
{
|
|
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(tibetanUnicode);
|
|
toMostlyDecomposedUnicode(sb, normForm);
|
|
return sb.toString();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** There are 19 codepoints in the Tibetan range of Unicode 3.2
|
|
which can be decomposed into longer strings of codepoints in
|
|
the Tibetan range of Unicode. Often one wants to manipulate
|
|
decomposed codepoint strings. Also, HTML and XML are W3C
|
|
standards that require certain normalization forms. This
|
|
routine returns a chosen normalized form for such codepoints,
|
|
and returns null for codepoints that are already normalized or
|
|
are not in the Tibetan range of Unicode.
|
|
@param tibetanUnicodeCP the codepoint to normalize
|
|
@param normalizationForm NORM_NFTHDL, NORM_NFKD, or NORM_NFD
|
|
if you expect something nontrivial to happen
|
|
@return null if tibetanUnicodeCP is already in the chosen
|
|
normalized form, or a string of two or three codepoints
|
|
otherwise */
|
|
public static String toNormalizedForm(char tibetanUnicodeCP,
|
|
byte normalizationForm)
|
|
{
|
|
if (normalizationForm == NORM_NFKD
|
|
|| normalizationForm == NORM_NFD
|
|
|| normalizationForm == NORM_NFTHDL) {
|
|
// Where not specified, the NFKD and NFTHDL forms are
|
|
// identical to the NFD form.
|
|
switch (tibetanUnicodeCP) {
|
|
case '\u0F00': return ((normalizationForm == NORM_NFTHDL)
|
|
? "\u0F68\u0F7C\u0F7E" : null);
|
|
case '\u0F0C': return ((normalizationForm == NORM_NFKD)
|
|
? "\u0F0B" : null);
|
|
case '\u0F43': return "\u0F42\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0F4D': return "\u0F4C\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0F52': return "\u0F51\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0F57': return "\u0F56\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0F5C': return "\u0F5B\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0F69': return "\u0F40\u0FB5";
|
|
case '\u0F73': return "\u0F71\u0F72";
|
|
case '\u0F75': return "\u0F71\u0F74";
|
|
case '\u0F76': return "\u0FB2\u0F80";
|
|
case '\u0F77': {
|
|
// I do not understand why NFD does not decompose this
|
|
// codepoint, hence NORM_NFTHDL does:
|
|
if (normalizationForm == NORM_NFKD
|
|
|| normalizationForm == NORM_NFTHDL)
|
|
return "\u0FB2\u0F71\u0F80";
|
|
else
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
case '\u0F78': return "\u0FB3\u0F80";
|
|
case '\u0F79': {
|
|
// I do not understand why NFD does not decompose this
|
|
// codepoint, hence NORM_NFTHDL does:
|
|
if (normalizationForm == NORM_NFKD
|
|
|| normalizationForm == NORM_NFTHDL)
|
|
return "\u0FB3\u0F71\u0F80";
|
|
else
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
case '\u0F81': return "\u0F71\u0F80";
|
|
case '\u0F93': return "\u0F92\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0F9D': return "\u0F9C\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0FA2': return "\u0FA1\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0FA7': return "\u0FA6\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0FAC': return "\u0FAB\u0FB7";
|
|
case '\u0FB9': return "\u0F90\u0FB5";
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff tibetanUnicodeCP {@link
|
|
#isInTibetanRange(char) is a Tibetan codepoint} and if the
|
|
Unicode 3.2 standard discourages the use of
|
|
tibetanUnicodeCP. */
|
|
public static boolean isDiscouraged(char tibetanUnicodeCP) {
|
|
return ('\u0F73' == tibetanUnicodeCP
|
|
|| '\u0F75' == tibetanUnicodeCP
|
|
|| '\u0F77' == tibetanUnicodeCP
|
|
|| '\u0F79' == tibetanUnicodeCP
|
|
|| '\u0F81' == tibetanUnicodeCP);
|
|
/* DLC FIXME -- I was using 3.0 p.437-440, check 3.2. */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** If ch is in one of the ranges U+0F90-U+0F97, U+0F99-U+0FB9,
|
|
* then this returns the same consonant in the range
|
|
* U+0F40-U+0F69. If ch is not in that range, this returns
|
|
* garbage. */
|
|
public static char getNominalRepresentationOfSubscribedConsonant(char ch) {
|
|
return (char)((int)ch-(((int)'\u0F90') - ((int)'\u0F40')));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff ch corresponds to the Tibetan letter ra.
