inserting 5 characters at a time and then skipping ahead just one position. I don't think this affected correctness. I believe there's still a terrible (exponential?) slowdown as the input file gets bigger, however. Perhaps not -- but we run through the first 1000 TMW glyphs in 6 seconds, the 20th thousand takes at least 60 seconds. Is TMW->Wylie faster than TMW->Unicode? If so, why? Thought: don't use a DuffPane within TibetanConverter -- it can only add overhead, right? My hprof profile said that the conversion was taking just a couple of percent of the work; the rest was going to display-related stuff that you should only see if you were displaying the document. I'm not! |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| org/thdl | ||
| xml | ||
| .cvsignore | ||
| keyboards.ini | ||
| options.txt | ||
| overview.html | ||
| Sambhota_keymap_one.rtf | ||
| TCC_keyboard_1.rtf | ||
| TCC_keyboard_2.rtf | ||
| Wylie_keyboard.rtf | ||