From c7d42b44b09be83ce8f9dd44bb667839d39a6b76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: a1tsal Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:27:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add systematic test cases for all native-Tibetan stacks. Obviously I should have done this long ago, because WW rejected snr-, which is definitely legal. Add explanatory comment re: baraga. --- Conversion test cases.txt | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Conversion test cases.txt b/Conversion test cases.txt index 1100293..5aba519 100644 --- a/Conversion test cases.txt +++ b/Conversion test cases.txt @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ mnags gdams 'gams +// All the compound native-Tibetan stacks +rka rga rnga rja rnya rta rda rna rba rma rtsa rdza lka lga lnga lca lja lta lda lpa lba lha ska sga snga snya sta sda sna spa sba sma stsa kwa khwa gwa cwa nywa twa dwa tswa tshwa zhwa zwa rwa shwa swa hwa kya khya gya pya phya bya mya kra khra gra tra thra dra pra phra bra mra shra sra hra kla gla bla zla rla sla rkya rgya rmya rgwa rtswa skya sgya spya sbya smya skra sgra snra spra sbra smra grwa drwa phywa + // Random things known to be hard // Difficult to parse deterministically @@ -205,7 +208,9 @@ wa~M`ba~MthangumaM ragyada 'agarma gayaradasa -// WylieWord 2.0 got this wrong (and I didn't have a test for it then) +// This has been discussed on tibetscript@list.mail.virginia.edu. Currently WW gets it wrong. +// Plausibly WW can be fixed by disallowing b as a prefix for r unless it has a subscript +// (maybe unless it has an l subscript specifically). baraga // There's special-case code for lng in Sanskrit lngaTa