|
|
Several Unicode codepoints correspond to the Tibetan letter ra
|
|
(in its subscribed form or otherwise). Oftentimes,
|
|
<code>\u0F62</code> is thought of as the nominal
|
|
representation. Returns false for some codepoints that
|
|
contain ra but are not merely ra, such as <code>\u0F77</code> */
|
|
public static boolean isRa(char ch) {
|
|
return ('\u0F62' == ch
|
|
|| '\u0F6A' == ch
|
|
|| '\u0FB2' == ch
|
|
|| '\u0FBC' == ch);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff ch corresponds to the Tibetan letter wa.
|
|
Several Unicode codepoints correspond to the Tibetan letter
|
|
wa. Oftentimes, <code>U+0F5D</code> is thought of as the
|
|
nominal representation. */
|
|
public static boolean isWa(char ch) {
|
|
return ('\u0F5D' == ch
|
|
|| '\u0FAD' == ch
|
|
|| '\u0FBA' == ch);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff ch corresponds to the Tibetan letter ya.
|
|
Several Unicode codepoints correspond to the Tibetan letter
|
|
ya. Oftentimes, <code>U+0F61</code> is thought of as the
|
|
nominal representation. */
|
|
public static boolean isYa(char ch) {
|
|
return ('\u0F61' == ch
|
|
|| '\u0FB1' == ch
|
|
|| '\u0FBB' == ch);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff there exists at least one codepoint cp in
|
|
unicodeString such that cp {@link #isRa(char) is ra} or contains
|
|
ra (like <code>U+0F77</code>). This method is not implemented
|
|
as fast as it could be. It calls on the canonicalization code
|
|
in order to maximize reuse and minimize the possibility of
|
|
coder error. */
|
|
public static boolean containsRa(String unicodeString) {
|
|
String canonForm = toMostlyDecomposedUnicode(unicodeString, NORM_NFKD);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < canonForm.length(); i++) {
|
|
if (isRa(canonForm.charAt(i)))
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
/** Inefficient shortcut.
|
|
@see #containsRa(String) */
|
|
public static boolean containsRa(char unicodeCP) {
|
|
return containsRa(new String(new char[] { unicodeCP }));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns a human-readable, ASCII form of the Unicode codepoint
|
|
cp. If shortenIfPossible is true, then printable ASCII
|
|
characters will appear as themselves. */
|
|
public static String unicodeCodepointToString(char cp,
|
|
boolean shortenIfPossible) {
|
|
return unicodeCodepointToString(cp, shortenIfPossible, "\\u");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Like {@link #unicodeCodepointToString(char, boolean)} if you
|
|
pass in <code>"\\u"</code> as prefix. If you pass in the
|
|
empty string as prefix, then U+0F55 will print as
|
|
<code>0F55</code>. */
|
|
public static String unicodeCodepointToString(char cp,
|
|
boolean shortenIfPossible,
|
|
String prefix) {
|
|
if (shortenIfPossible) {
|
|
if ((cp >= 'a' && cp <= 'z')
|
|
|| (cp >= 'A' && cp <= 'Z')
|
|
|| (cp >= '0' && cp <= '9')
|
|
|| cp == '.'
|
|
|| cp == ','
|
|
|| cp == ' '
|
|
|| cp == '\''
|
|
|| cp == '"'
|
|
|| cp == '+'
|
|
|| cp == '-'
|
|
|| cp == '='
|
|
|| cp == '_'
|
|
|| cp == '@'
|
|
|| cp == '!'
|
|
|| cp == '#'
|
|
|| cp == '$'
|
|
|| cp == '%'
|
|
|| cp == '^'
|
|
|| cp == '&'
|
|
|| cp == '*'
|
|
|| cp == ':'
|
|
|| cp == '['
|
|
|| cp == ']'
|
|
|| cp == '('
|
|
|| cp == ')'
|
|
|| cp == '{'
|
|
|| cp == '}')
|
|
return new String(new char[] { cp });
|
|
if ('\t' == cp)
|
|
return "\\t";
|
|
if ('\n' == cp)
|
|
return "\\n";
|
|
if ('\r' == cp)
|
|
return "\\r";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (cp < '\u0010')
|
|
return prefix + "000" + Integer.toHexString((int)cp);
|
|
else if (cp < '\u0100')
|
|
return prefix + "00" + Integer.toHexString((int)cp);
|
|
else if (cp < '\u1000')
|
|
return prefix + "0" + Integer.toHexString((int)cp);
|
|
else
|
|
return prefix + Integer.toHexString((int)cp);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Returns a human-readable, ASCII form of the String s of Unicode
|
|
* codepoints. */
|
|
public static String unicodeStringToString(String s) {
|
|
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(s.length() * 6);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i++) {
|
|
sb.append(unicodeCodepointToString(s.charAt(i), false));
|
|
}
|
|
return sb.toString();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Returns the most succinct possible, human-readable, ASCII form
|
|
* of the String s of Unicode codepoints. */
|
|
public static String unicodeStringToPrettyString(String s) {
|
|
if (s == null) return "null";
|
|
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(s.length() * 6);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i++) {
|
|
sb.append(unicodeCodepointToString(s.charAt(i), true));
|
|
}
|
|
return sb.toString();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff cp is a Unicode 3.2 Tibetan consonant,
|
|
subjoined or not. This counts precomposed consonant stacks
|
|
like <code>U+0FA7</code> as consonants. If you don't wish to
|
|
treat such as consonants, then put the input into NORM_NFD,
|
|
NORM_NFKD, or NORM_NFTHDL first. If it changes under such a
|
|
normalization, it is a precomposed consonant. */
|
|
public static boolean isTibetanConsonant(char cp) {
|
|
return (((cp >= '\u0F40' && cp <= '\u0F6A')
|
|
|| (cp >= '\u0F90' && cp <= '\u0FBC'))
|
|
&& '\u0F48' != cp
|
|
&& '\u0F98' != cp);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true if a character is in the Tibetan range of Unicode
|
|
4.0 but is a reserved code in that range, not yet assigned to
|
|
any character. */
|
|
public static boolean isReservedTibetanCode(char cp) {
|
|
return (cp == '\u0F48'
|
|
|| cp == '\u0F98'
|
|
|| (cp >= '\u0F6B' && cp <= '\u0F70')
|
|
|| (cp >= '\u0F8C' && cp <= '\u0F8F')
|
|
|| cp == '\u0FBD'
|
|
|| (cp >= '\u0FCD' && cp <= '\u0FCE')
|
|
|| (cp >= '\u0FD0' && cp <= '\u0FFF'));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** This array has a number of pairs. The first element in a pair
|
|
* is the one that should come first if the two characters are
|
|
* direct neighbors in a sequence. (Note that this is not the
|
|
* most compact form for this information: we've done a cross
|
|
* product already instead of letting the code do the cross
|
|
* product.)
|
|
*/
|
|
private static char unicode_pairs[][]
|
|
= { { '\u0f71', '\u0f74' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f72' },
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f7a' },
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f7b' },
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f7c' },
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f7d' },
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f80' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f71', '\u0f83' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f72' },
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f7a' },
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f7b' },
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f7c' },
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f7d' },
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f80' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f74', '\u0f83' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f72', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f72', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f72', '\u0f83' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f7a', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7a', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7a', '\u0f83' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f7b', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7b', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7b', '\u0f83' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f7c', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7c', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7c', '\u0f83' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f7d', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7d', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f7d', '\u0f83' },
|
|
|
|
{ '\u0f80', '\u0f7e' },
|
|
{ '\u0f80', '\u0f82' },
|
|
{ '\u0f80', '\u0f83' },
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/** Mutates sb if sb contains an error like having U+0f72 directly
|
|
* before U+0f71. Let's say more:
|
|
*
|
|
* <p>Chris Fynn wrote:</p>
|
|
*
|
|
* <blockquote>By normal Tibetan & Dzongkha spelling, writing,
|
|
* and input rules Tibetan script stacks should be entered and
|
|
* written: 1 headline consonant (0F40->0F6A), any subjoined
|
|
* consonant(s) (0F90-> 0F9C), achung (0F71), shabkyu (0F74),
|
|
* any above headline vowel(s) (0F72 0F7A 0F7B 0F7C 0F7D and
|
|
* 0F80); any ngaro (0F7E, 0F82 and 0F83)</blockquote>
|
|
*
|
|
* <p>FIXME DLC: We still miss some Unicode well-formedness
|
|
* problems here, but the problems that this function does catch
|
|
* may not be solved during e.g. a TMW-to-Unicode conversion
|
|
* because we don't call this function for the entire output,
|
|
* just pieces of it. Depending on how you break up those pieces
|
|
* we could miss problems that this function can fix. TODO(DLC):
|
|
* A separate tool that passes over a unicode file and outputs
|
|
* the same file modulo Unicode booboos would be better. </p>
|
|
*
|
|
* @param sb the buffer to be mutated
|
|
* @return true if sb was mutated */
|
|
public static boolean fixSomeOrderingErrorsInTibetanUnicode(StringBuffer sb) {
|
|
boolean mutated = false;
|
|
int len = sb.length();
|
|
boolean mutated_this_time_through;
|
|
// the do-while loop helps us be correct for \u0f7a\u0f72\u0f71.
|
|
|
|
// PERFORMANCE FIXME: try using a map instead of iterating
|
|
// over all of unicode_pairs and see if it isn't faster.
|
|
do {
|
|
mutated_this_time_through = false;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < len - 1; i++)
|
|
for (int j = 0; j < unicode_pairs.length; j++)
|
|
if (unicode_pairs[j][1] == sb.charAt(i)
|
|
&& unicode_pairs[j][0] == sb.charAt(i + 1)) {
|
|
sb.setCharAt(i, unicode_pairs[j][0]);
|
|
sb.setCharAt(i + 1, unicode_pairs[j][1]);
|
|
mutated = true;
|
|
mutated_this_time_through = true;
|
|
}
|
|
} while (mutated_this_time_through);
|
|
return mutated;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff ch is a valid Tibetan codepoint in Unicode
|
|
* 4.0: */
|
|
public boolean isTibetanUnicodeCodepoint(char ch) {
|
|
// NOTE: could use an array of 256 booleans for speed but I'm lazy
|
|
return ((ch >= '\u0f00' && ch <= '\u0fcf')
|
|
&& !(ch == '\u0f48'
|
|
|| (ch > '\u0f6a' && ch < '\u0f71')
|
|
|| (ch > '\u0f8b' && ch < '\u0f90')
|
|
|| ch == '\u0f98'
|
|
|| ch == '\u0fbd'
|
|
|| ch == '\u0fcd'
|
|
|| ch == '\u0fce'));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Returns true iff ch is in 0F00-0FFF but isn't a valid Tibetan
|
|
* codepoint in Unicode 4.0: */
|
|
public boolean isInvalidTibetanUnicode(char ch) {
|
|
return (isInTibetanRange(ch) && !isTibetanUnicodeCodepoint(ch));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|